Rockets fired at Iraq airport, two wounded: security official

Rockets fired at Iraq airport, two wounded: security official
US army soldiers, part of the Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve, walk around at the K1 Air Base northwest of Kirkuk in northern Iraq. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 10 min 56 sec ago

Rockets fired at Iraq airport, two wounded: security official

Rockets fired at Iraq airport, two wounded: security official
  • “Two Katyusha rockets fell in the military section of Kirkuk airport,” slightly wounding two security personnel, the official said

KIRKUK, Iraq: Two rockets struck the military section of Kirkuk airport in northern Iraq late on Monday, slightly wounding two security personnel, a senior security official told AFP.
Another rocket fell on a house in the city of Kirkuk, causing material damage.
“Two Katyusha rockets fell in the military section of Kirkuk airport,” slightly wounding two security personnel, the official said, requesting anonymity because he is not allowed to speak to the media.
One rocket did not explode, according to the official.
“A third rocket struck a house in the Uruba neighborhood,” causing material damage, the source added.
The military sector of Kirkuk’s airport includes bases for the Iraqi Army, the federal police, and the Hashed Al-Shaabi, a coalition of former pro-Iranian paramilitary forces now integrated into the regular armed forces.
A security source told the official INA news agency that two rockets struck the military air base at Kirkuk airport, one of which fell near the runaways, and another hit a house in the city.
There has been no claim of responsibility for the attacks.
Kirkuk International Airport management said that there was no damage at the airport and that the attack did not disrupt flights.
Iraq has long been a battleground of drone and rocket assaults and proved fertile ground for proxy wars.
But it only recently regained a semblance of stability after decades of devastating conflicts and turmoil.
Last week, hours before a ceasefire ended the 12-day Iran-Israel war, unidentified drones struck radar systems at two military bases in Baghdad and southern Iraq.
The government said it launched a probe into the drone attacks, but it has not yet identified any perpetrators.


A week into the fragile Israel-Iran peace agreement, here’s what we still don’t know

A week into the fragile Israel-Iran peace agreement, here’s what we still don’t know
Updated 8 min 55 sec ago

A week into the fragile Israel-Iran peace agreement, here’s what we still don’t know

A week into the fragile Israel-Iran peace agreement, here’s what we still don’t know
  • Iran’s retaliatory missile attacks on a US base in Qatar following the American bombardment were sloughed off by the White House as a half-hearted, face-saving measure
  • A preliminary report issued by the US Defense Intelligence Agency, meanwhile, said the strikes did significant damage to the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan sites, but did not totally destroy the facilities

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates: It’s been a week since the United States pressed Israel and Iran into a truce, ending a bloody, 12-day conflict that had set the Middle East and globe on edge.
The fragile peace, brokered by the US the day after it dropped 30,000-pound “bunker-busting” bombs on three of Iran’s key nuclear sites, is holding. But much remains unsettled.
How badly Iran’s nuclear program was set back remains murky. The prospects of renewed US-Iran peace talks are up in the air. And whether US President Donald Trump can leverage the moment to get Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ‘s government and Hamas focused on a ceasefire and hostage deal that brings about an end to the 20-month war in Gaza remains an open question.
Here is a look at what we still don’t know:
How far Iran’s nuclear program has been set back

Trump says three targets hit by American strikes were “obliterated.” His defense secretary said they were “destroyed.”
A preliminary report issued by the US Defense Intelligence Agency, meanwhile, said the strikes did significant damage to the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan sites, but did not totally destroy the facilities.
Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said on CBS’ “Face the Nation” on Sunday that the three Iranian sites with “capabilities in terms of treatment, conversion and enrichment of uranium have been destroyed to an important degree.” But, he added, “some is still standing” and that because capabilities remain, “if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again.” He said assessing the full damage comes down to Iran allowing inspectors access.
What future US-Iran relations might look like
After the ceasefire deal came together, Trump spoke of potentially easing decades of biting sanctions on Tehran and predicted that Iran could become a “great trading nation” if it pulled back once-and-for-all from its nuclear program.
The talk of harmony didn’t last long.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in his first public appearance after the ceasefire was announced, claimed Tehran had delivered a “slap to America’s face.” Trump responded by suggesting the supreme leader own up to the fact Iran “got beat to hell. The president also said he was backing off reviewing any immediate sanction relief, because of Khamenei’s heated comments.
White House officials say the US and Iran are already in early discussions about resuming negotiations that had ended after Israel began launching strikes. But Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi says there’s no agreement in place to restart talks.
It’s unclear if Iran’s leadership is ready to come to the table so soon after the fighting has ended — especially if Trump holds to the position that Iran must give up nuclear enrichment for even civilian use. And Trump has offered conflicting statements about his commitment to talks. “We may sign an agreement,” he said Wednesday at a NATO summit press conference. He added, “I don’t think it’s that necessary.”
What role Iran’s supreme leader will play
Khamenei’s age and recent diminished appearance have raised questions about the scope of his involvement in US-Iran relations and the Islamic Republic’s response to both American and Israeli strikes. But despite having spent the last few weeks in a bunker as threats to his life escalated, there is little indication that the ayatollah does not still reign supreme over the country’s massive military and governmental operations.
Khamenei has ruled three times longer than his predecessor, the late Ruhollah Khomeini, and has shaped life for the country’s more than 90 million people perhaps even more dramatically.
He entrenched the system of rule by the “mullahs,” or Shiite Muslim clerics. That secured his place in the eyes of hard-liners as the unquestionable authority, below only that of God. At the same time, Khamenei built the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard into the dominant force in Iran’s military and internal politics.
How Iran might strike back
Iran’s retaliatory missile attacks on a US base in Qatar following the American bombardment were sloughed off by the White House as a half-hearted, face-saving measure. The US was forewarned and the salvos were easily fended off.
Yet Iran remains a persistent threat, particularly via cyberwarfare. Hackers backing Tehran have already targeted US banks, defense contractors and oil industry companies — but so far have not caused widespread disruptions to critical infrastructure or the economy.
The US Department of Homeland Security last week issued a public bulletin warning of increased Iranian cyber threats. And the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, is urging organizations that operate critical infrastructure like water systems, pipelines or power plants to stay vigilant.
Whether the Israel-Iran ceasefire will hold

It remains a fragile peace.
Immediately following the US strikes, Trump got on the phone with Netanyahu and told the Israeli leader not to expect further US offensive military action, according to a senior White House official who was not authorized to comment publicly about the sensitive diplomatic talks.
But even as he agreed to deal, Netanyahu made clear that Israel will strike again “if anyone in Iran tries to revive this project.”
The ceasefire deal came without any agreement from Tehran on dismantling its nuclear program. Khamenei claims the attacks “did nothing significant” to Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Trump expressed confidence that Iran, at the moment, has no interest in getting its nuclear program back up. “The last thing they’re thinking about right now is enriched uranium,” Trump said.
Still, Trump says he expects Iran to open itself to international inspection to verify that it doesn’t restart its nuclear program by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN nuclear watchdog, or some other organization “that we respect, including ourselves.”
Whether Trump can now press Netanyahu on Gaza
The president took a big gamble with his decision to order strikes on Iran’s nuclear fortress.
As a candidate, he promised to quickly end Russia’s brutal war in Ukraine and the Israel-Hamas conflict in Gaza, but has failed to find a resolution to either. He also vowed to keep the US military out of foreign conflicts.
But after helping Israel with US strikes on Iran, Trump — in conversations with Netanyahu and other world leaders in recent days — has made clear he wants a deal completed soon, according to two people familiar with the private discussions and were not authorized to comment publicly.
On Friday, Trump told reporters, “We think within the next week we’re going to get a ceasefire.”
Trump didn’t offer any further explanation for his optimism. But Israeli Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer will be in Washington this week for talks with senior administration officials on a Gaza ceasefire, Iran and other matters, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said.

 


PKK disarmament process to begin early July: report

PKK disarmament process to begin early July: report
Updated 29 min 59 sec ago

PKK disarmament process to begin early July: report

PKK disarmament process to begin early July: report
  • The pro-Kurdish DEM party, which has played a key role in facilitating contacts between the jailed PKK founder Abdullah Ocalan and the Turkish government, said it was likely to happen in the second week of July

ISTANBUL: Militants from the PKK will begin laying down their weapons at a disarmament ceremony in Iraqi Kurdistan in early July, the Kurdish media outlet Rudaw reported on Monday.
The move comes just six weeks after the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) announced it was ending more than four decades of guerrilla warfare in a conflict that claimed over 40,000 lives.
Turkey's Kurdish minority is hoping the PKK's decision will pave the way for a political settlement with Ankara that will herald a new openness to the Kurds, who make up about 20 percent of Turkey's population of 85 million.
The pro-Kurdish DEM party, which has played a key role in fa cilitating contacts between the jailed PKK founder Abdullah Ocalan and the Turkish government, said it was likely to happen in the second week of July.
"It seems these developments are likely to happen next week," Sezai Temelli, vice president of DEM's parliamentary group told lawmakers on Monday.
He said a delegation of DEM lawmakers was planning to meet President Recep Tayyip Erdogan "on July 8 or 9 after which they would visit the political parties then go to Imrali" -- the island where Ocalan has been jailed since 1999.
Last week, Erdogan also said he would meet the DEM delegation in the coming days.
"We are pleased with the progress made in a short time by the work towards a terror-free Turkey," he said after the weekly cabinet meeting on Monday, using Ankara's shorthand for the peace process.
"Recent events in our region have confirmed how accurate and strategic a step this process is," he said of Turkey's efforts to rebuild ties with its Kurdish minority as the Middle East undergoes seismic changes triggered by the Gaza war.

Citing two sources in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, Rudaw said the move would be both a "trust-building step" and a "goodwill gesture" to advance the reconciliation process with Turkey.
According to the sources, the ceremony would take place in Sulaimaniyah, Iraqi Kurdistan's second-biggest city.
Most of the PKK's fighters have spent the past decade in the mountains of northern Iraq, where Turkey also maintains military bases and has carried out frequent operations against Kurdish fighters.
"Between July 3 and 10, a group of PKK members, probably numbering between 20 and 30, will lay down their weapons in a ceremony to be held in Sulaimaniyah," Rudaw said.
The sources said Ocalan was expected to issue a new message regarding the resolution process "in the next few days".
"After that, the disarmament process will officially begin," they said.
Quoting one of the sources, Rudaw said that after laying down their weapons, the militants would "then return to their bases, unarmed", denying reports they would be held in certain cities in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.
"The guerrillas will return to their bases after disarming. It is out of the question for them to go to any city," the source said.
Until now, there has been little detail about how the dissolution mechanism would work but the Turkish government has said it would carefully monitor the process to ensure full implementation.

 


Netanyahu will visit the White House next Monday as Trump presses for a ceasefire in Gaza

Netanyahu will visit the White House next Monday as Trump presses for a ceasefire in Gaza
Updated 19 min 31 sec ago

Netanyahu will visit the White House next Monday as Trump presses for a ceasefire in Gaza

Netanyahu will visit the White House next Monday as Trump presses for a ceasefire in Gaza
  • “I do know he has expressed interest in coming to Washington and meeting with the president, and we are working on a date for that,” Leavitt added
  • Israeli Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer is in Washington this week for talks with senior administration officials on a Gaza ceasefire, Iran and other matters

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump will host Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for talks at the White House next Monday as the US leader steps up his push on the Israeli government and Hamas to broker a ceasefire and hostage agreement and bring about an end to the war in Gaza.
The impending visit was confirmed by two US administration officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to comment publicly on it.
The trip will be Netanyahu’s third visit to the White House since Trump returned to office in January, and it comes after the United States inserted itself into Israel’s war against Iran by attacking Iranian nuclear sites. After brokering a ceasefire between the two countries, Trump has signaled that he’s turning his attention to bringing a close to the fighting between Israel and Hamas.
Trump on Friday told reporters that “we think within the next week we’re going to get a ceasefire” in Gaza, but didn’t offer any further explanation for his optimism.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Monday that Trump and administration officials were in constant communication with Israeli leadership and that bringing about an end to the Gaza conflict is a priority for Trump.
“It’s heartbreaking to see the images that have come out from both Israel and Gaza throughout this war, and the president wants to see it end,” Leavitt added. “He wants to save lives.”
Israeli Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer is in Washington this week for talks with senior administration officials on a Gaza ceasefire, Iran and other matters.
Talks between Israel and Hamas have repeatedly faltered over a major sticking point — whether the war should end as part of any ceasefire agreement. About 50 hostages remain captive in Gaza, with less than half believed to be alive.
With Netanyahu’s visit, the timing of which was first reported by Axios, Trump will embrace the Israeli leader while continuing to push back against skeptical questions from Democratic lawmakers and others about how far US and Israeli strikes have set back Iran’s nuclear program.
A preliminary report issued by the US Defense Intelligence Agency, meanwhile, said the strikes did significant damage to the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan sites, but did not totally destroy the facilities.
Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said on CBS’ “Face the Nation” on Sunday that the three Iranian sites with “capabilities in terms of treatment, conversion and enrichment of uranium have been destroyed to an important degree.” But, he added, “some is still standing,” and that because capabilities remain, “if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again.” He said assessing the full damage comes down to Iran allowing inspectors access.
Trump in recent days has also inserted himself into Israeli domestic affairs, calling for charges against Netanyahu in his ongoing corruption trial to be thrown out. He has condemned the trial as a “WITCH HUNT” and vowed that the United States will be the one who “saves” Netanyahu from serious corruption charges.
The decision by Trump to plunge himself into one of Israel’s most heated debates has unnerved some in its political class.
Meanwhile, the Trump administration on Monday approved a new half-billion-dollar arms sale to Israel to resupply its military with bomb guidance kits for precision munitions.
The State Department said the sale is worth $510 million. It includes more than 7,000 guidance kits for two different types of Joint Direct Attack Munitions, or JDAMs.
The deal is relatively small given that the US provides Israel with more than $3 billion annually in military aid. But Israel has relied on JDAMs and other related US weaponry in its war against Hamas in Gaza and its recent strikes against Iran.
“The United States is committed to the security of Israel, and it is vital to US national interests to assist Israel to develop and maintain a strong and ready self-defense capability,” the department said in a statement. “This proposed sale is consistent with those objectives.”

 


Tunisia court sentences Sonia Dhamani, a lawyer critical of the president, to 2 years

People walk in front of the Tunis Court on May 13, 2024. (AFP file photo)
People walk in front of the Tunis Court on May 13, 2024. (AFP file photo)
Updated 01 July 2025

Tunisia court sentences Sonia Dhamani, a lawyer critical of the president, to 2 years

People walk in front of the Tunis Court on May 13, 2024. (AFP file photo)
  • Dhamani’s lawyers withdrew from the trial after the judge refused to adjourn the session, claiming Dhamani was being tried twice for the same act

TUNIS: A Tunisian court on Monday sentenced Sonia Dhamani, a prominent lawyer and critical voice of President Kais Saied, to two years, lawyer Bassam Trifi said.
Dhamani’s lawyers withdrew from the trial after the judge refused to adjourn the session, claiming Dhamani was being tried twice for the same act.
The court sentenced Dhamani for statements criticizing practices against migrants from sub-Saharan Africa.

 


Iraq’s top court to resume work after president retires amid controversy

Iraq’s top court to resume work after president retires amid controversy
Updated 01 July 2025

Iraq’s top court to resume work after president retires amid controversy

Iraq’s top court to resume work after president retires amid controversy
  • Iraq’s Supreme Judicial Council announced Sunday the retirement of the head of the Federal Supreme Court, Judge Jassim Mohammed Abboud Al-Amiri, citing “health reasons”

BAGHDAD: Iraq’s top court was set to resume work Monday after nine judges who had tendered their resignations in recent weeks returned to work following the retirement of the court’s president and the appointment of a successor.
Iraq’s Supreme Judicial Council announced Sunday the retirement of the head of the Federal Supreme Court, Judge Jassim Mohammed Abboud Al-Amiri, citing “health reasons.” The Council nominated Judge Mundher Ibrahim Hussein, deputy president of the Federal Court of Cassation, to assume the position, and Hussein was appointed by presidential decree on Monday.
A court official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment, said the judges had resigned over alleged interference undermining the court’s independence and agreed to return only after Al-Amiri’s departure.
Al-Amiri could not be reached for comment.
The Federal Supreme Court has been embroiled in controversy over a number of rulings that were seen as politically motivated, including the dismissal of former Parliament Speaker Mohammed Al-Halbousi, a prominent Sunni figure, in November 2023, which triggered significant political turmoil.
In February, the top court threw out a legal challenge that had temporarily halted three controversial laws passed by the country’s Parliament. The measures included an amendment to the country’s personal status law to give Islamic courts increased authority over family matters, including marriage, divorce and inheritance, which critics have said would erode women’s rights.
They also include a general amnesty law that opponents say allows the release of people involved in public corruption and embezzlement as well as militants who committed war crimes. The third bill aimed to return lands confiscated from the Kurds under the rule of Saddam Hussein, which some fear could lead to the displacement of Arab residents.
A number of members of Parliament had filed a complaint alleging that the voting process was illegal because all three bills — each supported by different blocs — were voted on together rather than each one being voted on separately.
Most recently, the court was embroiled in controversy over its ruling that overturned Iraq’s agreement with Kuwait on the regulation of maritime navigation in the Khor Abdullah waterway. That sparked both a diplomatic and constitutional crisis after the ruling was challenged by both Iraq’s Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani and President Abdul Latif Rashid.
The Federal Supreme Court had also increasingly come into conflict with other judicial bodies.
Before his retirement, Al-Amiri had submitted two formal requests to the president and the speaker of Parliament, calling for a meeting of the State Administration Coalition, the ruling coalition in the government, to deliberate on the growing conflict between rulings issued by the Federal Supreme Court and the Court of Cassation. He proposed inviting constitutional and legal experts to attend. Both requests were rejected.
The resignation of the nine judges could have led to a constitutional vacuum had an agreement not been reached to bring them back.