Cardinals set Pope Francis’ funeral for Saturday morning, with public viewing starting Wednesday

Update Cardinals set Pope Francis’ funeral for Saturday morning, with public viewing starting Wednesday
Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin, left, prays in front of the body of Pope Francis laid out in state inside his private chapel at the Vatican on April 21, 2025. (Vatican Media via AP)
Short Url
Updated 22 April 2025

Cardinals set Pope Francis’ funeral for Saturday morning, with public viewing starting Wednesday

Cardinals set Pope Francis’ funeral for Saturday morning, with public viewing starting Wednesday
  • First so-called ‘general congregation’ signals the start of a centuries-old tradition that culminates in the election by cardinals of a new pontiff within three weeks

VATICAN CITY: Cardinals have taken their first decisions following the death of Pope Francis, setting Saturday as the date for his funeral and allowing ordinary faithful to begin paying their final respects starting Wednesday, when his casket is brought into St. Peter’s Basilica.

The cardinals met for the first time Tuesday in the Vatican’s synod hall to chart the next steps before a conclave begins to choose Francis’ successor, as condolences poured in from around the world grieving history’s first Latin American pope.

The cardinals set the funeral for Saturday at 10 a.m. in St. Peter’s Square, to be celebrated by the dean of the College of Cardinals, Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re.

US President Donald Trump has announced he and first lady Melania Trump plan to attend Saturday’s funeral Argentine President Javier Milei is also expected.

Francis died Monday at age 88 after suffering a stroke that put him in a coma and led his heart to fail. He had been recovering in his apartment after being hospitalized for five weeks with pneumonia. He made his last public appearance Sunday, delivering an Easter blessing and making what would be his final greeting to followers from his popemobile, looping around St. Peter’s Square.

In retrospect, his Easter appearance from the same loggia where he was introduced to the world as the first pope from the Americas on March 13, 2013, was a perfect bookend to a 12-year papacy that sought to shake up the church and return it to its Gospel-mandated mission of caring for the poorest.

“He gave himself to the end,” said Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, the head of the Italian bishops’ conference and considered a possible contender to be next pope. “To go out to meet everyone, speak to everyone, teach us to speak to everyone, to bless everyone.”

The first images of Francis’ body were released Tuesday, showing him in the wooden casket, in red vestments and his bishop’s miter, with the Vatican secretary of state praying over him in the chapel of the Domus Santa Marta hotel where he lived and died.

In his final will, Francis confirmed he would be buried at St. Mary Major basilica, which is outside the Vatican and home to his favorite icon of the Virgin Mary. Before and after every foreign trip, Francis would go to the basilica to pray before the Byzantine-style painting that features an image of Mary, draped in a blue robe, holding the infant Jesus, who in turn holds a jeweled golden book.

Francis stopped by the basilica on his way home from the Gemelli hospital on March 23, after his 38-day hospital stay, to deliver flowers to be placed before the icon. He returned April 12 to pray before the Madonna for the last time.

The world reacts

Bells tolled in chapels, churches and cathedrals around the world and flags flew at half staff in Italy, India, Taiwan and the US after Francis’ death was announced by the Vatican camerlengo. Soccer matches in Italy and Argentina were suspended in honor of the Argentine pope who was a lifelong fan of the San Lorenzo soccer club.

World leaders praised Francis for his moral leadership and compassion, while ordinary faithful remembered his simplicity and humanity.

“Like every Argentine, I think he was a rebel,” said 23-year-old Catalina Favaro, who had come to pay her respects in the Buenos Aires church where Francis discovered his priestly vocation. “He may have been contradictory, but that was nice, too.”

In East Timor, where Francis’ final outdoor Mass drew nearly half of the population last September, President Jose Ramos-Horta praised Francis’ courage. “Papa Francisco was a brave man who was not afraid to speak out against the rulers of the world who seek war, but do not want to seek peace,” Ramos-Horta said.

“He challenged the powerful to act with justice, called nations to welcome the stranger, and reminded us that our common home – this Earth – is a gift we must protect for future generations,” said Nigeria’s President Bola Tinubu, who is Muslim. Nigeria is Africa’s most populous country and has around 30 million Catholics, representing about 14 percent of the total population.

Viewing the pope’s coffin

The pope’s formal apartments in the Apostolic Palace and in the Santa Marta hotel were sealed Monday evening, following a centuries-old ritual. Cardinal Kevin Farrell, who as camerlengo had the task of announcing the death and confirming it once the cause was determined, presided over the rituals.

Francis chose not to live in the palace, though, but in a two-room suite in Santa Marta on the other side of Vatican City. He died there and his body was transferred to the hotel chapel in the lobby, where the private viewing was being held Tuesday for Vatican officials and members of the pontifical household.

In changes made by Francis last year, his body was not placed in three wooden coffins, as it had been for previous popes. Rather, Francis was placed in a simplified wooden coffin with a zinc coffin inside.

Once in St. Peter’s, his coffin will not be put on an elevated bier but will just be placed simply facing the pews, with the Paschal candle nearby.

“He was a pope who didn’t change his path when it came to getting dirty,” Francis’ vicar for Rome, Cardinal Baldassarre Reina, said in a Mass in his honor. “For him, poor people and migrants were the sacrament of Jesus.”

Choosing the next pope

After the funeral, there are nine days of official mourning, known as the “novendiali.” During this period, cardinals arrive in Rome and meet privately before the conclave.

To give everyone time to assemble, the conclave must begin 15-20 days after the “sede vacante” – the “vacant See” – is declared, although it can start sooner if the cardinals agree.

Once the conclave begins, cardinals vote in secret sessions in the Sistine Chapel. After voting sessions, the ballots are burned in a special stove. Black smoke indicates that no pope has been elected, while white smoke indicates that the cardinals have chosen the next head of the Catholic Church.

The one who has secured two-thirds of the votes wins. If he accepts, his election is announced by a cardinal from the loggia of St. Peter’s Basilica who tells the world “Habemus Papam,” Latin for “We have a pope.”


Russia shows off conventional and nuclear military might in drills — and raises tensions with NATO

Updated 6 sec ago

Russia shows off conventional and nuclear military might in drills — and raises tensions with NATO

Russia shows off conventional and nuclear military might in drills — and raises tensions with NATO
Rutte referenced Moscow’s hypersonic missiles, noting that they shatter the notion that Spain or Britain are any safer than Russia’s neighbors of Estonia or Lithuania
The Zapad 2025 exercise comes as Russia’s 3½-year-old war in Ukraine has dragged on despite President Donald Trump’s push for a peace deal and his Aug. 15 meeting with Putin in Alaska

WARSAW: A swarm of Russian drones flies into Poland in what officials there regard as a deliberate provocation.
NATO responds by bolstering the alliance’s air defenses on its eastern flank.
Moscow showcases its conventional and nuclear military might in long-planned exercises with Belarus, as it warns the West against sending foreign troops into Ukraine.
These events — all taking place in the month since the US-Russia summit meeting in Alaska failed to bring peace to Ukraine — have only heightened tensions in eastern Europe.
When Russian President Vladimir Putin launched the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, it came days after joint maneuvers with Belarus. The latest sweeping drills, dubbed “Zapad 2025” — or “West 2025” — have worried NATO members Poland, Latvia and Lithuania that border Belarus to the west.
The maneuvers, which wrap up Tuesday, have included nuclear-capable bomber and warships, thousands of troops and hundreds of combat vehicles simulating a joint response to an enemy attack -– including what officials said was planning for nuclear weapons use and options involving Russia’s new intermediate range ballistic missile, the Oreshnik.
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte referenced Moscow’s hypersonic missiles, noting that they shatter the notion that Spain or Britain are any safer than Russia’s neighbors of Estonia or Lithuania.
“Let’s agree that within this alliance of 32 countries, we all live on the eastern flank,” he said in Brussels.
The anniversary of Russia’s nuclear weapons policy
One year ago this month, Putin outlined a revision of Moscow’s nuclear doctrine, noting that any nation’s conventional attack on Russia that is supported by a nuclear power will be considered a joint attack on his country. That threat was clearly aimed at discouraging the West from allowing Ukraine to strike Russia with longer-range weapons and appears to significantly lower the threshold for the possible use of Russia’s nuclear arsenal.
That doctrine also places Belarus under the Russian nuclear umbrella. Russia, which says it has deployed battlefield nuclear weapons to Belarus, plans to station Oreshnik missiles there as well later this year.
The Zapad 2025 exercise comes as Russia’s 3½-year-old war in Ukraine has dragged on despite President Donald Trump’s push for a peace deal and his Aug. 15 meeting with Putin in Alaska.
On Sept. 10, two days before the maneuvers started, about 20 Russian drones flew into Poland’s airspace. While Moscow denied targeting Poland and officials in Belarus alleged that the drones veered off course after being jammed by Ukraine, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said it was a “provocation” that “brings us all closer to open conflict, closer than ever since World War II.”
Rutte branded Moscow’s action as “reckless” as he announced a new “Eastern Sentry” initiative to bolster the alliance’s air defenses in the area. He also noted that in addition to Poland, “drones violate our airspace in Romania, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.”
Putin’s Oreshnik threat
When Russia first used the Oreshnik against Ukraine in November 2024, Putin warned the West it could use it next against allies of Kyiv that allowed it to strike inside Russia with their longer-range missiles.
Putin has bragged that Oreshnik’s multiple warheads plunge at speeds of up to Mach 10 and can’t be intercepted, and that several of them used in a conventional strike could be as devastating as a nuclear attack. Russian state media boasted that it would take the missile only 11 minutes to reach an air base in Poland and 17 minutes to reach NATO headquarters in Brussels. There’s no way to know whether it’s carrying a nuclear or a conventional warhead before it hits the target.
Russia has begun Oreshnik production, Putin said last month, reaffirming plans to deploy it to Belarus later this year.
Belarus’ deputy defense minister, Pavel Muraveiko, said Tuesday that the drills involved planning for the use of tactical nuclear weapons and the deployment of the Oreshnik. He didn’t give any further details.
Unlike nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles that can obliterate entire cities, less-powerful tactical weapons have a short range for use against troops on the battlefield.
Russia’s Defense Ministry released videos of nuclear-capable bombers on training missions as part of the drills that spread from Belarus — which borders NATO members Poland, Latvia and Lithuania — to the Arctic, where its naval assets practiced launches of nuclear-capable missiles, including the hypersonic Zircon missile.
Rebuilding the Soviet-era ‘nuclear fortress’
Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko said in December that his country has several dozen Russian tactical nuclear weapons.
The revamped Russian nuclear doctrine says Moscow could use nuclear weapons “in the event of aggression” against Russia and Belarus with conventional weapons that threaten “their sovereignty and/or territorial integrity.”
Russian and Belarusian officials have made contradictory statements about who controls the weapons. When their deployment was first announced, Lukashenko said Belarus will be in charge, but the Russian military emphasized that it will retain control.
While signing a security pact with Lukashenko in December, Putin said that even with Russia controlling the Oreshniks, Moscow would allow Minsk to select the targets. He noted that if the missiles are used against targets closer to Belarus, they could carry a significantly heavier payload.
Deploying tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus would allow Russian aircraft and missiles to reach potential targets in Ukraine more easily and quickly if Moscow decides to use them. It also extends Russia’s capability to target several NATO allies in eastern and central Europe.
“The weapons’ deployment closer to the borders with the West sends a signal even if there are no plans to use it,” said Andrey Baklitskiy, senior researcher at the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research.
Alexander Alesin, a Minsk-based military analyst, said the deployment of Russian tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus has turned it into a “balcony looming over the West” that threatens the Baltics and Poland, as well as Ukraine.
The planned Oreshnik deployment will threaten all of Europe in a return to a Cold War-era scenario when Belarus was a forward base for Soviet nuclear weapons aimed at Europe, he said.
In the Cold War, Belarus hosted more than a half of the Soviet arsenal of intermediate-range missiles under the cover of its deep forests. Such land-based weapons that can reach between 500 to 5,500 kilometers (310 to 3,400 miles) were banned under the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty that was terminated in 2019.
“Belarus served as a nuclear fortress during the Soviet times,” Alesin said.
The USSR built about 100 heavily reinforced storage sites for nuclear weapons in Belarus, some of which have been revamped for holding Russian nuclear weapons, he said.
“If they restored several dozen storage sites and are actually keeping nuclear warheads in just two or three, the potential enemy will have to guess where they are,” Alesin added.

Suspects accused of flying drone over Polish presidential palace are Belarusian and Ukrainian

Suspects accused of flying drone over Polish presidential palace are Belarusian and Ukrainian
Updated 16 September 2025

Suspects accused of flying drone over Polish presidential palace are Belarusian and Ukrainian

Suspects accused of flying drone over Polish presidential palace are Belarusian and Ukrainian
  • The two suspects are “a young Belarusian woman” and a Ukrainian man “in his early 20s,” Dobrzynski said
  • “We deny rumors that this is a massive espionage action”

BERLIN: Polish authorities said the two people detained on suspicion of flying a drone over state buildings on Monday night were Belarusian and Ukrainian citizens.
The drone, which was spotted flying over the Belvedere presidential palace in the capital, Warsaw, was neutralized by the State Protection Services.
The two suspects are “a young Belarusian woman” and a Ukrainian man “in his early 20s,” Jacek Dobrzynski, a spokesman for the minister coordinating special services, said in a press briefing on Tuesday morning.
Prime Minister Donald Tusk had initially written on social media on Monday night that “two Belarusian citizens” were detained. It was not immediately clear why the initial information was incorrect, but the State Protection Services said that police interrogated the suspects overnight.
“We deny rumors that this is a massive espionage action,” Dobrzynski said, adding that it was too early to confirm any further details.
The country is on high alert after multiple Russian drones crossed into the country last week in what European officials described as a deliberate provocation. NATO sent fighter jets to shoot down the drones.


Kenya court seeks UK citizen’s arrest over young mother’s murder

Kenya court seeks UK citizen’s arrest over young mother’s murder
Updated 16 September 2025

Kenya court seeks UK citizen’s arrest over young mother’s murder

Kenya court seeks UK citizen’s arrest over young mother’s murder
  • Agnes Wanjiru, 21, died in 2012 after she reportedly went partying with British soldiers at a hotel in central Nanyuki town
  • Nairobi High Court judge Alexander Muteti said there was “probable cause to order the arrest of the accused and his surrender before this court for his trial“

NAIROBI: A Nairobi court issued an arrest warrant Tuesday for a British citizen in connection with the high-profile death of a young Kenyan mother whose body was found in a septic tank over a decade ago.
Agnes Wanjiru, 21, died in 2012 after she reportedly went partying with British soldiers at a hotel in central Nanyuki town, where Britain has a permanent army garrison.
The Office for the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) said it had informed the court “that evidence gathered links the suspect, a United Kingdom citizen, to the murder.”


Nairobi High Court judge Alexander Muteti said there was “probable cause to order the arrest of the accused and his surrender before this court for his trial,” granting a warrant for “one citizen and resident of the United Kingdom.”
Following the judge’s ruling, the ODPP said in a statement on X that “extradition proceedings would now be initiated to ensure the suspect is brought before a Kenyan court.”
Wanjiru’s sister, Rose Wanyua Wanjiku, 52, welcomed the announcement and told AFP: “Let justice prevail.”
“As a family we are very happy because it has been many years but now we can see a step has been made,” she said.

- ‘Accelerate progress’ -

A spokesperson for the British government acknowledged the DPP had “determined that a British National should face trial in relation to the murder of Ms Wanjiru in 2012.”
The government remains “absolutely committed to helping them secure justice,” but will not comment further due to legal proceedings, according to a statement.
In October 2021, The Sunday Times reported that a soldier had confessed to his comrades to killing Wanjiru and showed them her body.
The report alleged that the murder was taken to military superiors, but there was no further action.
A Kenyan investigation was opened in 2019 but no results have been disclosed. The ODPP said earlier that a team of senior prosecutors had been assembled to review the case.
British defense minister John Healey met the family earlier this year, stressing the need to “accelerate progress” on the case.
London and Nairobi have been at odds over the question of jurisdiction for British soldiers who break the law in Kenya.
The UK has said it does not accept the jurisdiction of the Kenyan court investigating Wanjiru’s death.
Since Kenya gained independence in 1963, Britain has kept a permanent army base near Nanyuki around 200 kilometers (125 miles) north of the capital Nairobi.
The British Army Training Unit in Kenya is an economic lifeline for many in Nanyuki but has faced criticism over incidents of misconduct by its soldiers.


Philippines says one injured in China Coast Guard water cannon attack

Philippines says one injured in China Coast Guard water cannon attack
Updated 16 September 2025

Philippines says one injured in China Coast Guard water cannon attack

Philippines says one injured in China Coast Guard water cannon attack
  • The incident is the latest in a series of confrontations between China and the Philippines in the crucial waterway
  • A crewmember of the Filipino vessel “sustained injuries due to the shattered glass caused by the water cannon,” said Tarriela

MANILA: The Philippines said one person was injured Tuesday when a water cannon attack by a China Coast Guard vessel shattered a window on the bridge of a fisheries bureau ship near a disputed shoal in the South China Sea.
Two Chinese ships used water cannons while in pursuit of the BRP Datu Gumbay Piang as it delivered rations to Filipino fishermen near the Beijing-controlled Scarborough Shoal, a Philippine Coast Guard spokesman said in a statement.
The incident is the latest in a series of confrontations between China and the Philippines in the crucial waterway, which Beijing claims almost entirely despite an international ruling that the assertion has no legal basis.
“This aggressive action lasted for about 29 minutes, resulting in significant damage, including shattered glass from the aft window of the bridge” and “damage to the captain’s cabin partitions,” said Commodore Jay Tarriela.
A crewmember of the Filipino vessel “sustained injuries due to the shattered glass caused by the water cannon,” said Tarriela, the coast guard’s spokesman for South China Sea issues.
A picture released by the Philippine coast guard showed a man with what appeared to be a lacerated ear.
The China Coast Guard on Tuesday evening released its own statement saying the Philippine ship had “deliberately rammed” a Chinese vessel.
Chinese ships had “taken control measures” on multiple vessels that had “insisted on illegally invading China’s territorial waters of Huangyan Dao,” China’s name for the Scarborough Shoal, they said.
An accompanying video showed the Philippine vessel — caught between two China Coast Guard ships — making contact with one of the Chinese ships after it was hit by the water cannon.
Tariella said the Filipino boat later sailed to a “safer position” away from the shoal following the encounter, which caused a short circuit aboard the vessel.
More than 60 percent of global maritime trade passes through the South China Sea.
Last month, a Chinese navy vessel collided with one from its own coast guard while chasing a Philippine patrol boat near Scarborough Shoal.
China seized control of the fish-rich shoal from the Philippines after a lengthy standoff in 2012.


UK protesters in court charged with supporting Palestine Action

UK protesters in court charged with supporting Palestine Action
Updated 16 September 2025

UK protesters in court charged with supporting Palestine Action

UK protesters in court charged with supporting Palestine Action
  • They were arrested after a protest in Westminster on July 5, when London’s Metropolitan Police detained 41 people for allegedly supporting the group

LONDON: The first people charged with supporting Palestine Action after the UK government banned it as a “terror” group appeared in court in London on Tuesday.
Hundreds of people have been arrested at protests accused of showing support for the pro-Palestinian organization since it was proscribed by the UK government in July.
The trio who appeared on Tuesday, two of whom are in their 70s, were greeted outside Westminster Magistrates’ Court by several dozen supporters, some chanting slogans and waving Palestinian flags.
Inside, more supporters packed the public gallery.
Jeremy Shippam, 72, Judit Murray, 71, and Fiona Maclean, 53, all entered not guilty pleas and were released on bail until a trial set for March 16 next year.
They were arrested after a protest in Westminster on July 5, when London’s Metropolitan Police detained 41 people for allegedly supporting the group.
They are accused of displaying an article in a public place and arousing reasonable suspicion that they are a supporter of a proscribed organization, according to the charge sheet.
The charges come under section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
They allegedly held placards reading “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action” prior to their arrest.
The government proscribed Palestine Action following several acts of vandalism, including against two planes at a Royal Air Force base which caused an estimated £7.0 million ($10 million) in damage.
At the time, Palestinian Action said: “Despite publicly condemning the Israeli Government, Britain continues to send military cargo, fly spy planes over Gaza and refuel US/Israeli fighter jets.”
“Britain isn’t just complicit, it’s an active participant in the Gaza genocide and war crimes across the Middle East.”
Critics of the ban, including the United Nations, have condemned it as legal overreach and a threat to free speech.
Kay Wagland, a fellow protester and friend of one of those charged, told AFP the government had banned a “non-violent direct action group as terrorist.”
“That means no-one can take any physical action. The protests are about this being a bad law,” the 66-year-old retired environmental projects manager said.
“It is a slippery slope,” warned another supporter, 69-year-old retired boat driver Sarah Green.
Since the ban came into force, there have been multiple protests and arrests.
Police said earlier this month they had arrested 890 people in one London protest on September 6, the majority under anti-terror laws.
Organizers of that protest, campaign group Defend our Juries (DOJ), said the rally had been the “picture of peaceful protest.”
Most demonstrators charged face six months in jail but organizers could be sentenced to up to 14 years if found guilty.
Six activists appeared in court on September 4 charged with “various offenses of encouraging support for a proscribed terrorist organization,” relating to 13 online meetings they attended to allegedly prepare for protests to support Palestine Action over the summer.