FBI searches home and office of ex-Trump national security adviser John Bolton

FBI searches home and office of ex-Trump national security adviser John Bolton
FBI agents carry boxes as they exit the building that houses the Washington office of former national security adviser John Bolton. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 23 August 2025

FBI searches home and office of ex-Trump national security adviser John Bolton

FBI searches home and office of ex-Trump national security adviser John Bolton
  • Bolton emerged as an outspoken critic of President Donald Trump after being fired in 2019
  • Searches come as the Trump administration has moved to examine the activities of other critics

WASHINGTON: The FBI on Friday searched the Maryland home and Washington office of former Trump administration national security adviser John Bolton as part of a criminal investigation into the potential mishandling of classified information, a person familiar with the matter said.
Bolton, who emerged as an outspoken critic of President Donald Trump after being fired in 2019 and fought with the first Trump administration over a scathing book he wrote documenting his time in the White House, was not in custody Friday and has not been charged with any crimes, said the person who was not authorized to discuss the investigation by name and spoke to The Associated Press on the condition of anonymity.
The searches, seemingly the most significant public step the Justice Department has taken against a perceived enemy of the president, are likely to elicit fresh concerns that the Trump administration is using its law enforcement powers to target the Republican’s foes. They come as the Trump administration has moved to examine the activities of other critics, including by authorizing a grand jury investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe that dogged Trump for much of his first term, and as FBI and Justice Department leaders signal their loyalty to the president.

Speaking to reporters during an unscheduled visit to the White House Historical Association, Trump said he had seen news coverage of Friday’s searches and expected to be briefed about it by the Justice Department but also insisted he didn’t “want to know about it.”
“I could know about it. I could be the one starting it. I’m actually the chief law enforcement officer. But I feel that it’s better this way,” Trump said.
Bolton had said in interviews this year that he was mindful that he could be scrutinized, telling the AP in January shortly before Trump took office, “Anybody who ever disagrees with Trump has to worry about retribution. It’s a pretty long list.”
An FBI search like the one at Bolton’s properties requires authorization from a federal magistrate judge. It wasn’t immediately clear what information authorities submitted to demonstrate that they had probable cause of a crime, though the Justice Department years ago launched an investigation into whether Bolton improperly disclosed classified information in a book manuscript he had written. The inquiry was later closed.
Vice President JD Vance denied in an NBC News interview on Friday that Bolton was being targeted because of his criticism of Trump, “If there’s no crime here, we’re not going to prosecute it. If there is a crime here, of course, Ambassador Bolton will get his day in court. That’s how it should be.”
Bolton was in his office building at the time
Bolton was not home for the search of his home, but after it started, he was spotted Friday morning standing in the lobby of the Washington building where he keeps an office and talking to two people with “FBI” visible on their vests. He left a few minutes later and appeared to have gone upstairs in the building. Agents were seen taking bags into the office building through a back entrance.
Messages left with a spokesperson for Bolton were not immediately returned, and a lawyer who has represented Bolton had no immediate comment.
The Justice Department had no comment, but leaders appeared to cryptically refer to the searches in a series of social media posts Friday morning.
FBI Director Kash Patel, who included Bolton on a list of “members of the Executive Branch Deep State” in a 2023 book he wrote, posted on X: “NO ONE is above the law… @FBI agents on mission.” Attorney General Pam Bondi shared his post, adding: “America’s safety isn’t negotiable. Justice will be pursued. Always.”

The Justice Department is separately conducting mortgage fraud investigations into Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff of California and New York Attorney General Letitia James, who brought a civil fraud lawsuit against Trump and his company, and ex-Trump prosecutor Jack Smith faces an investigation from an independent watchdog office. Schiff and James have vigorously denied any wrongdoing through their lawyers.
The Bolton searches also unfolded against the backdrop of a 2022 search for classified documents at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, an action that produced since-dismissed criminal charges but remains the source of outrage for the president and supporters who insist he was unjustly targeted despite the retrieval of top-secret records.
Patel said in a Fox Business Channel interview this week that the Mar-a-Lago search represented a “total weaponization and politicization” of the bureau, and Trump himself referenced it on Friday, telling reporters: “I guess his house was raided today, but my house was raided, also.”
Trump and Bolton have been at odds for years
Bolton served as Trump’s third national security adviser for 17 months and clashed with him over Iran, Afghanistan and North Korea.
He faced scrutiny during the first Trump administration over a book he wrote about his time in government that officials argued disclosed classified information. To make its case, the Justice Department in 2020 submitted sworn statements from senior administration officials, including then-National Security Agency Director Paul Nakasone, asserting that Bolton’s manuscript included classified information that could harm national security if exposed.
Bolton’s lawyers have said he moved forward with the book after a White House National Security Council official, with whom Bolton had worked for months, said the manuscript no longer contained classified information.
The Biden administration Justice Department in 2021 abandoned its lawsuit and dropped a separate grand jury investigation, with Bolton’s lawyer calling the effort to block the book “politically motivated” and illegitimate.
Bolton’s harshly critical book, “The Room Where It Happened,” portrayed Trump as grossly ill-informed about foreign policy and said he “saw conspiracies behind rocks, and remained stunningly uninformed on how to run the White House, let alone the huge federal government.”
Trump responded by slamming Bolton as a “crazy” warmonger who would have led the country into “World War Six.”
Bolton served as US ambassador to the United Nations under President George W. Bush and also held positions in President Ronald Reagan’s administration. He considered running for president in 2012 and 2016.
Trump, on his first day back in office this year, revoked the security clearances of more than four dozen former intelligence officials, including Bolton. Bolton was also among a group of former Trump officials whose security details were canceled by Trump earlier this year.
In 2022, an Iranian operative was charged in a plot to kill Bolton in presumed retaliation for a 2020 US airstrike that killed the country’s most powerful general.
The handling of classified information by top government officials has been a politically loaded topic in recent years. Besides Trump, the Justice Department also investigated whether then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, mishandled classified information after serving as vice president in the Obama administration, and the FBI also recovered what it said were classified documents from the home of former Trump Vice President Mike Pence. Neither man was charged.


Indonesia turns down ear-splitting ‘haram’ street parties

Indonesia turns down ear-splitting ‘haram’ street parties
Updated 42 min 13 sec ago

Indonesia turns down ear-splitting ‘haram’ street parties

Indonesia turns down ear-splitting ‘haram’ street parties
  • Loudspeaker towers are commonplace on Indonesia’s main island of Java, but they have drawn the ire of local authorities and calm-seeking neighbors
  • An online backlash has forced authorities in East Java to issue an order limiting noise levels and specifying the times and locations loudspeakers can be used

MALANG, Indonesia: People in an Indonesian village watched as a tower of loudspeakers mounted on a truck rumbled through their usually serene home, blasting a thumping bass loud enough to crack windows.
Loudspeaker towers are commonplace on Indonesia’s main island of Java, blaring a repetitive mix of electronic tunes and traditional folk music at street parties, but they have drawn the ire of local authorities and calm-seeking neighbors.
The loudspeaker stacks have proven so disruptive that officials this month have restricted their use while religious bodies have declared excessive and damaging sound from them to be “haram,” or forbidden under Islamic law.
“The sound is booming from 1 p.m. to 3 am. They play loud music and drink alcohol,” Ahmad Suliyat, a resident of Ngantru village in East Java province, told AFP.
“It’s really disturbing.”
Indonesians in East Java have shared videos on social media of cracked walls, falling roof tiles and damaged stores caused by the noise impact known as “sound horeg,” which loosely means to move or vibrate in Javanese.
The online backlash forced authorities in East Java to issue an order this month limiting noise levels and specifying the times and locations loudspeakers can be used.
“It was made for health and security reasons. The noise level must be regulated so it will not disturb the public peace and order,” East Java governor Khofifah Indar Parawansa told AFP.

This photo taken on August 9, 2025 shows costumed dancers performing as they follow a truck mounted with a tower of subwoofers and spotlights during a "sound horeg", which loosely means to move or vibrate in Javanese, held as part of Indonesia's 80th Independence Day celebrations in Malang, East Java. (AFP)


Ear-splitting noise has been shown to have adverse health consequences, including a higher risk of heart conditions for those exposed.
And Indonesia’s loudspeaker towers, popular for little more than a decade in the world’s most populous Muslim nation, have had dire consequences for some who attend the deafening street gatherings.
A woman died this month after allegedly suffering cardiac arrest caused by loudspeaker towers at a carnival she attended, local media reported, while there has been an increase in hearing problems among those attending the events.
The East Java government has capped sound system levels at 120 decibels, while mobile units used in parades or protests are limited to 85 decibels.
Mobile units are also banned from being used near schools, hospitals, ambulances and places of worship that are in session.
In July, a local Islamic council issued a religious edict that said excessive sound at parties that is capable of causing damage is forbidden by religion.
“The use of a sound system excessively, especially during a wedding convoy, or any other events that cause noise, disturb road users, or make people neglect worshipping, is haram,” read the fatwa.
Locals typically rent the speaker towers for weddings, circumcisions and Independence Day events — all celebrations that can last until dawn.
Some like Daini, who goes by one name like many Indonesians, believe the loudspeakers are a local tradition that should be kept.
She glanced at her cracked window, held together by duct tape, as music blared from the truck in Ngantru.
“The glass cracked during a sound horeg event last year. But that’s OK, people here like loud events,” said the 61-year-old.

 

This photo taken on August 9, 2025 shows costumed dancers performing as they follow a truck mounted with a tower of subwoofers and spotlights during a "sound horeg", which loosely means to move or vibrate in Javanese, held as part of Indonesia's 80th Independence Day celebrations in Malang, East Java. (AFP)

But loudspeakers have continued blasting above the new limits, due to lax enforcement by local authorities.
After the rules were issued, an AFP journalist heard loudspeaker towers blaring music at an East Javan event as authorities watched on.
The World Health Organization says sound at 85 decibels and above can cause hearing damage over time, and anything above 120 decibels can cause immediate harm.
Some Indonesians posted screenshots online of apps registering loudspeaker sound levels as high as 130 decibels.
Operators of loudspeaker towers argue they are responding to demand that generates revenue for local businesses.
“I believe most people who dislike sound horeg are not from here,” David Stevan Laksamana, a 40-year-old loudspeaker rental owner in Malang, told AFP.
“In Malang alone, it employed tens of thousands of people. This business is helping the economy.”
Others who cannot stand the disruptive street parties fear reporting them, with some loudspeaker tower owners reportedly parking outside complainants’ houses to blare music for hours.
“I never complain to the village head,” said Ahmad.
“I just keep quiet. I’m afraid of intimidation if I say anything.”
 


Taiwan, China battle it out in competing World War Two narratives

Taiwan, China battle it out in competing World War Two narratives
Updated 24 August 2025

Taiwan, China battle it out in competing World War Two narratives

Taiwan, China battle it out in competing World War Two narratives
  • Taiwan says China falsely claiming communists had leading role fighting Japan
  • China hits back at what it sees as distorting of communist party’s role
  • Taiwan calls on its people not to go to China’s parade set for next month to mark war’s end

TAIPEI: Veteran Pan Cheng-fa says he clearly remembers fighting for China against the Japanese in World War Two, but gets agitated when asked about the role of communist forces who at the time were in an uneasy alliance with his republican government.
“We gave them weapons, equipment — we strengthened them,” Pan, 99, said at an event in Taiwan’s capital Taipei to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two.
As China gears up for a mass military parade in Beijing next month to mark the war’s end, both Taiwan — whose formal name remains Republic of China — and the People’s Republic of China are locked in an increasingly bitter war of words about historical narrative and who should really be claiming credit for the victory.
Fighting in China began in earnest in 1937 with the full-scale Japanese invasion and continued until the surrender of Japan in 1945, when the island of Taiwan was handed over to the Republic of China after decades of Japanese rule.
“After Japan was taken down, (the communists’) next target was the Republic of China,” Pan added, referring to the resumption of the civil war which led to the victory of Mao Zedong’s forces and flight of the republican government to Taiwan in 1949.

The ruling Chinese Communist Party often reminds people of its struggle against the Japanese, but a lot of the fighting was done by the forces of Chiang Kai-shek’s republican government, and it was the Republic of China who signed the peace agreement as one of the allied nations.
“During the Republic of China’s war of resistance against Japan, the People’s Republic of China did not even exist, but the Chinese communist regime has in recent years repeatedly distorted the facts, claiming it was the Communist Party who led the war of resistance,” Taiwan’s top China-policy maker Chiu Chui-cheng said on August 15, the Japanese surrender anniversary.

A wreath lies during an event to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two at Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall in Taipei, Taiwan, August 16, 2025. (REUTERS)

The Mainland Affairs Council, which Chiu heads, said this month that the communists’ strategy at the time was “70 percent about strengthening themselves, 20 percent dealing with republican government and 10 percent about opposing Japan,” repeating an old wartime accusation against Mao the Chinese Communist Party has denied.
Taiwan’s own anniversary events are much more low key, and don’t mention the role of the communists apart from to lambaste them.
A defense ministry concert on Thursday night in Taipei featured performers dressed as World War Two-era republican soldiers, images of the Flying Tigers — volunteer US pilots who flew for the republican Chinese air force — and rap by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One.
“History affirms that the War of Resistance was led and won by the Republic of China,” the ministry said a performance program.
China has hit back at what it sees as misrepresentation of the Chinese Communist Party’s role.
On Tuesday, the party’s official People’s Daily wrote in an online commentary that vigilance was needed against efforts to “distort and falsify the Chinese Communist Party’s role as the country’s backbone” in fighting Japan.
China says the victory belongs to all Chinese people, including those in Taiwan, and is also celebrating the fact the war’s end in 1945 led to Taiwan — a Japanese colony from 1895 — being “returned” to Chinese rule as part of the peace agreement.

Caption

Taiwan says nothing in any agreements talked about handing over Taiwan to the Chinese Communist Party-run People’s Republic of China which was only founded in late 1949.
Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te marked the surrender anniversary of August 15 with a Facebook post saying aggression will be defeated, in a pointed reference to Beijing’s military threats against the island.
The People’s Republic of China says it is the successor state to the Republic of China and that Taiwan is an inherent part of Beijing’s territory, a view Taipei’s government vehemently opposes.
Taiwan’s government has urged its people not to attend China’s military parade, warning against reinforcing Beijing’s territorial claims and backing its version of what the anniversary means.
Veteran Pan, who says family members left behind after the civil war were brutalized while he escaped to Taiwan, sees Beijing’s parade as having nothing to do with him.
“I can’t say anything good about the communists,” he said.


UK’s mass facial-recognition roll-out alarms rights groups

UK’s mass facial-recognition roll-out alarms rights groups
Updated 24 August 2025

UK’s mass facial-recognition roll-out alarms rights groups

UK’s mass facial-recognition roll-out alarms rights groups
  • Britain is theonly European country to deploy the technology on a large scale as apolicing tool
  • Big Brother Watchworried thatsuch mass data capture “treats us like a nation of suspects”

 

LONDON: Outside supermarkets or in festival crowds, millions are now having their features scanned by real-time facial-recognition systems in the UK — the only European country to deploy the technology on a large scale.
At London’s Notting Hill Carnival, where two million people are expected to celebrate Afro-Caribbean culture over Sunday and Monday, facial-recognition cameras are being deployed near entrances and exits.
The police said their objective was to identify and intercept wanted individuals by scanning faces in large crowds and comparing them with thousands of suspects already in the police database.
The technology is “an effective policing tool which has already been successfully used to locate offenders at crime hotspots resulting in well over 1,000 arrests since the start of 2024,” said Metropolitan Police chief Mark Rowley.
The technology was first tested in 2016 and its use has increased considerably over the past three years in the United Kingdom.
Some 4.7 million faces were scanned in 2024 alone, according to the NGO Liberty.
UK police have deployed the live facial-recognition system around 100 times since late January, compared to only 10 between 2016 and 2019.

Examples include before two Six Nations rugby games and outside two Oasis concerts in Cardiff in July.
When a person on a police “watchlist” passes near the cameras, the AI-powered system, often set up in a police van, triggers an alert.
The suspect can then be immediately detained once police checks confirm their identity.

“Nation of suspects”

But such mass data capture on the streets of London, also seen during the coronation of King Charles III in 2023, “treats us like a nation of suspects,” said the Big Brother Watch organization.

“There is no legislative basis, so we have no safeguards to protect our rights, and the police is left to write its own rules,” Rebecca Vincent, its interim director, told AFP.
Its private use by supermarkets and clothing stores to combat the sharp rise in shoplifting has also raised concerns, with “very little information” available about how the data is being used, she added.
Most use Facewatch, a service provider that compiles a list of suspected offenders in the stores it monitors and raises an alert if one of them enters the premises.
“It transforms what it is to live in a city, because it removes the possibility of living anonymously,” said Daragh Murray, a lecturer in human rights law at Queen Mary University of London.
“That can have really big implications for protests but also participation in political and cultural life,” he added.
Often, those using such stores do not know that they are being profiled.
“They should make people aware of it,” Abigail Bevon, a 26-year-old forensic scientist, told AFP by the entrance of a London store using Facewatch.
She said she was “very surprised” to find out how the technology was being used.
While acknowledging that it could be useful for the police, she complained that its deployment by retailers was “invasive.”

“Invasive tech”
Since February, EU legislation governing artificial intelligence has prohibited the use of real-time facial recognition technologies, with exceptions such as counterterrorism.
Apart from a few cases in the United States, “we do not see anything even close in European countries or other democracies,” stressed Vincent.
“The use of such invasive tech is more akin to what we see in authoritarian states such as China,” she added.
Interior minister Yvette Cooper recently promised that a “legal framework” governing its use would be drafted, focusing on “the most serious crimes.”
But her ministry this month authorized police forces to use the technology in seven new regions.
Usually placed in vans, permanent cameras are also scheduled to be installed for the first time in Croydon, south London, next month.
Police assure that they have “robust safeguards,” such as disabling the cameras when officers are not present and deleting the biometric data of those who are not suspects.
However, the UK’s human rights regulator said on Wednesday that the Metropolitan Police’s policy on using the technology was “unlawful” because it was “incompatible” with rights regulations.
Eleven organizations, including Human Rights Watch, wrote a letter to the Metropolitan Police chief, urging him not to use it during Notting Hill Carnival, accusing him of “unfairly targeting” the Afro-Caribbean community while highlighting the racial biases of AI.
Shaun Thompson, a 39-year-old black man living in London, said he was arrested after being wrongly identified as a criminal by one of these cameras and has filed an appeal against the police.


Ukraine drone attack causes fire, capacity reduction at Russia’s Kursk nuclear power plant

Ukraine drone attack causes fire, capacity reduction at Russia’s Kursk nuclear power plant
Updated 24 August 2025

Ukraine drone attack causes fire, capacity reduction at Russia’s Kursk nuclear power plant

Ukraine drone attack causes fire, capacity reduction at Russia’s Kursk nuclear power plant
  • Fire caused by falling drone thatwas shot down by Russian air defense systems, said the plant’s press service in a statement
  • There were no injuries, but as a result of the denotation, one unit of the plant was reduced to 50 percent capacity, the statement added

A Ukrainian drone attack sparked a short-lived fire at the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant, damaged an auxiliary transformer and led to reduction in the operating capacity at one of the plant’s units, the plant’s press service reported early on Sunday.
“A combat unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) belonging to the Armed Forces of Ukraine was shot down by air defense systems near the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant,” the press service said in a statement on the Telegram messaging app.
“Upon impact, the drone detonated, resulting in damage to an auxiliary transformer.”
The press service added that there were no injuries, but as a result of the denotation, unit three of the plant was reduced to 50 percent capacity. The destroyed drone also sparked a fire that has since been extinguished, the press service said.
Radiation levels at the site and in the surrounding area have not exceeded normal limits, the press service added.
There was no immediate comment from Ukraine. Kyiv has said its strikes inside Russia are in response to Russia’s continued attacks on Ukraine and are aimed at destroying infrastructure deemed crucial to Moscow’s overall military efforts.
Reuters could not independently verify the report. It was not immediately clear at what part of the plant the fire occurred.
Earlier, Russia’s federal free-to-air television network REN TV reported, citing the plant’s press service, that the transformer is not a part of the nuclear section of the plant.


Pentagon restricts Ukraine’s use of US missiles against Russia, WSJ reports

Pentagon restricts Ukraine’s use of US missiles against Russia, WSJ reports
Updated 24 August 2025

Pentagon restricts Ukraine’s use of US missiles against Russia, WSJ reports

Pentagon restricts Ukraine’s use of US missiles against Russia, WSJ reports
  • As the White House sought to persuade Putin to join peace talks, an approval process was put in place at the Pentagon has kept Ukraine from launching strikes deep into Russian territory, the Journal said

WASHINGTON: The Pentagon has been quietly blocking Ukraine from using US-made long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to strike targets inside Russia, limiting Kyiv’s ability to employ these weapons in its defense against Moscow’s invasion, the Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday, citing US officials.
Reuters could not immediately verify the report.
The news came as US President Donald Trump has grown more frustrated publicly over the three-year-old war and his inability to secure a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine.
After his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin and a subsequent meeting with European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky failed to produce observable progress, Trump said on Friday that he was again considering
slapping Russia with economic sanctions or, alternatively, walking away from the peace process.
“I’m going to make a decision as to what we do and it’s going to be, it’s going to be a very important decision, and that’s whether or not it’s massive sanctions or massive tariffs or both, or we do nothing and say it’s your fight,” Trump said.
Trump had hoped to arrange a bilateral meeting between Putin and Zelensky, but that has also proven difficult. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told NBC on Friday that there was no agenda in place for a sitdown with Zelensky.
“Putin is ready to meet with Zelensky when the agenda would be ready for a summit. And this agenda is not ready at all,” Lavrov told NBC, saying no meeting was planned for now.
As the White House sought to persuade Putin to join peace talks, an approval process put in place at the Pentagon has kept Ukraine from launching strikes deep into Russian territory, the Journal reported.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has final say over use of the long-range weapons, the Journal said.
Neither Ukraine’s presidential office nor the defense ministry immediately responded to Reuters’ request for a comment outside business hours. The White House and the Pentagon also did not immediately respond to requests for comment.