European military trainers should be part of Ukraine security guarantees, EU general says

European military trainers should be part of Ukraine security guarantees, EU general says
A man and wounded Ukrainian serviceman hug one another at a makeshift memorial for fallen Ukrainian and foreign soldiers, on Independence Square in Kyiv, Ukraine. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 19 sec ago

European military trainers should be part of Ukraine security guarantees, EU general says

European military trainers should be part of Ukraine security guarantees, EU general says
  • With the war in Ukraine showing no sign of ending, Western officials have been developing post-war plans to bolster Kyiv’s forces and deter Russia from attacking its neighbor again

BRUSSELS: The European Union should move military trainers into Ukraine after the war there ends to strengthen Ukrainian forces as part of Western security guarantees, the EU’s top military adviser told Reuters.
General Sean Clancy, chair of the EU’s military committee, said the United States would remain important for Europe’s security even as the EU gears up to be ready to defend itself by 2030.
NATO will continue to provide “hard power” to defend Europe but the transatlantic relationship will be rebalanced with Europeans becoming more self-reliant, said Clancy, who is Irish.

HAVING EU TRAINERS IN UKRAINE AFTER WAR IS ‘OPTIMAL’
The EU’s defense push has been driven by Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine and US President Donald Trump’s demands for Europeans to take more responsibility for their own security.
With the war in Ukraine showing no sign of ending, Western officials have been developing post-war plans to bolster Kyiv’s forces and deter Russia from attacking its neighbor again.
Clancy said it would be “optimal” to move part of the EU Military Assistance Mission in support of Ukraine (EUMAM Ukraine) into the country after the war. The mission has already trained more than 80,000 soldiers outside Ukraine.
Clancy said strong Ukrainian forces would serve as a security guarantee for both Ukraine and Europe.
“Europe can provide a high degree of that level of training. Will some of that be in Ukraine? I think that is optimal,” he said.
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said in September there was broad support from EU countries to take such a step, but no decision has been made yet. It would likely depend on the terms of any ceasefire or peace deal, diplomats say, and would need the backing of all 27 EU member states.

SIZE OF MISSION WOULD DEPEND ON REQUIREMENTS
Clancy said the size of any EU presence inside Ukraine would depend on what Kyiv wanted and the type of training required.
“This is something that we are...prudently examining in concert with our colleagues in Ukraine. And their needs are changing as well,” he said.
As chair of the EU military committee, Clancy serves as the voice of the military chiefs of the bloc’s member countries in discussions on defense and security policy.
That has included providing advice for the European Commission’s “Defense Readiness Roadmap,” which aims to prepare Europe to “credibly deter its adversaries and respond to any aggression” by 2030.
But Clancy said the US-European security relationship would remain important, not least because Europeans would still be using US weapons systems, even while striving to expand their own defense industries.
“For Patriot missiles, for F-35s (fighter jets) — all of the equipment and the high-end equipment that we already have sourced in the United States has a lifetime of decades to come,” he said.


North Korea fires unidentified ballistic missile: Seoul military

Updated 44 sec ago

North Korea fires unidentified ballistic missile: Seoul military

North Korea fires unidentified ballistic missile: Seoul military
SEOUL: North Korea fired a ballistic missile Friday, Seoul’s military said, around a week after US President Donald Trump approved South Korea’s plan to build a nuclear-powered submarine.
Analysts have said Seoul’s plan to construct one of the atomic-driven vessels would likely draw an aggressive response from Pyongyang.
South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff said North Korea fired an unidentified ballistic missile toward the East Sea, referring to the body of water also known as the Sea of Japan.
The missile landed in the sea outside Japan’s economic waters and no damage or injuries had been reported, said Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi.
But the Kremlin defended North Korea’s latest launch, saying Pyongyang — a key ally for Russia during its Ukraine campaign — had the “legitimate right” to do so.
“We are respectful of the legitimate right of our friends in the DPRK (North Korea) to ensure their security and take measures for it,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters.
Washington’s security ally Tokyo, meanwhile, said North Korea’s ballistic missile launches have been “absolutely unforgivable.”
As “evidenced” by North Korea’s provocations, “it’s never too early to accelerate efforts to revamp our defense capabilities,” Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi said.
“We will consider what steps are needed to protect our nation’s... peace and the lives of our people, without ruling out any options.”
The missile launched at 12:35 p.m. (0335 GMT) from an area north of Pyongyang and flew around 700 kilometers (435 miles), South Korea’s military said.
North Korea has significantly increased missile testing in recent years, which analysts say is aimed at improving precision strike capabilities, challenging the United States as well as South Korea, and testing weapons before potentially exporting them to Russia.
“From North Korea’s perspective, the possibility of sudden attacks from the East Sea will be a source of anxiety,” Ahn Chan-il, a defector-turned-researcher who runs the World Institute for North Korea Studies, told AFP.
“If South Korea acquires a nuclear-powered submarine, they would be able to enter North Korean waters and preemptively monitor or intercept weapons such as submarine-launched ballistic missiles.”
Trump had announced that South Korea would build the submarine in the United States, but Seoul says it is considering making it at home.
Unlike diesel-powered submarines, which must regularly surface to recharge their batteries, nuclear-powered ones can remain submerged for far longer.

- ‘Irreversible’ nuclear state -

Analysts say developing a nuclear-powered submarine would be a significant leap for South Korea.
Only the United States, Australia, China, Russia, India, France and Britain have moved toward nuclear-powered submarines, according to media and analysis reports.
Since North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s 2019 summit with Trump collapsed over the scope of denuclearization and sanctions relief, Pyongyang has repeatedly declared itself an “irreversible” nuclear state.
Kim has since been emboldened by the war in Ukraine, securing critical support from Moscow after sending thousands of troops to fight alongside Russian forces.
Pyongyang did not respond to Trump’s offer to meet with Kim last week, and instead its Foreign Minister Choe Son Hui headed to Moscow, where she and Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to strengthen bilateral ties.
In September, Kim appeared alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping and Putin at an elaborate military parade in Beijing — a striking display of his new, elevated status in global politics.
Trump met Kim three times during his first term and once famously said the pair had fallen “in love,” but the US leader ultimately failed to secure a lasting agreement on North Korea’s nuclear program.
South Korean lawmaker Lee Seong-kweun said this week that Seoul’s spy agency believes Kim was still open to talks with Washington, “and will seek contact when the conditions are in place.”
Although the proposed meeting with Trump did not materialize, “multiple signs suggest” that Pyongyang “had been preparing behind the scenes for possible talks with the US,” said the lawmaker.