The case for a clear legal definition of environmental crime

The case for a clear legal definition of environmental crime

The case for a clear legal definition of environmental crime
Infographic courtesy of the National Center for Environmental Compliance.
Short Url

Often overlooked and dismissed as a minor issue, “environmental crime” remains undefined in international law, even though it is acknowledged as one of the fastest-growing areas of illicit activity worldwide.

This type of crime destroys habitats, depletes economic resources, and at times creates security risks. Yet the absence of a definition has led countries and institutions to adopt their own interpretations, undermining international cooperation.

The world must either establish a new convention or recognize “ecocide” as an international criminal offense, while also strengthening existing enforcement mechanisms, such as Interpol and the UN Office on Drugs and Crime.

For now, environmental crime exists as a fragmented legal concept that hinders global enforcement coordination and policy harmonization because it lacks universal recognition comparable to piracy or terrorism.

The broader definition, now adopted in some jurisdictions, extends to carbon market fraud, deliberate manipulation of emissions data, and cyberattacks against environmental monitoring systems.

These varying definitions have created obstacles to establishing mutual understanding. While several nations support creating a new treaty or recognizing ecocide as an international crime, others continue to focus on strengthening existing frameworks.

While this global discussion continues, has worked to establish domestic legal certainty through the Environmental Law of 2020, supported by complementary regulations that codify a wide range of environmental crimes and their penalties.

Key classifications include industrial pollution and hazardous waste, covering unlicensed discharges, dumping, or mishandling of dangerous materials, and illegal hunting and trading of wildlife, particularly endangered or protected species, under the Wildlife Conservation Law.

They also include encroachment on protected areas, and deforestation and overgrazing, regulated by the Forests and Rangelands Law through restrictions on tree cutting, uprooting, excessive livestock grazing, and large-scale vegetation destruction.

Marine and freshwater contamination caused by discharges of pollutants, and the illegal drilling of wells, which refers to unlicensed excavation or over-extraction of groundwater, are also key classifications.

Enforcement is shared among specialized institutions, including the National Center for Environmental Compliance, which oversees compliance and regulations, and the Special Forces for Environmental Security, responsible for field enforcement.

While this global discussion continues, has worked to establish domestic legal certainty.

Amal Albawardi

These also include the National Center for Wildlife, which manages biodiversity and protected areas, and the Public Prosecution, tasked with bringing serious environmental crimes to court to hold offenders accountable.

These institutions show that the Kingdom treats environmental protection as integral to its law, sovereignty, and security. 

Supporters of a new global framework advocate making large-scale environmental destruction an international crime. Small island states and vulnerable nations most affected by climate change support proposals to codify ecocide.

Pragmatists contend that enhancing the effectiveness of existing tools is quicker and more efficient.

Interpol’s success is evident in operations such as Days at Sea and 30 Days of Action, which have uncovered thousands of violations across several countries. These programs show that enforcement can succeed even without a shared definition when states work together.

In 2025, participated in the first meeting of the UN Intergovernmental Expert Group on Crimes that Affect the Environment, held in Vienna. This demonstrated its commitment to global governance through international policy work that protects national sovereignty while creating equitable partnerships.

The Kingdom’s position builds on Vision 2030 domestic reforms, which place environmental sustainability at the center of national transformation.

’s approach demonstrates both national commitment and international responsibility.

Domestically, the Kingdom enforces laws that punish pollution, wildlife trafficking, deforestation and illegal oil drilling. Abroad, it actively engages in shaping the conversation on how to confront these crimes collectively.

The Kingdom demonstrates its position as a global leader through clear domestic policies and active international relations. Environmental crime exists beyond borders, and so does the commitment to fight it.

Amal Albawardi is general manager of the General Department of International Agreements and Cooperation at ’s National Center for Environmental Compliance.

 

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point of view

Lithuania’s main airport shut over suspected balloons

Lithuania’s main airport shut over suspected balloons
Updated 34 sec ago

Lithuania’s main airport shut over suspected balloons

Lithuania’s main airport shut over suspected balloons
  • Airports in Germany, Denmark, Norway and Poland have recently suspended flights due to unidentified drones, while Romania and Estonia have pointed the finger at Russia, which has brushed off the allegations

VILNIUS: Lithuania’s main airport was closed on Sunday due to a suspected “series of balloons,” the latest such incident to disrupt flights in a European city.
Airports in Germany, Denmark, Norway and Poland have recently suspended flights due to unidentified drones, while Romania and Estonia have pointed the finger at Russia, which has brushed off the allegations.
Vilnius airport said it had received official information at 10:16 p.m. (1916 GMT) on Saturday that “air traffic is being temporarily suspended.”
“According to our information, the decision was made due to a possible series of balloons heading toward Vilnius Airport,” it said on Facebook.
The statement did not say where the purported balloons had come from.
It said its airspace would be closed until 4:30 am on Sunday.
At least 10 flights were affected, with several planes — including from London, Frankfurt and Vienna — rerouted to the Latvian capital Riga.
One from Copenhagen was forced to turn back, while a scheduled departure to Helsinki was canceled, Vilnius airport said.
“Other departures may also be delayed or canceled,” the airport warned.
The incident came after drone sightings this week caused Munich airport to shut down twice in as many days.
Flights from the German city gradually resumed on Saturday after travel disruptions affecting over 6,500 passengers, the operator said.
 


Georgian police clash, detain protesters as ruling party says it won local elections

Georgian police clash, detain protesters as ruling party says it won local elections
Updated 34 min 27 sec ago

Georgian police clash, detain protesters as ruling party says it won local elections

Georgian police clash, detain protesters as ruling party says it won local elections
  • Georgian Dream claims victory in municipal elections
  • Riot police force protesters back from presidential palace

TBILISI: Georgian riot police used pepper spray and water cannons to drive demonstrators away from the presidential palace and detained five activists on Saturday, as the opposition staged a large demonstration on a day of local elections.
The governing Georgian Dream party said it had clinched victory in every municipality across the South Caucasus country of 3.7 million people in an election boycotted by the two largest opposition blocs.
Shortly before polls closed, a group of demonstrators attempted to force entry to the presidential palace in the capital Tbilisi, a Reuters witness said, after opposition figures called for a “peaceful revolution” against GD, which they accuse of being pro-Russian and authoritarian.

Georgia’s pro-Western opposition has been staging protests since October last year, when GD won a parliamentary election that its critics say was fraudulent. The party has rejected accusations of vote-rigging.
Once one of the most pro-Western nations to emerge from the ashes of the Soviet Union, Georgia has had frayed relations with the West since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022.
On Saturday the Health Ministry said 21 members of the security forces and six demonstrators had been injured in clashes in the center of Tbilisi, according to local media.
Georgia’s Rustavi-2 television and Russian state media quoted Deputy Interior Minister Aleksandre Darakhvelidze as saying the police detained five activists, including the opera singer Paata Burchuladze and two members of the United National Movement, Georgia’s largest opposition party.
They are charged with calling for the overthrow of the authorities and face up to nine years in prison, if convicted, Darakhvelidze said.
The government froze accession talks to the European Union soon after last year’s vote, abruptly halting a longstanding national goal and triggering large demonstrations that have continued since.
Thousands of protesters gathered on central Freedom Square and Rustaveli Avenue, waving Georgian and EU flags.
Davit Mzhavanadze, who attended the demonstration, said the protests were part of “a deep crisis which is absolutely formed by our pro-Russian and authoritarian government.”
“I think this protest will continue until these demands will be responded to properly from our government,” he said.
A smaller group of demonstrators marched to the presidential palace and were repelled by police after attempting to break into the building. Some of them then barricaded a nearby street, lighting fires and facing off with riot police.
Georgian Dream, which is widely seen as controlled by founder Bidzina Ivanishvili, the country’s richest man and a former prime minister, denies it is pro-Moscow. It says it wants to join the EU while preserving peace with Russia, its huge neighbor to the north.
 


Vinicius double helps Real Madrid beat Villarreal

Vinicius double helps Real Madrid beat Villarreal
Updated 37 min 35 sec ago

Vinicius double helps Real Madrid beat Villarreal

Vinicius double helps Real Madrid beat Villarreal
  • Los Blancos moved two points clear of champions Barcelona, who visit Sevilla on Sunday, as they bounced back from last week’s derby drubbing

MADRID: Vinicius Junior fired Real Madrid to the top of La Liga with a brace in a 3-1 win over Villarreal on Saturday, while Kylian Mbappe was also on target.
Los Blancos moved two points clear of champions Barcelona, who visit Sevilla on Sunday, as they bounced back from last week’s derby drubbing.
Having returned from their long midweek trip to Kazakhstan, where they beat Kairat in the Champions League, Madrid turned their focus back to domestic matters.
Thrashed 5-2 by city rivals Atletico Madrid last weekend, Xabi Alonso’s side had plenty to prove against a strong Villarreal team, who are third.
“I played very well and I want to continue like this, keeping this confidence and doing even more,” Vinicius told Real Madrid TV.
“We have good feelings... when we come back (from the international break) we have big games and we need confidence,” added Vinicius.
The winger did not start the season well but has found form in recent outings.
“Vini had a very good game and he was decisive, I’m very happy for him,” Alonso told reporters.
Alonso brought Fede Valverde back into the team, playing him at right-back in the absence of injured duo Dani Carvajal and Trent Alexander-Arnold.
Madrid had the better of a slow-paced first half at the Santiago Bernabeu.
Teenage attacker Franco Mastantuono might have sent Los Blancos ahead but Villarreal defender Renato Veiga blocked his shot after Mbappe cut the ball back to him.
At the other end, Thibaut Courtois saved superbly from Tani Oluwaseyi, who snuck in behind the center-backs but could not beat Madrid’s Belgian goalkeeper.
Los Blancos took the lead early in the second half through Vinicius, whose shot took a fortunate deflection off Santi Comesana and flew past the helpless Arnau Tenas.
Xabi Alonso brought on Jude Bellingham for the final 25 minutes, after benching him for the second game running following the Atletico debacle.
Thomas Tuchel left the midfielder out of his England squad for upcoming World Cup qualifiers this week, and he was out to prove a point.

- Tenas resistance -

Madrid doubled their lead when Rafa Marin brought down Vinicius in the area and the Brazilian beat Tenas from the spot. The former Barcelona goalkeeper could have stopped the penalty but the ball slipped under him.
Alonso said that Mbappe is Madrid’s main penalty taker but “it was their decision” to give Vinicius the ball.
Vinicius wanted another penalty when Tenas appeared to bring him down in the box moments later, but his appeals were waved away.
Bellingham twice came close but Tenas denied him on both occasions, with the midfielder kicking a post in frustration.
Villarreal pulled a goal back through Georges Mikautadze, who finished lethally from the edge of the box, but Madrid quickly restored their two-goal cushion.
Yellow Submarine defender Santiago Mourino was sent off for a second yellow card for a push on Vinicius as he charged down the wing, and soon Mbappe netted the third.
Brahim Diaz teed up the French superstar to roll home his ninth league goal of the campaign, making him the division’s top scorer.
Mbappe was taken off grimacing in the final stages, in the only negative note for a Madrid side who were good value for their three points.
“Kylian already had a little discomfort in his ankle, we will see how it goes,” said Alonso, adding that the forward would still travel to join up with the French national team.
Villarreal’s Comesana complained about some of the refereeing decisions that went against his side.
“It’s a shame about the first goal which hit me, and then came the penalty, which wasn’t enough (of a foul) to give it,” Comesana told DAZN.
“That hurt us a lot, you only have to look how he threw himself down... and the red card (was soft)... if it’s already hard to win at the Bernabeu, with these things it’s even harder.”


Militants attack major prison in Mogadishu hours after roadblocks lifted

Militants attack major prison in Mogadishu hours after roadblocks lifted
Updated 46 min ago

Militants attack major prison in Mogadishu hours after roadblocks lifted

Militants attack major prison in Mogadishu hours after roadblocks lifted

MOGADISHU, Somalia: Explosions and heavy gunfire erupted near Somalia’ s presidential palace on Saturday in an attack by a militant group targeting a major prison just hours after the federal government lifted roadblocks in place for years in the capital.
Residents in the central Mogadishu district of Bondhere reported hearing explosions and gunfire and seeing smoke billowing from the prison, which also serves as the headquarters for the regional intelligence unit.
A resident, Hibo Mohamed, told The Associated Press by phone, “We are truly scared. The city had been calm for months, but now everyone feels anxious once more.”
The Al-Qaeda-linked Al-Shabab militant group, which is based in Somalia, claimed responsibility for the attack, saying it had released prisoners.

The government did not immediately comment on the attack, and phone calls and messages to officials went unanswered Saturday.
Somalia’s state media reported that the militants used a vehicle disguised to resemble those of the intelligence unit’s security forces, and that soldiers repelled the attack and killed several militants.
The attack targeted the Godka Jilacow prison, which was previously attacked in 2014 when Al-Shabab militants set off a suicide car bomb at the gate before storming the compound in an attempt to free detainees. Somali forces repelled the attackers in that assault, but at least a dozen people were killed.
Saturday’s attack came just hours after the federal government lifted several long-standing roadblocks in Mogadishu. The barriers had been in place for years to safeguard critical government sites, but many residents argued that they obstructed traffic and commerce.
Security forces promptly cordoned off the roads leading to the scene, while ambulances hurried to the area. The number of casualties was not immediately clear.
Mogadishu had been relatively calm in recent months as government forces, backed by local militias and African Union troops, have pushed Al-Shabab fighters out of several areas in central and southern Somalia.


US judge temporarily blocks Trump administration from deploying troops in Portland, Oregon

US judge temporarily blocks Trump administration from deploying troops in Portland, Oregon
Updated 57 min 38 sec ago

US judge temporarily blocks Trump administration from deploying troops in Portland, Oregon

US judge temporarily blocks Trump administration from deploying troops in Portland, Oregon
  • US District Judge Karin Immergut issued the order pending further arguments in a lawsuit brought by the state and city 
  • Trump has deployed or threatened to deploy troops in several US cities, particularly ones led by Democrats, including Los Angeles, Washington, Chicago and Memphis

PORTLAND, Oregon: A federal judge in Oregon temporarily blocked President Donald Trump’s administration from deploying the National Guard in Portland, ruling in a lawsuit brought by the state and city.
US District Judge Karin Immergut issued the order pending further arguments in the suit. The plaintiffs say a deployment would violate the US Constitution as well as a federal law that generally prohibits the military from being used to enforce domestic laws.
Immergut wrote that the case involves the intersection of three fundamental democratic principles: “the relationship between the federal government and the states, between the military and domestic law enforcement, and the balance of powers between the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government.
“Whether we choose to follow what the Constitution mandates with respect to these three relationships goes to the heart of what it means to live under the rule of law in the United States,” she wrote.
Generally speaking the president is allowed “a great level of deference” to federalize National Guard troops in situations where regular law enforcement forces are not able to execute the laws of the United States, the judge said, but that has not been the case in Portland.
Plaintiffs were able to show that the demonstrations at the Portland immigration facility were not significantly violent or disruptive in the days or weeks leading up to the president’s order, the judge wrote, and “overall, the protests were small and uneventful.”
“The President’s determination was simply untethered to the facts.”
The Defense Department had said it was placing 200 members of Oregon’s National Guard under federal control for 60 days to protect federal property at locations where protests are occurring or likely to occur after Trump called the city “war-ravaged.”
Oregon officials said that description was ludicrous. The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement building in the city has recently been the site of nightly protests, which typically drew a couple dozen people in recent weeks before the deployment was announced.
Trump The Republican president has deployed or threatened to deploy troops in several US cities, particularly ones led by Democrats, including Los Angeles, Washington, Chicago and Memphis. Speaking Tuesday to US military leaders in Virginia, the president proposed using cities as training grounds for the armed forces.
Last month a federal judge ruled that Trump’s deployment of some 4,700 National Guard soldiers and Marines in Los Angeles earlier this year was illegal, but he allowed the 300 who remain in the city to stay as long as they do not enforce civilian laws.
As for Portland, the Defense Department announced that it was placing 200 members of Oregon’s National Guard under federal control for 60 days to protect federal property at locations where protests are occurring or likely to occur.
That announcement came after Trump called “war-ravaged” in late September, a characterization that Oregon officials called ludicrous while saying they do not need or want federal troops there.
The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement building in Portland has been the site of nightly protests, and the demonstrations and occasional clashes with law enforcement have been limited to a one-block area in a city that covers about 145 square miles (375 square km) and has about 636,000 residents.
A handful of immigration and legal advocates often gather at the building during the day. At night, recent protests have typically drawn a couple dozen people.
A larger crowd demonstrated Sept. 28 following the announcement of the guard deployment. The Portland Police Bureau, which has said it does not participate in immigration enforcement and only intervenes in the protests if there is vandalism or criminal activity, arrested two people on assault charges.
A peaceful march earlier that day drew thousands to downtown and saw no arrests, police said.
Trump sent federal officers to Portland over the objections of local and state leaders in 2020 during long-running racial justice protests following George Floyd’s killing by Minneapolis police. The administration sent hundreds of agents for the stated purpose of protecting the federal courthouse and other federal property from vandalism.
That deployment antagonized demonstrators and prompted nightly clashes. Federal officers fired rubber bulled and used tear gas.
Viral videos captured federal officers arresting people and hustling them into unmarked vehicles. A report by the Department of Homeland Security’s inspector general found that while the federal government had legal authority to deploy the officers, many of them lacked the training and equipment necessary for the mission.
The government agreed this year to settle an excessive force lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union by paying compensating several plaintiffs for their injuries.