��������

LONDON: Human rights and media organizations are calling for the protection of journalists amid a near-total communications blackout in El-Fasher following the city’s fall to the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces.

A limited and scattered stream of reports have emerged of the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe in the North Darfur capital city, with the Sudanese government accusing the RSF of killing over 2,000 civilians during the past weekend.

The Committee to Protect Journalists reported that as many as 11 journalists have gone missing in El-Fasher, including freelance reporter Muhammad Ibrahim. Ibrahim appeared in a video circulated by the RSF on Sunday, showing him being captured while trying to leave the city.

In a statement on Thursday, the CPJ confirmed it had verified the whereabouts of three of the missing, all of whom have fled the city. The remaining journalists remain incommunicado amid ongoing hostilities and the blackout that severely limits external communication.

“The RSF’s claims that it is solely targeting ‘terrorists’ and not civilians replicate a familiar play-book — first denial of civilian harm, then shifting of blame, and then active suppression of journalists attempting to document the truth,” said Sara Qudah, CPJ regional director.

Fighting has escalated since April 2023, when internal conflicts within Sudan’s military regime erupted into open clashes in Khartoum, quickly spreading across the country.

Over the past weekend, the RSF took control of the last Darfur regional capital following an 18-month siege, expanding its influence across the west and southwest of Sudan.

A comprehensive communications blackout appears to be in effect across large areas of North Darfur, severely restricting external access, impeding independent verification and deepening the isolation of journalists and affected communities.

Multiple sources report that as the RSF advanced it seized journalists, killed a significant number of civilians, and broadcast footage of their operations on social media — a “chilling escalation” in the targeted repression of both the press and the public, according to the CPJ.

An estimated 260,000 civilians are still trapped in the city, half of them children.

“This cycle fosters impunity, stifles independent reporting and erodes accountability,” Qudah said.

“We urge all parties — and the international community — to act immediately to protect journalists, restore communications and ensure accountability for these grave violations.”

On Wednesday, the Sudan Media Forum condemned the attacks, saying they demonstrated “a complete disregard for international law and human dignity.”

The group called on the international community to “exert maximum pressure” on the RSF to allow essential supplies — including food, medicine and aid — to reach the city and to halt what it termed “summary executions” and “ethnically motivated killings.”

The CPJ also urged the imposition of targeted sanctions and accountability measures against RSF leaders, stating: “The world can no longer afford to wait to act in defense of the public’s right to know and for the safety of journalists in El-Fasher.”

Since the war between the RSF and the Sudanese Armed Forces began on April 15, 2023, the RSF has killed at least 14 journalists with dozens more detained, assaulted, raped or disappeared, according to the CPJ’s research.

DUBAI: Tech giants Google and Amazon agreed to use a secret code to warn their client, the Israeli government, if their data was being handed over to foreign law enforcement, according to a joint investigation by The Guardian, Israeli-Palestinian publication +972 Magazine, and Hebrew-language outlet Local Call.

The agreement was part of a $1.2 billion cloud-computing deal inked in 2021, known as Project Nimbus. It stemmed from Israel’s concerns that the data it stores on these tech companies’ cloud platforms could end up in the hands of foreign law enforcement authorities.

Tech companies must comply with requests from law enforcement and security agencies to hand over customer data for investigative purposes. Moreover, they are often prohibited from informing the customer that their data has been disclosed.

Therefore, Israeli officials developed the so-called “winking” mechanism, under which Google and Amazon would send secret signals, hidden in payments, to the Israeli government, revealing the identity of the country to which they had been compelled to hand over Israeli data.

According to leaked documents from Israel’s Finance Ministry, which include a finalized version of the Nimbus agreement, payments must be made “within 24 hours of the information being transferred” and correspond to the telephone dialing code of the foreign country, amounting to sums between 1,000 ($308) and 9,999 shekels.

For example, if either firm provided information to authorities in the US, where the dialing code is +1, they would have to send the Israeli government 1,000 shekels.

If they share Israeli data with authorities in Italy, where the dialing code is +39, they would have to send 3,900 shekels.

In cases where the companies concluded they were under a gag order preventing them from indicating which country had received the data, they must pay 100,000 shekels to the Israeli government.

The agreement also includes measures that prohibit the US companies from restricting how the Israeli government and its branches, including the military and security services, use their cloud services.

Both companies’ standard “acceptable use” policies state that their cloud platforms should not be used to violate the legal rights of others, nor to engage in or encourage activities that cause “serious harm” to people.

However, according to an Israeli official familiar with the Nimbus project, there can be “no restrictions” on the kind of information stored in Google and Amazon’s cloud platforms.

The leaked documents state that Israel is “entitled to migrate to the cloud or generate in the cloud any content data they wish.”

Legal experts said the agreement is extremely unusual and risky, as the coded messages could violate legal obligations in the US, where Google and Amazon are headquartered.

“It seems awfully cute and something that if the US government or, more to the point, a court were to understand, I don’t think they would be particularly sympathetic,” a former US government lawyer told The Guardian.

Both Google and Amazon’s cloud businesses have denied evading any legal obligations. Neither responded to The Guardian’s questions about whether they had used the “wink.”

An Amazon spokesperson said that the company has a “rigorous global process for responding to lawful and binding orders for requests related to customer data,” adding that there are no “processes in place to circumvent our confidentiality obligations on lawfully binding orders.”

Google declined to comment on which of Israel’s demands it had accepted in the Nimbus deal, but said it was “false” to “imply that we somehow were involved in illegal activity, which is absurd.”

A spokesperson for Israel’s Finance Ministry said: “The article’s insinuation that Israel compels companies to breach the law is baseless.”

Google and Amazon are “bound by stringent contractual obligations that safeguard Israel’s vital interests,” and “we will not legitimize the article’s claims by disclosing private commercial terms,” the spokesperson added.