Trump’s decision to send aircraft carrier to South America will leave Mideast and Europe with none

Trump’s decision to send aircraft carrier to South America will leave Mideast and Europe with none
US President Donald Trump gestures before boarding Air Force One before travelling to South Korea, at Haneda Airport in Tokyo, Japan. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 13 sec ago

Trump’s decision to send aircraft carrier to South America will leave Mideast and Europe with none

Trump’s decision to send aircraft carrier to South America will leave Mideast and Europe with none
  • Aircraft carriers, with their thousands of sailors and dozens of warplanes, have long been recognized as one of the ultimate signifiers of US military might and the nation’s foreign policy priorities
  • The new orders for the USS Gerald R. Ford illustrate the Trump administration’s increasing focus on the Western Hemisphere and mark a major escalation of firepower as the US military ramps up fatal strikes on alleged drug boats

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump’s decision to shift the nation’s most advanced aircraft carrier to South America in his campaign against drug cartels is pulling the ship out of the Mediterranean Sea at a time when a tenuous ceasefire between Israel and Hamas has been threatened by new strikes in Gaza.
The US is set to be in the fairly unusual position of having only a single aircraft carrier deployed and none in the waters off both Europe and the Middle East. The change is especially stark after the US joined Israeli strikes on Iran in June and has engaged in some of the most intense combat operations since World War II against Yemen’s Houthi rebels in the Red Sea.
Aircraft carriers, with their thousands of sailors and dozens of warplanes, have long been recognized as one of the ultimate signifiers of US military might and the nation’s foreign policy priorities. There have been five carrier deployments to the Middle East since the Hamas-led attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, including two carriers in the region at multiple points this year and last.
The new orders for the USS Gerald R. Ford illustrate the Trump administration’s increasing focus on the Western Hemisphere and mark a major escalation of firepower as the US military ramps up fatal strikes on alleged drug boats. With a buildup of warships, aircraft and troops already in the region, Trump himself has signaled what could be next.
Speaking from another aircraft carrier, the USS George Washington, in its home port of Japan, Trump noted the US attacks at sea and reiterated that “now we’ll stop the drugs coming in by land.”
Mark Cancian, a senior adviser with the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a retired Marine colonel, questioned how long the Ford would be able to remain in South America, when only three of the 11 US aircraft carriers are typically out to sea.
“It’s such a powerful and scarce resource, there will be a lot of pressure to do something or send it elsewhere,” Cancian said. “You can imagine the peace negotiations breaking down in the eastern Mediterranean or something happening with Iran.”
The USS Nimitz also is deployed but is heading home from the South China Sea to the West Coast before being decommissioned. It recently lost two aircraft — a fighter jet and a helicopter — in separate crashes that are under investigation. A third carrier, the USS Theodore Roosevelt, is not deployed but is conducting exercises off the coast of San Diego.
The shift is happening just as violence has flared up again in Gaza despite a ceasefire that Trump helped broker after two years of war. The Israeli army launched a barrage of attacks Tuesday as tensions with Hamas grew two weeks into the fragile ceasefire.
Carrier’s move adds pressure on Venezuela
Meanwhile, the US military’s growing presence near Venezuela and its 13 fatal strikes on alleged drug boats have stoked fears that Trump could try to topple authoritarian President Nicolás Maduro, who faces charges of narcoterrorism in the US
In response to questions about the speculation, Secretary of State Marco Rubio insisted Saturday that the US is taking part in a counterdrug operation. And he again accused Maduro’s government of participating in the shipment of narcotics.
“This is a very serious problem for the hemisphere, and a very destabilizing one,” Rubio said. “And that has to be addressed.”
Maduro said in a recent national broadcast that the Trump administration is manufacturing a war against him.
“They are fabricating an extravagant narrative, a vulgar, criminal and totally fake one,” Maduro added. “Venezuela is a country that does not produce cocaine leaves.”
Experts say the US forces in the region aren’t large enough for an invasion. But they could help push out Maduro — and possibly plunge the nation into chaos.
“There’s a really high potential for violence and instability,” according to Geoff Ramsey, an expert on US policy toward Venezuela who is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. If Maduro loses power, he said Venezuela could “devolve into a Libya-style meltdown that could last years.”
Land strikes are ‘a real possibility’
The Ford strike group, which includes five destroyers, will add to an unusually large US military buildup in the waters off Venezuela. The Navy already has eight warships in the region — three destroyers, three amphibious assault ships, a cruiser and a smaller littoral combat ship that’s designed for coastal waters. It was not clear if all five of the destroyers in the Ford strike group would make the journey.
A US Navy submarine also is operating in the broader area of South America and is capable of launching cruise missiles. The US military also sent a squadron of F-35B Lightning II fighter jets to an airstrip in Puerto Rico and recently flew a pair of supersonic, heavy bombers up to the coast of Venezuela.
The administration says the military has killed at least 57 people in the strikes against vessels accused of transporting drugs. Trump has declared drug cartels to be unlawful combatants because of narcotics flowing into the country and said the US is in an “armed conflict” with them, relying on the same legal authority used by the Bush administration after 9/11.
Lawmakers from both political parties have expressed concerns about Trump’s lack of congressional approval and unwillingness to provide details about the attacks. Others, such as Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, believe the president has all the authority he needs.
The South Carolina Republican said Sunday on CBS’ “Face the Nation” that land strikes in Venezuela are “a real possibility.”
“We’re not going to sit on the sidelines and watch boats full of drugs come to our country,” Graham said. “We’re going to blow them up and kill the people that want to poison America, and we’re now going to expand operations, I think, to the land.”


China says it ‘absolutely will not’ rule out use of force over Taiwan

Updated 6 sec ago

China says it ‘absolutely will not’ rule out use of force over Taiwan

China says it ‘absolutely will not’ rule out use of force over Taiwan
BEIJING/TAIPEI: China “absolutely will not” rule out using force over Taiwan, a government spokesperson said on Wednesday, striking a much tougher tone than a series of articles in state media this week that pledged benign rule if the island comes over to Beijing.
China, which views democratically governed Taiwan as its own territory, has never renounced use of force to “reunify” with the island.
But the policy is not often directly voiced in public and did not appear in three Xinhua news agency commentaries this week about Taiwan, one of which mapped out how “patriots” could rule the island after “reunification” and promised Taiwan’s existing social system and way of life would be respected.
Peng Qing’en, a spokesperson for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office, told a regular news conference in Beijing that peaceful “reunification” under the “one country, two systems” model is the fundamental approach to “resolving the Taiwan issue.”
“We are willing to create ample space for peaceful reunification and will spare no effort to pursue this prospect with the utmost sincerity,” he said.
“However, we absolutely will not renounce the use of force and reserve the option to take all necessary measures.”
China’s top official in charge of Taiwan policy, the ruling Communist Party’s fourth ranked leader Wang Huning, did not mention force in a key policy speech on Saturday, that instead focused on how both sides would benefit from “reunification.”
China’s renewed push on an autonomy model for Taiwan, which no major Taiwanese political party supports and the government in Taipei has repeatedly denounced, comes ahead of a meeting in Thursday between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping.
Trump told reporters on Wednesday he did not know whether he would even discuss Taiwan with Xi.
Taiwan’s government rejects Beijing’s sovereignty claims.
Speaking earlier on Wednesday in Taipei, Taiwan National Security Bureau Director-General Tsai Ming-yen said China’s “patriots” model was what Beijing used in Hong Kong and Macau and had no market in Taiwan.
“The aim is to belittle Taiwan’s international standing, and Hong Kong-ify and Macau-ify Taiwan, to achieve the political objective of eliminating Taiwan’s sovereignty, which the Chinese Communist Party seeks to do,” he said.
“I think the Chinese communists have no way to enact the application of the Macau or Hong Kong model in Taiwan.”
In 2021, Hong Kong, which returned to Chinese rule from Britain in 1997, held its first “patriots-only” election with candidates vetted as loyal to Beijing. Turnout hit a record low.
Taiwan held its first direct presidential election in 1996 and democracy on the island is a noisy and vibrant affair where candidates are free to espouse any point of view, including being pro-independence or pro-Beijing.
China’s government refuses to talk to Taiwan President Lai Ching-te, saying he is a “separatist.”

Vice President Vance says troops will be paid as pressure builds on Congress to end the shutdown

Vice President Vance says troops will be paid as pressure builds on Congress to end the shutdown
Updated 29 October 2025

Vice President Vance says troops will be paid as pressure builds on Congress to end the shutdown

Vice President Vance says troops will be paid as pressure builds on Congress to end the shutdown

WASHINGTON: Vice President JD Vance said Tuesday he believes US military members will be paid at the end of the week, though he did not specify how the Trump administration will reconfigure funding as pain from the second-longest shutdown spreads nationwide.
The funding fight in Washington gained new urgency this week as millions of Americans face the prospect of losing food assistance, more federal workers miss their first full paycheck and recurring delays at airports snarl travel plans.
“We do think that we can continue paying the troops, at least for now,” Vance told reporters after lunch with Senate Republicans at the Capitol. “We’ve got food stamp benefits that are set to run out in a week. We’re trying to keep as much open as possible. We just need the Democrats to actually help us out.”
The vice president reaffirmed Republicans’ strategy of trying to pick off a handful of Senate Democrats to vote for stopgap funding to reopen the government. But nearly a month into the shutdown, it hasn’t worked. Just before Vance’s visit, a Senate vote on legislation to reopen the government failed for the 13th time.
Federal employee union calls for end to shutdown
The strain is building on Democratic lawmakers to end the impasse. That was magnified by the nation’s largest federal employee union, which on Monday called on Congress to immediately pass a funding bill and ensure workers receive full pay. Everett Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said the two political parties have made their point.
“It’s time to pass a clean continuing resolution and end this shutdown today. No half measures, and no gamesmanship,” said Kelley, whose union carries considerable political weight with Democratic lawmakers.
Still, Democratic senators, including those representing states with many federal workers, did not appear ready to back down. Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine said he was insisting on commitments from the White House to prevent the administration from mass firing more workers. Democrats also want Congress to extend subsidies for health plans under the Affordable Care Act.
“We’ve got to get a deal with Donald Trump,” Kaine said.
But shutdowns grow more painful the longer they go. Soon, with closures lasting a fourth full week as of Tuesday, millions of Americans are likely to experience the difficulties firsthand.
“This week, more than any other week, the consequences become impossible to ignore,” said Rep. Lisa McClain, chair of the House Republican Conference.
How will Trump administration reconfigure funds?
The nation’s 1.3 million active duty service members were at risk of missing a paycheck on Friday. Earlier this month, the Trump administration ensured they were paid by shifting $8 billion from military research and development funds to make payroll. Vance did not say Tuesday how the Department of Defense will cover troop pay this time.
Larger still, the Trump administration says funding will run out Friday for the food assistance program that is relied upon by 42 million Americans to supplement their grocery bills. The administration has rejected the use of more than $5 billion in contingency funds to keep benefits flowing into November. And it says states won’t be reimbursed if they temporarily cover the cost of benefits next month.
A coalition of 25 states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit Tuesday in Massachusetts that aims to keep SNAP benefits flowing by compelling the Agriculture Department to use the SNAP contingency funds.
Vance said that reconfiguring funds for various programs such as SNAP was like “trying to fit a square peg into a round hole with the budget.”
The Agriculture Department says the contingency fund is intended to help respond to emergencies such as natural disasters. Democrats say the decision concerning the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP, goes against the department’s previous guidance concerning its operations during a shutdown.
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said the administration made an intentional choice not to the fund SNAP in November, calling it an “act of cruelty.”
Another program endangered by the shutdown is Head Start, with more than 130 preschool programs not getting federal grants on Saturday if the shutdown continues, according to the National Head Start Association. All told, more than 65,000 seats at Head Start programs across the country could be affected.
Judge blocks firings
A federal judge in San Francisco on Tuesday indefinitely barred the Trump administration from firing federal employees during the government shutdown, saying that labor unions were likely to prevail on their claims that the cuts were arbitrary and politically motivated.
US District Judge Susan Illston granted a preliminary injunction that bars the firings while a lawsuit challenging them plays out. She had previously issued a temporary restraining order against the job cuts that was set to expire Wednesday.
Federal agencies are enjoined from issuing layoff notices or acting on notices issued since the government shut down Oct. 1. Illston said that her order does not apply to notices sent before the shutdown.
Will lawmakers find a solution?
At the Capitol, congressional leaders mostly highlighted the challenges many Americans are facing as a result of the shutdown. But there was no movement toward negotiations as they attempted to lay blame on the other side of the political aisle.
“Now government workers and every other American affected by this shutdown have become nothing more than pawns in the Democrats’ political games,” said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D.
The House passed a short-term continuing resolution on Sept. 19 to keep federal agencies funded. Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, has kept the House out of legislative session ever since, saying the solution is for Democrats to simply accept that bill.
But the Senate has consistently fallen short of the 60 votes needed to advance that spending measure. Democrats insist that any bill to fund the government also address health care costs, namely the soaring health insurance premiums that millions of Americans will face next year under plans offered through the Affordable Care Act marketplace.
Window-shopping for health plans delayed
When asked about his strategy for ending the shutdown, Schumer said that millions of Americans will begin seeing on Saturday how much their health insurance is going up next year.
“People in more than 30 states are going to be aghast, aghast when they see their bills,” Schumer said. “And they are going to cry out, and I believe there will be increased pressure on Republicans to negotiate.”
The window for enrolling in ACA health plans begins Saturday. In past years, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has allowed Americans to preview their health coverage options about a week before open enrollment. But, as of Tuesday, Healthcare.gov appeared to show 2025 health insurance plans and estimated prices, instead of next year’s options.
Republicans insist they will not entertain negotiations on health care until the government reopens.
“I’m particularly worried about premiums going up for working families,” said Sen. David McCormick, R-Pennsylvania “So we’re going to have that conversation, but we’re not going to have it until the government opens.”


Trump tells US troops he is ready to send ‘more than the National Guard’ into cities

Trump tells US troops he is ready to send ‘more than the National Guard’ into cities
Updated 29 October 2025

Trump tells US troops he is ready to send ‘more than the National Guard’ into cities

Trump tells US troops he is ready to send ‘more than the National Guard’ into cities

US President Donald Trump has told US troops he was prepared to send “more than the National Guard” into US cities if needed, in the latest demonstration of his willingness to escalate a confrontation with Democratic-led local governments which oppose the deployments.
Trump delivered his remarks on Tuesday aboard the George Washington aircraft carrier, which was docked at the Yokosuka naval base near Tokyo. His speech, which occasionally touched on partisan issues, was interrupted by applause and cheers from the troops several times.
“We have cities that are troubled ... and we’re sending in our National Guard. And if we need more than the National Guard, we’ll send more than the National Guard because we’re going to have safe cities,” Trump said.
Trump since June has deployed National Guard troops to various Democratic-led jurisdictions in an extraordinary expansion of the use of the military for domestic purposes. Trump has sent them to Los Angeles, Memphis and Washington, D.C., and is waging court battles to try to dispatch them to Portland and Chicago.
In Los Angeles, Trump also took the rare step of deploying active duty Marines, although their job was to protect federal agents and federal property and they have since been withdrawn.
Trump has left open the possibility that he might use the centuries-old Insurrection Act to deploy active duty troops for policing purposes and sidestep any court rulings blocking the dispatch of Guard troops into American cities.
Under federal law, National Guard and other military troops are generally prohibited from conducting civilian law enforcement. But the Insurrection Act allows for an exception, giving troops the power to directly police and arrest people.
Since his second term as president began in January, Trump has shown little hesitation in seeking to wield governmental authority against his political opponents, as he pushes to expand the powers of the presidency in ways that have tested the limits of the law.
Last month, in a speech to top military commanders, Trump suggested using US cities as “training grounds” for the armed forces, alarming Democrats and civil liberties groups.


Trump heads to South Korea with all eyes on Xi meeting

Trump heads to South Korea with all eyes on Xi meeting
Updated 29 October 2025

Trump heads to South Korea with all eyes on Xi meeting

Trump heads to South Korea with all eyes on Xi meeting
  • Trump’s two-day visit to key US ally South Korea is the third leg of a trip to Asia
  • He will meet Chinese leader Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the APEC summit

TOKYO: US President Donald Trump heads Wednesday for South Korea, where a key meeting with Chinese leader Xi Jinping could produce a truce in the blistering trade war between the world’s two largest economies.
Trump’s two-day visit to key US ally South Korea is the third leg of a trip to Asia that has seen him lauded at a regional summit in Malaysia and flattered as a “peacemaker” by Japan’s Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi.
But the eyes of the world will be on a meeting set for Thursday — the first time in six years Trump sits down with Xi.
It could determine whether the United States and China can halt a trade war that has roiled global markets and sent international supply chains into panic.
Negotiators from Beijing and Washington have both confirmed a “framework” has been agreed.
It is now down to Trump and Xi, who will meet on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in the city of Gyeongju, to sign off on it.
“There seems to be a mismatch in terms of where both countries are, heading into the Trump-Xi summit,” said William Yang, an analyst at the International Crisis Group.
The United States “is eager to reach any trade deal that Trump could declare as a victory,” while China is focused on “building more mutual trust, managing longstanding differences, and steadying the bilateral trade relationship,” he added.

- ‘Complicated’ -

Trump is due to land in the South Korean city of Busan, fresh from two days in Tokyo, where Japan’s new conservative premier Takaichi hailed a “golden age” in bilateral ties.
The US president will head to Gyeongju for a summit with South Korean President Lee Jae Myung — their second in-person talks just two months after a meeting in Washington.
Discussion will likely be focused on trade, with the two sides still deadlocked over a deal between the major economic partners.
In July, Trump said Washington had agreed to cut tariffs on South Korean imports to 15 percent in exchange for a $350 billion investment pledge by Seoul.
Steep auto tariffs, however, remain in place, and the two governments remain divided over the structure of the investment pledge.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent admitted Monday there was still “a lot of details to work out” in what he said was a “complicated” deal, while Trump has denied that there was a “snag” in the talks.
Activists plan to welcome the US leader, whose sweeping tariffs triggered the trade war, with anti-Trump demonstrations in Gyeongju condemning his “predatory investment demands.”

- DMZ meeting? -

Adding to the diplomatic high drama, Trump has also extended an invitation to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un to meet while he is on the peninsula.
The two leaders last met in 2019 at the Demilitarised Zone (DMZ), the fraught Cold War frontier that has separated the two Koreas for decades.
Trump has said that he would “love to meet” Kim and even suggested sanctions could be a topic for conversation.
But North Korea is yet to respond publicly to the invitation. Officials in Seoul appear divided as to whether it will go ahead.
Kim said last month he had “fond memories” of his meetings with Trump.
He also expressed openness to talks if the United States dropped its “delusional” demand that Pyongyang give up its nuclear weapons.
“Trump’s made it clear he wants to meet,” Chad O’Carroll, founder of the specialist website NK News, told AFP.
“The ball is in Kim Jong Un’s court.”
But the US leader now faces a different Kim than in 2019 — one emboldened since their diplomatic love affair during Trump’s first term, having secured crucial backing from Russia after sending thousands of North Korean troops to fight alongside Moscow’s forces.
“North Korea has time on its side and isn’t as isolated as before,” said Hong Min, a senior analyst at the Korea Institute for National Unification.
“A surprise event to show personal rapport is possible, but a negotiation with tangible results — like denuclearization talks — will not happen,” he told AFP.


NATO stands with Lithuania over balloon incursion: Rutte

NATO stands with Lithuania over balloon incursion: Rutte
Updated 29 October 2025

NATO stands with Lithuania over balloon incursion: Rutte

NATO stands with Lithuania over balloon incursion: Rutte
  • Dozens of balloons forced the temporary closure of two airports in Lithuania last week
  • Authorities shut its last two border crossings with neighboring Belarus over the incident

BRUSSELS: NATO voiced firm support for Lithuania Tuesday over what Vilnius condemned as a “hybrid attack” on its airspace by Russia’s ally Belarus, involving balloons filled with contraband cigarettes.
The alliance’s Secretary General Mark Rutte said he had spoken with Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda about the incident, in which dozens of balloons forced the temporary closure of two airports last week.
“NATO stands firmly with Lithuania — including through the air policing currently provided by Spain and Hungary as well as the NATO forces led by Germany,” Rutte wrote on X.
Lithuania, a NATO and European Union member, also shut its last two border crossings with neighboring Belarus over the incident.
EU chief Ursula von der Leyen called the balloon incident “a hybrid threat” and said the European Union supported Lithuania.
“This is destabilization. This is provocation,” she said on X, adding that Europe should speed up measures to defend its eastern flank.
The Lithuanian army has now been authorized to shoot down such balloons, Prime Minister Inga Ruginiene told journalists on Monday.
She said Belarus’s lack of action to detain those responsible for the balloons led her to believe the authorities were involved.
Black-market tobacco is a revenue source for Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko’s government, according to the country’s opposition.
Belarusian Foreign Minister Maxim Ryzhenkov rejected Lithuania’s accusations, calling them a “provocation” aimed at justifying “measures against Belarus (and) against Russia.”