In ruined Ukrainian cities, residents have tried to cling to hope but eventually they leave

In ruined Ukrainian cities, residents have tried to cling to hope but eventually they leave
Mykhailo Maistruk, 67, walks downstairs during evacuation from Kostiantynivka, Ukraine, Tuesday. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 5 min 21 sec ago

In ruined Ukrainian cities, residents have tried to cling to hope but eventually they leave

In ruined Ukrainian cities, residents have tried to cling to hope but eventually they leave

KOSTIANTYNIVKA, Ukraine: For many residents of Ukraine’s eastern Donetsk region, evacuation begins with one defining blast — the explosion that makes it impossible to stay. For 69-year-old Tetiana Zaichikova, it came when a strike reduced her home to rubble.
The region has been the epicenter of heavy fighting for years and evacuations there have continued as long as Russia’s invasion — more than three years. Town after town in the region, larger than Slovenia or roughly the size of Massachusetts, is emptying amid the fighting as Russian forces now control around 70 percent of the area.
Some are staying in shattered cities, clinging to the hope that the war will end any day — a hope fueled by ongoing peace efforts, largely led by US President Donald Trump, that so far yielded no breakthroughs. They hold on until it becomes too dangerous even for the military and police to drive into the city.
“We kept hoping. We waited for every round of negotiations. We thought somehow they would reach an agreement in our favor, and we could stay in our homes,” said Zaichikova, who still bears bruises and hematomas across her face.
Defining moment to flee
If Zaichikova had taken even one step into the kitchen that night, she is convinced she would not have survived.
In Kostiantynivka — a city that once had a population of approximately 67,000 — conditions in recent months have become apocalyptic: There is no reliable electricity, water or gas, and nightly barrages grow heavier with each passing hour. Russian forces fire all types of weapons while Ukrainian troops answer back, and the former industrial hub has become a proving ground crowded with drones overhead.
Zaichikova knew the city was barely livable, but she clung to the hope she would not lose the place where she had lived all her life and taught music at a kindergarten.
On the night of Aug. 28, after months of rarely leaving her home, she wanted only to make tea before bed. She switched on a night lamp and walked toward the kitchen. As she reached for the light switch, the blast hit.
A wooden beam and shelves collapsed on her. When she came to, the rubble rose as high as she stood. The entrance to her building was blocked.
Emergency services no longer operated in the city, too dangerous even for soldiers. “If we had been burning, we would have just burned,” she said.
Her neighbor swung a sledgehammer through the night until midday, finally breaking a hole for her to crawl through. Outside, she saw what she believed was the crater of a glide bomb.
A few days later, she left the city.
“I didn’t want to leave until the last moment, but that was the last straw. When I was driven through the city, I saw what it had become. It was black and destroyed,” she said.
Last call
Police Officer Yevhen Mosiichuk has driven into Kostiantynivka almost every day for the past year to evacuate people. He has watched the situation deteriorate.
The city now sits on Ukraine’s shrinking patch of territory, wedged just west of Russian-held Bakhmut and nearly encircled from three sides by Moscow’s forces.
“The difficulty of evacuations is that the city is under constant attack,” he said, listing not only drones but artillery, rockets and glide bombs.
As he spoke, a drone detector beeped. “Oh, it caught drones,” he said.
They drove across the river, one flying over it and then toward the bridge, before jamming it with their equipment. Their van is fitted with anti-drone netting, and they pass through mesh corridors that Ukrainians installed to force drones to detonate prematurely or malfunction.
“The situation has been worsening — not every day, week or month, but every minute,” Mosiichuk said. “It is clear because they are using all kinds of weapons.”
For civilians, that means their city may soon be wiped off the map, like other once-large cities in the Donetsk region — Avdiivka and Bakhmut, now ghost towns stripped of their industrial and historic past.
Like Zaichikova, those still in the city are mostly elderly, often disabled and poor. For them, losing their homes means setting out into the unknown without any support. Some evacuees said dying at home would be easier than leaving.
Wearing a helmet and body armor, Mosiichuk approached the apartment building of those who had requested evacuation. Explosions rumbled at varying distances. He and his colleague worked quickly, knowing every minute in the city was life-threatening.
The entrance was littered with shattered glass, and every floor had broken windows. Faded notices on the walls advertised electricians and plumbers who would never come.
They climbed to the seventh floor. A few residents peeked out after hearing the commotion. Police shouted at them to leave as soon as possible, warning that it would soon be impossible to enter the city.
Leaving it all behind
When police came to evacuate 67-year-old Mykhailo Maistruk, it was the first time in two years he had set foot outside. With an amputated leg, he had been trapped in his apartment since the elevator stopped working and the city became too dangerous.
Together with his wife, Larysa Naumenko, he packed what little they had. Naumenko had lived in the apartment since before the Soviet Union collapsed.
They handed the keys to one of the two neighbors left in the building and left under the thunder of shelling.
“We hoped … we lived here for 40 years. Do you think it’s easy to leave all this behind? At our age, we are left with nothing,” Naumenko said.
Maistruk said even they could no longer endure the endless explosions and finally decided to leave. Many of their neighbors and friends had fled in the first months of the invasion; some later returned and left again. What kept them in place was not only Maistruk’s disability but also their small pensions, which made it nearly impossible to start from scratch elsewhere.
“Hardly anyone will come back here. It feels like the city is being wiped off the face of the earth,” Naumenko said as she was driven away by the evacuation car. “Who will rebuild all this? It was such a developed city, with so many factories. Now they are gone.”


Thai parliament to vote on new PM, as Thaksin jets off amid chaos   

Thai parliament to vote on new PM, as Thaksin jets off amid chaos   
Updated 25 sec ago

Thai parliament to vote on new PM, as Thaksin jets off amid chaos   

Thai parliament to vote on new PM, as Thaksin jets off amid chaos   
  • Tycoon’s departure leaves ruling party in disarray
  • Vote on PM comes after days of deadlock

BANGKOK: Thailand’s parliament was set to choose a new prime minister on Friday, after days of political chaos, in a vote that could be overshadowed by the dramatic departure from the country of its most powerful politician Thaksin Shinawatra.
Polarising billionaire Thaksin, the central figure in a tumultuous two-decade battle for power in Thailand, left on his private jet for Dubai late on Thursday, with his family’s ruling party Pheu Thai in disarray.
Thaksin’s flight out of Thailand came only days ahead of a court ruling next week that could see him jailed.
The departure of Thaksin, the driving force behind Pheu Thai, came six days after a court sacked his daughter, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, as prime minister for an ethics violation, triggering a scramble for power and a bold offensive by a renegade party to form its own government.
Pheu Thai, the populist political juggernaut that won five of the past six elections, has fought desperately to thwart the challenge of former alliance partner Bhumjaithai, which has won the backing of the biggest force in parliament with a pledge to call a new election within four months.
The turmoil has put Bhumjaithai leader Anutin Charnvirakul in pole position ahead of Friday’s vote, where he needs the support of more than half of the lower house to become prime minister.
His coalition has 146 lawmakers and with the People’s Party opting to stay in the opposition but guaranteeing him its 143 votes, Anutin could comfortably pass the required threshold of 247 votes.

’The final show’
After a failed attempt to dissolve the house to stymie Anutin, Pheu Thai made another last-ditch attempt to undermine his alliance on Thursday, announcing it would nominate 77-year-old former attorney-general Chaikasem Nitisiri to contest the prime ministerial vote, with a promise to call a snap election immediately if elected.
But with the sudden departure of 76-year-old power-broker Thaksin amid a crisis in his once-dominant party, the chances of political unknown Chaikasem succeeding look increasingly slim.
In an overnight post on X, Thaksin said he had arrived for a medical checkup in Dubai, where he spent most of his 15 years in self-imposed exile to avoid a jail term for abuse of power and conflicts of interest while he was prime minister from 2001-2006.
He said he would return by Monday.
Thaksin made a vaunted homecoming before cheering crowds in 2023 to serve his eight-year sentence, but on his first night in prison, he was transferred to the VIP wing of a hospital on medical grounds.
The tycoon had his sentence commuted to a year by the king and was released on parole after six months in detention. The Supreme Court will decide on Tuesday if his hospital stint counts as time served, if not, it could send him back to jail.
Wanwichit Boonprong, a political science lecturer at Rangsit University, said Anutin had outmaneuvered Thaksin’s Pheu Thai by making a pact with the opposition.
“I’m quite confident that Anutin will be elected as the next prime minister,” he said.
“Pheu Thai’s tactics are like the final show,” he said. “Pheu Thai has completely closed the curtain.” 


US senators pit Kennedy against Trump on vaccine policy. Democrats, medical groups call for his resignation

US senators pit Kennedy against Trump on vaccine policy. Democrats, medical groups call for his resignation
Updated 05 September 2025

US senators pit Kennedy against Trump on vaccine policy. Democrats, medical groups call for his resignation

US senators pit Kennedy against Trump on vaccine policy. Democrats, medical groups call for his resignation
  • Republican Senator Cassidy contrasts Kennedy’s anti-vaccine stance with Trump’s 2020 COVID vaccine initiative
  • Criticism of Kennedy has intensified since he fired CDC Director Monarez, which triggered resignations of four CDC agency officials
  • The officials cited anti-vaccine policies and misinformation pushed by Kennedy and his team

WASHINGTON: Democrats and Republicans pushed US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy’s Jr. on his recent vaccine policies and their stark contrast to President Donald Trump’s successful first-term pandemic initiative to speed vaccine development during a combative three-hour Senate hearing on Thursday.
Half a dozen heated exchanges focused on the details of his decision to fire Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Susan Monarez, who had started the job with Kennedy’s support only a month earlier.
Republican Senator Bill Cassidy, a physician who played a critical role in Kennedy’s confirmation, grilled him about the cancelation of $500 million in COVID vaccine contracts, while citing examples of doctors and cancer patients who have been unable to obtain the protection against the potentially deadly disease.
“I would say, effectively, we’re denying people vaccine,” concluded Cassidy.
“Well, you’re wrong,” Kennedy responded.
Cassidy, of Louisiana, praised Trump for having accelerated the development, manufacturing, and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines in 2020.
His line of questioning — mirrored by two other members of his and Trump’s party — underscored the tightrope Republicans critical of Kennedy needed to walk in order to push back against his vaccine policies without criticizing the president.
Cassidy asked Kennedy during the Senate Finance Committee hearing if he agreed with him that Trump deserved a Nobel Peace Prize for the COVID vaccine initiative, known as Operation Warp Speed. Kennedy said he did.

 

Why then had Kennedy said the vaccines killed more people than COVID? Cassidy asked. Kennedy denied making the statement, would not agree that the vaccines saved lives, and in a later exchange acknowledged the shots prevented deaths but not how many.
COVID vaccines in the first year of their use saved some 14.4 million lives globally, according to a study published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases journal.
Kennedy has also canceled $500 million in funding for research on the mRNA technology that yielded the most widely used COVID vaccines under Trump, which Cassidy characterized as denying people vaccines.
Republicans Thom Tillis of North Carolina and John Barrasso of Wyoming, who like Cassidy is a physician, adopted Cassidy’s tactic, as did Senate Democrats Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire, Raphael Warnock of Georgia, where the CDC is headquartered, and Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who caucuses with Democrats.
The White House backed Kennedy, with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and Vice President JD Vance both defending him and Leavitt attacking Democrats in posts on X. Neither mentioned his Republican critics.
“Secretary Kennedy, in your confirmation hearings you promised to uphold the highest standards for vaccines. Since then, I’ve grown deeply concerned,” said Barrasso.
“The public has seen measles outbreaks, leadership in the National Institutes of Health questioning the use of mRNA vaccines, the recently confirmed Director of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention fired,” the senator added.

 

Under fiery questioning from most Democrats and some Republicans, Kennedy defended the ousting of Monarez, adding that he might need to fire even more people at the agency.
Trump fired Monarez after she resisted changes to vaccine policy advanced by Kennedy that she believed contradicted scientific evidence, further destabilizing the already embattled agency.
In an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal on Thursday, Monarez said she had been directed to preapprove vaccine recommendations and fire career CDC officials, describing her ouster as part of a broader push to weaken US vaccine standards.
Kennedy said she lied and that he had never told Monarez she needed to preapprove decisions, but that he did order her to fire officials, which she refused to do.
“Secretary Kennedy’s claims are false, and at times, patently ridiculous. Dr. Monarez stands by what she said in her Wall Street Journal op-ed,” her lawyers said in a statement, adding that she was willing to repeat it under oath.

Calls for Kennedy's resignation
Kennedy said the CDC during the COVID-19 pandemic had lied to Americans about mask wearing, social distancing, school closures and the ability of the vaccine to stop transmission.
“I need to fire some of those people and make sure this doesn’t happen again,” Kennedy said.

 

The CDC’s pandemic recommendations were based on past experience with virus transmission and what was known about the novel coronavirus at the time. By late 2021, with more real-world data, the CDC acknowledged the shots could not stop COVID infection and transmission, but were highly effective in preventing severe cases, hospitalizations and deaths.
Since taking the job, Kennedy has made a series of controversial changes to US vaccine policy, including narrowing who is eligible for COVID shots and firing all 17 expert members of a CDC vaccine advisory panel, choosing some fellow anti-vaccine activists to replace them.
Vaccination rates in the US have been on the decline. Florida on Wednesday said it plans to end all state vaccine mandates, including for students to attend schools. No senators asked Kennedy about the announcement in the hearing.
Criticism of Kennedy has intensified since Monarez’s firing, which triggered resignations of four CDC agency officials who cited anti-vaccine policies and misinformation pushed by him and his team. He revisited several issues after the hearing, posting four times on X to address questions and respond to accusations.
Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, the committee’s top-ranking Democrat, called for Kennedy’s resignation, as have Warnock, Sanders, and over 1,000 current and former health employees.
 


Xi and Putin heard on hot mic talking about how long science will extend the human life span

Xi and Putin heard on hot mic talking about how long science will extend the human life span
Updated 05 September 2025

Xi and Putin heard on hot mic talking about how long science will extend the human life span

Xi and Putin heard on hot mic talking about how long science will extend the human life span
  • “In a few decades, ... people will become younger and perhaps even achieve immortality,” Putin says
  • “Some predict that within this century, it may be possible ... may be able to live up to 150 years old,” Xi responds

BEIJING: Chinese leader Xi Jinping and Russia President Vladimir Putin chatted about how advances in science could prolong the human life span in a rare hot mic moment in the Chinese capital.
The brief exchange was captured on a live news video feed of Xi and Putin as they walked on a red carpet with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un at the head of a large cluster of high-level guests. The group was going toward the viewing platform for a major Chinese military parade on Wednesday.
Xi spoke first, and although only parts of his words can be made out, a translator followed in Russian: “Before it’s said to be very rare to live up to 70, and now it’s said that you are still a child at 70.”
Putin, turning toward Xi, gesticulated with pointed fingers as he responded. Kim, on the other side of Xi, turned in to listen to both, breaking into an occasional smile.
The Russian president’s words are inaudible, but after he spoke, an interpreter can be heard translating what he said into Chinese.
“In a few decades, as biotechnology continues to develop, human organs will continue to be transplanted and people will become younger and perhaps even achieve immortality,” the interpreter said.

Xi appeared to break into a slight smile as the interpreter spoke, turning his head once to look at Putin briefly.
The live feed then switched to an overhead view of the viewing platform on historic Tiananmen Gate, but the audio from the walking leaders continued.
A voice that sounded like Xi said, “Some predict that within this century, it may be possible ... .”
Then the audio paused briefly. When it came back, someone can be heard saying at much lower volume, ” ... may be able to live up to 150 years old.”
The second phrase follows naturally from the first one in Chinese, but it’s not clear whether the second one is also Xi or someone else. A translator than said in Russian, “There are forecasts that in this world a person will live up to 100.”
The feed was provided by the parade media center to international news agencies including The Associated Press.
Xi presided over a parade that marked the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. The fighter jets, missiles and other military hardware were a display of strength intended in part to show the progress the country has made under Communist Party rule.
Later in the day, Putin said at a news conference that Xi had brought up life expectancy while they were walking to the parade.
“The chairman mentioned this,” he said, referring to the Chinese leader. He added that former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi had actively promoted the topic in the past.
“Modern health and medical technologies, surgical procedures connected with organ replacements and so on give humanity reason to hope that an active life can continue differently than now,” Putin said. “The average age varies across countries, of course, but life expectancy is significantly increasing.”
 


China’s Xi and North Korea’s Kim pledge deeper ties during meeting in Beijing

China’s Xi and North Korea’s Kim pledge deeper ties during meeting in Beijing
Updated 05 September 2025

China’s Xi and North Korea’s Kim pledge deeper ties during meeting in Beijing

China’s Xi and North Korea’s Kim pledge deeper ties during meeting in Beijing

BEIJING: Chinese President Xi Jinping and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un pledged mutual support and enhanced cooperation during talks in Beijing after a commemoration of the end of World War II, the countries’ state media said.
Xi and Kim, along with top officials from their countries, met at Beijing’s Great Hall of the People a day after Kim attended a Chinese military parade alongside other foreign leaders including Russian President Vladimir Putin. Kim is making a rare trip outside North Korea.
Xi highlighted the “traditional friendship” between China and North Korea and pledged to consolidate and boost relations, according to a readout of their statements published by Chinese state broadcaster CCTV on Thursday.
“This position will not change regardless of how the international situation evolves,” Xi told Kim, according to CCTV.
North Korea’s official Korean Central News Agency said Friday that the leaders discussed increasing high-level visits and contacts as well as strengthening strategic cooperation and protecting shared interests in international and regional affairs. It said Kim left Beijing by his private train Thursday evening after his meeting with Xi.
China has been North Korea’s biggest trading partner and aid provider, though questions have lingered about the strength of their bilateral relationship.
In recent years, Kim’s foreign policy has focused heavily on Russia. He has sent combat troops and ammunition to back Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in return for economic and military assistance. At a meeting with Kim in Beijing after the parade, Putin praised the bravery of North Korean soldiers in the fighting.
But experts say that Kim would feel the need to prepare for the possible end of the Russia-Ukraine war.
Kim, on his first visit to China in six years, brought his young daughter, adding to speculation that she’s being primed as the country’s next leader.
On Wednesday, he joined 26 foreign leaders who watched the parade marking the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. It was the first time that Kim had joined an event with a large group of world leaders since taking office in late 2011.
North Korea’s economy has been suffering under heavy US sanctions tied to Pyongyang’s development of nuclear weapons. Some observers say Kim’s trip could also be meant to increase leverage in potential talks with US President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly expressed his hopes to resume diplomacy between the two countries.
China is believed to want its neighbor to return to negotiation and give up its nuclear weapons development.
North Korea’s more recent closer ties with Russia have raised some concern in Beijing, which has long been Pyongyang’s most important ally.
The joint appearance of Kim, Xi and Putin at the parade has sparked speculation about a joint effort to push back at US pressure on their three countries. Trump said as much in a social media post, telling Xi to give his warmest regards to Putin and Kim “as you conspire against The United States of America.”
Putin dismissed that idea at a news conference in Beijing on Wednesday, saying no one has expressed anything negative about the Trump administration during his trip to China.
“The President of the United States is not without a sense of humor,” he said.
Although China, North Korea and Russia are embroiled in separate confrontations with the US, they haven’t formed a clear three-way alliance so far.
Zhu Feng, the dean of Nanjing University’s School of International Relations, said that “ganging up” with North Korea would damage China’s image, because the former is the most closed and authoritarian country in the world.
“It should not be overinterpreted that China-North Korea-Russia relations would see reinforcement,” he said.


Takeaways from RFK Jr.’s contentious hearing before Senate lawmakers

Takeaways from RFK Jr.’s contentious hearing before Senate lawmakers
Updated 05 September 2025

Takeaways from RFK Jr.’s contentious hearing before Senate lawmakers

Takeaways from RFK Jr.’s contentious hearing before Senate lawmakers

WASHINGTON: A contentious three-hour hearing between US senators and Robert Kennedy Jr. devolved into multiple screaming matches on Thursday as the nation’s health secretary fended off accusations about sweeping changes he’s made to vaccines, health care policy and leadership.
The oversight hearing in the Senate Finance Committee was a chance for senators to seek answers from Kennedy on recent high-profile departures at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the appointment of vaccine critics to an influential federal advisory committee and changes to COVID-19 vaccine recommendations that will make it harder for many Americans to get the shots.
Both Democrats and Republicans came out swinging. They questioned whether he would keep his earlier promise that he wouldn’t block vaccines for Americans who wanted them. A frustrated Kennedy dismissed those arguments but also sowed doubt on vaccine safety and effectiveness from the prominent perch on Capitol Hill.
HERE ARE SOME KEY TAKEAWAYS FROM THE HEARING:
Kennedy tried to discredit ousted CDC director
Kennedy repeatedly disputed the account of fired CDC director Susan Monarez, who was abruptly removed from her post last week after less than a month on the job. Monarez was nominated by President Donald Trump, endorsed for the job by Kennedy and confirmed by a Senate vote in July.
In a Wall Street Journal op-ed published Thursday, Monarez reiterated that she was told to “preapprove” recommendations by Kennedy’s handpicked vaccine advisers, many of whom have records of questioning basic vaccine science.
“I asked her: ‘Are you a trustworthy person?’ and she said ‘No,’” Kennedy stated, explaining his change of opinion on Monarez. “If you had an employee who told you they weren’t trustworthy, would you ask them to resign?”
An attorney representing Monarez called Kennedy’s statements “false” and “patently ridiculous,” in a written statement. Her attorney said she would repeat the allegations in her Wall Street Journal op-ed under oath.
Later in the hearing, Kennedy acknowledged that he’d told Monarez to fire several senior CDC officials. Throughout the hearing, Kennedy accused the agency’s scientists of failing to combat chronic disease and making unsound recommendations during the pandemic.
“The people who at CDC who oversaw that process, who put masks on our children, who closed our schools, are the people who will be leaving,” Kennedy said.
‘You’re just making stuff up:’ A combative Kennedy lobbed attacks
For Kennedy, tough questions from angry senators were an opportunity to fight back.
Throughout the hearing, a resolute Kennedy accused senators of lying, misrepresenting his agency and making little sense. As a result, questioning from Democratic senators repeatedly turned into yelling matches.
“You’re just making stuff up,” Kennedy told Sen. Tina Smith, a Democrat from Minnesota, after she accused him of “blaming school shootings on antidepressants.” The health secretary said on Fox News after the recent Minnesota shooting that antidepressants could potentially contribute to violence, and said his agency was investigating. While critics of antidepressants have long alleged they may increase homicidal behavior, the link is not supported by multiple, large clinical trials of the drugs.
When Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock of Georgia questioned Kennedy about his disparaging rhetoric about CDC employees before a recent deadly shooting at the agency, Kennedy retorted: “Are you complicit in the assassination attempts on President Trump?”
Kennedy said Sen. Ben Ray Luján of New Mexico was “talking gibberish” when the Democrat asked him about the details of his agency’s autism research.
“Mr. Secretary, let me speak slowly and clearly so that you can understand me through my New Mexico accent,” Luján responded.
Senators challenged claim that ‘anybody can get the booster’ for COVID
Democratic senators pressed Kennedy on recent changes narrowing the approval of annual COVID-19 shots. He repeatedly disputed or denied their accusations.
Last month, the Food and Drug Administration approved updated shots but only for seniors or younger people with underlying health risks. That’s sparked confusion and frustration from many Americans, including parents interested in vaccinating healthy children against the virus.
“Why have you acted behind closed doors to overrule scientists and limit the freedom of parents to choose the COVID vaccine for their children?” Democratic Sen. Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire asked.
“This is crazy talk,” Kennedy responded. Later, he acknowledged that access to vaccines at pharmacies “depends on the state.”
In many states, pharmacists are legally barred from administering vaccines outside the uses endorsed by the CDC’s advisory panel, prompting CVS and other pharmacy chains to turn away people seeking shots in certain states.
“You promised that you would not take away vaccines from anyone who wanted them,” said Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts.
“I’m not taking them away from people,” Kennedy said, noting that healthy Americans who want a shot should still be able to get one if a doctor prescribes one. Typically, Americans do not need to see a doctor for annual vaccine updates.
Until this year, the FDA and CDC had recommended yearly COVID vaccinations for everyone ages 6 months and up.
COVID statistics remain a flashpoint
Kennedy could not be pinned down on basic facts and statistics, particularly when it came to vaccines and COVID-19.
In an exchange with Sen. Mark Warner, Kennedy claimed nobody knows how many Americans have died from COVID-19 because of a lack of government data.
Both the CDC and the World Health Organization have concluded that approximately 1.2 million Americans have died from the virus.
“The secretary of Health and Human Services doesn’t know how many Americans died from COVID,” said Warner, a Virginia Democrat. “How can you be that ignorant?”
Republicans also pressed Kennedy on his assessment of Operation Warp Speed, the Trump-led initiative that rapidly developed COVID vaccines in the first year of the pandemic. Trump has long claimed success for the effort, while acknowledging unsubstantiated theories that mass vaccinations may have caused more harm than good.
Kennedy has said it’s unclear how many lives were saved by the vaccines because of imperfect data collected by the CDC and vaccine makers.
Nevertheless, when questioned by Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana — a physician whose vote was key in Kennedy’s nomination — about Operation Warp Speed, Kennedy agreed that Trump “absolutely” deserved a Nobel Prize.
Vaccine concerns were bipartisan
Senate Republicans were more aggressive with Kennedy than they have been with most of Trump’s top officials, with several asking pointed questions about his efforts to limit access to vaccines.
Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso, also a doctor and the No. 2 Senate Republican, said he had grown “deeply concerned” that some vaccines could be in jeopardy after Kennedy had cut research funding and fired the CDC director.
“Americans don’t know who to rely on,” Barrasso said.
North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis read off a list of questions for Kennedy that he said he wanted answered after the hearing, including where the health secretary stands on the COVID-19 vaccine.