UK govt under pressure over Israeli president’s visit

UK govt under pressure over Israeli president’s visit
Israeli President Isaac Herzog addresses a joint meeting of Congress inside the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S., July 19, 2023. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 09 September 2025

UK govt under pressure over Israeli president’s visit

UK govt under pressure over Israeli president’s visit
  • Isaac Herzog accused of being an ‘architect’ of Gaza genocide
  • Group of 60 politicians write to British PM to voice concern at visit

LONDON: The upcoming visit of Israeli President Isaac Herzog to London on Wednesday has prompted controversy in the UK, with campaigners calling for his arrest and MPs voicing their concern about the trip.

The Friends of Al-Aqsa campaign group has filed a request to the director of public prosecutions for an arrest warrant to be issued against Herzog for alleged war crimes.

The claim centers around statements made by him in the aftermath of the Hamas attack of Oct. 7, 2023, after which he said “the entire Palestinian nation” was responsible.

Those words, it is claimed in the request, were used by Israeli soldiers as justification for their actions in the subsequent war in Gaza.

A lawyer advising the group said normally heads of state would be immune from arrest and prosecution in the UK, but a precedent had been set by the International Criminal Court’s issuing of arrest warrants for heads of state.

The lawyer added that in England, private individuals could also ask the director of public prosecutions to issue arrest warrants for private prosecutions, rather than leave them to the Crown Prosecution Service for state action.

Earlier this year, the ICC issued arrest warrants for senior Israeli politicians, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“A leader of a country that carries out gross human right violations and indiscriminate killing should not be allowed in the UK,” said the founder of Friends of Al-Aqsa, Ismail Patel.

“Britain has failed to defend Palestinian rights and champion the rule of law. There is now an opportunity to correct the failings and issue an arrest warrant to investigate into Herzog’s incitement to attacks on Gaza.”

Meanwhile, a group of 60 politicians have written to UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer to express their misgivings about Herzog’s visit.

They said the UK, as a signatory of the 1948 Genocide Convention, has a duty “to take active steps to prevent and punish genocide and incitement to it wherever it occurs. This obligation includes ensuring that individuals credibly implicated in the commission or incitement of such crimes are not afforded political legitimacy or hospitality by our government.”

They added that the International Court of Justice had said there is a possibility that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, and asked the government to “clarify what legal advice they have received regarding this visit, whether President Herzog’s entry to the UK is compatible with our obligations under the Genocide Convention, and what steps will be taken to ensure that Britain is not complicit in shielding or legitimising those accused of grave international crimes.”

Andy McDonald MP, one of the letter’s signatories, said: “It is of real concern the government has not concluded that Israel is acting with the intent of causing genocide, and that the government does not consider ICJ Provisional Measures should be regarded as warning of the risk of genocide.

“We all see mass civilian killings. Destruction of hospitals. Withholding vital aid. Israeli Ministers stating ‘no food, no water.’ The International Association of Genocide Scholars, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty and the ICJ have all warned states to uphold the Genocide Convention. The UK is failing to do so and that must change.”

The Palestine Solidarity Campaign said Herzog is an “architect” of the “genocide in Gaza,” and the UK’s decision to welcome him “has caused outrage and revulsion amongst supporters of Palestinian rights.”

Ben Jamal, director of the PSC, said in a statement: “The president of a state recognised by a consensus of international law and genocide scholars to be committing the crime of genocide should be welcomed by nobody on a visit to the UK. 

“It is bad enough that the government is not acting to deny him a visa; the news that Keir Starmer appears prepared to sit down with him at Downing Street is further confirmation of his government’s complicity in this genocide. 

“A man who has issued a genocidal statements that dehumanise all Palestinians as Herzog has, belongs not in a comfy chair in Downing Street but in the dock at the Hague.”


Indonesian activists protest plan to name Suharto as national hero

Indonesian activists protest plan to name Suharto as national hero
Updated 10 sec ago

Indonesian activists protest plan to name Suharto as national hero

Indonesian activists protest plan to name Suharto as national hero
  • Suharto’s 32-year rule was marked by corruption, human rights violations
  • Activists are citing his role in some of the darkest periods in Indonesia’s history

JAKARTA: Indonesian activists are rallying against a government proposal to name as national hero the late military ruler Suharto who led the country for over three decades.

Suharto’s New Order military dictatorship was considered one of the most brutal and corrupt of the 20th century. The former president, who died in 2008, held power for 32 years before student-led protests forced him to step down in 1998, amid an economic crisis and deadly riots in Jakarta.

He was included in a list of 49 candidates to receive the national hero title this year, an honor bestowed annually on National Heroes’ Day on Nov. 10 for those considered to have made a significant contribution to the country.

The plan, which has yet to be finalized, has sparked protests among members of Indonesia’s civil society, who pointed to widespread allegations of human rights abuses and corruption during Suharto’s regime.

“In his 32-year reign, Suharto committed many human rights violations. He also came to power through a coup … corruption, collusion, and nepotism were also widespread during his rule,” Damairia Pakpahan, an Indonesian women’s rights activist based in Yogyakarta, told Arab News.

Pakpahan was part of a coalition of hundreds of Indonesian citizens and organizations, who signed a letter demanding the government to remove Suharto from the list of national hero candidates. A similar petition published online has received over 13,500 signatures so far.

Suharto “did not deserve to be granted a National Hero title,” the coalition said in the letter issued on Oct. 30, before detailing at least nine cases of gross human rights violations that took place under his rule.

This includes the unsolved violence during the riots in May 1998 as well as the 1965-66 killings, a series of countrywide political purges targeting members and alleged sympathizers of Partai Komunis Indonesia — at the time the third-largest communist party after China and the Soviet Union.

While an accurate and verified count of the dead is unlikely ever to be known, historians say that a total of 500,000 to 1 million people had been killed. Another 1.5 million had been imprisoned, while their family members still face stigma and discrimination, and many were prevented from holding government jobs up until recently.

“(The) Suharto government’s track record, particularly during the New Order era, demonstrates a pattern of authoritarian and repressive rule that had a far-reaching impact on the lives of the Indonesian people,” the civil society coalition said.

“Numerous policies and security operations implemented under Suharto’s rule resulted in serious human rights violations, ranging from murder and enforced disappearances, torture, sexual violence, to land grabbing and systematic social discrimination.”

On Thursday, about 100 activists rallied near the presidential palace in Jakarta to protest Suharto’s candidacy for the national hero title. Some carried posters that read: “Stop the Whitewashing of the General of Butchery” and “Thousands Died But The Country Chose to Forget.”

Indonesia’s social and culture ministries have said that public input was part of the process to nominate national hero candidates. 

Culture Minister Fadli Zon, who heads the committee in charge of naming national heroes, said at a press conference that “there was never evidence” that Suharto was involved in the 1960s massacres, which scholars have said amounted to genocide due to its scale. 

“Every one of these candidates have fulfilled all the requirements … their struggles are clear, their background and life history, all of it has undergone academic evaluation … This includes (former) President Suharto, whose name has been suggested two, three times now … We are looking at their extraordinary contributions (to the country),” he told reporters earlier this week.

Andreas Harsono, senior Indonesia researcher at Human Rights Watch, told Arab News that the process to grant national hero status has always been controversial in Indonesia.

“Gen. Suharto, for instance, is a hero to some groups in Indonesia, but obviously, not a hero to many other groups, especially those who have suffered from his authoritarian regime, including the 1965 genocide,” he told Arab News.

“It’s much better if (the Indonesian government) is to end these jokes about national heroes. Let historians do their work and let the public decide their own respective heroes.”