Designing AI for a humane future in Techville

Designing AI for a humane future in Techville

Short Url

In the bustling fictional city of Techville, where algorithms shape daily routines and data flows faster than the desert wind, a new debate has emerged among policymakers, entrepreneurs, and citizens: can technology be not only ethical but also beautiful? 

The conversation is no longer limited to codes of conduct, compliance frameworks, or regulatory guidelines. Instead, it expands into a cultural and philosophical question — what does it mean to create an “aesthetic of ethics” in artificial intelligence?

This debate resonates deeply because Techville is more than a metaphor. It mirrors the global struggle to reconcile innovation with responsibility. In every smart traffic light, predictive medical system, or autonomous delivery drone, the city reflects our own aspirations and anxieties.

Beyond rules

For years, the AI ethics discussion revolved around frameworks: transparency, accountability, privacy, fairness. These principles remain indispensable, but they often feel abstract to citizens. A compliance checklist might prevent abuse, but it rarely inspires trust or admiration.

This is where aesthetics enter the picture. In philosophy, aesthetics are not limited to beauty in art or architecture; they encompass the sensory and emotional experience of human beings in their environment. Applied to AI, aesthetics ask: how does an ethical system feel to the user? Does it generate trust, harmony, and dignity — or suspicion, alienation, and fear?

In Techville, for instance, the municipal AI system that regulates public transportation does more than move buses efficiently. It communicates its decisions clearly, explains delays in human terms, and respects the dignity of commuters. By embedding ethics into design, the system achieves a kind of elegance. Commuters perceive it not as an intrusive machine but as a civic partner.

The aesthetic of trust

Trust is the first pillar of aesthetic ethics in AI. Trust is not built only on mathematical guarantees or legal contracts; it emerges from the visible coherence between principles and practice.

Take the example of health applications in Techville. Citizens consent to share anonymized medical data for predictive healthcare. The process could have remained a cold transaction — a form on a screen, a checkbox to click. Instead, the designers introduced a storytelling interface. Patients see how their contribution may help predict epidemics, improve emergency responses, and save lives. The interface shows the “why,” not just the “what.”

This is not cosmetic. It is an aesthetic rooted in ethics: when users feel respected, informed, and empowered, trust becomes natural. The beauty of the system is not in its design colors or typography but in its moral transparency.

Technology and society

A second dimension of aesthetics is harmony. A city thrives when its physical spaces are designed for coexistence — parks, plazas, walkable streets. Similarly, digital systems require ethical aesthetics to harmonize technology with society.

In Techville, this principle guides the deployment of facial recognition. Instead of allowing uncontrolled surveillance, the city council and its Innovation and Ethics Office set boundaries. Cameras can be used for crowd safety in public events, but not for profiling or social scoring. This balance avoids both extremes: a dystopia of constant monitoring and a chaos of unmanaged risks.

The result is harmony. Citizens sense that their rights are safeguarded without sacrificing security. Once again, the aesthetic experience flows directly from ethical discipline.

From algorithms to narratives

The philosopher Hans-Georg Gadamer once suggested that truth and beauty often converge through narrative — the way stories shape meaning. Techville’s leaders understood that algorithms, no matter how powerful, remain invisible and abstract. To foster legitimacy, they turned algorithmic decisions into narratives citizens can understand.

When the education department uses AI to allocate scholarships, the system does not simply output a list of names. It provides explanations in clear language: how merit, financial need, and geographic distribution were weighed. Students and families see not just the outcome but the reasoning.

This storytelling approach transforms raw data into a narrative of fairness. It is, in a way, the art of ethics — the aesthetic of a transparent and relatable process.

The ethical aesthetic of limits

Beauty is not only about abundance but also about proportion and restraint. Classical architecture remains admired not because it maximized materials but because it balanced form and function.

In AI, restraint is equally vital. Techville deliberately limited the use of predictive policing algorithms. While such systems could anticipate crime hotspots, they also risk amplifying social biases. The city decided that prevention must rely primarily on human community engagement, with AI serving only as a supportive tool.

The decision was not framed as a sacrifice of efficiency but as an affirmation of dignity. Citizens recognized the beauty of restraint — a reminder that ethics can flourish not only in what we build but also in what we refuse to build.

Global Lessons from Techville

Although fictional, Techville offers lessons for real-world cities, governments, and companies. A purely technical or legalistic view of ethics risks producing systems that are correct but uninspiring. By contrast, an aesthetic view recognizes that human beings long for dignity, harmony, and trust in their daily interactions with technology.

For policymakers, this means regulations should not only prevent harm but also promote values that resonate with citizens’ cultural and moral imagination.

For companies, it means design choices must reflect respect and empathy, not just usability or profit.

For citizens, it means demanding not only functional but also meaningful interactions with AI.

The challenge is immense, but so is the opportunity. If the industrial revolutions of the past left behind smokestacks and sprawling highways, the digital revolution could leave behind a legacy of elegant systems — technologies that embody ethical aesthetics.

A humane digital civilization

The debate on AI and ethics is often framed in terms of risk: the dangers of bias, surveillance, or loss of control. These are real, but they should not obscure the positive horizon. By embracing an aesthetic rooted in ethics, societies can move from a defensive stance to a creative one.

In Techville, this vision is beginning to shape education. Schools teach not only coding and data science but also digital philosophy and civic design. Students debate questions such as: What makes an algorithm fair? Can a machine decision be graceful? Should efficiency ever override empathy? These conversations nurture a generation that sees ethics not as a burden but as a form of cultural beauty.

Ultimately, the goal is not simply to make AI safer but to make digital life worth living. A humane digital civilization will emerge when ethics are not imposed as afterthoughts but woven into the very aesthetics of technological design.

Techville teaches us that ethics in AI must go beyond compliance to inspire confidence, dignity, and even admiration. The aesthetic of ethics is not decorative; it is foundational. When citizens perceive technology as trustworthy, harmonious, and narratively transparent, they experience not only safety but also beauty in their interaction with machines.

In an age where algorithms shape human destiny, the ultimate test of progress will not be whether systems work efficiently but whether they resonate with our deepest values. To build beautiful AI is to build ethical AI — and in that union lies the future of Techville, and perhaps of us all.

Rafael Hernandez de Santiago, viscount of Espes, is a Spanish national residing in and working at the Gulf Research Center.
 

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point of view

How Israel’s expansion into Syria uprooted families and undermined regional stability

How Israel’s expansion into Syria uprooted families and undermined regional stability
Updated 6 sec ago

How Israel’s expansion into Syria uprooted families and undermined regional stability

How Israel’s expansion into Syria uprooted families and undermined regional stability
  • Israel has advanced deeper into Syria since Assad’s ouster, marking a shift from earlier low-intensity campaign
  • Rights monitors have documented home demolitions, abuses, and arrests, accusing Israel of possible war crimes

LONDON: Almost immediately after the collapse of Bashar Assad’s regime on Dec. 8 last year, Israeli troops entered southern Syria’s Quneitra province and began raiding properties.

Residents recall their homes shaking as armored vehicles rolled through their normally quiet villages and troops took control of areas close to the disputed border with Israel.

“It was clear from their behavior that they intended to stay,” one woman from Al-Hamidiyah village said, recalling the day Israeli soldiers raided her home.

She told researchers from the New York-based Human Rights Watch that soldiers pointed their guns at her and her two daughters. They also forced her husband and son into another room at gunpoint.

“My daughters and I were held like that from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. My husband and son weren’t released until 11 p.m.,” she said. “The soldiers sat in our living room, laughing and speaking a language we didn’t understand, as if it were their house.”

Following Assad’s ouster in a rapid rebel offensive, Israel moved quickly to exploit the power vacuum. Its forces advanced deep into the UN-monitored demilitarized zone separating the occupied Golan Heights from the rest of Syria.

Soon, Israeli troops established nine military posts stretching from Mount Hermon through Quneitra city to parts of western Daraa.

The HRW documented widespread abuses against civilians in a report published on Sept. 17.

In Al-Hamidiyah, a village in the countryside of Quneitra, Israeli troops reportedly demolished at least 12 buildings on June 16, displacing eight families, to establish a military installation. But residents said expulsions began the same day Assad’s government fell.

“Our house was closest to the military post, so it was first to be demolished,” one villager told the HRW. “The land surrounding it, which we had planted with trees, was completely bulldozed along with the house.”

“Nothing was left,” he added. “We’ve been living under extremely difficult conditions ever since we lost our home and land.”

As the months passed, tensions continued to escalate.

On Oct. 18, Israeli forces set up a checkpoint on the road linking Ofania and Jubata Al-Khashab, where they allegedly intimidated and assaulted civilians, according to the Syrian state-run Alikhbaria TV.

Nearly three days later, Israeli forces raided Al-Hamidiyah again to conduct excavation work, Syria’s state news agency SANA reported on Oct. 22. They were accompanied by heavy machinery, including drilling rigs and bulldozers.

Nearby, in the town of Jubata Al-Khashab, Israeli forces reportedly cleared further tracts of land — including a century-old forest reserve — to build another military installation.

The HRW also documented severe restrictions that cut residents off from their farmland and grazing areas. Locals said troops bulldozed or fenced off agricultural plots, groves, and pastures.

“We own agricultural land with a total area of 50 dunams (5 hectares),” one woman said. “Part of it was cultivated with wheat or barley, while the other part was used for grazing sheep.”

She told the HRW that Israeli forces built a high earthen berm that blocked access to the entire property and placed it under military control.

The HRW report detailed arbitrary arrests and the transfer of detainees into Israel, including a 17-year-old from Jubata Al-Khashab arrested in April and held without charge.

Shortly after midnight on June 12, Israeli forces, backed by armored vehicles, heavy equipment, and police dogs, raided the village of Beit Jinn in the Damascus countryside, 3 kilometers east of the disengagement line.

Residents told the HRW that soldiers arrested seven men and killed another who had cognitive disabilities.

The Israeli military told Reuters the detainees belonged to Hamas and were planning “multiple terror plots” against Israeli civilians and troops in Syria. It said the men were transferred into Israel for further interrogation.

Syria’s Interior Ministry rejected the claim, saying those arrested were local civilians, not Hamas members. The ministry condemned the raid, which lasted around 45 minutes, as a “blatant violation” of Syria’s sovereignty.

The HRW said Israel’s forced displacements, home demolitions and land seizures constitute war crimes under international law. “Israel’s documented actions in southern Syria violated the laws of war,” the monitor added.

The Israeli military, however, maintains that its operations comply with international law. It described the demolitions as “necessary operational measures,” claiming no civilians lived in the affected buildings.

The HRW said these actions were part of a broader strategy to entrench Israel’s military presence in southern Syria — a view seemingly confirmed by Israeli officials.

In August, Israel’s Defense Minister Israel Katz said Israeli troops “will remain on the summit of (Mount) Hermon and in the security zone that is vital to defending communities in the Golan and Galilee from threats emanating from the Syrian side.”

Israeli troops captured the Syrian peak of Mount Hermon — the highest point on the eastern Mediterranean coast — almost immediately after Assad’s fall.

In a post on X, Katz said maintaining control there was a “central lesson from the events of Oct. 7,” referring to the 2023 Hamas-led attack on southern Israel that killed 1,200 and saw 251 taken hostage.

Israel’s retaliatory offensive in Gaza has killed at least 68,280 people, according to the local health authority, displaced more than 90 percent of the population, and reduced much of the Palestinian enclave to rubble.

Katz made similar remarks in April, saying that Israeli troops would remain in Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria indefinitely, The Associated Press reported.

“Unlike in the past, the (Israeli military) is not evacuating areas that have been cleared and seized,” Katz said in a statement on April 17.

He added that the military “will remain in the security zones as a buffer between the enemy and (Israeli) communities in any temporary or permanent situation in Gaza — as in Lebanon and Syria.”

Israel’s posture marks a shift from its earlier low-intensity campaign against Hezbollah and Palestinian factions in Syria, which began around 2017.

During Assad’s rule, Israel frequently launched airstrikes, particularly targeting Iranian-backed forces and Hezbollah assets near Damascus and across southern Syria.

By 2018, Israeli officials said they had carried out more than 200 airstrikes on Iranian targets in Syria in about 18 months.

However, Hiba Zayadin, senior Syria researcher at the HRW, said that Israel’s recent actions in southern Syria “are not legitimate acts of military necessity, but pages out of the playbook used in the occupied Palestinian territory and other parts of the region, stripping residents of basic rights and freedoms.”

Analysts say these moves reflect a calculated effort by Israel to reshape the post-Assad landscape to its advantage.

“(The late American political scientist Henry) Kissinger famously warned that ‘the desire of one power for absolute security means absolute insecurity for all the others,’” Joshua Landis, director of the Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Oklahoma, told Arab News.

“This dictum expresses a core principle of realist international relations theory, which emphasizes the balance of power.

“A nation’s attempt to achieve complete and undeniable security will necessarily require it to amass so much power that it threatens all other nations, leading to a breakdown of stability and a heightened risk of war.

“Today, Israel has amassed so much power that it can threaten its neighbors with little or no risk to itself, and it is doing so.

“By seizing more Syrian territory, demolishing homes, and depriving farmers of their livelihoods, Israel is setting itself and the region up for another round of wars and regional conflict.”

He warned that “the international community has accepted this imbalance and fails to do anything about it despite the heavy future price that is obvious to all.”

Since Oct. 7, 2023, Israel has carried out strikes in Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and even Qatar, while continuing its war in Gaza and intensifying its occupation of the West Bank.

In Syria alone, Israel’s air force and navy carried out more than 350 strikes within the first two days of Assad’s fall, destroying roughly 80 percent of the country’s strategic military arsenal. The attacks continued for months afterward.

“Israel’s occupation of southern Syria is a deliberate strategy to prevent the consolidation of a unified Syrian state,” Nanar Hawach, a senior Syria analyst at the International Crisis Group, told Arab News.

“This policy of managed instability aims to create a permanent buffer zone and a controlled ‘border society,’ which secures Israel’s northern frontier on its own terms.

“Beyond the southern borders, Israeli actions create an unstable environment that effectively discourages regional investment needed for economic recovery, prolonging Syria’s fragility.

“This approach, while providing a security advantage for Israel, comes at the cost of Syrian sovereignty and regional stability, trapping the country in a cycle of poverty, political fragility, and instability.”

In February, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar openly advocated a federal Syria composed of autonomous regions — a move analysts warn could deepen internal fragmentation and undermine efforts at national stabilization.

Syrian economists warn that without security and stability, the country risks losing crucial regional and international investment.

Landis said Israel and Syria have a rare opportunity to pursue peace.

“Unfortunately, this opportunity is being squandered because of the dramatic imbalance of power and because Israel seeks absolute security through the force of arms rather than diplomacy,” he said.

Israel has voiced growing distrust of Syria’s interim government, especially after attacks on Druze populations in the south in July.

To counter that, it has cultivated ties with local Druze communities, supporting their autonomy and influence as a buffer against Damascus’ central authority.

In February, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israeli forces would remain on Mount Hermon “for an unlimited period of time.” He demanded “the full demilitarization of southern Syria from troops of the new Syrian regime.”

He also said Israel would not tolerate any threats to Druze communities in the region.

Syria’s interim president, Ahmed Al-Sharaa, has repeatedly stated that his government does not seek conflict with Israel and poses no threat to its neighbors.

“We are not the ones creating problems for Israel. We are scared of Israel, not the other way around,” Al-Sharaa said on Sept. 24, during an event hosted by the Middle East Institute in New York.

He warned that Israel’s continued airspace violations and territorial incursions risk derailing US-brokered peace talks, which remain stalled over issues of sovereignty, withdrawal schedules, and minority protections.

Landis said Israel’s policies reflect a long-standing pattern.

“Since the 1967 (Arab-Israeli war), Israel has discovered that it can win lopsided victories,” he said. “Despite international insistence that it trade land for peace, Israel has chosen land over peace.

“By expanding its borders in the name of absolute security, Israel has squandered efforts to find a negotiated peace. The result is that it has locked the region into perpetual war.

“Israel also forces its allies in the US and Europe to choose between Israel and its Arab neighbors. The West has always chosen Israel, and thus, the imbalance continues and so does war.”