‘Wetware’: Scientists use human mini-brains to power computers

‘Wetware’: Scientists use human mini-brains to power computers
A screen monitoring human brain cells activity is photographed at the Swiss start-up FinalSpark in Vevey, on October 3, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 5 min 36 sec ago

‘Wetware’: Scientists use human mini-brains to power computers

‘Wetware’: Scientists use human mini-brains to power computers
  • Founder Swiss start-up FinalSpark believes that processors using brain cells will one day replace the chips powering the artificial intelligence boom

VEVEY, Switzerland: Inside a lab in the picturesque Swiss town of Vevey, a scientist gives tiny clumps of human brain cells the nutrient-rich fluid they need to stay alive.
It is vital these mini-brains remain healthy, because they are serving as rudimentary computer processors — and unlike your laptop, once they die, they cannot be rebooted.
This new field of research, called biocomputing or “wetware,” aims to harness the evolutionarily honed yet still mysterious computing power of the human brain.
During a tour of Swiss start-up FinalSpark’s lab, co-founder Fred Jordan told AFP he believes that processors using brain cells will one day replace the chips powering the artificial intelligence boom.
The supercomputers behind AI tools like ChatGPT currently use silicon semiconductors to simulate the neurons and networks of the human brain.
“Instead of trying to mimic, let’s use the real thing,” Jordan said.
Among other potential advantages, biocomputing could help address the skyrocketing energy demands of AI, which have already threatened climate emissions targets and led some tech giants to resort to nuclear power.
“Biological neurons are one million times more energy efficient than artificial neurons,” Jordan said. They can also be endlessly reproduced in the lab, unlike the massively in-demand AI chips made by companies like behemoth Nvidia.
But for now, wetware’s computing power is a very long way from competing with the hardware that runs the world.
And another question lingers: could these tiny brains become conscious?

Brain power

To make its “bioprocessors,” FinalSpark first purchases stem cells. These cells, which were originally human skin cells from anonymous human donors, can become any cell in the body.
FinalSpark’s scientists then turn them into neurons, which are collected into millimeter-wide clumps called brain organoids.
They are around the size of the brain of a fruit fly larvae, Jordan said.
Electrodes are attached to the organoids in the lab, which allow the scientists to “spy on their internal discussion,” he explained.
The scientists can also stimulate the organoids with a small electric current. Whether they respond with a spike in activity — or not — is roughly the equivalent of the ones or zeroes in traditional computing.
Ten universities around the world are conducting experiments using FinalSpark’s organoids — the small company’s website even has a live feed of the neurons at work.
Benjamin Ward-Cherrier, a researcher at the University of Bristol, used one of the organoids as the brain of a simple robot that managed to distinguish between different braille letters.
There are many challenges, including encoding the data in a way the organoid might understand — then trying to interpret what the brain cells “spit out,” he told AFP.
“Working with robots is very easy by comparison,” Ward-Cherrier said with a laugh.
“There’s also the fact that they are living cells — and that means that they do die,” he added.
Indeed, Ward-Cherrier was halfway through an experiment when the organoid died and his team had to start over. FinalSpark says the organoids live for up to six months.
At Johns Hopkins University in the United States, researcher Lena Smirnova is using similar organoids to study brain conditions such as autism and Alzheimer’s disease in the hopes of finding new treatments.
Biocomputing is currently more “pie in the sky,” unlike the “low-hanging fruit” use of the technology for biomedical research — but that could change dramatically over the next 20 years, she told AFP.

Do organoids dream of electric sheep?

All the scientists AFP spoke to dismissed the idea that these tiny balls of cells in petri dishes were at risk of developing anything resembling consciousness.
Jordan acknowledged that “this is at the edge of philosophy,” which is why FinalSpark collaborates with ethicists.
He also pointed out that the organoids — which lack pain receptors — have around 10,000 neurons, compared to a human brain’s 100 billion.
However much about our brains, including how they create consciousness, remains a mystery.
That is why Ward-Cherrier hopes that — beyond computer processing — biocomputing will ultimately reveal more about how our brains work.
Back in the lab, Jordan opens the door of what looks like a big fridge containing 16 brain organoids in a tangle of tubes.
Lines suddenly start spiking on the screen next to the incubator, indicating significant neural activity.
The brain cells have no known way of sensing that their door has been opened, and the scientists have spent years trying to figure why this happens.
“We still don’t understand how they detect the opening of the door,” Jordan admitted.


France and Britain refine plans at UN for Gaza force resolution

France and Britain refine plans at UN for Gaza force resolution
Updated 17 October 2025

France and Britain refine plans at UN for Gaza force resolution

France and Britain refine plans at UN for Gaza force resolution
  • Stabilization force unlikely to be a formal UN peacekeeping mission
  • Indonesia offered 20,000 troops for Gaza mission

PARIS/UNITED NATIONS: France and Britain, in coordination with the United States, are working to finalize a UN Security Council resolution in the coming days that would lay the foundation for a future international force in Gaza, France said on Thursday.
With a shaky US-mediated ceasefire between Israel and Hamas holding, planning has begun for an international force to stabilize security in the Palestinian enclave, two senior US advisers said on Wednesday.
Speaking to reporters in Paris, French Foreign Ministry spokesperson Pascal Confavreux said such a force needed a UN mandate to provide a strong foundation in international law and ease the process of getting potential contributions from countries.
“France is working closely with its partners on the establishment of such an international mission, which must be formalized through the adoption of a UN Security Council resolution,” he said.
“Discussions, notably with the Americans and British, are ongoing to propose this resolution in the coming days.”
US President Donald Trump’s administration is speaking with many countries interested in contributing to the force, a White House official said on Thursday.
“We are also in conversations about a potential UN Security Council resolution to support this effort,” the White House official said.

Stabilization force ‘will take some time’, says Britain
Paris hosted talks with other European and Arab powers on October 10 to flesh out ideas for Gaza’s post-war transition, including how an international force could take shape.
Diplomats said the stabilization force would not be a formal United Nations peacekeeping force paid for by the world body.
Instead, a Security Council resolution could mirror action taken by the 15-member body to back the deployment of an international force to combat armed gangs in Haiti.
That resolution spells out and authorizes the mission and states contributing to the force to “take all necessary measures” – code for the use of force – to carry out the mandate.
“The stabilization force will take some time,” British Prime Minister Keir Starmer told parliament on Tuesday. “The terms of reference are still being drawn up. There is a United Nations Security Council resolution on the establishment of the force, or I hope there will be, but the wider terms of reference are not yet agreed.”

Indonesia previously offered 20,000 troops
Among the countries the US is speaking to about contributing to the force are Indonesia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Qatar, and Azerbaijan, the advisers said on condition of anonymity.
There are also currently up to two dozen US troops in the region to help set up the operation, serving in a “coordination, oversight” role, they said.
Italy has publicly said it was willing to take part.
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto told the United Nations General Assembly on September 23 that if there was a UN resolution, Indonesia was prepared to deploy 20,000 or more troops in Gaza to help secure peace.
The 193-member UN General Assembly last month overwhelmingly voted to endorse a declaration that aimed to advance a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians, which supports the deployment of a temporary international stabilization mission mandated by the UN Security Council. 


Senegal unveils report on WWII massacre by French colonial army

Senegal unveils report on WWII massacre by French colonial army
Updated 17 October 2025

Senegal unveils report on WWII massacre by French colonial army

Senegal unveils report on WWII massacre by French colonial army
  • Document aims to clarify events in 1944 when the French colonial army in Senegal massacred African troops who had fought alongside them in World War II
  • Even though most of the perpetrators are now dead, the findings could still eventually lead to demands for reparations

DAKAR: Investigations into one of the worst massacres in France’s colonial history took a step forward on Thursday when researchers presented an official report to Senegalese President Bassirou Diomaye Faye.
The document aims to clarify events in 1944 when the French colonial army in Senegal massacred African troops who had fought alongside them in World War II.
Even though most of the perpetrators are now dead and France is no longer a colonial power in west Africa, the findings could still eventually lead to demands for reparations.
The report’s authors said the killings were “premeditated” and accused France of altering records to conceal the massacre.
“The French authorities did everything to cover (it) up,” the white paper said, adding that official French records documented 70 killed but that the most credible estimates suggested there were 300 to 400 victims.
Excavations have been under way since early May at the Thiaroye military camp to shed light on the massacre of African soldiers who had fought for France and protested against unpaid wages.
“This white paper is a decisive step in the rehabilitation of historical truth,” Faye told a ceremony attended by Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko and members of his government.
He said the document was “based on tangible facts, drawn from archives here and in France.”
Around 1,300 soldiers from several countries in west Africa were sent to the Thiaroye camp in November 1944, after being captured by Germany while fighting for France.
Discontent soon mounted over unpaid backpay and demands that they be treated on a par with white soldiers.
On December 1, French forces opened fire on them.

Excavations 

Even now, questions remain about the number of soldiers killed, their identities and the location of their burial.
French authorities at the time said 35 had been killed.
Excavations at a cemetery at the Thiaroye military camp, outside Dakar, began in May. Archaeologists unearthed human skeletons with bullets in their bodies.
The Senegalese government, which still accuses France of withholding archive documents that would shed light on the death toll, ordered the excavations as a way to “uncover the whole truth.”
On Thursday, Faye said they would continue “at all sites likely to contain mass graves.”
“Historical truth cannot be decreed. It is uncovered excavation by excavation, until the last stone is lifted,” he said.
It was not until November 2024, 80 years after the atrocity, that France acknowledged the massacre had occurred.
The French corps of “Senegalese riflemen” — created during the Second Empire (1852-1870) and disbanded in the 1960s — comprised soldiers from former French colonies in Africa, notably Senegal, Ivory Coast and what are now Mali and Burkina Faso.
The term “Senegalese rifleman” eventually came to refer to all African soldiers fighting under the French flag.
They took part in both world wars and the wars of decolonization.
 


Russian barrage causes blackouts in Ukraine as Zelensky seeks Trump’s help

Russian barrage causes blackouts in Ukraine as Zelensky seeks Trump’s help
Updated 17 October 2025

Russian barrage causes blackouts in Ukraine as Zelensky seeks Trump’s help

Russian barrage causes blackouts in Ukraine as Zelensky seeks Trump’s help
  • kraine's President Zelensky accused Russia of using cluster munitions and conducting repeated strikes on the same target to hit emergency crews repairing damaged electric grid
  • Zelensky was due to meet on Friday with US President Trump, who calls on Russian President Vladimir Putin to end the war had been ignored

KYIV, Ukraine: Russia battered Ukraine’s energy facilities with hundreds of drones and dozens of missiles in its latest heavy bombardment of the country’s power grid, authorities said Thursday, as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky prepared to ask President Donald Trump at a White House meeting for more American-made air defenses and long-range missiles.
As he considers Zelensky’s push for US missiles, Trump said after Thursday’s call with Russian President Vladimir Putin that they will meet in Budapest, Hungary to try to bring the war to an end. No date for the meeting has been set.
Trump said in a post on Truth Social that he will discuss his call with Putin “and much more” when he meets Zelensky on Friday, adding that “I believe great progress was made with today’s telephone conversation.”
Meanwhile, eight Ukrainian regions experienced blackouts after the barrage, Ukraine’s national energy operator, Ukrenergo, said. DTEK, the country’s largest private energy company, reported outages in the capital, Kyiv, and said it had to stop its natural gas extraction in the central Poltava region due to the strikes. Natural gas infrastructure was damaged for the sixth time this month, Naftogaz, Ukraine’s state-owned oil and gas company, said.
Russia fires hundreds of drones and 37 missiles
Zelensky said Russia fired more than 300 drones and 37 missiles at Ukraine overnight. He accused Russia of using cluster munitions and conducting repeated strikes on the same target to hit emergency crews and engineers working to repair the grid.
“This fall, the Russians are using every single day to strike our energy infrastructure,” Zelensky said on Telegram.
The Ukrainian power grid been one of Russia’s main targets since its invasion of its neighbor more than three years ago. Attacks increase as the bitterly cold months approach in a Russian strategy that Ukrainian officials call “weaponizing winter.” Russia says it aims only at targets of military value.
Ukraine has hit back by targeting oil refineries and related infrastructure that are crucial for Russia’s economy and war effort. Ukraine’s general staff said Thursday its forces struck Saratov oil refinery, in the Russian region of the same name, for the second time in two months. The facility is located some 500 kilometers (300 miles) from the Ukrainian border. Moscow made no immediate comment on the claim.
Ukraine seeks air defenses and attack missiles
Ukrainian forces have resisted Russia’s bigger and better-equipped army, limiting it to a grinding war of attrition along the roughly 1,000-kilometer (600-mile) front line snaking through eastern and southern regions.
But Ukraine, which is almost the size of Texas, is hard to defend from the air in its entirety, and Kyiv officials are seeking more Western help to fend against aerial attacks and strike back at Russia.
Zelensky was expected to arrive in the United States on Thursday, ahead of his Oval Office meeting with Trump on Friday.
Ukraine is seeking cruise missiles, air defense systems and joint drone production agreements from the United States, Kyiv officials say. Zelensky also wants tougher international economic sanctions on Moscow.
The visit comes amid signs that Trump is leaning toward stepping up pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin to break the deadlock in US-led peace efforts.
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Wednesday in Brussels that if Russia won’t budge from its objections and refuses to negotiate a peace deal, Washington “will take the steps necessary to impose costs on Russia for its continued aggression.”
Also, Trump said Wednesday that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi personally assured him that his country would stop buying Russian oil. That would deny Moscow income it needs to keep fighting in Ukraine.
Washington has hesitated over providing Ukraine with long-range missiles, such as Tomahawks, out of concern that such a step could escalate the war and deepen tensions between the United States and Russia.
But Trump has been frustrated by his inability to force an end to the war in Ukraine and has expressed impatience with Putin, whom he increasingly describes as the primary obstacle to a resolution.
The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, said in an assessment published late Wednesday that sending Tomahawks to Ukraine would not escalate the war and would only “mirror Russia’s own use of … long-range cruise missiles against Ukraine.”
Ukraine engages with American defense companies
Meanwhile, Ukraine’s Economy Ministry said Thursday it has signed a memorandum of understanding with US company Bell Textron Inc. to cooperate in aviation technology.
The Fort Worth, Texas-based aerospace and defense company will open an office in Ukraine and establish a center for assembly and testing, while exchanging know-how and training Ukrainians in the United States, according to a ministry statement.
Ukraine, unsure what it can expect from Western allies, is keen to develop its own arms industry.
On Wednesday, a Ukrainian government delegation met during a US visit with prominent American weapons manufacturers Lockheed Martin and Raytheon.
 


Afghanistan’s Taliban government blames Pakistan for twin drone strikes on Kabul

Afghanistan’s Taliban government blames Pakistan for twin drone strikes on Kabul
Updated 17 October 2025

Afghanistan’s Taliban government blames Pakistan for twin drone strikes on Kabul

Afghanistan’s Taliban government blames Pakistan for twin drone strikes on Kabul
  • The truce announced by the two sides Wednesday followed appeals from major regional powers, as the violence threatened to destabilize a region where groups, including the Daesh group and Al-Qaeda, are trying to resurface

KABUL, Afghanistan: Afghanistan’s Taliban government said Thursday that Pakistan had carried out two drone strikes on Kabul the previous day, just before the two neighbors announced a ceasefire following days of fighting that killed dozens in both countries and injured hundreds more.
The truce Wednesday brought at least a temporary halt to the deadliest clashes between the neighbors since 2021, when the Taliban seized power in Afghanistan following the collapse of the Western-backed government as the US and NATO forces were withdrawing after 20 years of war.
There was no immediate response in Islamabad to the latest accusations from Kabul and it was not immediately clear how this would affect the ceasefire, which was welcomed Thursday by the United Nations as it urged both sides to bring a lasting end to hostilities.
Pakistani officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss ongoing operations, had earlier told The Associated Press that Pakistani forces had targeted militant hideouts on Wednesday.
Khalid Zadran, a spokesman for the Kabul police chief, told The Associated Press that the strikes hit the city on Wednesday afternoon. He said the drones hit a civilian house and a market. Zadran did not give casualty figures, but hospital doctors said earlier that five people were killed and dozens were injured.
The surgical center run by Emergency, a nongovernmental organization, said people had suffered shrapnel wounds, blunt force trauma, and burns. Zabihullah Mujahid, the Taliban government’s chief spokesman, initially said there had been an oil tanker explosion.
Cross-border violence has escalated since Oct. 10, with both Islamabad and Kabul saying they were retaliating to armed provocations from the other.
The truce announced by the two sides Wednesday followed appeals from major regional powers, as the violence threatened to destabilize a region where groups, including the Daesh group and Al-Qaeda, are trying to resurface. There were no reports of overnight fighting. Key border crossings remained closed on Thursday.
The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan welcomed the ceasefire. It said the heaviest toll was in the south on Wednesday.
The mission, known as UNAMA, said on Thursday that 37 civilians were killed and 425 were wounded in Afghanistan as a result of cross-border clashes with Pakistan this week. The casualties took place in Paktya, Paktika, Kunar, Khost, Kandahar and Helmand provinces, it said.
It said it has also documented at least 16 civilian casualties in several Afghan provinces during earlier clashes between the two countries.
“UNAMA calls on all parties to bring a lasting end to hostilities to protect civilians and prevent further loss of life,” the mission added.
Pakistan has not provided figures for civilian casualties suffered on its side of the border. Islamabad has repeatedly accused Afghanistan of harboring militants, a charge rejected by the Taliban. Pakistan is grappling with attacks that have increased since 2021.
Pakistani officials said security forces had shot and killed dozens of militants who crossed over from Afghanistan on Thursday. They were spotted in Mohmand district, northwest Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, according to the officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the media.
The two countries share a 2,611-kilometer (1,622-mile) long border known as the Durand Line, which Afghanistan has never recognized.


Ex-Trump national security adviser Bolton charged with storing and sharing classified information

Ex-Trump national security adviser Bolton charged with storing and sharing classified information
Updated 17 October 2025

Ex-Trump national security adviser Bolton charged with storing and sharing classified information

Ex-Trump national security adviser Bolton charged with storing and sharing classified information
  • 18-count indictment alleges Bolton shared classified information with two unnamed family members, alsosuggestclassified information was exposed when Bolton’s email account was hacked in 2021
  • Bolton is now the third Trump adversary prosecuted in the last month, amid concernsthe president was using his Justice Department to pursue political enemies and to spare allies from scrutiny

GREENBELT, Maryland: John Bolton, who served as President Donald Trump’s national security adviser during his first term and later became a vocal critic, was charged Thursday with storing top secret records at home and sharing with relatives diary-like notes about his time in government that officials said contained classified information.
The 18-count indictment also suggests classified information was exposed when operatives believed linked to the Iranian regime hacked Bolton’s email account in 2021 and gained access to sensitive material he had shared. A Bolton representative told the FBI that his emails had been hacked, prosecutors say, but did not reveal that he had shared classified information through the account or that the hackers now had possession of government secrets.
The indictment sets the stage for a closely watched court case centering on a longtime fixture in Republican foreign policy circles who became known for his hawkish views on American power and who served for more than a year in Trump’s first administration before being fired in 2019 and emerging as a harsh critic of the president. The investigation that produced the criminal case was well underway when Trump took office again this past January but burst into public view in August when the FBI searched his home in Maryland and his office in Washington
Bolton is now the third Trump adversary prosecuted in the last month, meaning the case will unfold against the backdrop of concerns the president is using his Justice Department to pursue political enemies and to spare allies from scrutiny. He foreshadowed that argument in a defiant statement Thursday in which he denied the charges and called them part of an “intensive effort” by Trump to “intimidate his opponents.”
“Now, I have become the latest target in weaponizing the Justice Department to charge those he deems to be his enemies with charges that were declined before or distort the facts,” Bolton said.
“The underlying facts in this case were investigated and resolved years ago. These charges stem from portions of Amb. Bolton’s personal diaries over his 45-year career — records that are unclassified, shared only with his immediate family, and known to the FBI as far back as 2021,” Bolton lawyer Abbe Lowell said in a separate statement. “Like many public officials throughout history, Amb. Bolton kept diaries — that is not a crime. We look forward to proving once again that Amb. Bolton did not unlawfully share or store any information.”
The case follows separate indictments over the last month accusing former FBI Director James Comey of lying to Congress and New York Attorney General Letitia James of committing bank fraud and making a false statement, charges they both deny. Both those cases were filed in federal court in Virginia by a prosecutor Trump hastily installed in the position after growing frustrated that investigations into high-profile enemies had not resulted in prosecution.
The Bolton case, by contrast, was filed in Maryland by a US attorney who before being elevated to the job had been a career prosecutor in the office.
The indictmen is significantly more detailed than the Comey or James cases. It alleges, for instance, that Bolton shared more than 1,000 pages of information about day-to-day activities with two unnamed family members and stored and shared sensitive information about foreign adversaries that in some cases revealed details about sources and methods used by the government to collect intelligence.
One document related to a foreign adversary’s plans for a missile launch, while another detailed US government plans for covert action and included intelligence blaming an adversary for an attack, court papers say.
“There is one tier of justice for all Americans,” Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement. “Anyone who abuses a position of power and jeopardizes our national security will be held accountable. No one is above the law.”
Questions about Bolton’s handling of classified information date back years. He faced a lawsuit and a Justice Department investigation after leaving office related to information in his 2020 book “The Room Where it Happened,” which portrayed Trump as grossly uninformed about foreign policy.
The Trump administration asserted that Bolton’s manuscript included classified information that could harm national security if exposed. Bolton’s lawyers have said he moved forward with the book after a White House National Security Council official, with whom Bolton had worked for months, said the manuscript no longer contained classified information.
A search warrant affidavit that was previously unsealed said a National Security Council official had reviewed the book manuscript and told Bolton in 2020 that it appeared to contain “significant amounts” of classified information, some at a top-secret level.
Lowell has said that many of the documents seized in August had been approved as part of a pre-publication review for Bolton’s book. He said many were decades old, from Bolton’s long career in the State Department, as an assistant attorney general and as the US ambassador to the United Nations.
Bolton also served in the Justice Department during President Ronald Reagan’s administration and was the State Department’s point man on arms control during George W. Bush’s presidency. Bolton was nominated by Bush to serve as US ambassador to the United Nations, but the strong supporter of the Iraq war was unable to win Senate confirmation and resigned after serving 17 months as a Bush recess appointment. That allowed him to hold the job on a temporary basis without Senate confirmation.
In 2018, Bolton was appointed to serve as Trump’s third national security adviser. But his brief tenure was characterized by disputes with the president over North Korea, Iran and Ukraine.
Those rifts ultimately led to Bolton’s departure, with Trump announcing on social media in September 2019 that he had accepted Bolton’s resignation. Bolton subsequently criticized Trump’s approach to foreign policy and government in his 2020 book, including by alleging that Trump directly tied providing military aid to Ukraine to that country’s willingness to conduct investigations into Joe Biden, who was soon to be Trump’s Democratic 2020 election rival, and members of his family.
Trump responded by slamming Bolton as a “washed-up guy” and a “crazy” warmonger who would have led the country into “World War Six.” Trump also said at the time that the book contained “highly classified information” and that Bolton “did not have approval” for publishing it.