��������

In a world chasing sustainable development, numbers — meant to illuminate paths forward — often become tools of distortion. Politicized data occurs when governments manipulate poverty or hunger statistics for agendas, skewing reality and stalling reforms. This hinders UN Sustainable Development Goals, such as eradicating poverty and hunger, while widening income gaps.
Based on recent studies, this piece dissects how data turns from neutral metrics into political weapons. It covers mechanisms, Arab/Islamic/global cases, and impacts on growth, offering evidence-based solutions for transparency. Data must serve people, not power.
Politics shapes poverty data at its core. Alleviation involves resource distribution and power plays. In non-electoral Arab systems, multidimensional poverty metrics — income, education, health, housing — draw from Indian economist Amartya Sen’s capabilities framework. Yet biases creep in as local bureaucracies favor influential areas, causing exclusion errors that understate needs.
Electoral systems target swing voters, as in Islamic nations such as Indonesia or Pakistan, boosting inequality and polarization. A 124-country study ties political risks — conflicts, corruption, and ethnic tensions to food insecurity drops of up to 0.113 percent from strife, countered by +0.059 percent rule-of-law gains. Data thus shifts from science to strategy, blocking true assessments.
Empirical evidence shows politicization’s damage. China’s Targeted Poverty Alleviation strategy lifted almost 93.5 million people out of extreme poverty by 2020 via hybrid governance, but earlier corruption cycles lingered. India’s West Bengal and Mexico saw partisan gains, yet unfair targeting persisted.
A 140-country study (1980-2018) reveals democracy’s mixed poverty effects: 11-14 percent drops in five years, 20 percent after 10-14, undermined by elite capture and weak data.
In the Arab world, conflict amplifies issues. Egypt’s poverty hit 33.5 percent by 2021 amid soaring prices and debt-fueled deprivations in food/electricity — stats softened to hide failures. Yemen’s multidimensional rate stands at 82.7 percent, with eight in 10 deprived, as war disrupts data and yields clashing estimates. Syria’s has neared 90 percent in 2025, gross domestic product shrinking 1 percent, with turmoil diverting aid and stats evading blame.
In Islamic contexts, Pakistan’s poverty rose to 44.7 percent in 2025 under new thresholds, fueled by shocks and corruption. Indonesia’s fell to 8.47 percent in March 2025, but politicization skews education/services access. Turkiye exposed financial data falsification for targeting critics, with nearly 12 million in extreme poverty by mid-2025. 

Empirical evidence shows politicization’s damage.

Dr. Turki Faisal Al-Rasheed

In ��������, the Citizens Account program (Hesab Al-Muwatn), launched in 2017 under Vision 2030, has provided assistance to 10 million people amid subsidy cuts, distributing over SR100 billion ($26 billion) and extending to 2025.
It is crucial to recognize that data manipulation and concealment are not confined to authoritarian or conflict zones, but are increasingly common even among nations once champions of free expression and information access. When interests are threatened, stances shift dramatically, as seen in the UK and US. In the latter, the Trump administration halted the US Department of Agriculture’s longstanding annual food insecurity survey in September 2025, obscuring hunger trends and the impacts of aid cuts on poverty and unemployment, framing it as “overly politicized,” while stripping key gauges of national need. In Britain, former Prime Minister Gordon Brown has decried the child poverty crisis, painting vivid scenes of “tables without food, bedrooms without beds,” with homes lacking heat, utensils, or even soap highlighting how austerity leaves millions in silent suffering.
This escalating social crisis demands urgent mobilization and a clear action plan: Ministers must act swiftly, citizens support the needy, and collaborative efforts bridge the gap. Even if governments invoke D-notices typically for national security to enforce silence, they cannot hide the poverty epidemic’s severity. Official neglect condemns countless children to worsening daily struggles behind closed doors, underscoring that politicization knows no ideological bounds.
These examples prove politicization is deliberate, slowing progress worldwide.
Tampering sabotages growth. Economically, risks curb investment; corruption links to 0.052 percent caloric drops, harming productivity/health. Socially, it bars aid, deepens poverty, and sparks polarization per World Values Surveys.
Sustainably, it blocks SDGs in conflict zones via institutional weakness. Strong democracy/transparency counters this, as rule-of-law cases show.
To break cycles, there is a need to adopt global standards like Multidimensional Poverty Index for health/education/living deprivations. Empower civil society for independent data, as Jordan’s Arab Barometer uncovers injustices.
Politicized data threatens development, entrenching inequality and conflicts in Arab, Islamic, and global spheres. In Egypt, Yemen, Pakistan, it fuels poverty-violence loops. Yet transparency, civil society, and anti-corruption can retool data for justice — demanding governments, bodies, and communities unite for citizen-serving stats.
As �������� nears a decade of Vision 2030 under King Salman, accessible analysis spotlights gains: 93 percent targets met via 674 initiatives; 32 million summer 2025 visitors; eight UNESCO sites; unemployment at 3.2 percent Q2 2025; homeownership 65.4 percent (exceeding 2025 goal); women’s participation 34.5 percent.
This pivots from fanfare to a bridge for brighter future achievements as shared stories, not stats. Amid geopolitical shifts eroding Western dominance, spotlight ��������’s model to enrich global geocultural discourse.

• Dr. Turki Faisal Al-Rasheed is an adjunct professor at the University of Arizona’s College of Agriculture, Life and Environmental Sciences, in the Department of Biosystems Engineering. He is the author of “Agricultural Development Strategies: The Saudi Experience.”
X: @TurkiFRasheed