Mediterranean search-and-rescue NGOs refuse to cooperate with Libyan coast guard

A group of NGOs operating rescue missions in the Mediterranean have ceased cooperating with the Libyan coast guard over the latter’s alleged violent treatment of asylum-seekers. (Screenshot/The Guardian)
A group of NGOs operating rescue missions in the Mediterranean have ceased cooperating with the Libyan coast guard over the latter’s alleged violent treatment of asylum-seekers. (Screenshot/The Guardian)
Short Url
Updated 6 sec ago

Mediterranean search-and-rescue NGOs refuse to cooperate with Libyan coast guard

Mediterranean search-and-rescue NGOs refuse to cooperate with Libyan coast guard
  • Group of 13 organizations announce they will no longer share information over allegations of violent conduct
  • Migrants and asylum-seekers allegedly attacked, taken to camps notorious for slavery, torture and rape in North African country

LONDON: A group of NGOs operating rescue missions in the Mediterranean have ceased cooperating with the Libyan coast guard over the latter’s alleged violent treatment of asylum-seekers.

Thirteen groups running boats across the sea say it is a rejection of pressure from the EU to share information with Libya in a bid to stem the flow of migrants, particularly to Italy.

The EU funds and trains Libya’s coast guard, but the groups say that it has been involved in violently preventing people crossing to Europe, and has taken migrants to camps where rape, torture and slavery are common.

A 2021 UN report found asylum-seekers and refugees in Libya faced a “litany of abuses” in camps across the country that were “suggestive of crimes against humanity.”

Another report published last month by Berlin-based NGO Sea-Watch said that the Libyan coast guard had engaged in 54 acts of violence in the Mediterranean since 2016.

It highlighted ramming, shootings and assaults, while in August the Libyan coast guard was accused of opening fire on a ship belonging to the NGO SOS Mediterranee.

Ina Friebe, a member of the German activist group CompassCollective, said in a joint statement on behalf of the 13 NGOs: “We have never recognized these actors (Libya’s coast guard) as a legitimate rescue authority — they are part of a violent regime enabled by the EU.”

She added: “Now we are increasingly being pressured to communicate with exactly these actors. This must stop. Ending all operational communication with the so-called Libyan Rescue Coordination Center is both a legal and moral necessity — a clear line against European complicity in crimes against humanity.”

The group of 13 NGOs added that they know their stance could result in fines, detention and loss of their vessels.

“It is not only our right but our duty to treat armed militias as such in our operational communication — not as legitimate actors in search-and-rescue operations,” said Giulia Messmer of Sea-Watch.

Rescue organizations operating in the Mediterranean have saved more than 155,000 people over the past decade, but that has led to backlashes, including in Italy where the law was changed to prevent them operating freely out of ports.

The 13 NGOs said this week that they had launched the Justice Fleet initiative to track incidents involving the Libyan coast guard, as well as compile information on legal action taken by the groups.

“For 10 years, civil sea rescue has been providing first aid in the Mediterranean. For that, we have been blocked, criminalized, slandered,” the Justice Fleet website said.

“That’s why we are joining forces now, stronger than ever — to defend human rights and international maritime law together.”


Indonesian activists protest plan to name Suharto as national hero

Indonesian activists protest plan to name Suharto as national hero
Updated 08 November 2025

Indonesian activists protest plan to name Suharto as national hero

Indonesian activists protest plan to name Suharto as national hero
  • Suharto’s 32-year rule was marked by corruption, human rights violations
  • Activists are citing his role in some of the darkest periods in Indonesia’s history

JAKARTA: Indonesian activists are rallying against a government proposal to name as national hero the late military ruler Suharto who led the country for over three decades.

Suharto’s New Order military dictatorship was considered one of the most brutal and corrupt of the 20th century. The former president, who died in 2008, held power for 32 years before student-led protests forced him to step down in 1998, amid an economic crisis and deadly riots in Jakarta.

He was included in a list of 49 candidates to receive the national hero title this year, an honor bestowed annually on National Heroes’ Day on Nov. 10 for those considered to have made a significant contribution to the country.

The plan, which has yet to be finalized, has sparked protests among members of Indonesia’s civil society, who pointed to widespread allegations of human rights abuses and corruption during Suharto’s regime.

“In his 32-year reign, Suharto committed many human rights violations. He also came to power through a coup … corruption, collusion, and nepotism were also widespread during his rule,” Damairia Pakpahan, an Indonesian women’s rights activist based in Yogyakarta, told Arab News.

Pakpahan was part of a coalition of hundreds of Indonesian citizens and organizations, who signed a letter demanding the government to remove Suharto from the list of national hero candidates. A similar petition published online has received over 13,500 signatures so far.

Suharto “did not deserve to be granted a National Hero title,” the coalition said in the letter issued on Oct. 30, before detailing at least nine cases of gross human rights violations that took place under his rule.

This includes the unsolved violence during the riots in May 1998 as well as the 1965-66 killings, a series of countrywide political purges targeting members and alleged sympathizers of Partai Komunis Indonesia — at the time the third-largest communist party after China and the Soviet Union.

While an accurate and verified count of the dead is unlikely ever to be known, historians say that a total of 500,000 to 1 million people had been killed. Another 1.5 million had been imprisoned, while their family members still face stigma and discrimination, and many were prevented from holding government jobs up until recently.

“(The) Suharto government’s track record, particularly during the New Order era, demonstrates a pattern of authoritarian and repressive rule that had a far-reaching impact on the lives of the Indonesian people,” the civil society coalition said.

“Numerous policies and security operations implemented under Suharto’s rule resulted in serious human rights violations, ranging from murder and enforced disappearances, torture, sexual violence, to land grabbing and systematic social discrimination.”

On Thursday, about 100 activists rallied near the presidential palace in Jakarta to protest Suharto’s candidacy for the national hero title. Some carried posters that read: “Stop the Whitewashing of the General of Butchery” and “Thousands Died But The Country Chose to Forget.”

Indonesia’s social and culture ministries have said that public input was part of the process to nominate national hero candidates. 

Culture Minister Fadli Zon, who heads the committee in charge of naming national heroes, said at a press conference that “there was never evidence” that Suharto was involved in the 1960s massacres, which scholars have said amounted to genocide due to its scale. 

“Every one of these candidates have fulfilled all the requirements … their struggles are clear, their background and life history, all of it has undergone academic evaluation … This includes (former) President Suharto, whose name has been suggested two, three times now … We are looking at their extraordinary contributions (to the country),” he told reporters earlier this week.

Andreas Harsono, senior Indonesia researcher at Human Rights Watch, told Arab News that the process to grant national hero status has always been controversial in Indonesia.

“Gen. Suharto, for instance, is a hero to some groups in Indonesia, but obviously, not a hero to many other groups, especially those who have suffered from his authoritarian regime, including the 1965 genocide,” he told Arab News.

“It’s much better if (the Indonesian government) is to end these jokes about national heroes. Let historians do their work and let the public decide their own respective heroes.”