Ex-Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn launches new UK political party

Jeremy Corbyn attends a protest in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza, in London, Britain. (File/Reuters)
Jeremy Corbyn attends a protest in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza, in London, Britain. (File/Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 24 July 2025

Ex-Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn launches new UK political party

Jeremy Corbyn attends a protest in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza, in London, Britain. (File/Reuters)
  • In announcement, Corbyn and Sultana called for a “mass redistribution of wealth and power,” said they would “keep demanding an end to all arms sales to Israel”

LONDON: Former leftist Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn announced Thursday he was forming a new political party alongside another ex-member of Britain’s ruling party, as the UK’s political landscape continues to splinter.
Corbyn, who lost two elections as Labour leader in 2017 and 2019, and fellow independent MP Zarah Sultana referred to the new left-wing outfit as “Your Party,” but later said its name still had to be decided.
“It’s time for a new kind of political party. One that is rooted in our communities, trade unions and social movements,” they said in a joint statement.
In their announcement, they called for a “mass redistribution of wealth and power” and said they would “keep demanding an end to all arms sales to Israel.”
They also committed to a “free and independent Palestine.”
Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who has pulled Labour to the center since succeeding Corbyn as leader, faces growing calls within his party to recognize a Palestinian state.
Corbyn, 76, stepped down as Labour leader after overseeing its worst result in decades, when it was trounced in the 2019 general election by the Conservatives, then led by Boris Johnson.
Labour under Starmer suspended him in 2020 after he refused to fully accept the findings of a rights watchdog’s probe into claims that anti-Semitism had become rampant within Labour’s ranks under his leadership.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission ruled the party had broken equality law when Corbyn was in charge.
Corbyn said anti-Semitism had been “dramatically overstated for political reasons.”
Last year Corbyn announced he would stand as an independent in the July 2024 general election after Labour failed to put him forward as a candidate.
He was expelled from the party but still went on to win comfortably his Islington North seat in London, which he has represented for more than 40 years.
Sultana, an MP since 2019, was suspended by Labour last year after she and several other members of parliament voted to scrap a controversial cap on child benefits.

While it remains to be seen whether the new movement will take off, its formation appears to confirm a trend in British politics toward a multi-party system.
British politics has long been dominated by Labour and the Conservatives, but three other parties are challenging that order.
The center-left Liberal Democrats won 72 seats in the 650-seat parliament in July 2024, while Nigel Farage’s anti-immigrant Reform UK party won about 14 percent of the vote.
It picked up five seats, an unprecedented breakthrough for a hard-right party in Britain.
Farage’s Euroskeptics swept dozens of council and mayoral seats in local elections in May and are leading national opinion polls, although the next general election is not expected until 2029.
While Reform are picking up support on the right, Labour is also losing votes to the Greens on the left.
Starmer, a former chief state prosecutor who is seen as too right-wing for some left-wingers in his party, recently suspended four lawmakers who rebelled over his attempts at reforming welfare.
They currently sit as independents and Westminster watchers will be keeping a close eye on whether they are tempted to join Corbyn’s new party.
“I do think there is space for a left-wing populist party in the UK with a charismatic leader that could pose an enormous threat to Labour and the other parties, but it’s going to take a lot to convince me that Jeremy Corbyn can be it,” Chris Hopkins, political research director at polling firm Savanta, told AFP.


UK counterterror laws applied ‘too broadly,’ risk ‘overreach’: Report

UK counterterror laws applied ‘too broadly,’ risk ‘overreach’: Report
Updated 7 sec ago

UK counterterror laws applied ‘too broadly,’ risk ‘overreach’: Report

UK counterterror laws applied ‘too broadly,’ risk ‘overreach’: Report
  • Current definition of terrorism ‘creates uncertainty,’ should be tightened: Commission
  • Legislation used to ban Palestine Action requires far more parliamentary scrutiny

LONDON: Laws used in the UK to ban the group Palestine Action have been applied “too broadly,” a review into counterterrorism legislation has found.

The review, led by former Judge Declan Morgan, has determined that the UK definition of terrorism creates “uncertainty and overreach in its application” and needs to be tightened.

The 15-person Independent Commission on UK Counter-Terrorism Law, Policy and Practice added that cases related to property damage should only include “serious risk to life, national security, or public safety, or involving arson, explosives, or firearms.”

Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist organization in the UK on July 5 after several incidents, including a break-in at a Royal Air Force base that saw two military aircraft sprayed with paint.

The ban, which is being challenged in the High Court, makes supporting the group a criminal offense punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

But the review said proscription of any group should only occur where a risk to the public from acts of terrorism exists, and that if not renewed, bans should lapse after five years.

“The commission heard evidence that, without careful calibration, counter-terrorism powers risk being applied too broadly — capturing behaviour that is harmful but not terrorist,” it said.

“When a group is proscribed, individuals can face prosecution for membership, inviting or expressing support, or wearing associated symbols or uniforms,” the report added.

“Providing funding or handling property linked to a proscribed organisation may constitute a criminal offence, and any act carried out for the benefit of a proscribed group can be treated as an act of terrorism.

“These far-reaching implications can create confusion, deter lawful civic engagement, and strain relations with communities connected to affected organisations — particularly where banned groups also pursue political objectives.”

Proscription, the report said, should be subject to far more parliamentary scrutiny in future.

The banning of Palestine Action has led to a series of protests across the UK featuring people holding placards stating: “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.”

Almost 2,000 people have been arrested for taking part in the protests under the Terrorism Act.

The report said going forward, people should only be charged under sections 12 and 13 of the act “where there is clear intent to commit the offence.”

That could impact cases such as that of Kneecap rapper Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who was charged under section 13 for allegedly holding up a flag of the banned Lebanese group Hezbollah at a gig earlier this year. The case against him was dismissed due to a technical error in September.