Germany presses ahead with deportations to Afghanistan

Update Germany presses ahead with deportations to Afghanistan
New Chancellor Friedrich Merz made tougher migration policy a central plank of his campaign for Germany’s election in February. (FILE/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 18 July 2025

Germany presses ahead with deportations to Afghanistan

Germany presses ahead with deportations to Afghanistan
  • “Deportations to Afghanistan must continue to be carried out safely in the future,” Dobrindt said
  • Berlin has had only indirect contact with the Taliban authorities through third parties

BERLIN: Germany said Friday it had deported 81 Afghan men convicted of crimes to their Taliban-controlled homeland, as Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s government looks to signal a hard line on immigration.

Europe’s top economy was forging ahead with a “policy change,” said Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt, who was also hosting several European counterparts for a migration meeting.

“Deportations to Afghanistan must continue to be carried out safely in the future. There is no right of residence for serious criminals in our country,” he said.

The interior ministry said the plane took off Friday morning bound for Afghanistan, adding that all the deportees were under expulsion orders and were convicted by the criminal justice system.

Germany had stopped deportations to Afghanistan and closed its embassy in Kabul following the Taliban’s return to power in 2021.

But expulsions resumed last year, when the previous government of Social Democrat (SPD) chancellor Olaf Scholz expelled a group of 28 Afghan convicts.

Berlin has had only indirect contact with the Taliban authorities through third parties, with Friday’s operation executed with the help of Qatar, said the interior ministry.

Following the announcement, the United Nations said no one should be sent back to Afghanistan, whatever their status.

The UN human rights commissioner called for an “immediate halt to the forcible return of all Afghan refugees and asylum-seekers, particularly those at risk of persecution, arbitrary detention or torture upon their return,” spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani told reporters in Geneva.

Amnesty International directly criticized the deportations, saying the situation in Afghanistan was “catastrophic” and that “extrajudicial executions, enforced disappearances and torture are commonplace.”

Merz defended the expulsions at a press conference, saying he was “grateful” to be able to deliver on a promise he had made when entering government.

None of those deported “had a residence status anymore. All asylum applications were legally rejected without further legal recourse,” he said. “This is why this deportation and this flight were possible.”

The deportations were among a number of “corrections” made to immigration policy by his government, including tightening border controls and limiting family reunification rights for some refugees.

Merz however said policing Germany’s borders was only a “temporary” fix and a durable solution was needed at the European level.

To that end, Dobrindt was meeting his Austrian, Danish, Czech, French and Polish counterparts, as well as European Commissioner for Home Affairs Magnus Brunner, in southern Germany.

The aim of the meeting was to “strengthen European migration policy,” Dobrindt told the Augsburger Allgemeine daily.

Migration has become a central issue on the German political agenda in tandem with the rise of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.

The AfD scored a historic election result of over 20 percent in February — its highest-ever score at the national level — leaving the party nipping on the heels of Merz’s conservative CDU/CSU bloc.

The controversy over immigration has been fueled by a series of deadly attacks where the suspects were asylum seekers — including several from Afghanistan.

Germany’s new government, a coalition between the CDU/CSU and SPD, has promised to expel more foreign criminals alongside a crackdown on irregular migration.

As well as carrying out deportations to Afghanistan, Dobrindt has said he was in contact with authorities to enable deportations to Syria, which have been suspended since 2012.

Longtime Syrian ruler Bashar Assad was toppled in December, and the country is now under the control of Islamist leaders, some of whom were once linked with the Al-Qaeda jihadist network.


Trump says he canceled Putin summit due to stalled negotiations

Trump says he canceled Putin summit due to stalled negotiations
Updated 6 sec ago

Trump says he canceled Putin summit due to stalled negotiations

Trump says he canceled Putin summit due to stalled negotiations

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday he canceled a planned summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, citing a lack of progress in diplomatic efforts and a sense that the timing was off.
“We canceled the meeting with President Putin — it just didn’t feel right to me,” Trump told reporters at the White House. “It didn’t feel like we were going to get to the place we have to get. So I canceled it, but we’ll do it in the future.”
Trump also expressed frustration with the stalled negotiations. “In terms of honesty, the only thing I can say is, every time I speak with Vladimir, I have good conversations, and then they don’t go anywhere. They just don’t go anywhere,” he said.
The summit cancelation came as the White House unveiled new sanctions targeting Russian oil exports, part of a broader effort to pressure Moscow over its continued military operations in Ukraine. Trump said he hoped the measures would be temporary.


COVID-19 vaccines may help some cancer patients fight tumors

COVID-19 vaccines may help some cancer patients fight tumors
Updated 12 min 24 sec ago

COVID-19 vaccines may help some cancer patients fight tumors

COVID-19 vaccines may help some cancer patients fight tumors
  • A healthy immune system often kills cancer cells before they become a threat

WASHINGTON: The most widely used COVID-19 vaccines may offer a surprise benefit for some cancer patients – revving up their immune systems to help fight tumors.
People with advanced lung or skin cancer who were taking certain immunotherapy drugs lived substantially longer if they also got a Pfizer or Moderna shot within 100 days of starting treatment, according to preliminary research being reported Wednesday in the journal Nature.
And it had nothing to do with virus infections.
Instead, the molecule that powers those specific vaccines, mRNA, appears to help the immune system respond better to the cutting-edge cancer treatment, concluded researchers from MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston and the University of Florida.
The vaccine “acts like a siren to activate immune cells throughout the body,” said lead researcher Dr. Adam Grippin of MD Anderson. “We’re sensitizing immune-resistant tumors to immune therapy.”
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has raised skepticism about mRNA vaccines, cutting $500 million in funding for some uses of the technology.
But this research team found its results so promising that it is preparing a more rigorous study to see if mRNA coronavirus vaccines should be paired with cancer drugs called checkpoint inhibitors — an interim step while it designs new mRNA vaccines for use in cancer.
A healthy immune system often kills cancer cells before they become a threat. But some tumors evolve to hide from immune attack. Checkpoint inhibitors remove that cloak. It’s a powerful treatment – when it works. Some people’s immune cells still don’t recognize the tumor.
Messenger RNA, or mRNA, is naturally found in every cell and it contains genetic instructions for our bodies to make proteins. While best known as the Nobel Prize-winning technology behind COVID-19 vaccines, scientists have long been trying to create personalized mRNA “treatment vaccines” that train immune cells to spot unique features of a patient’s tumor.
The new research offers “a very good clue” that maybe an off-the-shelf approach could work, said Dr. Jeff Coller, an mRNA specialist at Johns Hopkins University who wasn’t involved with the work. “What it shows is that mRNA medicines are continuing to surprise us in how beneficial they can be to human health.”
Grippin and his Florida colleagues had been developing personalized mRNA cancer vaccines when they realized that even one created without a specific target appeared to spur similar immune activity against cancer.
Grippin wondered if the already widely available mRNA coronavirus shots might also have some effect, too.
So the team analyzed records of nearly 1,000 advanced cancer patients undergoing checkpoint inhibitor treatment at MD Anderson – comparing those who happened to get a Pfizer or Moderna shot with those who didn’t.
Vaccinated lung cancer patients were nearly twice as likely to be alive three years after beginning cancer treatment as the unvaccinated patients. Among melanoma patients, median survival was significantly longer for vaccinated patients – but exactly how much isn’t clear, as some of that group were still alive when the data was analyzed.
Non-mRNA vaccines such as flu shots didn’t make a difference, he said.
 


University of Virginia strikes deal to pause Trump administration investigations

University of Virginia strikes deal to pause Trump administration investigations
Updated 15 min 55 sec ago

University of Virginia strikes deal to pause Trump administration investigations

University of Virginia strikes deal to pause Trump administration investigations
  • The deal, Mahoney wrote, preserves the university’s academic freedom and doesn’t hurt its attempts to secure federal research funding

WASHINGTON: The University of Virginia has agreed to abide by White House guidance forbidding discrimination in admissions and hiring, becoming the latest in a growing list of campuses striking deals with the Trump administration as the college tries to pause months of scrutiny by the US Justice Department.
The agreement was announced by the Justice Department, which began investigating the admissions and financial aid processes at the Charlottesville campus in April. Federal officials accused Virginia’s president of failing to end diversity, equity and inclusion practices President Donald Trump has labeled as unlawful discrimination.
The mounting pressure prompted James Ryan to announce his resignation as university president in June, saying the stakes were too high for others on campus if he opted to “fight the federal government in order to save my job.”
Unlike some universities’ deals with the Trump administration, the Virginia agreement announced Wednesday does not include a fine or monetary payment, said Paul Mahoney, interim president of the university, in a campus email. Instead, the university agreed to follow the government’s anti-discrimination criteria. Every quarter, the university must provide relevant data showing compliance, personally certified by its president.
The deal, Mahoney wrote, preserves the university’s academic freedom and doesn’t hurt its attempts to secure federal research funding. And the university won’t have external monitoring by the federal government beyond quarterly communications with the Department of Justice.
If Virginia complies, the Justice Department said it would officially end its investigations.
Virginia’s settlement follows other agreements signed by Columbia and Brown universities to end federal investigations and restore access to federal funding. Columbia paid $200 million to the government, and Brown paid $50 million to Rhode Island workforce development organizations.
Some of the Justice Department’s letters squarely took aim at Ryan, accusing him of engaging in “attempts to defy and evade federal anti-discrimination laws and the directives of your board.” Much of the federal scrutiny centered on complaints that Ryan was too slow to implement a March 7 resolution by the university’s governing board demanding the eradication of DEI on campus.
As a public university, the University of Virginia was an outlier in the Trump administration’s effort to reform higher education according to the president’s vision. Previously, the administration had devoted most of its scrutiny to elite private colleges, including Harvard and other Ivy League institutions, accused of tolerating antisemitism.
Since then, the White House has expanded its campaign to other public campuses, including the University of California, Los Angeles, and George Mason University.
The Charlottesville campus became a flashpoint this year after conservative critics accused it of simply renaming its DEI initiatives rather than ending them. The Justice Department expanded the scope of its review several times and announced a separate investigation into alleged antisemitism in May.
Among the most prominent critics was America First Legal, a conservative group created by Trump aide Stephen Miller. In a May letter to federal officials, the group said Virginia had only moved to “rename, repackage, and redeploy the same unlawful infrastructure under a lexicon of euphemisms.”
Similar accusations have embroiled George Mason University, where the governing board came to the defense of the president even as the Education Department cited allegations that he promoted diversity initiatives above credentials in hiring. On Aug. 1, the board unanimously voted to give President Gregory Washington a pay increase of 1.5 percent. The same day, the board approved a resolution forbidding DEI in favor of a “merit-based approach” in campus policies.
The University of Virginia deal with the Justice Department did not include one of the investigations the federal government had launched into the college. The Education Department had included the Charlottesville campus in a March 10 list identifying 60 universities that were under investigation for alleged antisemitism.
A department spokesperson said she could not confirm whether the investigation is still open because the agency’s Office for Civil Rights is furloughed during the government shutdown. She said the agreement does not resolve any department investigations.


US says two dead in strike on alleged drug-smuggling boat in Pacific

US says two dead in strike on alleged drug-smuggling boat in Pacific
Updated 22 October 2025

US says two dead in strike on alleged drug-smuggling boat in Pacific

US says two dead in strike on alleged drug-smuggling boat in Pacific
  • The strike brings the total number to at least eight, leaving at least 34 people dead
  • “There were two narco-terrorists aboard the vessel during the strike, which was conducted in international waters. Both terrorists were killed,” Hegseth said

WASHINGTON: A new US strike on an alleged drug-smuggling boat killed two people, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Wednesday, announcing Washington’s first such attack on a vessel in the Pacific Ocean.
The strike — which Hegseth announced in a post on X that featured a video of a boat being engulfed in flames — brings the total number to at least eight, leaving at least 34 people dead.
“There were two narco-terrorists aboard the vessel during the strike, which was conducted in international waters. Both terrorists were killed and no US forces were harmed in this strike,” Hegseth said of Tuesday’s action in the eastern Pacific.


“Just as Al-Qaeda waged war on our homeland, these cartels are waging war on our border and our people. There will be no refuge or forgiveness — only justice,” he wrote.
President Donald Trump’s administration has said in a notice to Congress that the United States is engaged in “armed conflict” with Latin American drug cartels, describing them as terrorist groups as part of its justification for the strikes.
“The president determined these cartels are non-state armed groups, designated them as terrorist organizations, and determined that their actions constitute an armed attack against the United States,” said the notice from the Pentagon, which also described suspected smugglers as “unlawful combatants.”
But Washington has not released evidence to support its assertion that the targets of its strikes are drug smugglers, and experts say the summary killings are illegal even if they target confirmed narcotics traffickers.

- Regional tensions -

There were survivors of a US strike for the first time last week, but Washington chose to repatriate them rather than put them on trial for their alleged crimes.
Ecuador released one after finding no evidence that he had committed a crime, while authorities in Colombia said the other — who “arrived with brain trauma, sedated, drugged, breathing with a ventilator” — would face prosecution.
The US military campaign — which has seen Washington deploy stealth warplanes and Navy ships as part of what it says are counter-narcotics efforts — has fueled tensions with countries in the region.
This is especially the case with Venezuela, where the buildup of US forces has sparked fears that the ultimate goal is the overthrow of President Nicolas Maduro, whom Washington accuses of heading a drug cartel.
The United States has not specified the origin of all the vessels it has targeted, but has said that some of them came from Venezuela.
Meanwhile, a public feud between Trump and Colombia’s leftist leader Gustavo Petro intensified in recent weeks over the Republican president’s deadly anti-drug campaign.
Trump on Sunday vowed to end all aid to the South American nation — a historically close US partner and the world’s leading cocaine producer — and branded Petro, who has accused the US president of murder, as an “illegal drug dealer.”
But just days later, the Colombian president met with the top US diplomat in his country to discuss counter-narcotics efforts, with Bogota’s foreign ministry saying the two sides “reaffirmed the commitment of both parties to improve drug fighting strategies.”


Man taken into custody after driving his car into security gate outside White House, authorities say

Man taken into custody after driving his car into security gate outside White House, authorities say
Updated 22 October 2025

Man taken into custody after driving his car into security gate outside White House, authorities say

Man taken into custody after driving his car into security gate outside White House, authorities say
  • The man was immediately arrested by officers from the Secret Service’s uniformed division
  • Investigators searched his car and deemed it to be safe

WASHINGTON: A man was taken into custody late Tuesday after driving his car into a security barrier outside the White House, authorities said.
The US Secret Service said the man crashed into the security gate at a White House entrance at 10:37 p.m. on Tuesday.


The man was immediately arrested by officers from the Secret Service’s uniformed division, the agency said.
Investigators searched his car and deemed it to be safe, Secret Service officials said in a statement.
The man, whose name wasn’t immediately released, was taken to a hospital for a mental health evaluation, according to a Secret Service spokesperson.
He is expected to be charged with unlawful entry and destruction of government property, the spokesperson said.