Evacuees in Philippines, Taiwan take shelter as super typhoon nears

Evacuees in Philippines, Taiwan take shelter as super typhoon nears
Short Url
Updated 10 sec ago

Evacuees in Philippines, Taiwan take shelter as super typhoon nears

Evacuees in Philippines, Taiwan take shelter as super typhoon nears
  • Philippine weather bureau says the typhoon was focused on the northern tip of the Philippines
  • In Taiwan, small-scale evacuations were ongoing in mountainous areas near Pingtung

MANILA: Hundreds of families sheltered in schools and evacuation centers on Monday as heavy rains and gale-force winds from Super Typhoon Ragasa lashed the northern Philippines and southern Taiwan.
The typhoon, named Nando by the Philippine weather bureau PAGASA, is gaining strength as it proceeds on a collision course with southern China, and was expected to make landfall over the Philippines’ Babuyan Islands by around midday.
The sparsely populated islands lie about 740 kilometers (460 miles) south of Taiwan in the Luzon Strait.
As of 8:00 a.m. (0000 GMT), maximum sustained winds of 215 kilometers per hour were reported at the storm’s center, with gusts reaching up to 265 kph as it moved toward the archipelago nation, the national weather service said.
“We are now experiencing strong winds here in northern Cagayan,” provincial disaster chief Rueli Rapsing told AFP, saying they were prepared for “the worst.”
“Since the super typhoon will traverse Calayan, we are very focused on that area,” he said of a town in the far north province.
In Taiwan, small-scale evacuations were ongoing in mountainous areas near Pingtung, local fire department officer James Wu told AFP.
“What worries us more is that the damage could be similar to what happened during Typhoon Koinu two years ago,” he added, describing a storm that saw utility poles collapse and sheet-metal roofs sent flying into the air.
Schools and government offices were closed Monday in the Manila region and across 29 Philippine provinces in anticipation of heavy rainfall.
Government weather specialist John Grender Almario said Sunday that “severe flooding and landslides” could be expected in the northern areas of the main island Luzon.
The threat of flooding from Ragasa comes just a day after thousands of Filipinos took to the streets to protest a growing corruption scandal involving flood control projects that were shabbily constructed or never completed.
A day of largely peaceful demonstrations turned violent in the afternoon and early evening as rock-throwing protesters clashed with police, leading to more than 70 arrests.
The Philippines is the first major landmass facing the Pacific cyclone belt, and the archipelago is hit by an average of 20 storms and typhoons each year, putting millions of people in disaster-prone areas in a state of constant poverty.
Scientists warn that storms are becoming more powerful as the world warms due to the effects of human-driven climate change.


US lawmakers push for military dialogue in a rare China visit

US lawmakers push for military dialogue in a rare China visit
Updated 22 September 2025

US lawmakers push for military dialogue in a rare China visit

US lawmakers push for military dialogue in a rare China visit
  • Premier Li Qiangwelcomed the delegates led by Rep. Adam Smith and called it an “icebreaking trip that will further the ties between the two countries”
  • US-China relations have taken a downturn since Trump’s first term and have been hobbled by trade tensions, Taiwan, Russia and South China Sea issues

BANGKOK: A bipartisan group of US lawmakers pushed for more military-to-military dialogue in a meeting Sunday with China’s Premier Li Qiang, a rare congressional visit since the US-China relations soured.
The last trip by a group of senators was in 2023, and Sunday’s delegation was the first from the House of Representatives to visit Beijing since 2019.
Li welcomed the delegates led by Rep. Adam Smith and called it an “icebreaking trip that will further the ties between the two countries.”
“It is important for our two countries to have more exchanges and cooperation, this is not only good for our two countries but also of great significance to the world,” Li said.
Smith, a Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, said both sides were in agreement on the overarching aim of the visit.
“Certainly, trade and economy is on the top of the list ... (but also) we’re very focused on our military-to-military conversations,” he said in opening remarks. “As a member of the Armed Services Committee, I’m deeply concerned that our two militaries don’t communicate more.”
The delegation also included Michael Baumgartner, a Republican member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, as well as Ro Khanna and Chrissy Houlahan, both Democrats on the House Armed Services Committee. The lawmakers are in China until Thursday.
US-China relations have taken a downturn since President Donald Trump’s first term and have been hobbled by trade tensions, the status of the self-ruled island of Taiwan, which China claims as its own territory, Beijing’s support for Russia and China’s vast claims in the disputed South China Sea.
“China and the US are the two most powerful and influential countries in the world, it’s really important that we get along, and we find a way to peacefully coexist in the world,” Smith said. “I really welcome your remarks about wanting to build and strengthen that relationship.”
Trump said he would meet Chinese leader Xi Jinping at a regional summit taking place at the end of October in South Korea and will visit China in the “early part of next year,” following a lengthy phone call between the two on Friday.


S.Sudan opposition says misidentified prisoner as leader’s bodyguard

S.Sudan opposition says misidentified prisoner as leader’s bodyguard
Updated 22 September 2025

S.Sudan opposition says misidentified prisoner as leader’s bodyguard

S.Sudan opposition says misidentified prisoner as leader’s bodyguard
  • The opposition says Kiir is seeking to consolidate power and has effectively destroyed a 2018 power-sharing deal that ended a devastating five-year civil war in which some 400,000 people died

NAIROBI: South Sudan’s opposition said Saturday it had misidentified a prisoner in a photograph as a bodyguard of its leader who died in custody amid widespread arrests of their supporters.
In a statement, the opposition said the leader’s office had been given an old photo and wrongly believed it showed the death in custody of Luka Gathok Nyuon.
The opposition had previously identified Nyuon as a bodyguard to the opposition leader and ex-vice president Riek Machar.
“It has come to my attention that this photo was in fact taken few years back in Rumbek prison and does not... (show) our fallen comrade,” opposition SPLA-IO party spokesman Lam Paul Gabriel said in a statement, without giving details on the bodyguard’s current circumstances.
The statement on X said Nyuon “passed on in detention in Juba.”
The government of President Salva Kiir has locked up dozens of opposition members in recent months, accusing them of fomenting violence.
The opposition says Kiir is seeking to consolidate power and has effectively destroyed a 2018 power-sharing deal that ended a devastating five-year civil war in which some 400,000 people died.
Machar, Kiir’s long-time rival, has been stripped of his position as vice president in the unity government and will appear in court from Monday on charges of treason and crimes against humanity.
He is accused of coordinating an attack on a military base by the White Army, a militia group from his ethnic Nuer community, which his party denies.
His supporters accused the government of locking up more than 100 “officials and officers” from Machar’s entourage “under very harsh conditions including torture, starvation and denial of medical care.”
South Sudan, one of the poorest countries in the world, has suffered chronic instability since it became independent from Sudan in 2011.

 


Russian official says Ukrainian drones kill three, injure 16 in Crimea resort area

Russian official says Ukrainian drones kill three, injure 16 in Crimea resort area
Updated 22 September 2025

Russian official says Ukrainian drones kill three, injure 16 in Crimea resort area

Russian official says Ukrainian drones kill three, injure 16 in Crimea resort area
  • The Moscow-appointed head of Crimea said that a school in the town was also damaged and falling drone debris sparked fire
  • Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 in the aftermath of a popular uprising in Kyiv that prompted a Moscow-friendly president to flee

A Ukrainian drone attack on a resort area of the Crimea peninsula killed three people and injured 16, the area’s top official said, in an attack denounced by Moscow.
Sergei Aksyonov, the Moscow-appointed head of Crimea, seized and annexed from Ukraine by Russia in 2014, gave the toll from the town of Faros in a Telegram post.
The Russian Defense Ministry said: “At about 19:30 Moscow time (1630 GMT) in the resort area of Crimea where there are no military targets whatsoever, the Ukrainian armed forces launched a terrorist strike using strike drones equipped with high-explosive payloads.”
The ministry described the incident as a “premeditated terrorist attack on a civilian target.”
Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova denounced the incident as “yet another act of terrorism by the Kyiv regime.
“And NATO and the European Union, when seeking the aggressor on the European continent, need to look into the mirror to see this,” she told the TASS news agency.
“They are the ones driving destabilization and the spread of terrorism in Europe by virtue of their sponsorship of the Kyiv regime and as supplier of arms to it.”
Ukrainian officials issued no comment on the incident and Reuters could not independently verify the report.
Aksyonov had earlier said that a school in the town was also damaged and falling drone debris sparked fires on open ground near Yalta along Crimea’s southern shore.
Mikhail Rozvozhayev, governor of Sevastopol, the home port of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, wrote on Telegram that anti-aircraft units had downed three drones in the area.
Russia annexed and incorporated Crimea into its territory in 2014 in the aftermath of a popular uprising in Kyiv that prompted a Russia-friendly president to flee Ukraine.
Subtropical Crimea has been a popular holiday area since Soviet times for both tourists and the Soviet and the elite.
Krymsky Veter, an independent website devoted to Crimean affairs, said senior officials were likely staying in the region’s guest houses.
Foros gained international notoriety in 1991 when Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev was briefly detained at a government dacha, or country house, during a shortlived attempt by hard-liners to unseat him. 

 


‘Fast and furious’: H-1B workers abroad race to US as Trump order sparks dismay, confusion

‘Fast and furious’: H-1B workers abroad race to US as Trump order sparks dismay, confusion
Updated 22 September 2025

‘Fast and furious’: H-1B workers abroad race to US as Trump order sparks dismay, confusion

‘Fast and furious’: H-1B workers abroad race to US as Trump order sparks dismay, confusion
  • On the popular Chinese social media app Rednote, people on H-1B visas shared their experiences of having to rush back to the US — in some cases just hours after landing in China or another country

SAN FRANCISCO/NEW YORK: Panic, confusion and anger reigned as workers on H-1B visas from India and China were forced to abandon travel plans and rush back to the US after President Donald Trump imposed new visa fees, in line with his wide-ranging immigration crackdown.
Tech companies and banks sent urgent memos to employees, advising them to return before a deadline of 12:01 a.m. EDT on Sunday (0401 GMT), and telling them not to leave the country.
A White House official on Saturday clarified that the order applied only to new applicants and not holders of existing visas or those seeking renewals, addressing some of the confusion over who would be affected by the order.
But Trump’s proclamation a day before had already set off alarm bells in Silicon Valley.

RUSH BACK TO US
Fearing they would not be allowed back once the new rule took effect, several Indian nationals at San Francisco airport said they cut short vacations.
“It is a situation where we had to choose between family and staying here,” said an engineer at a large tech company whose wife had been on an Emirates flight from San Francisco to Dubai that was scheduled to depart at 5:05 p.m. local time on Friday (0005 GMT on Saturday)
The flight was delayed by more than three hours after several Indian passengers who received news of the order or memos from their employers demanded to deplane, said the person who spoke on condition of anonymity. At least five passengers were eventually allowed off, the engineer said.
A video of the incident was circulating on social media, showing a few people leaving the plane. Reuters could not independently verify the veracity of the video.
The engineer’s wife, also an H-1B visa holder, chose to head to India to care for her sick mother.
“It’s quite tragic. We have built a life here,” he told Reuters.
On the popular Chinese social media app Rednote, people on H-1B visas shared their experiences of having to rush back to the US — in some cases just hours after landing in China or another country.
“My feelings are a mix of disappointment, sadness, and frustration,” said one woman in a post with a user handle “Emily’s Life in NY.”
The woman said she had boarded a United Airlines flight from New York to Paris, and it started taxiing, but after some back-and-forth with the airline the captain agreed to return to the gate to let her off the aircraft.
Feeling what she described to Reuters as “shaken,” she canceled her trip to France, abandoning plans with friends, including some who were flying in from China, after she received a letter from her company’s lawyers asking employees abroad to return to the US
Companies including Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet and Goldman Sachs were among those that sent urgent emails to their employees with travel adviseries.
Amazon gave guidance to staff on Saturday, after clarity emerged on who would be impacted, that no action was required for staff currently holding H-1B visas, according to a source who had viewed an internal portal. Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment outside business hours.
As of Sunday, some of the panic had dissipated, said IBM Vice Chairman Gary Cohn, on CBS’s “Face the Nation” program.
“I think it caused a panic over the weekend because people weren’t sure what was going on with the existing H-1B visas,” said Cohn. “It’s been cleaned up over the weekend, so at this point, there’s not a panic in the system.”
Cohn praised the move as ultimately good for the economy.
“I actually think this is a good idea, if you understand the H-1B visa program in the United States,” Cohn said. “Historically, it has been a lottery system.”

TRUMP’S U-TURN ON H-1B
Since taking office in January, Trump has kicked off a wide-ranging immigration crackdown, including moves to limit some forms of legal immigration.
This step to reshape the H-1B visa program represents his administration’s most visible effort yet to rework temporary employment visas and underscores what critics have said is a protectionist agenda. It is a U-turn from Trump’s earlier stance when he sided with one-time ally and Tesla CEO Elon Musk in a public dispute over the use of the H-1B visa, saying he fully backed the program for foreign tech workers even though it was opposed by some of his supporters.
Trump administration officials say the visa allows companies to suppress wages, and curbing it opens more jobs for US tech workers. Supporters of the program argue that it brings in highly skilled workers essential to filling talent gaps and keeping firms competitive.
In the hours following Trump’s proclamation, social media was flooded with debate on the scope of the order and dismay at what many saw as a move that dimmed the United States’ allure as a work destination.
An anonymous user on Rednote said that their life was like that of an “H-1B slave.” The person cut short a holiday in Tokyo to rush back to the US, describing it as “a real-life ‘Fast & Furious’ return to the US,” a reference to the hit Hollywood film series about street racing.
Trump’s H-1B proclamation read: “Some employers, using practices now widely adopted by entire sectors, have abused the H-1B statute and its regulations to artificially suppress wages, resulting in a disadvantageous labor market for American citizens.”
The secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, could exempt petitioners from the fee at her discretion, the proclamation said.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Friday that companies would have to pay $100,000 per year for H-1B worker visas.
However, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said in a post on X on Saturday that this was not an annual fee, only a one-time fee that applied to each petition.
A Nvidia engineer, who has lived in the US for 10 years, told Reuters at the San Francisco airport that he had been vacationing in Japan with his wife and infant when he rushed to reschedule his return flight after hearing the news.
“It feels surreal,” he said. “Everything is changing in an instant.”


Who recognizes the State of Palestine, who doesn’t, and why does it matter?

Who recognizes the State of Palestine, who doesn’t, and why does it matter?
Updated 21 September 2025

Who recognizes the State of Palestine, who doesn’t, and why does it matter?

Who recognizes the State of Palestine, who doesn’t, and why does it matter?
  • At least 144 countries out of 193 UN members already recognize the State of Palestine
  • Algeria became the first country to officially recognize a Palestinian state on November 15, 1988

PARIS: Britain, Australia and Canada on Sunday recognized a Palestinian state after nearly two years of war in the Gaza Strip, with France, Belgium and other countries poised to follow suit at the United Nations General Assembly in New York.
Here is an overview of diplomatic recognition of the state, which was unilaterally proclaimed by the Palestinian leadership in exile in 1988.
Of the territory claimed by the state, Israel currently occupies the West Bank and the Gaza Strip is largely in ruins.

Which countries recognize or will recognize the State of Palestine?

Answer: three-quarters of UN members.
According to an AFP tally, at least 144 countries out of 193 UN members already recognize the State of Palestine.
AFP has not yet obtained recent confirmation from three African countries.
The count includes Britain and Canada — the first G7 countries to do so — and Australia.
Portugal was expected to follow suit soon, and several other countries including France, Belgium, Luxembourg and Malta are expected to do the same during a summit on the future of the two-state solution chaired by France and on Monday at UN headquarters.
Russia, alongside all Arab countries, almost all African and Latin American countries, and most Asian countries including India and China are already on the list.
Algeria became the first country to officially recognize a Palestinian state on November 15, 1988, minutes after late Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) leader Yasser Arafat unilaterally proclaimed an independent Palestinian state.
Dozens of other countries followed suit in the following weeks and months, and another wave of recognitions came in late 2010 and early 2011.
The Israeli offensive in Gaza, which was sparked by the Palestinian Islamist organization Hamas’s attack in Israel on October 7, 2023, has already driven another 12 countries to recognize the state.

Who does not?

Answer: at least 46 countries, including Israel, the United States and their allies.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government completely rejects the idea of a Palestinian state.
Japan, South Korea and Singapore are the Asian countries that do not recognize Palestine.
Neither does Cameroon in Africa, Panama in Latin America and most countries in Oceania.
Europe is the most divided continent on the issue, and is split almost 50-50 over Palestinian statehood.
Until the mid-2010s, the only countries recognizing the State of Palestine apart from Turkiye were those of the former Soviet bloc.
Now, some former Eastern-bloc countries such as Hungary and the Czech Republic do not recognize a Palestinian state at a bilateral level.
Western and northern Europe were until now united in non-recognition, with the exception of Sweden, which extended recognition in 2014.
But the war in Gaza has upended things, with Norway, Spain, Ireland and Slovenia following in Sweden’s footsteps to recognize the state in 2024, before the United Kingdom did so on Sunday.
Italy and Germany do not plan on recognizing a Palestinian state.

What does recognition mean?

Romain Le Boeuf, a professor in international law at the University of Aix-Marseille in southern France, described recognition of Palestinian statehood as “one of the most complicated questions” in international law, “a little like a halfway point between the political and juridical.”
He told AFP states were free to choose the timing and form of recognition, with great variations that are either explicit or implicit.
According to Le Boeuf, there is no office to register recognitions.
“The Palestinian Authority in the West Bank puts all they consider to be acts of recognition on its own list, but from a purely subjective point of view. In the same way, other states will say that they have or have not recognized, but without really having to justify themselves,” he said.
However, there is one point on which international law is quite clear: “Recognition does not mean that a state has been created, no more than the lack of recognition prevents the state from existing.”
While recognition carries largely symbolic and political weight, three-quarters of countries say “that Palestine meets all the necessary conditions to be a state,” he said.
“I know for many people this seems only symbolic, but actually in terms of symbolism, it is sort of a game changer,” lawyer and Franco-British law professor Philippe Sands wrote in the New York Times in mid-August 2025.
“Because once you recognize Palestinian statehood... you essentially put Palestine and Israel on level footing in terms of their treatment under international law.”