Pentagon rebrand as Department of War a ‘message of strength’, says Trump

Pentagon rebrand as Department of War a ‘message of strength’, says Trump
President Donald Trump speaks as he hands a signed executive order to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at the White House on Sept. 5, 2025, in Washington. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 06 September 2025

Pentagon rebrand as Department of War a ‘message of strength’, says Trump

Pentagon rebrand as Department of War a ‘message of strength’, says Trump
  • “I’ve gotten peace because of the fact that we’re strong,” Trump said, echoing the “peace through strength” motto associated with Reagan
  • Congress has to formally authorize a new name, and Trump supporters in Congress said they will move to make it happen

WASHINGTON: After months of campaigning for the Nobel Peace Prize, President Donald Trump sent a sharply different message on Friday when he signed an executive order aimed at rebranding the Department of Defense as the Department of War.
Trump said the switch was intended to signal to the world that the United States was a force to be reckoned with, and he complained that the Department of Defense’s name was “woke.”
“I think it sends a message of victory. I think it sends, really, a message of strength,” Trump said of the change as he authorized the Department of War as a secondary title for the Pentagon.
Congress has to formally authorize a new name, and several of Trump’s closest supporters on Capitol Hill proposed legislation earlier Friday to codify the new name into law.
But already there were cosmetic shifts. The Pentagon’s website went from “defense.gov” to “war.gov.” Signs were swapped around Hegseth’s office while more than a dozen employees watched. Trump said there would be new stationery, too.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, whom Trump has begun referring to as the “secretary of war,” said during the signing ceremony that “we’re going to go on offense, not just on defense,” using “maximum lethality” that won’t be “politically correct.”
The attempted rebranding was another rhetorical salvo in Trump’s efforts to reshape the US military and uproot what he has described as progressive ideology. Bases have been renamed, transgender soldiers have been banned and websites have been scrubbed of posts honoring contributions by women and minorities to the armed forces.
He’s also favored aggressive — critics say illegal — military action despite his criticism of “endless wars” under other administrations. He frequently boasts about the stealth bomber strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities, and he recently ordered the destruction of a boat that the US says was carrying drugs off the coast of Venezuela.
The Republican president insisted that his tough talk didn’t contradict his fixation on being recognized for diplomatic efforts, saying peace must be made from a position of strength. Trump has claimed credit for resolving conflicts between India and Pakistan; Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo; and Armenia and Azerbaijan, among others. (He’s also expressed frustration that he hasn’t brought the war between Russia and Ukraine to a conclusion as fast as he wanted.)
“I think I’ve gotten peace because of the fact that we’re strong,” Trump said, echoing the “peace through strength” motto associated with President Ronald Reagan
When Trump finished his remarks on the military, he dismissed Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, from the room.
“I’m going to let these people go back to the Department of War and figure out how to maintain peace,” Trump said.
Florida Republican Rep. Greg Steube proposed legislation in the House to formally change the name of the department.
“From 1789 until the end of World War II, the United States military fought under the banner of the Department of War,” Steube, an Army veteran, said in a statement. “It is only fitting that we pay tribute to their eternal example and renowned commitment to lethality by restoring the name of the ‘Department of War’ to our Armed Forces.”
Sens. Rick Scott, R-Fla., and Mike Lee, R-Utah, are introducing companion legislation in the Senate.
The Department of War was created in 1789, then renamed and reorganized through legislation signed by President Harry Truman in 1947, two years after the end of World War II. The Department of Defense incorporated the Department of War, which oversaw the Army, plus the Department of the Navy and the newly created independent Air Force.
Hegseth complained that “we haven’t won a major war since” the name was changed. Trump said, “We never fought to win.”
Trump and Hegseth have long talked about restoring the Department of War name.
In August, Trump told reporters that “everybody likes that we had an unbelievable history of victory when it was Department of War. Then we changed it to Department of Defense.”
When confronted with the possibility that making the name change would require an act of Congress, Trump told reporters that “we’re just going to do it.”
“I’m sure Congress will go along,” he said, “if we need that.”
Trump and Hegseth have been on a name-changing spree at the Pentagon, sometimes by sidestepping legal requirements.
For example, they wanted to restore the names of nine military bases that once honored Confederate leaders, which were changed in 2023 following a congressionally mandated review.
Because the original names were no longer allowed under law, Hegseth ordered the bases to be named after new people with similar names. For example, Fort Bragg now honors Army Pfc. Roland L. Bragg, a World War II paratrooper and Silver Star recipient from Maine, instead of Confederate Gen. Braxton Bragg.
In the case of Fort A.P. Hill, named for Confederate Lt. Gen. Ambrose Powell Hill, the Trump administration was forced to choose three soldiers to make the renaming work.
The base now honors Union soldiers Pvt. Bruce Anderson and 1st Sgt. Robert A. Pinn, who contributes the two initials, and Lt. Col. Edward Hill, whose last name completes the second half of the base name.
The move irked Republicans in Congress who, in July, moved to ban restoring any Confederate names in this year’s defense authorization bill.
Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska, a Republican who co-sponsored the earlier amendment to remove the Confederate names, said that “what this administration is doing, particularly this secretary of defense, is sticking his finger in the eye of Congress by going back and changing the names to the old names.”


US is sending an aircraft carrier to Latin America in major escalation of military buildup

Updated 3 sec ago

US is sending an aircraft carrier to Latin America in major escalation of military buildup

US is sending an aircraft carrier to Latin America in major escalation of military buildup
The USS Ford is currently deployed to the Mediterranean Sea along with three destroyers
It would likely take several days for the ships to make the journey to South America

WASHINGTON: The US military is sending an aircraft carrier to the waters off South America, in the latest escalation and buildup of military forces in the region, the Pentagon announced Friday.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the USS Gerald R. Ford and its strike group to deploy to US Southern Command to “bolster US capacity to detect, monitor, and disrupt illicit actors and activities that compromise the safety and prosperity of the United States,” Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a social media post.
The USS Ford is currently deployed to the Mediterranean Sea along with three destroyers. It would likely take several days for the ships to make the journey to South America.
Deploying an aircraft carrier is a major escalation of military power in a region that has already seen an unusually large US military buildup in the Caribbean Sea and the waters off Venezuela.
Hours before Parnell announced the news, Hegseth said the military had conducted the 10th strike on a suspected drug-running boat, leaving six people dead and bringing the death count for the strikes that began in early September to at least 43 people.
The Pentagon told reporters it had nothing further to add beyond the statement.
Hegseth said the vessel struck overnight was operated by the Tren de Aragua gang. It was the second time the Trump administration has tied one of its operations to the gang that originated in a Venezuelan prison.
The pace of the strikes has quickened in recent days from one every few weeks when they first began to three this week, killing a total of at least 43 people since September. Two of the most recent strikes were carried out in the eastern Pacific Ocean, expanding the area where the military has launched attacks and shifting to where much of the cocaine from the world’s largest producers is smuggled.
In a 20-second black and white video of the strike posted to social media, a small boat can be seen apparently sitting motionless on the water when a long thin projectile descends, triggering an explosion. The video ends before the blast dies down enough for the remains of the boat to be seen again.
Hegseth said the strike happened in international waters and boasted that it was the first one conducted at night.
“If you are a narco-terrorist smuggling drugs in our hemisphere, we will treat you like we treat Al-Qaeda,” Hegseth said in the post. “Day or NIGHT, we will map your networks, track your people, hunt you down, and kill you.”
US focus on Venezuela and Tren de Aragua
The strike drew parallels to the first announced by the US last month by focusing on Tren de Aragua, which the Trump administration has designated a foreign terrorist organization and blamed for being at the root of the violence and drug dealing that plague some cities.
While not mentioning the origin of the latest boat, the Republican administration says at least four of the boats it has hit have come from Venezuela.
The attacks and an unusually large US military buildup in the Caribbean Sea and the waters off Venezuela have raised speculation that the administration could try to topple Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who faces charges of narcoterrorism in the US
In the latest move, the US military flew a pair of supersonic heavy bombers up to the coast of Venezuela on Thursday.
The Trump administration maintains that it’s combating drug trafficking into the United States, but Maduro argues that the operations are the latest effort to force him out of office.
Maduro on Thursday praised security forces and a civilian militia for defense exercises along some 2,000 kilometers (about 1,200 miles) of coastline to prepare for the possibility of a US attack.
In the span of six hours, “100 percent of all the country’s coastline was covered in real time, with all the equipment and heavy weapons to defend all of Venezuela’s coasts if necessary,” Maduro said during a government event shown on state television.
The US military’s presence is less about drugs than sending a message to countries in the region to align with US interests, according to Elizabeth Dickinson, the International Crisis Group’s senior analyst for the Andes region.
“An expression that I’m hearing a lot is ‘Drugs are the excuse.’ And everyone knows that,” Dickinson said. “And I think that message is very clear in regional capitals. So the messaging here is that the US is intent on pursuing specific objectives. And it will use military force against leaders and countries that don’t fall in line.”
Comparing the drug crackdown to the war on terror
Hegseth’s remarks around the strikes have recently begun to draw a direct comparison between the war on terrorism that the US declared after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and the Trump administration’s crackdown on drug traffickers.
President Donald Trump this month declared drug cartels to be unlawful combatants and said the US was in an “armed conflict” with them, relying on the same legal authority used by the Bush administration after 9/11.
When reporters asked Trump on Thursday whether he would request Congress issue a declaration of war against the cartels, he said that wasn’t the plan.
“I think we’re just going to kill people that are bringing drugs into our country, OK? We’re going to kill them, you know? They’re going to be like, dead,” Trump said during a roundtable at the White House with homeland security officials.
Lawmakers from both major political parties have expressed concerns about Trump ordering the military actions without receiving authorization from Congress or providing many details. Democrats have insisted the strikes violate international law.
“I’ve never seen anything quite like this before,” said Sen. Andy Kim, D-N.J., who previously worked in the Pentagon and the State Department, including as an adviser in Afghanistan.
“We have no idea how far this is going, how this could potentially bring in, you know, is it going to be boots on the ground? Is it going to be escalatory in a way where we could see us get bogged down for a long time?” he said.
But Republican Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida, who has long been involved in foreign affairs in the hemisphere, said of Trump’s approach: “It’s about time.”
While Trump is a president who “obviously hates war,” he also is not afraid to use the US military in targeted operations, Diaz-Balart said.
“I would not want to be in the shoes of any of these narco-cartels,” he added.

Three Ukrainians jailed for Russia-linked sabotage in Poland

Three Ukrainians jailed for Russia-linked sabotage in Poland
Updated 25 min 47 sec ago

Three Ukrainians jailed for Russia-linked sabotage in Poland

Three Ukrainians jailed for Russia-linked sabotage in Poland
  • The conviction of the three men is part of a wider investigation
  • The group operated in Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Ukraine and Russia

WARSAW: Three Ukrainians have been jailed in Poland for belonging to a gang accused of committing and preparing “acts of sabotage and terrorism” in Europe on Russia’s behalf, prosecutors said on Friday.
The conviction of the three men is part of a wider investigation, notably into fires at two shopping centers in Warsaw and an IKEA store in Vilnius, the capital of neighboring Lithuania, last year.
The Warsaw fire in May 2024 was “the result of an act of sabotage, perpetrated by members of an organized crime group acting on behalf of the intelligence agencies of the Russian Federation,” a statement read.
The group operated in Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Ukraine and Russia, it added.
The three men were sentenced to one year and four months, 2.5 years and 5.5 years at a court in Warsaw.
Their actions consisted of “setting fire to large-scale retail centers situated in European Union member states, with the intention of causing the severe intimidation of a large number of people, and consequently, influencing public opinion,” prosecutors said.
On Tuesday, the Polish authorities said 55 people suspected of acting on behalf of Moscow had been detained since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
Poland has since then repeatedly accused Russia of being behind a number of acts and attempted acts of sabotage, including fires across the country and in the capital.
Russia has consistently rejected those claims.
In retaliation, Poland has imposed restrictions on the movements of Russian diplomats on its soil and ordered the closure of two Russian consulates, in the western city of Poznan, and in Krakow, in the south.
Poland, an EU and NATO member, has borders with Ukraine, as well as Kremlin ally Belarus and Russia’s Kaliningrad exclave, and is one of the main countries through which Western powers ship arms and ammunition to Kyiv.


Dutchman to appear in court for death threats to politicians

Dutchman to appear in court for death threats to politicians
Updated 39 min ago

Dutchman to appear in court for death threats to politicians

Dutchman to appear in court for death threats to politicians
  • The man wrote to a politician in a private message on Instagram
  • An investigation into his phone showed he had also threatened to kill another party leader

AMSTERDAM: An 18-year old Dutch man is set to appear before a fast-track judge on Monday after he made death threats against two leaders of political parties ahead of a general election, Dutch prosecutors said on Friday.
The man, whose identity was not disclosed, wrote to a politician in a private message on Instagram that if he encountered him, “he would knock him out, drag him into a van, hang him, and cut him open,” the prosecutors said.
An investigation into his phone showed he had also threatened to kill another party leader on September 24, the prosecutors said.
Details about the party leaders were not disclosed to protect their privacy, they added.
Many politicians in the Netherlands have reported threats ahead of the October 29 election.
Earlier this week, another man was detained by the police over threats posted on TikTok.
Far right leader Geert Wilders, who has been living under tight security for over 20 years due to death threats, this month briefly suspended his campaign citing a new threat.


Zelensky calls for sanctions on all Russian oil companies, shadow fleet, oil terminals

Zelensky calls for sanctions on all Russian oil companies, shadow fleet, oil terminals
Updated 48 min 11 sec ago

Zelensky calls for sanctions on all Russian oil companies, shadow fleet, oil terminals

Zelensky calls for sanctions on all Russian oil companies, shadow fleet, oil terminals
  • “Peace is born from pressure on the aggressor,” Zelensky said

KYIV: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky urged Kyiv’s allies on Friday to introduce sanctions against all Russian oil companies, its shadow fleet and oil terminals to disrupt Moscow’s ability to fund its war in Ukraine.
Zelensky, speaking in London beside some of the leaders of the so-called “Coalition of the Willing,” said Russia — which has been attacking Ukrainian energy facilities — was trying to use the coming winter as a tool to put pressure on Ukraine.
“Peace is born from pressure on the aggressor,” Zelensky said.


Security Council’s legitimacy at stake as it marks its 80th anniversary, UN chief warns

Security Council’s legitimacy at stake as it marks its 80th anniversary, UN chief warns
Updated 57 min 18 sec ago

Security Council’s legitimacy at stake as it marks its 80th anniversary, UN chief warns

Security Council’s legitimacy at stake as it marks its 80th anniversary, UN chief warns
  • Secretary-General Antonio Guterres urges members to recommit to founding principles and reform the council to better reflect modern geopolitical realities
  • ‘The time has come to open the doors of the chamber and let in the light. Without a Security Council fit for purpose, the world is in grave danger,’ he says

NEW YORK CITY: The UN’s secretary-general, Antonio Guterres, warned on Friday that the Security Council’s “legitimacy is fragile.”
He urged member states to recommit to the founding principles of the UN Charter and take urgent action to reform the council so that it better reflects the geopolitical realities of today.
“Too often, we have seen members of this body act outside the principles of the Charter, principles we have all freely agreed to as sovereign nations,” Guterres said.
“When that happens, it not only stalls action in the moment, it erodes trust in the entire United Nations project. It also puts us all in great danger.”
Speaking from Hanoi, he was addressing a Security Council open debate convened by Russia, which holds the rotating presidency of the council this month, to mark the 80th anniversary of the UN. It was titled “The United Nations Organization: Looking Into the Future.”
The council remains a “vital necessity and a powerful force for good,” Guterres said. He credited it with helping to end apartheid in South Africa, restore peace in post-genocide Cambodia, and prevent a major-power war for eight decades.
But he cautioned that there was now a risk that these achievements would be undermined by paralysis, geopolitical rivalries and a lack of representativeness.
Reform of the Security Council, Guterres said, is “imperative and long overdue.”
He called for an expansion of its membership, noting that nearly half of all UN peacekeeping missions are deployed in Africa, yet the continent still lacks a permanent seat on the council. Latin America and the Caribbean also remain underrepresented, while the Asia-Pacific region, home to more than half of the world’s population, has only one permanent seat.
“Expanding the membership is not only about justice, it is also about results,” he said. “It has the potential to undo deadlocks and offer stability in our increasingly multipolar world.”
Guterres welcomed proposals by France and the UK to voluntarily limit the use of the power of veto held by them and the other permanent members of the council (Russia, China and the US). Such a measure has long been debated as a way to ensure the council can be more responsive to crises, including conflicts such as those in Ukraine, Gaza and Sudan.
“The Security Council is not about hegemons and empires,” he said. “It is about parents who have lost their children, refugees flung far from their homes, soldiers who have sacrificed their limbs.”
Calling for a renewed moral purpose and greater inclusivity, Guterres added: “The time has come to open the doors of the chamber and let in the light. Without a Security Council fit for purpose, the world is in grave danger.”