A jury is selected in the trial of a man accused of attempting to assassinate Trump

A jury is selected in the trial of a man accused of attempting to assassinate Trump
A jury was selected Wednesday in the trial of a man charged with trying to assassinate Donald Trump while he played golf last year in South Florida. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 6 sec ago

A jury is selected in the trial of a man accused of attempting to assassinate Trump

A jury is selected in the trial of a man accused of attempting to assassinate Trump
  • The panel of 12 jurors and four alternates was sworn in on the third day of jury selection
  • Cannon did not say Wednesday morning when opening statements would begin

FLORIDA: A jury was selected Wednesday in the trial of a man charged with trying to assassinate Donald Trump while he played golf last year in South Florida.
The panel of 12 jurors and four alternates was sworn in on the third day of jury selection at the federal courthouse in Fort Pierce, Florida. The jury has four white men, one Black man, six white women, and one Black woman. The alternates are two white men and two white women.
Ryan Routh’s trial begins nearly a year after prosecutors say a US Secret Service agent thwarted Routh’s attempt to shoot the Republican presidential nominee. Routh, 59, has pleaded not guilty to charges of attempting to assassinate a major presidential candidate, assaulting a federal officer and several firearm violations.
Routh is representing himself after US District Judge Aileen Cannon agreed to let him dismiss his court-appointed attorneys. They are, however, standing by in the courtroom if needed.
Cannon did not say Wednesday morning when opening statements would begin, though they had been tentatively scheduled for Thursday.
Since Monday, attorneys, Routh and the judge have screened about 180 potential jurors, with about 96 left in the pool on Tuesday night. The panel was selected following additional screening Wednesday.


Iranians, Sudanese and Syrians are among half of illegal UK migrants, data shows

Iranians, Sudanese and Syrians are among half of illegal UK migrants, data shows
Updated 15 sec ago

Iranians, Sudanese and Syrians are among half of illegal UK migrants, data shows

Iranians, Sudanese and Syrians are among half of illegal UK migrants, data shows
  • A total of 48,478 people with known nationality arrived in the UK through irregular routes in the 12 months to June, according to Home Office data
  • Migrants from Afghanistan, Eritrea, Iran, Sudan and Syria accounted for 55 percent of the total irregular entries to the UK

LONDON: People from Afghanistan, Eritrea, Iran, Sudan and Syria made up more than half of all detected entries through irregular channels to the UK in the 12 months to June this year, according to new data from the Home Office.

Migrants from these five countries account for 55 percent of the total irregular entry to the UK; however, they are among the least likely to receive legal visas. Individuals from Vietnam, Somalia, Iraq, Yemen and Turkiye are among the ten countries, where the nationality is known, that have entered the UK through irregular routes.

The data indicates that migrants from Afghanistan, Eritrea, Iran, Sudan and Syria received 3 percent of all visas issued by the Home Office to foreign nationals who entered legally in the past 12 months ending in June, for employment, study, family or humanitarian reasons.

Nationals from India, China, Pakistan, Nigeria and the US together make up 51 percent of the total visas issued to those arriving in the UK through these legal routes. None of these countries is among the top 15 for irregular migration. The highest nationality is Indian, ranked 17th, accounting for just over 1 percent of irregular arrivals.

A total of 48,478 people with known nationality arrived in the UK through irregular routes in the 12 months to June, according to Home Office data. The government announced it may suspend visas for countries that refuse return deals for illegal migrants in the UK.

Data shows that 42,446 crossed the English Channel, while others arrived in lorries or containers, or were found without proper documentation to be in the UK legally.

The leading nationality for irregular migration by June was Afghanistan, with 6,589 arrivals, making up 13.6 percent of the total. The tenth nationality was Turkiye, with 1,797 illicit migrants, accounting for 3.7 percent.

During the same period, a total of 834,977 visas were issued to legal migrants. India topped the list with 165,970 visas, accounting for 19.9 percent of the total. China followed with 114,128 visas, which represents 13.7 percent. Australia ranked tenth with 13,298 visas, accounting for 1.6 percent of the total visas issued.


UK’s Starmer hosts Israeli president for tense visit

UK’s Starmer hosts Israeli president for tense visit
Updated 4 min 24 sec ago

UK’s Starmer hosts Israeli president for tense visit

UK’s Starmer hosts Israeli president for tense visit
  • The pair shook hands in front of photographers and TV cameras in Downing Street, with few smiles on display
  • “The President will express strong objections to the British government’s intention to recognize a Palestinian state,” Herzog’s office said

LONDON: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer hosted Israeli President Isaac Herzog for a contentious meeting Wednesday, with the visiting head of state vowing to “voice firm opposition” to Britain’s recent stance on Israel.
Herzog’s visit comes after Starmer’s government has in recent months toughened its criticism of how Israel is waging its war in Gaza, triggering pushback from Israeli leaders.
The pair shook hands in front of photographers and TV cameras in Downing Street, with few smiles on display, as the meeting got underway Wednesday afternoon.
“The President will express strong objections to the British government’s intention to recognize a Palestinian state, and protest the notion of sanctions against the only democracy in the Middle East,” Herzog’s office said.
Starmer announced in late July his government would recognize a Palestinian state in mid-September unless Israel takes specific steps toward peace in Gaza.
It has also sanctioned Israeli finance minister Bezalel Smotrich and national security minister Itamar Ben Gvir.
Rights groups and some UK lawmakers, including from the ruling center-left Labour party, have said the government should not have allowed Herzog’s visit to go ahead.
Amid criticism of Israel’s strike against Hamas leaders in Qatar the previous day, Starmer told MPs earlier Wednesday he would make it “absolutely clear” that “we condemn Israel’s action.”
He also vowed to stress that “restrictions on aid must be lifted, the offensive in Gaza must stop, and settlement building must cease” in occupied Palestinian territories.
Starmer’s government has also come under pressure from critics of Israel to say the country has committed genocide in its military campaign in Gaza.
Shouts of “stop the genocide” could be heard from a protester outside the Downing Street gates as Herzog arrived.
A protester threw a red smoke canister toward Herzog’s convoy as it left. Police were seen detaining a person and removing the canister after the vehicles drove away.
London insisted this week it has not determined Israel is committing genocide, following the publication by a parliamentary watchdog committee of a September 1 letter by then-foreign secretary David Lammy.
It stated: “As per the Genocide Convention, the crime of genocide occurs only where there is specific ‘intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group’.
“The Government has not concluded that Israel is acting with that intent.”
Starmer’s official spokesman has said that the letter — written just prior to Lammy becoming interior minister in a government reshuffle last week — “reflects the UK’s position that we’ve not come to any conclusion” on the matter.


Britain’s Prince Harry to meet with his father, King Charles, media reports say

Britain’s Prince Harry to meet with his father, King Charles, media reports say
Updated 10 September 2025

Britain’s Prince Harry to meet with his father, King Charles, media reports say

Britain’s Prince Harry to meet with his father, King Charles, media reports say
  • The two have been distant since Harry and his wife, Meghan, left royal life and moved to California in 2020
  • Harry has also had little contact with his elder brother, Prince William, heir to the throne

LONDON: Prince Harry arrived Wednesday at Clarence House in London for an expected meeting with his father, King Charles III, British media reported.
The meeting would be their first in well over a year.
The two have been distant since Harry and his wife, Meghan, left royal life and moved to California in 2020 and then publicly aired grievances about his family.
There had been speculation that the Duke of Sussex might meet his father after he arrived in the UK for Monday’s third anniversary of the death of Queen Elizabeth II and for a series of visits to charities he supports.
The last time the two met was in February 2024, when the prince flew to London after receiving news his father had been diagnosed with cancer. Harry spent about 45 minutes with Charles before the king flew to his Sandringham country estate to recuperate from his treatment.
Harry has also had little contact with his elder brother, Prince William, heir to the throne.
Harry was last in London in April, when the Court of Appeal rejected his bid to restore a police protection detail that was canceled after he stopped being a working royal. Charles was on a state visit to Italy at the time, so a meeting then was impossible.
That case was itself an impediment to improved relations because it involved Harry criticizing the king’s government in the courts. But once it was over, change became possible.
Immediately after the case ended, Harry said he would “love reconciliation with my family.”
“There’s no point in continuing to fight anymore,” he told the BBC on the day the court case was resolved. “Life is precious. I don’t know how much longer my father has.”
Despite that olive branch, Harry struck a combative tone that might torpedo hopes of repairing the family breach. The prince repeatedly said that the decision to withdraw his security was made at the direction of the royal household in an effort to control him and his wife while putting their safety at risk.
“What I’m struggling to forgive, and what I will probably always struggle to forgive, is the decision that was made in 2020 that affects my every single day and that is knowingly putting me and my family in harm’s way,” Harry said.
But with the lawsuit out of the way, there were signs of change.
In July, the new team handling Harry and Meghan’s communications, headed by Los Angeles-based Meredith Maines, was seen on the balcony of a private members’ club in London speaking with Tobyn Andreae, the king’s press representative. The Mail on Sunday tabloid took a photo of what it called: “The secret Harry peace summit.”
Regardless of who tipped off the newspaper, it showed a change of tone since the meeting wouldn’t have happened if the so-called principals hadn’t given their tacit consent.


Harris says leaving reelection decision to Biden was ‘recklessness,’ but she defends his abilities

Harris says leaving reelection decision to Biden was ‘recklessness,’ but she defends his abilities
Updated 10 September 2025

Harris says leaving reelection decision to Biden was ‘recklessness,’ but she defends his abilities

Harris says leaving reelection decision to Biden was ‘recklessness,’ but she defends his abilities
  • “Was it grace, or was it recklessness? In retrospect, I think it was recklessness,” Harris said
  • The remarks are the first time Harris has been publicly critical of Biden’s decision to run again

WASHINGTON: Former Vice President Kamala Harris says it was “recklessness” for Democrats to leave it to President Joe Biden to decide whether to continue seeking another term last year, but she defends his ability to do the job, according an excerpt of her new book.
Harris, in an excerpt of “107 Days” published Wednesday in The Atlantic, writes that as questions swirled about whether the then-81-year-old Biden should seek re-election, she and others left the decision to him and first lady Jill Biden.
“Was it grace, or was it recklessness? In retrospect, I think it was recklessness,” Harris said.
The remarks are the first time Harris has been publicly critical of Biden’s decision to run again — an ill-fated decision that saw him drop out in July 2024 after a disastrous debate performance, leaving her to head up the Democratic ticket and ultimately lose to Republican Donald Trump.
“The stakes were simply too high,” Harris writes in the book. “This wasn’t a choice that should have been left to an individual’s ego, an individual’s ambition. It should have been more than a personal decision.”
Biden’s office did not immediately have a comment Wednesday.
Throughout the campaign and in its wake, Harris had avoided much criticism of the president she served beside and defended him amid questions about his mental acuity.
In the book excerpt, Harris continues to defend Biden’s ability to do the job but describes him in 2024 and especially at the time of his “debate debacle” as “tired.”
“On his worst day, he was more deeply knowledgeable, more capable of exercising judgment, and far more compassionate than Donald Trump on his best. But at 81, Joe got tired. That’s when his age showed in physical and verbal stumbles,” Harris writes. “I don’t think it’s any surprise that the debate debacle happened right after two back-to-back trips to Europe and a flight to the West Coast for a Hollywood fundraiser. I don’t believe it was incapacity.”
She adds that if she believed Biden were incapacitated, she would have said so out of loyalty to the country.
Harris also blames those close to Biden for unflattering media coverage throughout the time she served as vice president and throwing her under the bus to boost Biden’s public standing.
She writes about receiving a high level of scrutiny as the first female vice president but says “when the stories were unfair or inaccurate, the president’s inner circle seemed fine with it. Indeed, it seemed as if they decided I should be knocked down a little bit more.”
Harris writes that she often learned that Biden’s staff was “adding fuel to negative narratives” that surrounded her, such as stories about her vice presidential office being in disarray and having high turnover.
The former vice president also accuses Biden’s staff of being afraid of her upstaging him, describing a speech she gave in Selma, Alabama, in March of last year in which she called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and more humanitarian aid to be delivered to people there.
“It went viral, and the West Wing was displeased,” Harris says, “I was castigated for, apparently, delivering it too well.”
She suggests that diminishing her also diminished Biden, especially “given the concerns about his age.”
Harris’ success, she writes, would be a marker of Biden’s good judgment and a reassurance to the public that if something happened to the president, she could step in.
“My success was important for him,” she writes. “His team didn’t get it.”
Harris’ book, whose title is a nod to the length of her abbreviated presidential campaign, is set to be published by Simon & Schuster on Sept. 23.


ICC opens war crimes case against Ugandan rebel leader Joseph Kony

ICC opens war crimes case against Ugandan rebel leader Joseph Kony
Updated 10 September 2025

ICC opens war crimes case against Ugandan rebel leader Joseph Kony

ICC opens war crimes case against Ugandan rebel leader Joseph Kony
  • Kony is facing 39 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity
  • “The social and cultural fabric of Northern Uganda has been torn apart and it is still struggling to rebuild itself,” deputy prosecutor Mame Mandiaye Niang said

THE HAGUE: Prosecutors at the International Criminal Court began presenting evidence Tuesday to support their charges against fugitive Ugandan rebel leader Joseph Kony at the global court’s first ever in absentia hearing, alleging that he inflicted horrors on Ugandan society that still echo two decades later.
Kony is facing 39 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity as the fugitive leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army, or LRA, which terrorized northern Uganda for decades.
“The social and cultural fabric of Northern Uganda has been torn apart, and it is still struggling to rebuild itself,” deputy prosecutor Mame Mandiaye Niang said in his opening statements.
The LRA began its attacks in Uganda in the 1980s, when Kony sought to overthrow the government. After being pushed out of Uganda, the militia went on to attack villages in Congo, Central African Republic and South Sudan. It was notorious for using child soldiers, mutilating civilians and enslaving women.
Niang said that victims were still “scarred in their body and spirit.”
As part of his presentation to a panel of three black-robed judges, Niang showed multiple graphic videos of the destruction the prosecution says was wrought by the LRA, including a clip from a Uganda police video depicting a body being removed from the rubble of a burned out building.
The court’s so-called confirmation of charges hearing comes two decades after it issued an arrest warrant for Kony.
The ICC hearing is not a trial, but allows prosecutors to outline their case in court. After weighing the evidence, judges can rule on whether or not to confirm the charges against Kony, but he cannot be tried unless he is in ICC custody.
Court-appointed counsel for Kony argued the proceedings violate their client’s fair trial rights and should not have been held at all.
“The empty chair impacted the preparation of the defense,” lawyer Peter Haynes said, pointing to the courtroom seat where Kony would be if he was present.
The hearing has been seen as a test case for the court moving forward with other cases where the likelihood of having a suspect detained is considered remote, such as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or Russian President Vladimir Putin.
“Everything that happens at the ICC is precedent for the next case,” Michael Scharf, an international law professor at Case Western Reserve University, told The Associated Press.
Scharf added that while the whereabouts of Netanyahu and Putin are known, Kony has eluded US special forces and remained at large despite a $5 million reward. He also noted that the warrants for Netanyahu and Putin were issued in recent years, whereas Kony has been wanted since 2005.
Kony was thrust into the global spotlight in 2012 when a video about his crimes went viral. Despite the attention and international efforts to capture him, he remains at large.
The ICC proceedings against Kony will be followed by many in Uganda, where survivors welcome the charges even as they regret the failure to catch him.
“He did many things bad,” said Odong Kajumba, who escaped the LRA after he was captured and forced to carry a sack of sugar to Uganda’s border with Sudan in 1996. If they can arrest Kony, he said, “I am very happy.”
Not everyone is happy with the proceedings moving forward.
”Why do you want to try a man you can’t get? They should first get him,” said Odonga Otto, a former lawmaker from northern Uganda. “It’s a mockery.” Trying Kony while he is in custody makes court proceedings “more real” for victims and survivors of his alleged crimes, he said.
Another LRA commander, Dominic Ongwen, was convicted in 2020 of 61 offenses including murders, rapes, forced marriages and recruiting child soldiers. Ongwen was himself abducted by the militia as a 9-year-old boy, transformed into a child soldier and later became a brutal commander in the rebel group.
Ongwen is currently serving his 25-year sentence in Norway.