Unification Church leader questioned in ex-South Korea first lady investigation

Unification Church leader questioned in ex-South Korea first lady investigation
Han Hak-ja, center, has been accused of instructing the religious group to bribe former First Lady Kim Keon Hee and Kweon Seong-dong, a veteran lawmaker. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 19 sec ago

Unification Church leader questioned in ex-South Korea first lady investigation

Unification Church leader questioned in ex-South Korea first lady investigation
  • Han Hak-ja questioned over bribery allegations involving former First Lady Kim Keon Hee
  • Lawmaker detained over evidence destruction concerns, denies bribery

SEOUL: The leader of the Unification Church, Han Hak-ja, appeared for questioning by prosecutors on Wednesday over alleged involvement in bribing the wife of ousted South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol as part of a criminal probe into the former first couple.
Han declined to answer questions from reporters about the allegations as she arrived at the office of the special prosecutor.
“I’ve been unwell,” she said, when asked why she had chosen to respond to questioning, after refusing earlier summons.
Han, who is called “True Mother” by followers, is the widow of Unification Church founder Moon Sun-myung, who died in 2012.
Han was assisted by aides as she stepped out of the car and walked slowly through a throng of reporters and security.
A church official shouted “Mother, hang in there,” as Han made her way inside the prosecutors’ office.
An ambulance arranged by Han was on standby while she was interrogated, according to the special prosecutor’s team.
The special prosecutor has indicted former First Lady Kim Keon Hee for bribery and other charges in a widening probe into several charges of wrongdoing by her before and during Yoon’s presidency. Kim has been imprisoned as part of the probe.
Han has been accused of instructing the religious group to bribe the former first lady and Kweon Seong-dong, a veteran lawmaker and close confidante of Yoon. Han has denied the allegations.
Kweon from the conservative People Power Party was detained on Wednesday over concerns he could destroy evidence, prosecutors said. Kweon has denied that he took bribes from the church.
Kim Hyong Kun, deputy special prosecutor, told reporters on Wednesday that Han did not exercise her right to remain silent and answered questions well related to allegations of violating political funding and anti-graft laws.
The prosecutors were not currently considering issuing an arrest warrant for Han, since she had come in for questioning, Kim said.
Yoon, who is also in detention, is on trial over insurrection charges levelled against him by a separate special prosecutor related to his botched bid to declare martial law.
Kim is accused of receiving bribes worth 80 million won ($57,958) that include two Chanel bags and a diamond necklace from an official at the Unification Church in return for using her influence to help the church’s business interests.
Kim’s lawyers have denied the allegations against her, including over her receiving gifts.
Han has called the allegations against her “false information.”
The official from the church that prosecutors say was behind the bribery has been arrested and indicted on charges including violating anti-graft laws.
The Unification Church, formally called the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification, said previously it was “deeply regrettable” that it failed to prevent the misconduct of a former senior official, but denied any involvement in the case.


Pakistan backs idea of joint Arab security force after Israel’s strike in Doha

Pakistan backs idea of joint Arab security force after Israel’s strike in Doha
Updated 5 sec ago

Pakistan backs idea of joint Arab security force after Israel’s strike in Doha

Pakistan backs idea of joint Arab security force after Israel’s strike in Doha
  • Ishaq Dar tells Al Jazeera the force would be defensive, aimed at protecting regional states against ‘the occupier’
  • He says Pakistan will ‘discharge its duty’ toward the Muslim world, highlights its conventional military abilities

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar backed the idea of a joint Arab security force this week after Israel’s Sept. 9 airstrikes on Qatar, saying that his country was ready to play a role while highlighting its conventional military abilities.

Speaking to Al Jazeera ahead of the emergency Arab-Islamic summit in Doha, Dar said it was vital to strengthen multilateralism to ensure peace for everyone by carrying out institutional reforms at the United Nations.

His remarks came days after Israel targeted a group of Hamas leaders discussing a US-backed Gaza ceasefire proposal by hitting a residential neighborhood in Doha. Qatar has been a key mediator in ceasefire and hostage negotiations between Israel and Hamas, hosting the Palestinian group’s political bureau as part of the process.

Confirming reports that Arab states were discussing the idea of a combined security force, he said: “Why not? What’s wrong with that? They should [have such a force]. And according to their own capacity, their own strength, they should create some [defense] mechanism.”

Dar maintained such a force would not be developed for offensive purposes but to defend regional states and ensure peace by “stopping the occupier … [and] somebody who just doesn’t listen [to anyone].”

When asked about the role of “nuclear powered Pakistan,” he said his country’s nuclear arsenal was for deterrence but noted Islamabad would stand with Arab states and “discharge its duty” toward the Muslim community.

“Pakistan [has] a very large, known, very effective army, very effective Air Force, very effective Navy,” he added.

Referring to Pakistan’s military standoff with India in May, Dar said his country’s armed forces had proven their worth during the exchange.

Asked if Israel had also targeted Pakistan after Qatar, he said Israel had fully supported India in its war against Pakistan but had seen the results.


As officials searched for Charlie Kirk’s shooter, suspect confessed to his partner, prosecutor says

As officials searched for Charlie Kirk’s shooter, suspect confessed to his partner, prosecutor says
Updated 6 min 13 sec ago

As officials searched for Charlie Kirk’s shooter, suspect confessed to his partner, prosecutor says

As officials searched for Charlie Kirk’s shooter, suspect confessed to his partner, prosecutor says

PROVO, Utah: As authorities worked feverishly to find the person who assassinated Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University last week, the 22-year-old man now charged with the crime was texting with his romantic partner and acknowledging he was the shooter, court documents revealed.
Tyler Robinson fired a single fatal shot from the rooftop of a building overlooking the outdoor venue where Kirk was speaking to about 3,000 people on Sept. 10, investigators say. Afterward, prosecutors say he texted with the partner, who he lived with near St. George, Utah, about 240 miles (387 kilometers) southwest of the campus.
He said to look under his keyboard at their home. There was a note that said, “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I’m going to take it.”
After expressing shock, his partner asked Robinson if he was the shooter. Robinson responded, “I am, I’m sorry.”
The partner apparently never went to law enforcement with the information. Robinson remained on the run until the next night, when his parents recognized he was the person in a photo released by authorities as they searched for the shooter. They helped organize Robinson’s peaceful surrender.
The partner was not named in the charging documents that contained the narrative of the shooting and were made public Tuesday when authorities charged Robinson with capital murder and other counts. He could face the death penalty.
Law enforcement officials say they are looking at whether others knew about or aided Robinson in the assassination. They have not said if the partner is among those being investigated but have publicly expressed appreciation for the partner sharing information.
Prosecutors allege Robinson used a bolt-action rifle to shoot Kirk in the neck on the campus in Orem, about 40 miles (64 kilometers) south of Salt Lake City. DNA on the trigger of the rifle matched Robinson, according to Utah County Attorney Jeff Gray. The rifle had been Robinson’s grandfather’s.
Robinson appeared briefly Tuesday before a judge by video from jail. He nodded slightly at times but mostly stared ahead as the judge read the charges and said he would appoint an attorney to represent him. Robinson’s family has declined to comment to The Associated Press since his arrest.
Kirk, a 31-year-old father of two, was a prominent force in politics credited with energizing the Republican youth movement and helping Donald Trump win back the White House in 2024. He gained a large following through social media, his podcast and campus events that featured him responding to a line of questioners who could query and debate him on any topic.

Robinson detailed movements after the shooting

In a text exchange with his partner released by authorities, Robinson wrote about planning to get his rifle from his “drop point,” but that the area was “locked down.”
Later he sent: “I can get close to it but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don’t wanna chance it.” The texts cited in court documents did not include timestamps and it was unclear how long after the shooting Robinson was texting.
“To be honest I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you,” Robinson wrote in another text to his partner.
Prosecutor says Robinson told partner to delete texts
Robinson discarded the rifle and clothing and asked his roommate to conceal evidence, Gray said.
Robinson also was charged with felony discharge of a firearm, punishable by up to life in prison, and obstructing justice, punishable by up to 15 years in prison.
He also was charged with witness tampering because he had directed his partner to delete their text messages and told his partner to stay silent if questioned by police, Gray said.


Kash Patel says investigators will look at everyone
FBI Director Kash Patel said Tuesday that agents are looking at “anyone and everyone” who was involved in a gaming chatroom on the social media platform Discord with Robinson. The chatroom involved “a lot more” than 20 people, he said during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in Washington.
The charges filed Tuesday carry two enhancements, including committing several of the crimes in front of or close to children and carrying out violence based on the subject’s political beliefs.
Kirk, a dominant figure in conservative politics, became a confidant of President Donald Trump after founding Arizona-based Turning Point USA, one of the nation’s largest political organizations. He brought young, conservative evangelical Christians into politics.
In the days since Kirk’s assassination, Americans have found themselves facing questions about rising political violence, the deep divisions that brought the nation here and whether anything can change.
Despite calls for greater civility, some who opposed Kirk’s provocative statements about gender, race and politics criticized him after his death. Many Republicans have led the push to punish anyone they believe dishonored him, causing both public and private workers to lose their jobs or face other consequences at work.


Indonesia court to rule on challenges to legislation allowing expanded military role

Indonesia court to rule on challenges to legislation allowing expanded military role
Updated 50 min 1 sec ago

Indonesia court to rule on challenges to legislation allowing expanded military role

Indonesia court to rule on challenges to legislation allowing expanded military role
  • Fears are growing that President Prabowo Subianto is turning increasingly to the armed forces to help deliver his ambitious agenda
  • Prabowo has appointed former generals to key posts and has deployed the military for various task

JAKARTA: An Indonesian court was scheduled to rule on Wednesday on challenges to the revision of a military law allowing a greater armed forces role in civilian affairs, among the sources of anger that have stoked widespread anti-government protests.
The Constitutional Court was due to decide on five petitions against amendments that plaintiffs say were bulldozed through parliament in March without proper public consultation, amid concerns of an expansion of the military’s involvement in civilian life under President Prabowo Subianto.
Fears are growing in Indonesia that former special forces commander Prabowo is turning increasingly to the armed forces to help deliver his ambitious agenda after just 11 months in office, reviving memories of the military-dominated 1966-1998 New Order era of authoritarian rule.
Prabowo has appointed former generals to key posts and has deployed the military for various tasks, including handling street protests, implementing initiatives on free school meals and food security, manufacturing medicines and seizing palm oil plantations for a new state-owned firm.
The rulings come at a time of festering anger following two weeks of at times violent demonstrations over issues from lawmakers’ allowances and state budget priorities to police conduct and perceptions of creeping militarization in Indonesia, presenting Prabowo with his first major test.
The petitions argue the amendments to Indonesia’s military law lacked transparency and public participation before being passed by a parliament overwhelmingly allied with the president, and have called for the changes to be annulled.
“We expect the court to repeal the military law because the process is not in accordance with another law regulating legislative process,” petitioner Ardi Manto Adiputra told Reuters, adding lawmakers had met in secret to discuss revisions to the law and had rushed its passage.
The petitioners include human rights and student groups and Inayah Wahid, the daughter of Indonesia’s former President Abdurrahman Wahid.
Indonesia law minister has said the legislative process was above board and public input had been sufficiently sought.
The court decision is not expected to address the revisions to the law, but the processes that took place before it was passed.
Ardi said his group planned to file another judicial review over the substance of the legislation at a later stage.
He also said the court decision would be delivered virtually, with neither plaintiffs nor the public permitted to attend the verdict in person.


King Charles III prepares to welcome Trump for historic second state visit at Windsor Castle

King Charles III prepares to welcome Trump for historic second state visit at Windsor Castle
Updated 17 September 2025

King Charles III prepares to welcome Trump for historic second state visit at Windsor Castle

King Charles III prepares to welcome Trump for historic second state visit at Windsor Castle

WINDSOR, England: It’s the sort of experience you just can’t buy.
The carriages are being polished, the family silver is being laid out, and diamonds are being dusted off as King Charles III prepares to offer a royal welcome to Donald Trump for what will be the highlight of the US president’s unprecedented second state visit to Britain.
Hundreds of soldiers, gardeners and chefs are putting the finishing touches on their preparations to make sure the president and first lady Melania Trump get the full royal treatment. But it’s a spectacle with a purpose: to bolster ties with a world leader known for a love of bling at a time when his America First policies are putting pressure on trade and security arrangements globally.
The second leg of the visit will take place on Thursday, when Trump and Starmer meet at Chequers, the 16th-century redbrick pile in the Chiltern Hills northwest of London that serves as the official country estate of British prime ministers. The government hopes a technology deal to be signed during the trip will underline the trans-Atlantic bond remains strong despite differences over Ukraine, the Middle East and the future of NATO.
The backdrop for day one will be Windsor Castle, an almost 1,000-year-old royal residence with gilded interiors, crenelated towers and priceless artworks.
It’s a scene that has seemed to enchant Trump, who ditched his trademark bluster and described the invitation to Windsor as “a great, great honor.”
“I think that also is why he seems so visibly excited about the second meeting, because it isn’t an invitation given to (just) anyone,” said George Gross, an expert on the British monarchy at King’s College London.
Trump said Tuesday after arriving in London that he loved being back in the United Kingdom, calling it a “very special place.” Asked if he had a message for Charles, he said the king was a longtime friend of his and well-respected.
While Britain’s royals long ago gave up real political power, their history, tradition and celebrity give them a cachet that means presidents and prime ministers covet an invitation to join them. That makes the invitations, handed out at the request of the elected government, a powerful tool to reward friends and wring concessions out of reluctant allies.
 

State banquet
No US president, or any other world leader, has ever had the honor of a second UK state visit. That won’t be lost on a president who often describes his actions with superlatives and has made no secret of his fondness for the British royals.
The day will begin when the king and Queen Camilla formally welcome the Trumps to Windsor Castle.
That will be followed by a horse-drawn carriage ride through the estate — 6,400 hectares (15,800 acres) of farms, forest and open space that includes a one-time royal hunting ground which is still home to 500 red deer.
Back at the castle, a military band will play “God Save the King” and “The Star-Spangled Banner” before Trump and the king inspect an honor guard of soldiers in traditional scarlet tunics and tall bearskin hats.
After a private lunch and a visit to an exhibit of documents and artwork illustrating the ties between Britain and the US, it will be time for the glitz and glamor of a state banquet.
Tiaras and medals will be on display as up to 160 guests in formal wear gather around a 50-meter long mahogany table set with 200-year-old silver to honor the president. Charles will deliver a speech, then the king and president will offer toasts.
Trump won’t, however, have the chance to address a joint session of Parliament as French President Emmanuel Macron did in July during his state visit, because the House of Commons is in recess. The president also missed out on that honor during his first state visit amid opposition from then-Speaker of the House John Bercow.

‘It’s very dreary’
Most state visits are staged in London, against the grand backdrop of Buckingham Palace and the broad, flag-lined boulevard known as The Mall. But this one is taking place in the cozier confines of Windsor, a historic town of just over 30,000 people about 25 miles (40 kilometers) west of central London.
That makes it easier to control protests and protect the president at a time of increased international tensions, especially after the fatal shooting of Trump ally Charlie Kirk last week in Utah. Even so, British police have mounted a massive police operation to ensure the president’s safety.
When Trump was in London on his first state visit in 2019, he was met by thousands of protesters who filled the streets outside the Houses of Parliament as a balloon shaped like a giant, diaper-wearing baby Trump floated overhead.
Robert Lacey, a royal historian and the consultant on the Netflix television series “The Crown,” said Windsor is also a more “photogenic setting” for a state visit.
“Buckingham Palace has got its balcony, it’s got its façade,” he said. But “inside it’s very dreary and it’s currently being renovated, which is one reason why Mr. Trump will not be staying there. Windsor is a proper castle.”


FBI Director Kash Patel clashes with skeptical Democrats at contentious Senate hearing

FBI Director Kash Patel clashes with skeptical Democrats at contentious Senate hearing
Updated 17 September 2025

FBI Director Kash Patel clashes with skeptical Democrats at contentious Senate hearing

FBI Director Kash Patel clashes with skeptical Democrats at contentious Senate hearing

WASHINGTON: FBI Director Kash Patel clashed with skeptical Democrats at a contentious Senate oversight hearing Tuesday, defending his record amid criticism that he has politicized the nation’s premier federal law enforcement agency and pursued retribution against perceived adversaries of President Donald Trump.
The appearance Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee represented the first oversight hearing of Patel’s young but tumultuous tenure and provided a high-stakes platform for him to try to demonstrate that he is the right person for the job at a time of internal upheaval and mounting concerns about political violence inside the United States, a threat laid bare by last week’s killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk at a college campus in Utah.
The hearing broke along starkly partisan lines, with Republicans rallying support for Patel even as Democrats said he had debased the integrity of the nation’s premier federal law enforcement agency. Patel, for his part, accused Democrats of grandstanding for cameras and looking to score political points in a series of testy shouting matches that punctuated more sedate testimony about the criminal and national security threats facing the US
“You are the biggest fraud to ever sit in the United States Senate, you are a disgrace to this institution and you are an utter coward,” Patel told Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff of California, raising his voice during one particularly combative interaction.
“You can make an Internet troll the FBI director, but he will always be an Internet troll,” Schiff shot back as Patel continued to shout over him.
Patel sought to keep the focus on what he said was a series of accomplishments in fighting violent crime, protecting children from abuse and disrupting the flow of fentanyl. He similarly touted the FBI’s work in arresting within 33 hours the man suspected in Kirk’s assassination, but also faced questions over confusion he caused soon after the killing when he posted on social media that “the subject” was in custody.
That person was later released after investigators determined he had no connection. Patel said he had been trying to be transparent with the public and didn’t consider the post a mistake, but acknowledged he could have been clearer.
“Could I have been more careful in my verbiage and included ‘a’ subject instead of subject? Sure,” Patel said.
Questions about FBI firings
Democrats repeatedly tried to steer the hearing back to the turmoil inside the FBI, including a purge of experienced agents and supervisors that they said was a troubling about-face from his confirmation hearing pledge in January that he would not look “backwards” or seek retaliation as director.
“I’m not going to mince words: You lied to us,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat.
Patel angrily disputed that suggestion, and said that though he could not discuss the specifics of those firings due to the litigation, “Anyone that is terminated at the FBI, as I’ve said before, is done so because they failed to meet the standards and uphold their loyalty and oath to the Constitution.”
Five agents and top-level executives were known to have been summarily fired last month in a wave of ousters that current and former officials say has contributed to declining morale.
One of those, Steve Jensen, helped oversee investigations into the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the US Capitol. Another, Brian Driscoll, served as acting director in the early days of the Trump administration and resisted Justice Department demands to supply the names of agents who investigated Jan. 6. A third, Chris Meyer, was incorrectly rumored on social media to have participated in the investigation into Trump’s retention of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida.
A lawsuit filed last week by three of the fired agents alleged that Patel understood that the firings were “likely illegal” but had to carry them out because he was ordered to do so from the White House. Patel on Tuesday denied taking orders from the White House on whom to fire.
“I believe that you’re failing as a leader and that your failure does have serious implications for the safety and security of Americans and our families,” said Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey. “We’re more vulnerable to domestic and foreign attack because of your failures of leadership.”
The accusation prompted an angry response from Patel, who called it a “rant of false information” and rattled off what he said was a series of successes under his watch as the FBI has elevated its focus on illegal immigration, street crime, drugs and human trafficking.
“If the FBI under my seven-month leadership were failing this administration and this country, why do we have 23,000 violent felons arrested this year alone?” Patel asked. “Why is it that we have seized 6,000 weapons? Why have we found 1,500 child predators and arrested them?”
Patel had a similarly tense exchange with Sen. Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the committee, after Durbin challenged him on an unsubstantiated theory advanced by Deputy Director Dan Bongino that the placement of pipe bombs in Washington ahead of the Capitol riot was an inside job.
“I find it disgusting that everyone and anyone would jettison our 31 years of combined experience that is now at the helm of the FBI, delivering historic results at a historic speed for the American people,” Patel said.
Retaliation denied
Republicans eagerly came to Patel’s defense, with Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the committee chairman, praising the director for having “begun the important work of returning the FBI to its law enforcement mission.”
“It’s well understood that your predecessor left you an FBI infected with politics,” Grassley stated.
The hearing unfolded against the backdrop of the Kirk killing and on the same day that the suspected shooter, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, was charged in Utah with aggravated murder. Patel said the FBI was continuing to investigate the suspect, who authorities said ascribed to a ” leftist ideology, ” with investigators “running out every lead related to any allegation of broader violence.”
The FBI director was also challenged on whether he was pursuing retaliation against perceived Trump foes, including through a fresh inquiry the bureau has undertaken related to the long-concluded FBI investigation into potential ties between Russia and Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse estimated that Patel had already taken some sort of adverse action against 20 of the 60 or so people who were singled out in what the Rhode Island Democrat described as an “enemies list” in a 2023 book Patel authored called “Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth and the Battle for Our Democracy.”
The Justice Department, for instance, appeared to confirm in an unusual statement in July that it was investigating former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan, both pivotal players in the Russia saga.
“That is an entirely inaccurate presupposition,” Patel said. “I do not have an enemies list.”