French politicians accused of Islamophobia amid row over schoolgirls’ parliament visit

French politicians accused of Islamophobia amid row over schoolgirls’ parliament visit
1 / 2
Yael Braun-Pivet, the French National Assembly's president, was quick to criticize the girls wearing their hijabs inside the parliament. (AFP/File)
French politicians accused of Islamophobia amid row over schoolgirls’ parliament visit
2 / 2
The schoolgirls were on a visit to the French National Assembly when they were photographed sat in the public gallery. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 22 sec ago

French politicians accused of Islamophobia amid row over schoolgirls’ parliament visit

French politicians accused of Islamophobia amid row over schoolgirls’ parliament visit
  • Parliament speaker and other MPs condemn wearing of hijab inside National Assembly’s public gallery
  • Opponents say the girls did not breach France’s strict laws on religious symbols at school

LONDON: The latest row surrounding France’s ban on religious symbols at school has erupted after a group of Muslim schoolgirls visited the National Assembly wearing hijabs.

Yael Braun-Pivet, the assembly’s speaker and a member of President Emmanuel Macron’s centrist Renaissance Party, said the girls’ visit to the public gallery was “unacceptable” under the country’s secularist laws.

But other MPs hit back, accusing Braun-Pivet of Islamophobia and adopting the far-right strategy of using bans on religious clothing to target Muslims.

Students in public schools are banned from wearing religious symbols, including Christian crosses, Muslim headscarves, Jewish kippas and Sikh turbans. Civil servants face similar restrictions.

In 2023, France also banned students from wearing the abaya in public schools.

Images of the girls’ visit to the lower house of the French parliament on Wednesday were shared on social media and quickly went viral.

Braun-Pivet wrote on X: “At the very heart of the National Assembly, where the 2004 law on secularism in schools was voted, it seems to me unacceptable that young children can wear conspicuous religious symbols in the galleries … This is a question of the coherence of the republic.”

Some centrist and right-wing politicians joined in with the outcry, including Julien Odoul, an MP from the populist right-wing National Rally, who described the images as a “vile provocation.”

Others, however, said the criticism amounted to Islamophobia. Paul Vannier of the far-left France Unbowed party said Braun-Pivet “misunderstands the principle of secularism and, like the far right, she is instrumentalizing it against our Muslim fellow-citizens.” 

“That she targets young children who came to visit our Assembly adds to the ignominy and the stain that her Islamophobic statement constitutes,” he wrote on X.

Marine Tondelier, leader of the Greens, said that the National Assembly’s rules did not prohibit women from wearing the hijab in the public gallery.

“But if it prohibited Islamophobia, many politicians could no longer enter,” she added.

Amid the row, politicians clashed over whether the school ban on religious symbols included school outings. 

“They are part of school time and the same rules apply,” Gerard Larcher, the conservative speaker of the Senate, the upper house of the French parliament, was quoted as saying in The Times.

France’s strict secular rules are often the source of fierce debate in the country.

The government has long been accused of using the laws to target the Muslim community.


ICC confirms charges against Ugandan warlord Kony

Updated 5 sec ago

ICC confirms charges against Ugandan warlord Kony

ICC confirms charges against Ugandan warlord Kony
Under ICC procedure, a trial would normally follow the confirmation of charges
Judges said there were reasonable grounds to believe Kony was responsible for 29 charges as an “indirect co-perpetrator“

THE HAGUE: The International Criminal Court Thursday confirmed all 39 charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity allegedly committed by fugitive Uganda warlord Joseph Kony, including murder, enslavement, rape, and torture.
The leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army spearheaded a campaign of terror across northern Uganda between July 2002 and December 2005.
Under ICC procedure, a trial would normally follow the confirmation of charges. However, the court does not allow trials in absentia, and Kony has not been seen in public since 2006.
Judges said there were reasonable grounds to believe Kony was responsible for 29 charges as an “indirect co-perpetrator.”
This related to LRA attacks on a school and camps for internally displaced people and included murder, torture, forced marriage, forced pregnancy, rape, and conscripting children younger than 15.
The ICC also said Kony had a case to answer as a direct perpetrator in 10 cases related to two victims forced to be his “wives.”
These charges included enslavement, forced marriage, rape, forced pregnancy, and sexual slavery.
A former Catholic altar boy, Kony headed the feared LRA, whose insurgency against the Ugandan government saw more than 100,000 people killed and 60,000 children abducted, according to the United Nations.
His stated aim was to establish a nation based on the Bible’s 10 commandments but those who escaped told gruesome tales of the group’s brutality, being forced to hack or even bite others to death, eat human remains, and drink blood.
His last-known appearance was in 2006, when he told a Western journalist he was “not a terrorist” and that stories of LRA brutality were “propaganda.”
It is not known whether he is even still alive.

- ‘Tools of war’ -

In September, the ICC held a three-day “confirmation of charges” hearing in The Hague on the Kony case — the first-ever to be held without the suspect present.
His defense lawyer Peter Haynes argued during the hearing that the case should be frozen, as Kony had no way of challenging evidence in his absence.
The ICC judges rejected this request, they said in Thursday’s statement.
A lawyer for the victims, Sarah Pellet, laid out searing testimony of some of the atrocities suffered at the hands of the LRA.
The victims “had no choice when they were forced to watch killings. They had no choice when they were made to kill. They had no choice when their bodies were turned into tools of war,” Pellet told the court.
The court said neither party could appeal the decision until Kony had been informed — almost certainly a moot point.
The ICC prosecutor’s office said that confirming the charges was “a crucial step in holding Kony accountable for the grave crimes attributed to him.”
The office said it had an “unwavering commitment to pursuing justice for the victims of the crimes of the LRA and affected communities in northern Uganda.”
Several victims told AFP in Uganda that the confirmation of charges could not diminish the harm caused.
“ICC confirming Joseph Kony’s atrocities against us was expected, but is it erasing the suffering we suffered?,” said Angel Stella Lalam, a Kony victim who now heads the War Victims and Networking Organization based in Gulu city, the epicenter of the armed insurgency.
Lalam told AFP by phone that she was abducted as a child and only returned to her family more than a decade later.
“The confirmation of charges is cosmetic and does not address the suffering of the victims, especially when he is not in the dock and still at large,” she added.
Alex Okello, 56, a local leader in Pabbo, north of Gulu, said he wanted to see Kony actually face justice.
“The confirmation of charges against Kony is good but it’s not making us comfortable because he has not been arrested and he can kill more people,” Okello added.