Zohran Mamdani’s been called a communist who’ll defund the police. Here’s where he actually stands

Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani speaks as State Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins (R) and State Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal (L) listen during a brief press conference after touring the Amsterdam Houses on September 19, 2025 in New York City. (AFP)
Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani speaks as State Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins (R) and State Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal (L) listen during a brief press conference after touring the Amsterdam Houses on September 19, 2025 in New York City. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 30 sec ago

Zohran Mamdani’s been called a communist who’ll defund the police. Here’s where he actually stands

Zohran Mamdani’s been called a communist who’ll defund the police. Here’s where he actually stands
  • Mamdani’s opponents — two Democrats, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, and a Republican, Curtis Sliwa — have cast themselves as moderate alternatives to the 33-year-old

NEW YORK: President Donald Trump calls him a “communist.” His critics say he wants to defund the police. Zohran Mamdani insists he’s just a guy trying to make New York City more affordable.
Mamdani ‘s meteoritic rise to become the Democratic nominee for New York City mayor has put his past and present policy positions under close scrutiny. If elected, he would be the city’s first Muslim and Indian American mayor. He’d be the city’s most liberal mayor in generations.
But as he tries to broaden his support ahead of the November election, the state lawmaker has shifted more to the center on certain issues — while distancing himself from other potentially damaging political stances.
Mamdani’s opponents — two Democrats, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, and a Republican, Curtis Sliwa — have cast themselves as moderate alternatives to the 33-year-old.
Some top New York Democrats, including US Sen. Chuck Schumer, have been slow to endorse Mamdani. A few, including the state Democratic Party chair and some suburban members of Congress, have said they won’t back him. But more notable names have thrown their weight behind him in recent days, including Gov. Kathy Hochul and the state’s top two legislative leaders.
Here’s where he actually stands:
He’s a democratic socialist, not a communist
While Trump and other opponents keep calling Mamdani a communist, he identifies as something different: a democratic socialist. He believes government should play a role in reducing economic disparity, but he doesn’t advocate for a communist system where property is collectively owned.
Mamdani does favor raising taxes on the wealthy to fund proposals he argues would make the city more affordable. That includes free bus service, universal child care, and his signature issue: a freeze on rent increases for the city’s 1 million rent-regulated apartments. Opponents say a rent freeze would harm landlords, who have also been hit hard by inflation.
Perhaps nowhere has the “communist” label come up more than in relation to Mamdani’s proposal to set up a pilot program for city-run grocery stores. Billionaire John Catsimatidis, who owns grocery chains Gristedes and D’Agostino Supermarkets, said the program would “drag us down a path toward the bread lines of the old Soviet Union.”
In an interview with The Bulwark, Mamdani framed his proposal for five stores that would sell products at wholesale prices as a modest experiment. He said if it doesn’t work, “C’est la vie, then the idea was wrong.”
He has also faced criticism over comments he made on NBC’s “Meet The Press,” in which he said that in an economically just world, “I don’t think that we should have billionaires.” But Mamdani said that as mayor, he would be happy to work with billionaires to solve the city’s problems.
He no longer supports defunding the police
After the police killing of George Floyd in Minnesota in 2020, Mamdani was among a number of New York Democrats who advocated slashing the police department’s budget, and who frequently railed against police brutality.
In one social media post, Mamdani called the department “racist, anti-queer & a major threat to public safety.” In another, Mamdani wrote, “Defund this rogue agency” on a post sharing video of NYPD pummeling a man who had argued with a police officer.
During his mayoral campaign, Mamdani has distanced himself from these prior calls to reduce department funding, saying they don’t represent his current agenda. Mamdani said he would maintain the NYPD’s staffing levels but also create a new “Department of Community Safety” that would deploy mental health care teams, rather than armed officers, to handle certain emergency calls involving people in psychiatric crisis.
And he has softened his overall rhetoric around law enforcement. In a recent New York Times interview, he answered “yes” when asked if he owed officers an apology for calling the department racist, saying his 2020 comments were made “at the height of frustration.”
Mamdani’s opponents have been skeptical of his shift. Adams, a former police captain, says Mamdani changed his position on law enforcement because voters wouldn’t support defunding the department. Cuomo has said Mamdani is flip-flopping and hasn’t given voters a clear picture of who he really is.
He’s criticized Israel and defended Palestinian civil rights
Mamdani is a vocal defender of Palestinian civil rights and has accused the Israeli government of committing a genocide in Gaza.
He supports an economic boycott of Israel and has promised that if Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, visited New York City he would honor a warrant from the International Criminal Court and have Netanyahu arrested for war crimes. The US is not a member of the court and Israel denies it is engaging in genocide or war crimes.
Mamdani has repeatedly condemned the Hamas attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, calling the militant group’s slaughter of 1,200 “deplorable.” He has also said he believes Israel has a right to exist, though without a hierarchy that favors Jewish citizens over others.
That hasn’t assuaged critics who characterize such condemnations of Israeli policy as antisemitic.
Before the primary, Mamdani was asked whether he would disavow the phrase “globalize the intifada,” a slogan some see as a call to violence against Israeli civilians. At the time, Mamdani described it as reflecting “a desperate desire for equality and equal rights in standing up for Palestinian human rights.”
But Mamdani — who has not employed the phrase during his campaign — now says he would discourage others from using the slogan.
Is he connected to DSA
Mamdani is a member of the New York City and national chapters of the Democratic Socialists of America, an activist group that advocates for a universal health care system, immigrants’ rights, tuition-free higher education, nationwide rent regulation, a 32-hour workweek, and getting rid of mandatory jail time for some types of crimes, among other issues.
Cuomo, Adams and Sliwa have all heaped scorn on Mamdani for his association with the group. Mamdani says he is running on his own, distinct platform — not DSA’s — and that being part of a group doesn’t mean you agree with all of its goals.
Asked by reporters about his previous support for decriminalizing prostitution, Mamdani didn’t give a direct answer but said: “What I want to do is look at the ways in which the previous administration addressed this issue,” referring to former Mayor Bill de Blasio, under whom arrests for related charges decreased.


Tears of joy as Egyptian immigrant and Cincinnati chaplain is released from detention

Tears of joy as Egyptian immigrant and Cincinnati chaplain is released from detention
Updated 4 sec ago

Tears of joy as Egyptian immigrant and Cincinnati chaplain is released from detention

Tears of joy as Egyptian immigrant and Cincinnati chaplain is released from detention
  • Young United Souls for Revolutionary Action, a grassroots Muslim organization in Ohio, posted a video of a smiling Soliman being released on their Instagram page

CAIRO: An Egyptian immigrant who has worked as a chaplain for a Cincinnati hospital was released Friday after weeks in detention.
Ayman Soliman was detained in July during a check-in with immigration officials. Soliman served as an imam — a Muslim religious leader — in Egypt for 14 years before fleeing to the United States in 2014, according to the Initiative on Islam and Medicine, where he serves as a board member.
Speaking to supporters after his release Friday evening, Soliman thanked the community for advocating on his behalf and recalled how his fellow detainees celebrated as he was released. His press conference was paused briefly as people attended to afternoon prayers.
“I can’t find words to describe this moment. This is beyond a dream,” he said, as supporters including religious leaders and children held up signs reading “Finally Home,” “Home Is Here,” and “Immigrants Welcome here.” “I will always be indebted to every one of you.”

Ayman Soliman, center, is applauded during a news conference, after being released from ICE Custody, at the Clifton Mosque on Friday, Sept. 19, 2025, in Cincinnati. (AP)

Nazly Mamedova, one of Soliman’s attorney, said the US Department of Homeland Security sent them a letter Friday saying that it has terminated his removal proceeding and reinstated his asylum. “All cases against him have been closed,” said Mamedova, who was one of the people who picked Soliman up after his release.
“I was so happy. I was crying and screaming,” Mamedova said. “It was just amazing to see him outside. I would go every night go to jail and talk to him. Seeing him outside makes such a big difference. He was so much happier. He hasn’t seen the sun in a long time.”
In a statement, Democratic Rep. Greg Landsman said he was “glad that Ayman has been released and is on his way home and back to our Cincinnati community.”
Young United Souls for Revolutionary Action, a grassroots Muslim organization in Ohio, posted a video of a smiling Soliman being released on their Instagram page. “IMAM AYMAN IS FREE! Alhamdulilah! Press conference details forthcoming! Thank you to everyone who has worked tireless to get him released.”
The Department of Homeland Security said it “cannot discuss the details of individual immigration cases and adjudication decisions.”
According to his lawyers, Soliman was granted asylum in 2018 based on past persecution for his work as a journalist in Egypt during the Arab Spring uprising. His lawyers say he was jailed and tortured for reporting on the intense political conflict.
Soliman was hired as a prison chaplain in Oregon but soon lost that job after the FBI placed an unexplained “flag” on his background profile. In a case that is still pending, he sued to get more information about the flag and to clear his name.
In late 2024, a US asylum officer began proceedings to terminate Soliman’s asylum status, according to his legal team. The officer cited Soliman’s board membership of an organization called Al-Jameya al Shareya as “material support for terrorism” given the group’s links to the Muslim Brotherhood. The US has not designated the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist group, though President Donald Trump considered it during his first term.
One of Soliman’s lawyers said in July that Al-Jameya al Shareya is not a terrorist group but rather a nongovernmental organization that provides medical and charitable community services. They accuse the government, which knew about the board membership when it granted asylum, of reversing course in retaliation against his lawsuit.

 


White House says $100,000 H-1B visa fee to be one-time payment

White House says $100,000 H-1B visa fee to be one-time payment
Updated 38 min 30 sec ago

White House says $100,000 H-1B visa fee to be one-time payment

White House says $100,000 H-1B visa fee to be one-time payment
  • US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick had repeatedly said on Friday that the fee would be applied annually
  • “It ONLY applies to new visas, not renewals or current visa holders,” the official said on condition of anonymity

WASHINGTON: The White House issued a major clarification Saturday to its new H-1B visa policy that had rattled the tech industry a day earlier, saying a $100,000 fee will be a “one-time” payment imposed only on new applicants.
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick had repeatedly said on Friday that the fee would be applied annually, but a White House official said Saturday it is “a one-time fee that applies only to the petition.”
“It ONLY applies to new visas, not renewals or current visa holders,” the official said on condition of anonymity, after the text of the executive order left many current visa-holders confused about whether it applied to them.
The executive order, which is likely to face legal challenges, comes into force Sunday at 12:01 am (0401 GMT), or 9:01 p.m. Saturday on the Pacific Coast.
Prior to the White House’s clarification, US companies were scrambling to figure out the implications for their foreign workers, with several reportedly warning their employees not to leave the country.
Some people who were already on planes preparing to leave the country on Friday de-boarded over fears they may not be allowed to re-enter the country, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.
H-1B visas allow companies to sponsor foreign workers with specialized skills --- such as scientists, engineers, and computer programmers — to work in the United States, initially for three years but extendable to six.
Such visas are widely used by the tech industry. Indian nationals account for nearly three-quarters of the permits allotted via lottery system each year.
The United States approved approximately 400,000 H-1B visas in 2024, two-thirds of which were renewals.

- India, US business concerns -

US President Donald Trump announced the change in Washington on Friday, arguing it would support American workers.
The H-1B program “has been deliberately exploited to replace, rather than supplement, American workers with lower-paid, lower-skilled labor,” the executive order said.
Trump also introduced a $1 million “gold card” residency program he had previewed months earlier.
“The main thing is, we’re going to have great people coming in, and they’re going to be paying,” Trump told reporters as he signed the orders in the Oval Office.
Lutnick, who joined Trump in the Oval Office, said multiple times that the fee would be applied annually.
“The company needs to decide... is the person valuable enough to have $100,000 a year payment to the government? Or they should head home and they should go hire an American,” he told reporters.
Though he claimed that “all the big companies are on board,” many businesses were left confused about the details of the H-1B order.
US bank JPMorgan confirmed that a memo had been sent to its employees with H-1B visas advising them to remain in the United States and avoid international travel until further guidance was issued.
Tech entrepreneurs — including Trump’s former ally Elon Musk — have warned against targeting H-1B visas, saying that the United States does not have enough homegrown talent to fill important tech sector job vacancies.
India’s top IT industry body Nasscom said the new measure would hit “business continuity” and was also concerned by the short timeline.
“A one-day deadline creates considerable uncertainty for businesses, professionals, and students across the world,” Nasscom said in a statement.
India’s foreign ministry said the mobility of skilled talent had contributed to “technology development, innovation, economic growth, competitiveness and wealth creation” in both countries and that it would assess the changes.
It said in a statement the new measure would likely have “humanitarian consequences by way of the disruption caused for families,” which it hoped would be addressed by US authorities.


Russia slams UN vote to reimpose Iran nuclear sanctions

Russia slams UN vote to reimpose Iran nuclear sanctions
Updated 20 September 2025

Russia slams UN vote to reimpose Iran nuclear sanctions

Russia slams UN vote to reimpose Iran nuclear sanctions
  • The UN Security Council voted on Friday, after European pressure, to reimpose the UN sanctions on Iran

MOSCOW: Russia has slammed the UN Security Council vote to reimpose economic sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program and warned of a risk of an “escalation of tensions.”
“The Russian side has repeatedly pointed out the provocative and illegal nature of the actions of the European countries participating in the JCPOA,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement.
Britain, France, and Germany were among the parties to a 2015 deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, which provided Iran with relief from UN sanctions in exchange for UN-monitored restrictions on its nuclear activities.

FASTFACTS

• Russia has warned that the reimposition of sanctions against Iran risked ‘irreparable consequences.’

• Amir Saeid Iravani, Iran’s envoy to the UN, described the vote as the ‘politics of coercion.’

The three governments claim Iran has reneged on its commitments under the deal, which has been effectively moribund since Washington pulled out in 2018.
The UN Security Council voted on Friday, after European pressure, to reimpose the UN sanctions on Iran.
“These actions have nothing to do with diplomacy and lead exclusively to a further escalation of tensions surrounding the Iranian nuclear program,” the Russian ministry said.
Amir Saeid Iravani, Iran’s envoy to the UN, described the vote as the “politics of coercion.”
“Today’s action is hasty, unnecessary and unlawful. Iran recognizes no obligation to implement it,” he told the Security Council. 
In August, Moscow warned that the reimposition of sanctions against Iran risked “irreparable consequences.”
Tehran and Moscow have been strengthening their political, military, and economic ties over the past decade.
Also on Saturday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian vowed that Iran would overcome any reimposition of sanctions on it through a so-called “snapback” process.
“Through the ‘snapback’ they block the road, but it is the brains and the thoughts that open or build the road,” Pezeshkian said in remarks carried by state television.
“They cannot stop us. They can strike our Natanz or Fordow (nuclear installations attacked by the US and Israel in June), but they are unaware that it is humans who built and will rebuild Natanz,” Pezeshkian said.
“We will never surrender in the face of excessive demands because we have the power to change the situation,” Pezeshkian was quoted as saying by state media.
The “snapback” process would reimpose UN sanctions on Iran unless an agreement is reached on a delay between Tehran and key European powers within about a week.
The snapback would reimpose an arms embargo, a ban on uranium enrichment and reprocessing, a ban on activities with ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons, a global asset freeze, and travel bans on Iranian individuals and entities.
“We urge (Iran) to act now,” said British Ambassador Barbara Woodward after casting a vote against a resolution that would have extended the current suspension of the sanctions.

 


‘Better late than never’: Palestinian FM says UK recognition of state a ‘courageous step’

‘Better late than never’: Palestinian FM says UK recognition of state a ‘courageous step’
Updated 20 September 2025

‘Better late than never’: Palestinian FM says UK recognition of state a ‘courageous step’

‘Better late than never’: Palestinian FM says UK recognition of state a ‘courageous step’
  • The UK, alongside France, Canada and Australia, is preparing to formally recognize the State of Palestine at the UN

LONDON: The UK will be taking “a courageous step at a very difficult time” by officially recognizing a Palestinian state, the Palestinian Authority’s foreign minister has said, predicting the move will inspire other countries to follow suit.

that the UK’s expected announcement in the coming days was “better late than never.”

She added: “Britain, with its weight, can influence other countries to come forward and recognise, because that is the right thing to do.”

The UK, alongside France, Canada and Australia, is preparing to formally recognize the State of Palestine at the United Nations.

Aghabekian said the move should be seen as upholding international law and supporting the rights of both Israelis and Palestinians.

“Britain has been supporting the existence and flourishing of Israel for some time,” she said. “But today Britain is looking at the matter objectively — in terms of people’s rights, in terms of complying with international law, and in terms of the future of this area.”

She dismissed claims that recognition rewards Hamas terrorism, arguing that withholding recognition would only “reward extremists.”

She added: “If we wait until Israel decides it wants to go into negotiations with the Palestinians, then it won’t happen.” Aghabekian also said she expected Gaza to eventually return to Palestinian governance.

Three-quarters of UN member states already recognize Palestine, which comprises the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip — collectively known as the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

The West Bank has been under Israeli occupation since 1967, while Gaza has endured repeated bombardment since Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel, which killed nearly 1,200 people and saw around 250 taken hostage. Since then, more than 65,000 people have been killed in Gaza, according to Palestinian figures, while 48 hostages remain in captivity, 20 of whom are believed to be alive.

Aghabekian confirmed that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has provided assurances to world leaders that Hamas will not be part of Gaza’s governance.

But she cautioned against talk of eliminating the group entirely.

“Hamas is an ideology, not a building that you bring down,” she said. “Those who support Hamas need to see a future … that there might be a state in which their children and grandchildren might prosper. What people see today is darkness and destruction, violation of rights, helplessness and hopelessness. People need to see progress, and once that happens, the mood will shift.”


Austrian energy executive fired over alleged Russian spying links — magazine report says

Austrian energy executive fired over alleged Russian spying links — magazine report says
Updated 20 September 2025

Austrian energy executive fired over alleged Russian spying links — magazine report says

Austrian energy executive fired over alleged Russian spying links — magazine report says
  • The OMV employee allegedly attracted attention through meetings with a Russian diplomat
  • OMV told Reuters it had terminated the employee’s contract with immediate effect

VIENNA: Austrian oil, gas and chemicals group OMV has fired an executive over allegations of spying for Russia and a Russian diplomat has been summoned to the Foreign Ministry in Vienna as a result of the affair, news magazine Profil reported.
Profil magazine said the OMV employee allegedly attracted attention through meetings with a Russian diplomat suspected by Western intelligence services of being an agent of Russia’s domestic intelligence service FSB.
The magazine said that Austria’s Directorate of State Security and Intelligence had been monitoring the OMV executive, who was not identified, for several months.
OMV told Reuters it had terminated the employee’s contract with immediate effect and the company was cooperating fully with the relevant authorities.
“For data protection reasons, we cannot comment on further details regarding individual employment relationships,” an OMV spokesman said.
The Austrian Foreign Ministry told Reuters it was aware of the allegations and the pending criminal proceedings against a Russian diplomat.
The chargé d’affaires of the Russian embassy in Vienna has been summoned to the Foreign Ministry, and asked to waive the diplomat’s immunity.
“Otherwise, he would have been considered persona non grata and would have to leave Austria,” the Ministry told Reuters.
The Russian Foreign Ministry could not be reached for comment.