US judge rules Trump illegally ordered National Guard to Portland, Oregon

US judge rules Trump illegally ordered National Guard to Portland, Oregon
A federal officer detains a protester during a protest against increased activity by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and potential National Guard deployment in Portland, Oregon on Oct. 12, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 24 sec ago

US judge rules Trump illegally ordered National Guard to Portland, Oregon

US judge rules Trump illegally ordered National Guard to Portland, Oregon
  • Ruling blocks Trump administration from deploying National Guard to Portland
  • Judge finds protests were not a rebellion against the government

US President Donald Trump unlawfully ordered National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, a federal judge ruled Friday in a legal setback to the administration’s use of the military in American cities.

The ruling by US District Judge Karin Immergut is the first to permanently block Trump’s use of military force to quell protests against immigration authorities. Trump is also attempting to do that in Democratic-led Los Angeles, Chicago and Washington, D.C. It replaces her interim order that had prevented the Portland deployment.

White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement Friday that Trump had exercised his lawful authority to protect federal officers.

“President Trump will not turn a blind eye to the lawlessness plaguing American cities and we expect to be vindicated by a higher court,” Jackson said.

The Oregon Attorney General’s Office did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.

Trump breaks with norms on using military

Immergut, a Trump appointee, said the administration had no lawful basis to claim that there was a rebellion in Portland or that the government was unable to enforce federal law due to the protests.

“The occasional interference to federal officers has been minimal, and there is no evidence that these small-scale protests have significantly impeded the execution of any immigration laws,” she said in her 106-page opinion and order.

Trump’s attempts to use military force to tamp down unrest are a sharp break with long-standing but rarely tested norms against deploying troops on US soil.

The Trump administration is likely to appeal Friday’s ruling, and the case could ultimately reach the Supreme Court.

The City of Portland and Oregon Attorney General’s Office sued in September, alleging the Trump administration was exaggerating occasional violence to justify sending in troops under a law permitting presidents to do so in cases of rebellion.

Judges rule Trump exceeded legal authority

Dueling narratives emerged during a three-day bench trial.

Justice Department lawyers described a violent siege overwhelming federal agents, echoing Trump’s description of the city as “war-ravaged.” Lawyers for Oregon and Portland said violence has been rare, isolated and contained by local police.

Immergut concluded in her order that the violence was small-scale, isolated, disorganized and had largely subsided by the time Trump ordered in the National Guard in late September.

Democrats have said Trump is abusing military powers meant for genuine emergencies such as an invasion or an armed rebellion.

Immergut blocked Trump from deploying troops to Portland with an interim order on October 5.

The Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals is considering the Trump administration’s appeal of that decision.

Three judges, including Immergut, have issued preliminary rulings that Trump’s National Guard deployments are not allowed under the emergency legal authority cited by his administration.


Women make inroads in Pakistan as they become firefighters and barriers slowly fall

Updated 11 sec ago

Women make inroads in Pakistan as they become firefighters and barriers slowly fall

Women make inroads in Pakistan as they become firefighters and barriers slowly fall
KARACHI: Thick black smoke clawed at the sky last week over the industrial zone in Pakistan’s largest city as firefighter Syeda Masooma Zaidi raced toward the raging blaze in Karachi.
The storage facility was packed with truck and car tires, and the flames leapt hungrily, black plumes twisting skyward. Heat shimmered off the asphalt, turning the air heavy and acrid, stinging her eyes and lungs.
Zaidi did not hesitate amid the deafening roar, hose in hand, her helmet strapped tight.
The 23-year-old and the rest of her firefighting team — all men — aimed the jets of water at the molten rubber, which hissed and steamed under the torrent. The team worked methodically, every movement precise, every second critical.
Hours later, the blaze was under control. Nearby factories were spared, no lives were lost — though the damage ran into tens of thousands of dollars (millions of Pakistani rupees).
When the firefighters emerged from the smoke, their faces streaked with soot, dozens of onlookers cheered behind safety lines.
Zaidi is a rare sight in a country where women firefighters were mostly unheard-of until 2024. Her career — like those of other women in Pakistan’s emergency services — underscores the gradual inroads being made in the staunchly patriarchal and traditional Islamic nation.
Some were inspired when Shazia Perveen became Pakistan’s very first woman firefighter in 2010 in eastern Punjab province, where she is now a trainer. In Sindh province, where Karachi is the capital, women started joining firefighting services in 2024 after getting their training in Punjab.
And though they still make up less than 1 percent of Pakistan’s firefighters, authorities say more women are likely to join firefighting units in the coming years in the country of 255 million.
Most Pakistani women who go into professional fields choose careers as doctors, engineers or teachers, Zaidi said. She wanted to show that “we can do this too.”
Her chief fire officer, Humayun Khan, has praised Zaidi and her female colleagues.
Dr. Abid Jalaluddin Shaikh, chief of the Sindh Emergency Service, said Zaidi is one of 50 women firefighters in the province. Another 180 are in training as rescue divers, ambulance medics and emergency responders.
“The focus is no longer on breaking taboos,” he said. “Now we see real results.”
Zaidi graduated from the Punjab Rescue Service Academy, where she mastered high-angle rescues that use ladders, ropes and trolleys and typically involve victims trapped in skyscrapers, industrial towers or other high elevations, as well as various types of fire and water emergencies.
Still, she says she feels many doubt her ability on the job.
“When we arrive, people say, ‘She’s a girl — how can she rescue anyone?’” she said. “Every time we save a life, we prove that women can also do this job.”
Zaidi’s fellow firefighter Areeba Taj, also 23, recalled missions in Karachi where she and her female colleagues helped save lives amid chaos and smoke. Their supervisor, Ayesha Farooq, highlighted the unique strengths women bring, especially when victims include women and children.
“By joining rescue services, they earn respect — for themselves, and for the country,” Farooq said.
Zaidi, who grew up with seven brothers and one sister, says her motivation was simple: courage, duty, and faith.
“People still doubt us,” she said. “But every time we go out there, we keep proving them wrong.”
As the skyline above the Karachi industrial zone cleared last week, Zaidi returned with her team to the fire station, ready for the next alarm.
Every day on the job, Zaidi, Taj and their other female colleagues prove that gender is no barrier to bravery.