Israeli soldiers speak of ‘shooting without restraint’ in Gaza in documentary testimony

Maj. Neta Caspin, another officer, revealed military rabbis propagated genocidal mindsets, giving religious justification for mass demolitions. (AFP/File)
Maj. Neta Caspin, another officer, revealed military rabbis propagated genocidal mindsets, giving religious justification for mass demolitions. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 28 min 19 sec ago

Israeli soldiers speak of ‘shooting without restraint’ in Gaza in documentary testimony

Israeli soldiers speak of ‘shooting without restraint’ in Gaza in documentary testimony
  • ‘Life and death isn’t determined by procedure, but it’s up to the conscience of the commander on the ground,’ said one of the soldiers featured in ‘Breaking Ranks: Inside Israel’s War’
  • Film reveals Israeli army’s complete disregard for laws of war, including use of human shields and opening fire unprovoked on civilians at aid centers

LONDON: Israeli soldiers have revealed that they were allowed to shoot freely at their own discretion in Gaza, exposing a disregard for the laws of war in a new documentary set to air on UK public television Monday night.

The film, “Breaking Ranks: Inside Israel’s War,” offers rare firsthand testimonies from Israel Defense Forces soldiers who describe lawless combat during the Gaza conflict.

“If you want to shoot without restraint, you can,” Daniel, the commander of an IDF tank unit, reportedly said in the film.

Soldiers, some identified only by first names, also confirmed the IDF’s routine use of human shields, known informally as the “mosquito protocol,” contradicting official denials, and also described Israeli troops opening fire unprovoked on civilians rushing to food aid distribution points run by the US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.

“Life and death isn’t determined by procedures or opening fire regulations. It’s the conscience of the commander on the ground that decides,” said one soldier.

The soldier detailed how recognizing the enemy on the ground became arbitrary: “If they’re walking too fast, they’re suspicious. If they’re walking too slow, they’re suspicious. They’re plotting something. If three men are walking and one of them lags behind, it’s a two-to-one infantry formation; it’s a military formation,” he said.

One incident involved a senior officer ordering a tank to demolish a building marked safe for civilians, after seeing a man hanging laundry on the roof. The strike reportedly killed several people.

According to the Gaza health authority, considered reliable by the UN, over 69,000 Palestinians have died since Oct. 7, 2023, the vast majority civilians, though many fear the actual toll is higher.

Some soldiers said they were influenced by Israeli politicians and religious leaders who framed all Palestinians as legitimate targets following Hamas’ attacks two years ago.

Daniel said claims such as those by Israeli President Isaac Herzog, who declared “an entire nation out there that is responsible” for the Oct. 7 attacks, seeped into soldiers’ minds. “You hear that all the time, so you start to believe it.”

Maj. Neta Caspin, another officer, revealed military rabbis propagated genocidal mindsets, giving religious justification for mass demolitions.

“One time, the brigade rabbi sat down next to me and spent half an hour explaining why we must be just like they were on Oct. 7,” he said.

One of the most striking claims is the use of human shields forced to navigate Hamas tunnels wearing vests with smartphones transmitting GPS data to Israeli units above — a tactic dubbed the “mosquito protocol.”

Daniel explained, “You send the human shield underground. As he walks down the tunnel, he maps it all for you. The commanders saw how it works. And the practice spread like wildfire. After about a week, every company was operating its own mosquito.”

The New York Times reported in October 2024 that while IDF troops often used drones and sniffer dogs to scout Hamas tunnels and booby-trapped buildings, at times they used detainees — referred to as “wasps” or “mosquitoes” depending on origin — to aid reconnaissance.

The IDF has denied using human shields, opening internal investigations into such allegations.

The documentary also features a contractor from the GHF food distribution sites who witnessed the IDF shooting unarmed civilians. He recounted seeing soldiers fire on two young men running for aid, shooting them dead on the spot.

In response to the documentary, the IDF stated in writing that it “remains committed to the rule of law” and that allegations of misconduct are “thoroughly examined,” noting ongoing investigations by the Military Police Criminal Investigation Division.


Trump threatens to sue as BBC admits erroneous speech edit

Trump threatens to sue as BBC admits erroneous speech edit
Updated 45 sec ago

Trump threatens to sue as BBC admits erroneous speech edit

Trump threatens to sue as BBC admits erroneous speech edit
  • Trump’s lawyers say broadcaster must retract documentary or face action
  • BBC apologizes for ‘error of judgment,’ chair Shah rejects institutional bias
LONDON/NEW YORK: US President Donald Trump has threatened legal action against the BBC for its editing of a speech he made in 2021 on the day his supporters overran the Capitol, which the British broadcaster admitted on Monday was an “error of judgment.”
The president’s lawyers said the BBC must retract its documentary by November 14 or face a lawsuit for “no less” than $1 billion, according to a letter sent on Sunday. The documentary on the BBC’s flagship Panorama program spliced together two separate excerpts from one of Trump’s speeches, creating the impression that he was inciting the January 6, 2021 riot, which the lawyers said was “false and defamatory.” The revelation about the speech and wider criticism of BBC News has plunged the broadcaster into crisis, resulting in the resignation of its top two bosses, Director General Tim Davie and Chief Executive of News Deborah Turness, on Sunday.
Its chair Samir Shah on Monday apologized for the editing of the footage, but he rejected claims of systemic bias in the broadcaster’s news reporting. He said the BBC was considering how to respond to the legal threat.
CRISIS SPARKED BY LEAKING OF MEMO BY STANDARDS ADVISER The crisis was sparked by the leaking of an internal report that raised concerns about the BBC’s coverage, including the edit of the Trump speech in a program broadcast shortly before the November 2024 US presidential election.
Trump supporters overran the Capitol on that day, when Congress was due to certify Democrat Joe Biden’s win over Trump in the November 2020 election.
The editing was included in a dossier leaked to the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which also included criticism of the BBC’s coverage of the Israel-Gaza war and transgender issues.
Shah said the BBC accepted that the way the speech was edited gave the impression of a direct call for violence.
“The BBC would like to apologize for that error of judgment,” he said in a letter to lawmakers.
The letter by Trump’s lawyers said the BBC violated Florida defamation law by deliberately omitting facts and deceptively juxtaposing them to create a false impression of what Trump said.
It is typically difficult for public figures like Trump to win defamation cases under US law because they must prove defendants knew or should have known information was false but published it anyway.
Several US media companies, including CBS and ABC News, have recently settled lawsuits filed by the US president.
IMPARTIALITY IN BBC’S DNA
While Shah accepted criticism of the Trump edit, he hit back at suggestions the BBC had sought to bury any of the allegations around bias, or failed to tackle any problems. Asked if the charges of systemic bias were wrong, he said “yes.”
He said there were cases of individual errors and there were issues that pointed to underlying problems, but the notion of systemic or institutional bias did not hold true.
“I’ve worked in BBC News,” he told the BBC. “I know that BBC News’ DNA and culture is to be impartial. It’s to provide the best news we can and the most trustworthy news.”
He told lawmakers that the BBC was committed to restoring public trust and ensuring its journalism meets the highest standards of fairness.
A spokesperson for British Prime Minister Keir Starmer denied the BBC was institutionally biased or corrupt, and said the government supported the corporation.
“Clearly mistakes have been made in this case and the director general and Deborah Turness have taken responsibility for those mistakes,” the spokesperson said.
“What is important here is that the BBC maintains the high standards for which it is rightfully recognized internationally, and that’s very much our focus.”