Zelensky says Putin wants the rest of Ukraine’s Donetsk region as part of a ceasefire

In this file photo taken on June 8, 2022, released by the Ukrainian presidential press service, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky makes an address filming himself outside his office in Kyiv. (AFP file photo)
In this file photo taken on June 8, 2022, released by the Ukrainian presidential press service, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky makes an address filming himself outside his office in Kyiv. (AFP file photo)
Short Url
Updated 13 August 2025

Zelensky says Putin wants the rest of Ukraine’s Donetsk region as part of a ceasefire

Zelensky says Putin wants the rest of Ukraine’s Donetsk region as part of a ceasefire
  • Zelensky said Putin wants the remaining 9,000 square kilometers (3,500 square miles) of Donetsk under Kyiv’s control, where the war’s toughest battles are grinding on, as part of a ceasefire plan, in a press briefing on Tuesday in Kyiv

KYIV, Ukraine: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Tuesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants Ukraine to withdraw from the remaining 30 percent of the Donetsk region that it controls as part of a ceasefire deal, a proposal the leader categorically rejected.
Zelensky reiterated that Ukraine would not withdraw from territories it controls, saying that would be unconstitutional and would serve only as a springboard for a future Russian invasion.
He said diplomatic discussions led by the US focusing on ending the war have not touched on security guarantees for Ukraine to prevent future Russian aggression and that meeting formats currently being discussed do not include Europe’s participation, both key demands of Kyiv.
Meanwhile, Russian forces on the ground have been closing in on a key territorial grab around the city of Pokrovsk.
Zelensky said the necessity of territorial concessions was conveyed to him by US officials ahead of a summit Friday between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, and in further meetings at the level of national security officials.
It remained unclear whether Ukraine would take part in the Friday summit. European Union leaders also have been sidelined from the meeting, and they appealed to Trump on Tuesday to protect their interests.
Zelensky says Ukraine will not withdraw from the Donbas
Zelensky said Putin wants the remaining 9,000 square kilometers (3,500 square miles) of Donetsk under Kyiv’s control, where the war’s toughest battles are grinding on, as part of a ceasefire plan, in a press briefing on Tuesday in Kyiv.
Doing so would hand Russia almost the entirety of the Donbas, a region comprising Ukraine’s eastern industrial heartland that Putin has long coveted.
Zelensky learned of Russia’s position after holding a call with Trump and special envoy Steve Witkoff, after the latter’s bilateral meeting with Putin. Witkoff told Zelensky that Russia was ready to end the war and that there should be territorial concessions from both sides. Some European partners were also part of the call.
“And that, probably, Putin wants us to leave Donbas. That is, it didn’t sound like America wants us to leave,” he said, recounting the call.
Zelensky reiterated that withdrawing from Ukraine-controlled territory was out of the question, especially as the question of security guarantees for Ukraine, were not being discussed.
“We will not leave Donbas. We cannot do this. Everyone forgets the first part — our territories are illegally occupied,” Zelensky told reporters at a briefing on Tuesday. “Donbas for the Russians is a springboard for a future new offensive.”
Zelensky said this is what occurred in 2014 when Russia illegally annexed the Crimean Peninsula.
Seeking Trump’s ear before the summit
Trump has said he wants to see whether Putin is serious about ending the war, now in its fourth year.
The US president has disappointed allies in Europe by saying Ukraine will have to give up some Russian-held territory. He also said Russia must accept land swaps, although it was unclear what Putin might be expected to surrender.
The Europeans and Ukraine are wary that Putin, who has waged the biggest land war in Europe since 1945 and used Russia’s energy might to try to intimidate the EU, might secure favorable concessions and set the outlines of a peace deal without them.
Referring to the format for ceasefire talks, Zelensky said on Tuesday that the US proposed a bilateral meeting, between the US and Russia, and then a trilateral meeting that would include Ukraine. Zelensky said the presence of Europe was important for Kyiv because these were the only partners offering security guarantees, including funding the Ukrainian army.
European countries’ overarching fear is that Putin will set his sights on one of them next if he wins in Ukraine.
Their leaders said Tuesday they “welcome the efforts of President Trump toward ending Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.” But, they underlined, “the path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine” and “international borders must not be changed by force.”
The Europeans on Wednesday will make a fresh attempt to rally Trump to Ukraine’s cause at virtual meetings convened by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Trump did not confirm whether he would take part but did say “I’m going to get everybody’s ideas” before meeting with Putin.
Russia holds shaky control over four of the country’s regions, two in the country’s east and two in the south.
Mykhailo Podolyak, an adviser to the chief of Zelensky’s office, said anything short of Russia’s strategic defeat would mean that any ceasefire deal would be on Moscow’s terms, erode international law and send a dangerous signal to the world.
A ‘profoundly alarming moment for Europe’
Trump’s seemingly public rehabilitation of Putin — a pariah in most of Europe — has unnerved Ukraine’s backers.
The summit in Alaska is a “profoundly alarming moment for Europe,” said Nigel Gould-Davies, senior fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.
According to Gould-Davies, Putin might persuade Trump to try to end the war by “accepting Russian sovereignty” over parts of Ukraine, even beyond areas that it currently occupies. Trump also could ease or lift sanctions which are causing “chronic pain” to the Russian economy.
That would provoke a “really serious split in the transatlantic alliance,” he said.
The war isn’t about Russia’s territorial expansion but about Putin’s goal of subordinating Ukraine, which would create the opportunity to threaten other parts of Europe, Gould-Davies said.
It was unclear whether the Europeans also were unsettled by Trump mistakenly saying twice he would be traveling to Russia on Friday to meet Putin. The summit is taking place in the US state of Alaska, which was colonized by Russia in the 18th century until Czar Alexander II sold it to the US in 1867.
Tuesday’s European joint statement was meant to be a demonstration of unity. But Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who is Putin’s closest ally in Europe and has tried to block EU support for Ukraine, was the only one of the bloc’s 27 leaders who refused to endorse it.
Russia closes in on Pokrovsk
Russia appeared closer to taking an important city in the Donetsk region, Pokrovsk.
Military analysts using open-source information to monitor the battles said the next 24-48 hours could be critical. Losing Pokrovsk would hand Russia an important victory ahead of the summit. It also would complicate Ukrainian supply lines to the Donetsk region, where the Kremlin has focused the bulk of military efforts.
“A lot will depend on availability, quantity and quality of Ukrainian reserves,” Pasi Paroinen, an analyst with the Finland-based Black Bird Group, wrote on social media late Monday.
Ukraine’s military said its forces are fending off Russian infantry units trying to infiltrate their defensive positions in the Donetsk region. The region’s Ukrainian military command on social media Monday acknowledged that the situation remains “difficult, unpleasant and dynamic.”
Elsewhere in Ukraine, a Russian missile attack on a military training facility left one soldier dead and 11 others wounded, the Ukrainian Ground Forces posted on social media.


Afghan Taliban foreign minister to visit India for first time

Afghan Taliban foreign minister to visit India for first time
Updated 10 sec ago

Afghan Taliban foreign minister to visit India for first time

Afghan Taliban foreign minister to visit India for first time
  • Afghanistan’s Taliban foreign minister will visit India this month after the UN Security Council Committee temporarily lifted a travel ban, Kabul’s foreign ministry confirmed to AFP on Saturday
KABUL: Afghanistan’s Taliban foreign minister will visit India this month after the UN Security Council Committee temporarily lifted a travel ban, Kabul’s foreign ministry confirmed to AFP on Saturday.
Amir Khan Muttaqi will become the first senior Taliban leader to visit India since they returned to power in 2021 following the withdrawal of the US military.
The foreign ministry told AFP the minister would go to India “after the Moscow summit” on October 7, which includes representatives from China, India, Iran and Central Asian nations.
The UN Security Council Committee has granted an exemption to the travel ban on Muttaqi, who is under UN sanctions, to allow him to visit New Delhi between October 9 and 16.
India’s point-person on Afghanistan Anand Prakash visited Kabul in April to discuss political and trade relations.
Russia is the only country so far to have officially recognized the Taliban government, which has imposed a strict version of Islamic law.
The Taliban government, which recently released several American and British prisoners, says it wants to have good relations with other countries, notably the United States, despite the 20-year war against US-led forces.
Most countries advise against travel to Afghanistan.
The announcement of the India visit comes just days after the Taliban authorities shut down Afghanistan’s Internet and mobile networks.
The authorities still have not commented on why they imposed a telecoms blackout for 48 hours.

US says kills four in new attack on alleged drug-smuggling boat

US says kills four in new attack on alleged drug-smuggling boat
Updated 04 October 2025

US says kills four in new attack on alleged drug-smuggling boat

US says kills four in new attack on alleged drug-smuggling boat
  • US forces carried out a strike on an alleged drug-smuggling boat off the coast of Venezuela on Friday, killing four people, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said

WASHINGTON: US forces carried out a strike on an alleged drug-smuggling boat off the coast of Venezuela on Friday, killing four people, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said.
The latest strike, which Hegseth announced in a post on X, brings the number of such US attacks to at least four, leaving at least 21 people dead.
An accompanying video shared by Hegseth showed a boat speeding across the waves before being engulfed in smoke and flames.
“Four male narco-terrorists aboard the vessel were killed,” the Pentagon chief wrote.
He said the strike “was conducted in international waters just off the coast of Venezuela while the vessel was transporting substantial amounts of narcotics — headed to America to poison our people.”
“These strikes will continue until the attacks on the American people are over!!!!” he added.
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and some of his allies in the region condemned the attack.
The latest military action comes after President Donald Trump’s administration said in a notice to Congress that he has determined the United States is engaged in “armed conflict” with drug cartels.
Washington has not released evidence to support its assertion that the targets of its strikes are drug smugglers, and experts say the summary killings are illegal even if they target confirmed narcotics traffickers.
The administration’s letter, a copy of which was obtained by AFP on Thursday, was designed as a legal justification for at least three previous strikes.
“The president determined these cartels are non-state armed groups, designated them as terrorist organizations, and determined that their actions constitute an armed attack against the United States,” said the notice from the Pentagon, which also described suspected smugglers as “unlawful combatants.”
Armed aggression
Trump posted the same video as Hegseth on his Truth Social platform, saying that “a boat loaded with enough drugs to kill 25 TO 50 THOUSAND PEOPLE was stopped... from entering American Territory.”
Maduro called US actions in the region “an armed aggression to impose regime change, to impose puppet governments, and to steal Venezuela’s oil, gas, gold and all natural resources.”
Speaking at an event in Caracas, Maduro ordered the mobilization of reservists and militias “if it is necessary to move from unarmed combat to armed combat.”
The Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA), a leftist Latin American bloc co-founded by Maduro’s late mentor, Hugo Chavez, condemned in a statement the “illegal incursion” by US fighter jets, deeming the raid a violation of international law.
ALBA argued that the repeated US strikes aim to “destabilize the region” and instill fear in its people.
Colombian President Gustavo Petro — a fierce critic of Trump’s policy of striking alleged traffickers — wrote on X that “the narco-terrorists don’t go in the boats — the narcos live in the US, Europe and Dubai.”
“There were poor Caribbean youths on that boat,” Petro wrote, adding that striking vessels that could instead be intercepted at sea “violates the universal judicial principal of proportionality.”
Tensions between the United States and Venezuela have been high over the deployment of multiple American warships in the region.
Venezuela said Thursday it had detected “an illegal incursion” by five US fighter jets flying off its shores, with Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino denouncing the alleged flights as a “provocation.”
Trump last month dispatched 10 F-35 aircraft to Puerto Rico, a US territory in the Caribbean, as part of the biggest military deployment in the area in over three decades.


Government, protesters reach agreement to end days of unrest in Azad Kashmir

Government, protesters reach agreement to end days of unrest in Azad Kashmir
Updated 04 October 2025

Government, protesters reach agreement to end days of unrest in Azad Kashmir

Government, protesters reach agreement to end days of unrest in Azad Kashmir
  • At least nine people, including three policemen, were killed in this week’s clashes after a call for civil rights protest in the northern region
  • A judicial committee will probe violent incidents, victims will be compensated and a panel will be formed on reserved migrant seats, agreement says

ISLAMABAD: The government in Azad Kashmir has reached an agreement with a civil rights alliance to end days of unrest in the northern Pakistani region, a Pakistani federal minister announced on Saturday, following the killing of at least nine people in deadly clashes.

The clashes erupted after calls for an indefinite ‘lockdown’ by the Jammu Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee (JKJAAC) from Sept. 29, seeking removal of perks for government officials, ending 12 seats in the regional assembly reserved for Kashmiri migrants who came from the Indian-side of the territory, and royalty for hydel power projects.

The protests have turned violent as protesters and police came face to face and clashed at various locations, with authorities confirming killing of six civilians and three policemen this week. The crisis prompted Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to send a negotiations team to the territory to join the regional government in talks with the protesters.

“It was the wisdom of local and national leadership and the spirit of dialogue that enabled us to resolve this stand-off peacefully, without violence, without division, and with mutual respect,” Pakistani Planning Minister Ahsan Iqbal, who was part of the negotiations, said on X.

Pakistani Parliamentary Affairs Minister Dr. Tariq Fazal Chaudhry shared a copy of the agreement on X, which included the formation of a judicial commission to probe violent incidents, reduction in the number of regional government ministers and secretaries, and setting up a committee on reserved seats for migrants.

“Persons killed in the incidents of 1st and 2nd October 2025 shall be compensated with monetary benefits equivalent to LEAs (law enforcement agencies),” it read. “Gunshot injuries will be compensated at the rate of Rs10 lac ($3,554) per injured person. A government job shall be granted to one of the family members of each dead person within 20 days.”

The picture shared on Oct. 4, 2025, shows government officials and representative o Joint Action Committee in Islamabad, Pakistan. (Ahsan Iqbal/X)

Kashmir is divided between India and Pakistan since their independence from British rule in 1947. Both claim the territory in its entirety, but rule in part.

Azad Kashmir is the part administered by Pakistan. The negotiations between the government and AKJAAC followed shutter-down and wheel-jam strikes that disrupted public life in the territory.

In May 2024, a similar wave of protests paralyzed the region. After six days of strikes and violent clashes that left at least four dead, PM Sharif approved a grant of Rs 23 billion ($86 million) for subsidies on flour and electricity, and a judicial commission to review elite privileges.

Protest leaders suspended their campaign at that time but warned that failure to implement the package would fuel fresh unrest.


Takaichi wins ruling party vote, poised to be Japan’s 1st woman leader

Takaichi wins ruling party vote, poised to be Japan’s 1st woman leader
Updated 04 October 2025

Takaichi wins ruling party vote, poised to be Japan’s 1st woman leader

Takaichi wins ruling party vote, poised to be Japan’s 1st woman leader

TOKYO: Former Japanese internal affairs minister Sanae Takaichi on Saturday won the race to lead the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), and therefore likely become the next prime minister.
The winner is expected to replace Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba since the party remains the largest in parliament. However, following the recent elections, the LDP-led coalition no longer holds majorities in either chamber and will require cooperation from opposition lawmakers to govern effectively.
Takaichi beat Koizumi in a run-off vote after none of the five candidates won a majority in the first round of voting.
A vote in parliament to choose the next prime minister is expected to be held on Oct. 15.

 


Trump administration planning 7,500-person refugee ceiling, sources say

Trump administration planning 7,500-person refugee ceiling, sources say
Updated 04 October 2025

Trump administration planning 7,500-person refugee ceiling, sources say

Trump administration planning 7,500-person refugee ceiling, sources say
  • Record-low cap reflects Trump’s restrictive immigration stance
  • Focus to be on Afrikaners from South Africa

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump’s administration is preparing to set a refugee admissions cap at 7,500 people this fiscal year, a record low that prioritizes white South Africans of Afrikaner ethnicity, three people familiar with the matter said.
If finalized, the planned cap would be a steep drop from the 125,000 put in place last year under former President Joe Biden and reflect Trump’s restrictive view of immigration and humanitarian protection.
Trump, a Republican, slashed refugee levels during his 2017-2021 presidency as part of a broad crackdown on both legal and illegal immigration. After returning to office in January 2025, he froze refugee admissions, saying they could only resume if it was determined to be in the interest of the US
Weeks later, Trump issued an executive order prioritizing refugee entries from South Africa’s Dutch-descended Afrikaner minority, saying the white minority group suffered racial discrimination and violence in majority-Black South Africa. South Africa’s government has rejected those claims.
The first group of 59 South Africans arrived in May, reaching a total of 138 by early September, Reuters reported previously.
The White House, State Department and Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding the planned 7,500-person refugee ceiling in fiscal year 2026, which began on Wednesday. The New York Times first reported the plans.
John Slocum, executive director of Refugee Council USA, urged other elected officials to push Trump to bring in more refugees, saying in a statement that such a low limit would be “jeopardizing people’s lives, separating families, and undermining our national security and economic growth.”
Trump officials had previously discussed annual refugee admissions ranging from 40,000 to 60,000, Reuters reported in recent months.
At a side event at the United Nations General Assembly last week, top Trump administration officials urged other nations to join a global campaign to roll back asylum protections, a major shift that would seek to reshape the post-World War Two framework around humanitarian migration.