Zelensky, Trump express hope for trilateral talks with Putin to bring end to Russia-Ukraine war

Zelensky, Trump express hope for trilateral talks with Putin to bring end to Russia-Ukraine war
1 / 2
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is greeted by US President Donald Trump upon arrival at the White House. (AFP)
Zelensky, Trump express hope for trilateral talks with Putin to bring end to Russia-Ukraine war
2 / 2
US Chief of Protocol Monica Crowley greets French President Emmanuel Macron as he arrives at the White House amid negotiations to end the Russian war in Ukraine. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 19 August 2025

Zelensky, Trump express hope for trilateral talks with Putin to bring end to Russia-Ukraine war

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and US President Donald Trump participate in a meeting at the White House in Washington.
  • US president also said he would back European security guarantees for Ukraine as European leaders gathered in Washington
  • Trump stopped short of committing US troops to the effort, saying instead that there would be a “NATO-like” security presence

WASHINGTON: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and President Donald Trump expressed hope that their critical meeting Monday with European leaders at the White House could lead to three-party talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin to bring an end to his war on Ukraine.
The US president also said he would back European security guarantees for Ukraine as European leaders gathered in Washington to show support for Ukraine at the extraordinary White House meeting.
Trump stopped short of committing US troops to the effort, saying instead that there would be a “NATO-like” security presence but that all those details would be hashed out in their afternoon meeting with EU leaders.
“They want to give protection and they feel very strongly about it and we’ll help them out with that,” Trump said. “I think its very important to get the deal done.”
Trump’s engagement with Zelensky had a strikingly different feel to their last Oval Office meeting in February. It was a disastrous moment that led to Trump abruptly ending talks with the Ukrainian delegation after he and Vice President JD Vance complained that Zelensky had shown insufficient gratitude for US military assistance.
Zelensky at the start of the meeting presented a letter from his wife, Olena Zelenska, for Trump’s wife, Melania. The US first lady over the weekend sent a letter to Putin urging him to bring an end to the brutal 3 1/2 year war.
Trump at one point needled Zelensky over Ukraine delaying elections. They had been scheduled for last year but were delayed because of the ongoing Russian invasion. Ukrainian law does not allow presidential elections to be held when martial law is in effect.
Trump joked that a similar circumstance wouldn’t play well in the US.
“So let me just say three and a half years from now — so you mean, if we happen to be in a war with somebody, no more elections, oh, I wonder what the fake news would say,” Trump said.
Zelensky faced criticism during his February meeting from a conservative journalist for appearing in the Oval Office in a long sleeve T-shirt. This time he appeared in dark jacket and buttoned-shirt.
Zelensky has said his typically less formal attire since the start of the full-scale Russian invasion in 2022 is to show solidarity with Ukrainian soldiers.
Monday’s hastily assembled meeting comes after Trump met on Friday with Putin and has said that the onus is now on Zelensky to agree to concessions of land that he said could end the war.
“If everything works out today, we’ll have a trilat,” Trump said, referring to possible three-way talks among Zelensky, Putin and Trump. “We’re going to work with Russia, we’re going to work with Ukraine.”
Trump also said he plans to talk to Putin after his meetings with Zelensky and European leaders.
Zelensky expressed openness to trilateral talks.
“We are ready for trilateral as president said,” Zelensky said.
Trump first held one-on-one talks with Zelensky. The two will later gather with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, Finnish President Alexander Stubb and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte.
The European leaders were left out of Trump’s summit with Putin. They want to safeguard Ukraine and the continent from any widening aggression from Moscow. Many arrived at the White House with the explicit goal of protecting Ukraine’s interests — a rare show of diplomatic force.
Ahead of Monday’s meeting, Trump suggested that Ukraine could not regain Crimea, which Russia annexed in 2014, setting off an armed conflict that led to its broader 2022 invasion.
“President Zelensky of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight,” Trump wrote Sunday night on social media. “Remember how it started. No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!”
Zelensky responded with his own post late Sunday, saying, “We all share a strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably.” He said that “peace must be lasting,” not as it was after Russia seized Crimea and part of the Donbas in eastern Ukraine eight years ago, and “Putin simply used it as a springboard for a new attack.”
Zelensky said in a social media post he met with Trump’s special envoy for Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, on Monday ahead of his scheduled talks with Trump to discuss the battlefield situation and the shared “strong diplomatic capabilities” of the US, Ukraine and Europe. He also held talks with European leaders at the Ukrainian embassy in Washington.
European heavyweights in Washington
On the table for discussion with European leaders are possible NATO-like security guarantees that Ukraine would need for any peace with Russia to be durable. Putin opposes Ukraine joining NATO outright, yet Trump’s team claims the Russian leader is open to allies agreeing to defend Ukraine if it comes under attack.
“Clearly there are no easy solutions when talking about ending a war and building peace,” Meloni told reporters. “We have to explore all possible solutions to guarantee peace, to guarantee justice, and to guarantee security for our countries.”
The European leaders are aiming to keep the focus during the White House talks on finding a sustainable peace and believe forging a temporary ceasefire is not off the table, according to a European official.
The official, who was not authorized to comment publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the leaders are also looking to keep pressure on Russia to end the fighting and want to get more concrete assurances from the US about security guarantees for Ukraine as part of any deal.
Zelensky outlined what he said his country needed to feel secure, which included a “strong Ukrainian army” through weapons sales and training. The second part, he said, would depend on the outcome of Monday’s talks and what EU countries, NATO and the US would be able to guarantee to the war-torn country.
Trump briefed Zelensky and European allies shortly after the Putin meeting. Details from the discussions emerged in a scattershot way that seemed to rankle the US president, who had chosen not to outline any terms when appearing afterward with Putin.
Ahead of Monday’s White House meetings, Trump took to social media to say that even if Russia said, “We give up, we concede, we surrender” the news media and Democrats “would say that this was a bad and humiliating day for Donald J. Trump.”
Following the Alaska summit, Trump declared that a ceasefire was not necessary for peace talks to proceed, a sudden shift to a position favored by Putin.
‘A very big move’
European officials confirmed that Trump told them Putin is still seeking control of the entire Donbas region, even though Ukraine controls a meaningful share of it.
Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said the US and its allies could offer Ukraine a NATO-like commitment to defend the country if it came under attack as the possible security guarantee, with details to be worked out.
Zelensky came into the talks look to prevent a scenario in which he gets blamed for blocking peace talks by rejecting Putin’s maximalist demand on the Donbas. It is a demand Zelensky has said many times he will never accept because it is unconstitutional and could create a launching pad for future Russian attacks.


Sri Lanka ex-President Wickremesinghe hospitalized after arrest, media says

Updated 26 sec ago

Sri Lanka ex-President Wickremesinghe hospitalized after arrest, media says

Sri Lanka ex-President Wickremesinghe hospitalized after arrest, media says
Sri Lanka’s jailed former president, Ranil Wickremesinghe, was hospitalized on Saturday, local media reported, a day after his arrest on allegations that he misused public funds while in office.
Wickremesinghe, 76, who led the South Asian island nation during a devastating economic crisis, was arrested and taken into custody on Friday, police said.
The next day he was taken to the emergency care unit at Colombo National Hospital with complications from dehydration, diabetes and high blood pressure, the hospital director, Dr. Rukshan Bellana, told reporters. Wickremesinghe was later transferred to the intensive care unit where his condition was stable, Bellana was quoted as saying.
Wickremesinghe’s office and the hospital did not immediately respond on Sunday to emailed requests from Reuters for comment on his hospitalization.
Wickremesinghe, a six-time prime minister who lost the presidency last year, had been investigated over a visit he made to Britain to attend a special graduation lunch to celebrate his wife’s honorary professorship at a university there, local media reported.
On Saturday, his office did not respond to a request for comment on his arrest. An ally from his United National Party said Wickremesinghe was innocent and suggested the case was politically motivated.

India’s Modi dangles tax cuts as US tariffs loom

India’s Modi dangles tax cuts as US tariffs loom
Updated 3 min 13 sec ago

India’s Modi dangles tax cuts as US tariffs loom

India’s Modi dangles tax cuts as US tariffs loom
  • Proposed cuts to the goods and services tax to make everything from small cars to air conditioners cheaper for consumers, economists say
  • As the clock ticks down on the tariff hike, the state of US-India trade negotiations remains uncertain
MUMBAI: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s push to slash consumption taxes on everyday goods could deliver billions of dollars in annual relief and boost demand in an economy bracing for painful US tariffs, experts say.
US President Donald Trump has threatened to double import duties on India from 25 to 50 percent to punish New Delhi for buying oil from Russia, saying the purchases help Moscow fund its invasion of Ukraine.
The prospective measure has clouded the outlook for the world’s fifth-largest economy, with Indian exporters warning of plunging orders and severe job losses.
New Delhi has called Washington’s move “unfair, unjustified and unreasonable” but is already seeking to cushion the blow, with Modi last week promising to “bring down the tax burden on the common man” during an annual speech to mark India’s independence.
His proposed cuts to the goods and services tax (GST) would make everything from small cars to air conditioners cheaper for consumers, economists say.
Currently, the tax operates under a complex four-tier structure, with rates ranging from five to 28 percent.
Under Modi’s reforms, most goods would fall into just two tiers, taxed at either five or 18 percent.
The Indian leader has called the change a “Diwali gift,” a reference to the annual Hindu festival of lights when consumers splurge on everything from gold and clothes to consumer electronics.
Trump’s tariffs – and their impact on ordinary Indians – will hinge on how much progress is made toward a Russia-Ukraine peace deal, and whether New Delhi can secure alternative oil suppliers before the US president’s August 27 deadline.
But experts say Modi’s tax reform could help shore up demand by reducing tax collections by between $13 billion and $17 billion.
Analysts at Emkay Global Financial Services called the policy a “welcome reform toward boosting domestic consumption.”
They estimated that about the vast majority of items currently subject to the top 28 percent rate would be taxed at 18 percent, while “nearly all” in the 12 percent tier would move into the five-percent bracket.
Analysts at Motilal Oswal, an Indian financial services firm, said the changes would bring benefits to a wide range of sectors and “sizeable savings” to households.
The fate of the proposal ultimately rests with the GST Council, which includes representatives from state governments and has struggled to achieve broad consensus in the past.
If approved, the cuts would strain public finances, according to experts.
However, they said, they could also help to offset tariff risks and burnish Modi’s credentials among the middle class.
The proposal comes ahead of expected elections later this year in Bihar, a large, Hindu-majority state of 130 million people that is a key political battleground for Modi.
“The popular economic narrative right now is that of Trump’s 50 percent tariffs and how the US-India relationship is seeing setbacks,” Deepanshu Mohan, economist at O.P. Jindal Global University, said.
“The GST readjustment is a strong response from Modi in that context. It’s Modi telling the middle class: ‘We are trying to make sure you have enough at your end,’” Mohan said.
But, he added, it was also an acknowledgement that India’s economy had not worked for its “low middle-income class for some time.”
Although economists have called for an overhaul of the GST system for years, Modi’s surprise announcement comes as US-India ties hit a multi-decade low.
Economists estimate that if the two countries fail to sign a trade deal, Trump’s tariffs could drag India’s GDP growth below six percent this fiscal year, lower than the central bank’s projections of 6.5 percent.
New Delhi’s stance on Russian oil imports will become clearer by late September as most cargoes this month were contracted before Trump’s threats, according to trade intelligence firm Kpler.
Kpler analyst Sumit Ritolia said that while Indian refiners are showing “growing interest” in US, West African and Latin American crude, it was more indicative of “greater flexibility, not a deliberate pivot.”
“Until there’s a clear policy shift or sustained change in trade economics, Russian flows remain a core part of India’s crude basket,” Ritolia said.
As the clock ticks down on the tariff hike, the state of US-India trade negotiations remains uncertain.
New Delhi says it is committed to striking a deal, but Indian media reports suggest US negotiators have postponed a planned late-August visit to the Indian capital.

Pentagon working on plans for military deployment in Chicago, Washington Post reports

Pentagon working on plans for military deployment in Chicago, Washington Post reports
Updated 16 min 9 sec ago

Pentagon working on plans for military deployment in Chicago, Washington Post reports

Pentagon working on plans for military deployment in Chicago, Washington Post reports
  • President Donald Trump: ‘Chicago is a mess … And we’ll straighten that one out probably next’
  • City has grave concerns about the impact of any unlawful deployment of National Guard troops

WASHINGTON: The Pentagon is working on plans to deploy the US military to Chicago as President Donald Trump says he is cracking down on crime, homelessness and undocumented immigration, the Washington Post reported on Saturday.
The Defense Department planning, in the works for weeks, involves several options, including mobilizing at least a few thousand members of the National Guard as soon as September, the Post reported, citing officials familiar with the matter.
“Chicago is a mess,” Trump, a Republican, told reporters on Friday, deriding its mayor as he continued his attacks on cities run by Democratic politicians. “And we’ll straighten that one out probably next.”
The Pentagon said in a statement late on Saturday: “We won’t speculate on further operations. The department is a planning organization and is continuously working with other agency partners on plans to protect federal assets and personnel.”
Asked for comment, the White House referred to Trump’s statement on Friday.
JB Pritzker, the Democratic governor of Illinois, which includes Chicago, said in a statement the state had received no outreach from the federal government on whether it needed assistance. He said there was no emergency warranting a National Guard or other military deployment.
“Donald Trump is attempting to manufacture a crisis, politicize Americans who serve in uniform and continue abusing his power to distract from the pain he is causing working families,” Pritzker said.
A spokesperson for Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. On Friday Johnson said the city had grave concerns about the impact of any unlawful deployment of National Guard troops.
“The problem with the President’s approach is that it is uncoordinated, uncalled for and unsound,” the mayor said, adding that over the past year, homicides in Chicago have fallen by more than 30 percent, robberies by 35 percent and shootings by almost 40 percent.
At Trump’s request last weekend, the Republican governors of three states said they were sending hundreds of National Guard troops hundreds of miles to Washington, D.C.
The president has portrayed the nation’s capital as a city awash in crime, although Justice Department data shows violent crime hit a 30-year low last year in Washington, a self-governing federal district under the jurisdiction of Congress.
In June, Trump ordered 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles, against the wishes of California’s Democratic governor, during protests over mass immigration raids by federal officials.


Indonesia turns down ear-splitting ‘haram’ street parties

Indonesia turns down ear-splitting ‘haram’ street parties
Updated 24 August 2025

Indonesia turns down ear-splitting ‘haram’ street parties

Indonesia turns down ear-splitting ‘haram’ street parties
  • Loudspeaker towers are commonplace on Indonesia’s main island of Java, but they have drawn the ire of local authorities and calm-seeking neighbors
  • An online backlash has forced authorities in East Java to issue an order limiting noise levels and specifying the times and locations loudspeakers can be used

MALANG, Indonesia: People in an Indonesian village watched as a tower of loudspeakers mounted on a truck rumbled through their usually serene home, blasting a thumping bass loud enough to crack windows.
Loudspeaker towers are commonplace on Indonesia’s main island of Java, blaring a repetitive mix of electronic tunes and traditional folk music at street parties, but they have drawn the ire of local authorities and calm-seeking neighbors.
The loudspeaker stacks have proven so disruptive that officials this month have restricted their use while religious bodies have declared excessive and damaging sound from them to be “haram,” or forbidden under Islamic law.
“The sound is booming from 1 p.m. to 3 am. They play loud music and drink alcohol,” Ahmad Suliyat, a resident of Ngantru village in East Java province, told AFP.
“It’s really disturbing.”
Indonesians in East Java have shared videos on social media of cracked walls, falling roof tiles and damaged stores caused by the noise impact known as “sound horeg,” which loosely means to move or vibrate in Javanese.
The online backlash forced authorities in East Java to issue an order this month limiting noise levels and specifying the times and locations loudspeakers can be used.
“It was made for health and security reasons. The noise level must be regulated so it will not disturb the public peace and order,” East Java governor Khofifah Indar Parawansa told AFP.

This photo taken on August 9, 2025 shows costumed dancers performing as they follow a truck mounted with a tower of subwoofers and spotlights during a "sound horeg", which loosely means to move or vibrate in Javanese, held as part of Indonesia's 80th Independence Day celebrations in Malang, East Java. (AFP)


Ear-splitting noise has been shown to have adverse health consequences, including a higher risk of heart conditions for those exposed.
And Indonesia’s loudspeaker towers, popular for little more than a decade in the world’s most populous Muslim nation, have had dire consequences for some who attend the deafening street gatherings.
A woman died this month after allegedly suffering cardiac arrest caused by loudspeaker towers at a carnival she attended, local media reported, while there has been an increase in hearing problems among those attending the events.
The East Java government has capped sound system levels at 120 decibels, while mobile units used in parades or protests are limited to 85 decibels.
Mobile units are also banned from being used near schools, hospitals, ambulances and places of worship that are in session.
In July, a local Islamic council issued a religious edict that said excessive sound at parties that is capable of causing damage is forbidden by religion.
“The use of a sound system excessively, especially during a wedding convoy, or any other events that cause noise, disturb road users, or make people neglect worshipping, is haram,” read the fatwa.
Locals typically rent the speaker towers for weddings, circumcisions and Independence Day events — all celebrations that can last until dawn.
Some like Daini, who goes by one name like many Indonesians, believe the loudspeakers are a local tradition that should be kept.
She glanced at her cracked window, held together by duct tape, as music blared from the truck in Ngantru.
“The glass cracked during a sound horeg event last year. But that’s OK, people here like loud events,” said the 61-year-old.

 

This photo taken on August 9, 2025 shows costumed dancers performing as they follow a truck mounted with a tower of subwoofers and spotlights during a "sound horeg", which loosely means to move or vibrate in Javanese, held as part of Indonesia's 80th Independence Day celebrations in Malang, East Java. (AFP)

But loudspeakers have continued blasting above the new limits, due to lax enforcement by local authorities.
After the rules were issued, an AFP journalist heard loudspeaker towers blaring music at an East Javan event as authorities watched on.
The World Health Organization says sound at 85 decibels and above can cause hearing damage over time, and anything above 120 decibels can cause immediate harm.
Some Indonesians posted screenshots online of apps registering loudspeaker sound levels as high as 130 decibels.
Operators of loudspeaker towers argue they are responding to demand that generates revenue for local businesses.
“I believe most people who dislike sound horeg are not from here,” David Stevan Laksamana, a 40-year-old loudspeaker rental owner in Malang, told AFP.
“In Malang alone, it employed tens of thousands of people. This business is helping the economy.”
Others who cannot stand the disruptive street parties fear reporting them, with some loudspeaker tower owners reportedly parking outside complainants’ houses to blare music for hours.
“I never complain to the village head,” said Ahmad.
“I just keep quiet. I’m afraid of intimidation if I say anything.”
 


Taiwan, China battle it out in competing World War Two narratives

Taiwan, China battle it out in competing World War Two narratives
Updated 24 August 2025

Taiwan, China battle it out in competing World War Two narratives

Taiwan, China battle it out in competing World War Two narratives
  • Taiwan says China falsely claiming communists had leading role fighting Japan
  • China hits back at what it sees as distorting of communist party’s role
  • Taiwan calls on its people not to go to China’s parade set for next month to mark war’s end

TAIPEI: Veteran Pan Cheng-fa says he clearly remembers fighting for China against the Japanese in World War Two, but gets agitated when asked about the role of communist forces who at the time were in an uneasy alliance with his republican government.
“We gave them weapons, equipment — we strengthened them,” Pan, 99, said at an event in Taiwan’s capital Taipei to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two.
As China gears up for a mass military parade in Beijing next month to mark the war’s end, both Taiwan — whose formal name remains Republic of China — and the People’s Republic of China are locked in an increasingly bitter war of words about historical narrative and who should really be claiming credit for the victory.
Fighting in China began in earnest in 1937 with the full-scale Japanese invasion and continued until the surrender of Japan in 1945, when the island of Taiwan was handed over to the Republic of China after decades of Japanese rule.
“After Japan was taken down, (the communists’) next target was the Republic of China,” Pan added, referring to the resumption of the civil war which led to the victory of Mao Zedong’s forces and flight of the republican government to Taiwan in 1949.

The ruling Chinese Communist Party often reminds people of its struggle against the Japanese, but a lot of the fighting was done by the forces of Chiang Kai-shek’s republican government, and it was the Republic of China who signed the peace agreement as one of the allied nations.
“During the Republic of China’s war of resistance against Japan, the People’s Republic of China did not even exist, but the Chinese communist regime has in recent years repeatedly distorted the facts, claiming it was the Communist Party who led the war of resistance,” Taiwan’s top China-policy maker Chiu Chui-cheng said on August 15, the Japanese surrender anniversary.

A wreath lies during an event to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two at Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall in Taipei, Taiwan, August 16, 2025. (REUTERS)

The Mainland Affairs Council, which Chiu heads, said this month that the communists’ strategy at the time was “70 percent about strengthening themselves, 20 percent dealing with republican government and 10 percent about opposing Japan,” repeating an old wartime accusation against Mao the Chinese Communist Party has denied.
Taiwan’s own anniversary events are much more low key, and don’t mention the role of the communists apart from to lambaste them.
A defense ministry concert on Thursday night in Taipei featured performers dressed as World War Two-era republican soldiers, images of the Flying Tigers — volunteer US pilots who flew for the republican Chinese air force — and rap by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One.
“History affirms that the War of Resistance was led and won by the Republic of China,” the ministry said a performance program.
China has hit back at what it sees as misrepresentation of the Chinese Communist Party’s role.
On Tuesday, the party’s official People’s Daily wrote in an online commentary that vigilance was needed against efforts to “distort and falsify the Chinese Communist Party’s role as the country’s backbone” in fighting Japan.
China says the victory belongs to all Chinese people, including those in Taiwan, and is also celebrating the fact the war’s end in 1945 led to Taiwan — a Japanese colony from 1895 — being “returned” to Chinese rule as part of the peace agreement.

Caption

Taiwan says nothing in any agreements talked about handing over Taiwan to the Chinese Communist Party-run People’s Republic of China which was only founded in late 1949.
Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te marked the surrender anniversary of August 15 with a Facebook post saying aggression will be defeated, in a pointed reference to Beijing’s military threats against the island.
The People’s Republic of China says it is the successor state to the Republic of China and that Taiwan is an inherent part of Beijing’s territory, a view Taipei’s government vehemently opposes.
Taiwan’s government has urged its people not to attend China’s military parade, warning against reinforcing Beijing’s territorial claims and backing its version of what the anniversary means.
Veteran Pan, who says family members left behind after the civil war were brutalized while he escaped to Taiwan, sees Beijing’s parade as having nothing to do with him.
“I can’t say anything good about the communists,” he said.