Trump says Modi has assured him India will not buy Russian oil

Trump says Modi has assured him India will not buy Russian oil
US President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi attend a joint press conference at the White House in Washington on February 13, 2025. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 11 sec ago

Trump says Modi has assured him India will not buy Russian oil

Trump says Modi has assured him India will not buy Russian oil
  • Indian embassy in Washington has not yet confirmed agreement
  • Trump says India cannot halt Russian shipments ‘immediately’

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has pledged to stop buying oil from Russia, and Trump said he would next try to get China to do the same as Washington intensifies efforts to cut off Moscow’s energy revenues.
India and China are the two top buyers of Russian seaborne crude exports, taking advantage of the discounted prices Russia has been forced to accept after European buyers shunned purchases and the US and the European Union imposed sanctions on Moscow for its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
Trump has recently targeted India for its Russian oil purchases, imposing tariffs on Indian exports to the US to discourage the country’s crude buying as he seeks to choke off Russia’s oil revenues and pressure Moscow to negotiate a peace deal in Ukraine.
“So I was not happy that India was buying oil, and he assured me today that they will not be buying oil from Russia,” Trump told reporters during a White House event.
“That’s a big step. Now we’re going to get China to do the same thing.”
The Indian embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to emailed questions about whether Modi had made such a commitment to Trump. Russia is India’s top oil supplier. Moscow exported 1.62 million barrels per day to India in September, roughly one third of the country’s oil imports. For months, Modi resisted US pressure, with Indian officials defending the purchases as vital to national energy security.
While imports from other producers would likely cost India more, lower oil prices would temper the impact. Benchmark Brent crude futures hit a five-month low on Wednesday on concerns about a growing surplus in the market.
A move by India to stop imports would signal a major shift by one of Moscow’s top energy customers and could reshape the calculus for other nations still importing Russian crude. Trump wants to leverage bilateral relationships to enforce economic isolation on Russia, rather than relying solely on multilateral sanctions.
The announcement comes just days after Trump’s new pick for Indian ambassador, Sergio Gor, met with Modi.
The two discussed defense, trade and technology issues. The appointment of Gor, a close confidant to Trump, was widely seen as a positive move for the US-India bilateral relationship.
During his comments to reporters, Trump added that India could not “immediately” halt shipments, calling it “a little bit of a process, but that process will be over soon.”
Despite his push on India, Trump has largely avoided placing similar pressure on China. The US trade war with Beijing has complicated diplomatic efforts, with Trump reluctant to risk further escalation by demanding a halt to Chinese energy imports from Russia.
Trump imposed a 25 percent tariff on India this summer after the two countries failed to reach an initial trade agreement. He followed up with an additional 25 percent because of the country’s purchases of Russian oil. India chafed at the move because no other top purchasers of Russian oil, like China or Turkiye, were hit with similar tariffs.


Trump considering strikes on land against Venezuela cartels

Trump considering strikes on land against Venezuela cartels
Updated 15 October 2025

Trump considering strikes on land against Venezuela cartels

Trump considering strikes on land against Venezuela cartels
  • US has recently laucnhed strikes at sea against alleged drug-carrying boats

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said Wednesday he was considering strikes targeting Venezuelan cartels on land, after a series of deadly strikes at sea against alleged drug-carrying boats.
“We are certainly looking at land now, because we’ve got the sea very well under control,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, when asked if he was weighing strikes on land.
But Trump declined to confirm a New York Times report that he had secretly authorized the CIA to conduct covert action in Venezuela against the administration of President Nicolas Maduro.
Asked if he had given the CIA authority to “take out” Maduro, Trump replied: “That’s a ridiculous question for me to be given. Not really a ridiculous question, but wouldn’t it be a ridiculous question for me to answer?”
Trump said on Tuesday that another strike on boats allegedly transporting drugs from Venezuela had killed six “narcoterrorists.”
At least 27 people have been killed so far in such attacks. Experts question the legality of using lethal force in foreign or international waters against suspects who have not been intercepted or questioned.
Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro has said he believes some of those killed were Colombian.


Legal battle looms over Nepal’s post-uprising interim government

Legal battle looms over Nepal’s post-uprising interim government
Updated 15 October 2025

Legal battle looms over Nepal’s post-uprising interim government

Legal battle looms over Nepal’s post-uprising interim government
  • Youth-led protests over economic hardship and corruption in September forced the government’s collapse
  • A day after the dissolution, leaders of eight political parties calrrg for the reinstatement of parliament

KATMANDU: Petitions have been filed in Nepal’s Supreme Court challenging the formation of an interim government and the dissolution of parliament following last month’s uprising, a court official said Wednesday.
The youth-led protests, which erupted on September 8 over a brief social media ban, economic hardship and corruption, quickly morphed into nationwide fury after a deadly crackdown.
Two days of violence left at least 73 people dead, the parliament and government offices burned down, and forced the government’s collapse.
Former chief justice Sushila Karki, 73, was nominated as prime minister and the parliament was dissolved shortly after.
But the legality of those moves is now under scrutiny.
“Eleven petitions have been filed stating that the formation of the new interim government and the dissolution of the lower house is unconstitutional,” Nirajan Pandey, the court’s information officer told AFP.
Pandey said procedures were underway to register the petitions, after which hearings would be scheduled.
A day after the dissolution, leaders of eight political parties issued a joint statement calling for the reinstatement of parliament.
“It was not envisioned in the constitution that such a situation would arise,” lawyer Dinesh Tripathi said.
“It is a challenge, but the court will decide.”
KP Sharma Oli, the 73-year-old Marxist who served as prime minister four times before his ouster, has called for the reinstatement of the parliament “that was unconstitutionally dissolved,” in an address to supporters earlier this month.
The Supreme Court building was also damaged by fire during the protests, and only resumed full operations on Tuesday, with many sections operating under a tent.
 


US defense secretary’s plane makes emergency landing in UK

US defense secretary’s plane makes emergency landing in UK
Updated 15 October 2025

US defense secretary’s plane makes emergency landing in UK

US defense secretary’s plane makes emergency landing in UK
  • Hegseth was returning to Washington from a NATO defense ministers meeting in Brussels

WASHINGTON: A plane carrying US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was forced to make an emergency landing in Britain on Wednesday due to a crack in the aircraft’s windshield.
Hegseth was returning to the United States from a NATO defense ministers meeting in Brussels when his plane made the unscheduled landing at an unnamed airport in Britain, a spokesperson said.
“The plane landed based on standard procedures and everyone onboard, including Secretary Hegseth, is safe,” Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said on social media.
“All good. Thank God. Continue mission!” Hegseth posted in reply.
At the NATO meeting, Hegseth called for member countries to contribute more military aid to Ukraine in its fight against Russia’s invasion.


Pro-Palestine activists in Britain have bank account closed amid crackdown fears

Pro-Palestine activists in Britain have bank account closed amid crackdown fears
Updated 15 October 2025

Pro-Palestine activists in Britain have bank account closed amid crackdown fears

Pro-Palestine activists in Britain have bank account closed amid crackdown fears
  • John Nicholson, 70, and Norma Turner, 86, are treasurer and chair of Greater Manchester Friends of Palestine
  • ‘This kind of behaviour has just never happened in our lifetime of activism before, and is suddenly happening to activists and to organisations and to people’

LONDON: A retired British couple who took part in local pro-Palestine activist have had their joint bank account closed without explanation, The Guardian reported.

John Nicholson, 70, and Norma Turner, 86, are treasurer and chair, respectively, of Greater Manchester Friends of Palestine, which also had its bank account with Virgin Money frozen.

The couple said that their personal account with Yorkshire Building Society was used as a nest egg.

They received the full balance of the account via check after being informed of its closure.

Nicholson, a retired immigration barrister, and Turner, a former nurse, received a letter on Sept. 27 in which they were told that their account, which was opened about five years ago, would close on Sept. 30. 

“Neither of us​ have never been in financial difficulties, never been in debt​, (other than) mortgages, but paid those off. Never had any criminal ​record, fraud or anything​ of that sort of whatsoever,” Nicholson said.

“This is just inexplicable and, obviously, it’s not inexplicable because it’s to do with Palestine. It’s as simple as that but it’s inexplicable in that this was an amount of money we’ve got from retirement, put into a savings account, rolled it forward in a fixed-term bond, when that finished, rolled it forward in another one.

Yorkshire Building Society had, one month ago, “accepted quite happily” for the couple to roll forward the fix-term bond again, Nicholson said, adding that the account had no transactions.

He added: “This kind of behaviour has just never happened in our lifetime of activism before, and is suddenly happening to activists and to organisations and to people. If it isn’t Palestine, then why doesn’t YBS say what reason it is?”

The bank account of GMFP was frozen without explanation on July 10, five days after the banning of Palestine Action.

The Manchester organization had no connection with the proscribed group, sparking fears of a broader coordinated crackdown on pro-Palestinian activism in Britain.

The publicly listed activities of GMFP include letter-writing, individual consumer boycotting, leafleting, social media output, widespread protests and direct action.

A separate member of GMFP, also a signatory to the organization’s bank account, had their personal account frozen, too, but wished to remain anonymous.

Nicholson said: “We’ve absolutely no other idea of why anything could have happened to us other than (our pro-Palestinian activism) because that is pretty much the only thing that we’re doing in our lives at the moment.

“And then the ban came in on Palestine Action and we know that other people are having their bank accounts frozen,” he added, referring to the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign.

The SPSC had its account with Unity Trust bank frozen in June, apparently due to its website featuring a button to donate to Palestine Action before the group’s banning.

However, despite the button being removed after proscription, the account remains frozen.

YBS, Virgin Money and Unity Trust bank all declined to comment on individual cases when approached by The Guardian.

A spokesperson for the former said: “We never close savings accounts based on different opinions or beliefs. Accounts are closed only in very rare circumstances, with decisions made on the basis of the specific facts of the case.”


Germany pledges big military aid package to Ukraine as Kyiv puts 2026 defense needs at $120 billion

Germany pledges big military aid package to Ukraine as Kyiv puts 2026 defense needs at $120 billion
Updated 15 October 2025

Germany pledges big military aid package to Ukraine as Kyiv puts 2026 defense needs at $120 billion

Germany pledges big military aid package to Ukraine as Kyiv puts 2026 defense needs at $120 billion
  • Pistorius said that Germany would buy $500m worth of US weapons for Ukraine
  • He said that Germany would separately provide “another two Iris-T air defense systems, including a large number of guided missiles”

BRUSSELS: Germany on Wednesday pledged more than $2 billion in military aid for Ukraine, as the government in Kyiv signaled that it would need $120 billion in 2026 to stave off Russia’s nearly four-year all-out war.
Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said that Germany would buy $500 million worth of US weapons for Ukraine under a new program to fast-track military equipment. Estonia, Finland, Lithuania and Sweden said that they would also participate in the funding initiative.
Pistorius said that Germany’s “package addresses a number of urgent requirements of Ukraine. It provides air defense systems, Patriot (missile) interceptors, radar systems and precision guided artillery, rockets and ammunition.”
He said that Germany would separately provide “another two Iris-T air defense systems, including a large number of guided missiles, as well as shoulder-fired air defense missiles.” Anti-tank weapons, communication devices and hand-held weapons would also be delivered.
NATO’s fast-track funding program
Over the summer, the trans-Atlantic alliance started to coordinate regular deliveries of large weapons packages to Ukraine to help fend off Russia’s war. The aim was to send at least one load a month of targeted and predictable military support, each worth around $500 million.
Spare weapons stocks in European arsenals have all but dried up, and only the United States has a sufficient store of ready weapons that Ukraine most needs.
Under the financial arrangement — known as the Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List, or PURL — European allies and Canada are buying American weapons to help Kyiv keep Russian forces at bay. About $2 billion worth had previously been allocated since August.
Finland’s defense minister, Antti Häkkänen, said that his country has “decided to join the PURL, because we see that it’s crucial that Ukraine gets the critical US weapons.” Finland will also provide a separate package of its own military equipment.
Swedish Defense Minister Pål Jonson said that “Sweden stands ready to do more.” He welcomed discussions among other Nordic countries and the Baltic nations — Estonia and Lithuania — on helping to make up another load too.
Ukraine’s striking needs for 2026
Germany’s pledge came after a meeting of NATO defense ministers in Brussels, as Ukraine’s Western backers gathered to drum up more military support for their beleaguered partner.
Ukrainian Defense Minister Denys Shmyhal put his country’s defense needs next year at $120 billion.
“Ukraine will cover half, 60 billion, from our national resources. We are asking partners to join us in covering the other half,” he said. He said that “the most efficient, effective, fast” way for Kyiv’s backers to do that would be “to dedicate no less than 0.25 percent of their GDP (gross domestic product) to military support.”
Air defense systems are most in need. Shmyhal said that last month alone, Russia “launched over 5,600 strike drones and more than 180 missiles targeting our civilian infrastructure and people. Therefore, on the eve of winter, it is very critical to provide us with necessary equipment to repel such attacks.”
Dwindling support
The new pledges of support came a day after new data showed that foreign military aid to Ukraine had declined sharply recently. Despite the PURL program, support plunged by 43 percent in July and August compared to the first half of the year, according to Germany’s Kiel Institute, which tracks such deliveries and funding.
Jonson said that Sweden believes its aid “is critical now, because we’ve been seeing the wrong trajectory when it comes to support to Ukraine, that it’s been going down and we want to see more stepping up.”
Estonian Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur also expressed concern about a drop in Western backing, noting that “the reality is that the share of the US contributions to Ukraine has decreased significantly this year.”
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that “all countries need to translate goals into guns, commitments into capabilities and pledges into power. That’s all that matters. Hard power. It’s the only thing belligerents actually respect.”
The Trump administration hasn’t donated military equipment to Ukraine. It has been weighing whether to send Tomahawk long-range missiles if Russia doesn’t wind down its war soon, but it remains unclear who will pay for those weapons, should they ever be approved.
Sharing the burden

Criticism has mounted that France, Italy and Spain aren’t doing enough to help Ukraine, and Häkkänen called on all 32 NATO allies to take on their “fair share of the burden,” saying that “everyone has to find the money because this is a crucial moment.”
France and Italy are mired in debt and struggling to raise money just to meet NATO’s defense spending targets. Spain says it has other economic concerns and insists that it makes up for its spending gap at NATO by deploying troops on the alliance’s missions.
France also believes that European money should be spent on Europe’s defense industry, not in the United States, and it doesn’t intend to take part in PURL.