Trump’s tariffs have launched global trade wars. Here’s a timeline of how we got here

U.S. President Donald Trump holds a chart next to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick as Trump delivers remarks on tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 2, 2025. (REUTERS)
U.S. President Donald Trump holds a chart next to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick as Trump delivers remarks on tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 2, 2025. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 16 April 2025

Trump’s tariffs have launched global trade wars. Here’s a timeline of how we got here

Trump’s tariffs have launched global trade wars. Here’s a timeline of how we got here
  • Beijing responded with its own retaliatory tariffs on a range of US products

NEW YORK: Long-threatened tariffs from US President Donald Trump have plunged the country into trade wars abroad — all while on-again, off-again new levies continue to escalate uncertainty.
Trump is no stranger to tariffs. He launched a trade war during his first term, taking particular aim at China by putting taxes on most of its goods. Beijing responded with its own retaliatory tariffs on a range of US products. Meanwhile, Trump also used the threat of more tariffs to force Canada and Mexico to renegotiate a North American trade pact, called the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, in 2020.
When President Joe Biden took office, he preserved most of the tariffs Trump previously enacted against China, in addition to imposing some new restrictions — but his administration claimed to take a more targeted approach.
Fast-forward to today, and economists stress there could be greater consequences on businesses and economies worldwide under Trump’s more sweeping tariffs this time around — and that higher prices will likely leave consumers footing the bill. There’s also been a sense of whiplash from Trump’s back-and-forth tariff threats and responding retaliation seen over the last few months.
Here’s a timeline of how we got here:
January 20
Trump is sworn into office. In his inaugural address, he again promises to “tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens.” And he reiterates plans to create an agency called the External Revenue Service, which has yet to be established.
On his first day in office, Trump also says he expects to put 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico starting on Feb. 1, while declining to immediately flesh out plans for taxing Chinese imports.
January 26
Trump threatens 25 percent tariffs on all Colombia imports and other retaliatory measures after President Gustavo Petro’s rejects two US military aircraft carrying migrants to the country, accusing Trump of not treating immigrants with dignity during deportation.
In response, Petro also announces a retaliatory 25 percent increase in Colombian tariffs on US goods. But Colombia later reversed its decision and accepted the flights carrying migrants. The two countries soon signaled a halt in the trade dispute.
February 1
Trump signs an executive order to impose tariffs on imports from Mexico, Canada and China — 10 percent on all imports from China and 25 percent on imports from Mexico and Canada starting Feb. 4. Trump invoked this power by declaring a national emergency — ostensibly over undocumented immigration and drug trafficking.
The action prompts swift outrage from all three countries, with promises of retaliatory measures.
February 3
Trump agrees to a 30-day pause on his tariff threats against Mexico and Canada, as both trading partners take steps to appease Trump’s concerns about border security and drug trafficking.
February 4
Trump’s new 10 percent tariffs on all Chinese imports to the US still go into effect. China retaliates the same day by announcing a flurry of countermeasures, including sweeping new duties on a variety of American goods and an anti-monopoly investigation into Google.
China’s 15 percent tariffs on coal and liquefied natural gas products, and a 10 percent levy on crude oil, agricultural machinery and large-engine cars imported from the US, take effect Feb. 10.
February 10
Trump announces plans to hike steel and aluminum tariffs starting March 12. He removes the exemptions from his 2018 tariffs on steel, meaning that all steel imports will be taxed at a minimum of 25 percent, and also raises his 2018 aluminum tariffs from 10 percent to 25 percent.
February 13
Trump announces a plan for “reciprocal” tariffs — promising to increase US tariffs to match the tax rates that countries worldwide charge on imports “for purposes of fairness.” Economists warn that the reciprocal tariffs, set to overturn decades of trade policy, could create chaos for global businesses.
February 25
Trump signs an executive order instructing the Commerce Department to consider whether a tariff on imported copper is needed to protect national security. He cites the material’s use in US defense, infrastructure and emerging technologies.
March 1
Trump signs an additional executive order instructing the Commerce Department to consider whether tariffs on lumber and timber are also needed to protect national security, arguing that the construction industry and military depend on a strong supply of wooden products in the US
March 4
Trump’s 25 percent tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico go into effect, though he limits the levy to 10 percent on Canadian energy. He also doubles the tariff on all Chinese imports to 20 percent.
All three countries promise retaliatory measures. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announces tariffs on more than $100 billion of American goods over the course of 21 days. And Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum says her country would respond with its own retaliatory tariffs on US goods without specifying the targeted products immediately, signaling hopes to de-escalate.
China, meanwhile, imposes tariffs of up to 15 percent on a wide array of key US farm exports, set to take effect March 10. It also expands the number of US companies subject to export controls and other restrictions by about two dozen.
March 5
Trump grants a one-month exemption on his new tariffs impacting goods from Mexico and Canada for US automakers. The pause arrives after the president spoke with leaders of the “Big 3” automakers — Ford, General Motors and Stellantis.
March 6
In a wider extension, Trump postpones 25 percent tariffs on many imports from Mexico and some imports from Canada for a month.
Trump credited Sheinbaum with making progress on border security and drug smuggling as a reason for again pausing tariffs. His actions also thaw relations with Canada somewhat, although outrage and uncertainty remains. Still, after its initial retaliatory tariffs of $30 billion Canadian ($21 billion) on US goods, the government says it’s suspended a second wave of retaliatory tariffs worth $125 billion Canadian ($87 billion).
March 10
China’s retaliatory 15 percent tariffs on key American farm products — including chicken, pork, soybeans and beef — take effect. Goods already in transit are set to be exempt through April 12, per China’s Commerce Ministry previous announcement.
March 12

Trump’s new tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports go into effect. Both metals are now taxed at 25 percent across the board — with Trump’s order to remove steel exemptions and raise aluminum’s levy from his previously-imposed 2018 import taxes.
The European Union takes retaliatory trade action promising new duties on US industrial and farm products. The measures will cover goods from the United States worth some 26 billion euros ($28 billion), and not just steel and aluminum products, but also textiles, home appliances and agricultural goods. Motorcycles, bourbon, peanut butter and jeans will be hit, as they were during Trump’s first term. The 27-member bloc later says it will delay this retaliatory action until mid-April.
Canada, meanwhile, announces plans to impose more retaliatory tariffs worth Canadian $29.8 billion ($20.7 billion) on US imports, set to go into effect March 13.
March 13
Trump threatens a 200 percent tariff on European wine, Champagne and spirits if the European Union goes forward with its previously-announced plans for a 50 percent tariff on American whiskey.
March 24
Trump says he will place a 25 percent tariff on all imports from any country that buys oil or gas from Venezuela, in addition to imposing new tariffs on the South American country itself, starting April 2.
The tariffs would most likely add to the taxes facing China, which in 2023 bought 68 percent of the oil exported by Venezuela, per the US Energy Information Administration. But a number of countries also receive oil from Venezuela — including the United States itself.
March 26
Trump says he is placing 25 percent tariffs on auto imports. These auto imports will start being collected April 3 — beginning with taxes on fully-imported cars. The tariffs are set to then expand to applicable auto parts in the following weeks, through May 3.
April 2
Trump announces his long-promised “reciprocal” tariffs — declaring a 10 percent baseline tax on imports across the board starting April 5, as well as higher rates for dozens of nations that run trade surpluses with the US to take effect April 9.
Among those steeper levies, Trump says the US will now charge a 34 percent tax on imports from China, a 20 percent tax on imports from the European Union, 25 percent on South Korea, 24 percent on Japan and 32 percent on Taiwan. The new tariffs come on top of previously-imposed levies, including the 20 percent tax Trump announced on all Chinese imports earlier this year.
Meanwhile, for Canada and Mexico, the White House says USMCA-compliant imports can continue to enter the US duty-free. Once the two countries have satisfied Trump’s demands on immigration and drug trafficking, the White House adds, the tariff on the rest of their imports may drop from 25 percent to 12 percent.
April 3
Trump’s previously-announced auto tariffs begin. Prime Minister Mark Carney says that Canada will match the 25 percent levies with a tariff on vehicles imported from the US
April 4
China announces plans to impose a 34 percent tariff on imports of all US products beginning April 10, matching Trump’s new “reciprocal” tariff on Chinese goods, as part of a flurry of retaliatory measures.
The Commerce Ministry in Beijing says it will also impose more export controls on rare earths, which are materials used in high-tech products like computer chips and electric vehicle batteries. And the government adds 27 firms to lists of companies subject to trade sanctions or export controls.
April 5
Trump’s 10 percent minimum tariff on nearly all countries and territories takes effect.
April 9
Trump’s higher “reciprocal” rates go into effect, hiking taxes on imports from dozens of countries just after midnight. But hours later, his administration says it will suspend most of these higher rates for 90 days, while maintaining the recently-imposed 10 percent levy on nearly all global imports.
China is the exception. After following through on a threat to raise levies against China to a total of 104 percent, Trump says he will now raise those import taxes to 125 percent “effective immediately” — escalating tit-for-tat duties that have piled up between the two countries. The White House later clarifies that total tariffs against China are actually now 145 percent, once his previous 20 percent fentanyl tariffs are accounted for.
China upped its retaliation prior to this announcement — vowing to tax American goods at 84 percent starting April 10. Also earlier, EU member states vote to approve their own retaliatory levies on 20.9 billion euros ($23 billion) of US goods in response to Trump’s previously-imposed steel and aluminum tariffs. The EU’s executive commission doesn’t immediately specify which imports it will tax, but notes its counter tariffs will come in stages — with some set to arrive on April 15, and others May 15 and Dec. 1.
Separately, Canada’s counter tariffs on auto imports take effect. The country implements a 25 percent levy on auto imports from the US that do not comply with the 2020 USMCA pact.
April 10
The EU puts its steel and aluminum tariff retaliation on hold for 90 days, to match Trump’s pause on steeper “reciprocal” levies. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen says the commission wants to give negotiations with the US a chance — but warns countermeasures will kick in if talks “are not satisfactory.”
April 11
China says it will raise tariffs on US goods from 84 percent to 125 percent, in response to Trump’s heightened levies. The new rate is set to begin April 12.
Later, the Trump administration unveils that electronics, including smartphones and laptops, will be exempt from so-called “reciprocal” tariffs. But in the days following, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick signals that this is only a temporary reprieve, saying that sector-specific levies on semiconductors will arrive in “probably a month or two.” And other, non-“reciprocal” tariffs that tax some electronics, notably from China, remain.
April 14
Trump says he might temporarily exempt the auto industry from tariffs he previously imposed on the sector, to give carmakers time to adjust their supply chains.
The Trump administration also launches investigations into imports of computer chips, chipmaking equipment and pharmaceuticals — signaling next steps toward imposing tariffs on these sectors. The US Commerce Department posts notices about these probes, seeking public comment within the next three weeks.
Separately, the Commerce Department says it’s withdrawing from a 2019 agreement that had suspended an antidumping investigation into fresh tomato imports from Mexico. That termination, set to take effect July 14, means most tomatoes from Mexico will be subject to a 20.91 percent tariff.


Palestinian mission in UK celebrates statehood recognition, raises flag in London

Palestinian mission in UK celebrates statehood recognition, raises flag in London
Updated 59 min 30 sec ago

Palestinian mission in UK celebrates statehood recognition, raises flag in London

Palestinian mission in UK celebrates statehood recognition, raises flag in London

LONDON: The Palestinian Mission to the UK in London held a special ceremony on Monday to mark British recognition of Palestinian statehood, which included raising the Palestinian flag.

Britain on Sunday joined Australia, Canada and Portugal in officially recognizing a Palestinian state ahead of the UN General Assembly meetings this week.

More to follow...

The long road to Palestinian statehood
An Arab News Deep Dive
Enter
keywords

Experts question Albania’s AI-generated minister

Experts question Albania’s AI-generated minister
Updated 56 min 28 sec ago

Experts question Albania’s AI-generated minister

Experts question Albania’s AI-generated minister
  • Edi Rama: ‘Diella never sleeps, she doesn’t need to be paid, she has no personal interests, she has no cousins, because cousins are a big issue in Albania’
  • Appointment made headlines, something the PM excels at whether by attending international meetings in sneakers, announcing a TikTok ban, or creating a Bektashi State

TIRANA, Albania: Last week, Albania announced that an AI-generated minister would take charge of a new public tenders portfolio.
“Diella” is touted as the world’s first virtual minister, and Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama promised the appointment would end rampant corruption in government contracts — a major obstacle to the Balkan nation’s accession to the European Union.
But serious technical, political and ethical questions have been raised about the virtual lawmaker.

Truly incorruptible?

In announcing Diella’s appointment, Rama claimed that public tenders would now be “100 percent free of corruption.”
“Diella never sleeps, she doesn’t need to be paid, she has no personal interests, she has no cousins, because cousins are a big issue in Albania,” according to the prime minister, whose country ranks 80th out of 180 in Transparency International’s corruption index.
Albanian politicians are frequently implicated in corruption scandals linked to public funds.
The former mayor of the capital Tirana was detained while in office and remains in custody, suspected of corruption in connection with the awarding of government contracts.
The opposition leader and former prime minister Sali Berisha is also suspected of awarding public contracts to his associates.

Is Diella the solution?

Not really, according to experts.
“Like any AI system, she depends entirely on the quality and consistency of the data and the reliability of the models behind her,” said Erjon Curraj, an expert in digital transformation and cybersecurity.
The exact workings of Diella remain unknown, but it likely relies on Large Language Models (LLM) to respond to queries — similar to the vast amounts of text that power generative chatbots such as ChatGPT or Gemini.
But if input data is incomplete, biased, or outdated, the AI’s decisions will reflect those flaws, and it “might misinterpret documents, wrongly flag a supplier, or miss signs of collusion,” Curraj said.
“LLMs reflect society; they have biases. There’s no reason to believe it solves the problem of corruption,” computer scientist and artificial intelligence specialist Jean-Gabriel Ganascia said.
“Assuming a machine has no biases implies we must submit to the machine,” Ganascia said.

Who has control?

The Albanian opposition has appealed to the Constitutional Court over concerns about who would be accountable for the AI’s decisions.
“Who will control Diella?” Berisha asked the parliament.
Ganascia agrees that questions of accountability and control are key when it comes to AI.
“If public decision-making is entrusted to a machine, it means there is no longer accountability; we are reduced to the state of slaves.”
“What worries me is the idea of a machine governing, offering the ‘right’ answer, and preventing any deliberation,” the researcher, who is also a philosopher, said.
“A politician takes responsibility, but here, the idea is that the machine is perfect, and we cannot go against its decisions anyway.”
Appearing to address these concerns, a decree published Thursday states that Rama “also holds responsibility for the creation and operation of the virtual Ministry of Artificial Intelligence Diella.”

Old corruption, new software

The appointment grabbed headlines around the world, something the prime minister excels at whether by attending international meetings in sneakers, announcing a TikTok ban, creating a Bektashi State modelled on the Vatican, or opening migrant camps to house people intercepted at sea by the Italian government.
But achieving his goals is a different issue.
TikTok remains easily accessible in Albania, only a few dozen men have been transferred to the migrant camps and the initiative’s legality is still being contested by Italian courts.
Little public progress has been made either on the Bektashi State since its announcement a year ago.
As for Diella, whose face is that of the well-known Albanian actress Anila Bisha, who signed a contract expiring in December for the use of her image, it is unclear whether her appointment will survive the Constitutional Court’s scrutiny.
It is also uncertain whether it will comply with the standards of the European Union, which Albania hopes to join within the next five years.
“So far, there is no information about how Diella actually works,” Albanian political scientist Lutfi Dervishi said.
“If a corrupt system provides manipulated data, or filters are set up on what it must not see, Diella will merely legitimize old corruption with new software.”


Once overlooked, K-halal gains traction in Korea’s mainstream

Once overlooked, K-halal gains traction in Korea’s mainstream
Updated 22 September 2025

Once overlooked, K-halal gains traction in Korea’s mainstream

Once overlooked, K-halal gains traction in Korea’s mainstream
  • Kim Jin-woo has been spearheading halal industry in South Korea for 20 years
  • Halal footprint is steadily increasing in a country where only 0.2% are Muslim

SEOUL: It was in 2006 when Kim Jin-woo saw an opportunity where few others in South Korea were looking: the global halal industry. Nearly two decades later, he stands at the forefront of the country’s growing K-halal scene, introducing new trends in lifestyle, fashion, and food.

The idea to enter a niche market in a country where the Muslim population is less than 0.2 percent came to Kim while he was living in Malaysia and understood the industry’s scale.

“Halal is not just about food. It is a lifestyle that includes fashion, beauty, culture and how we live every day. The magnitude of this economy is about $3 trillion and affects about 1.9 billion people’s lives,” he told Arab News.

“I saw Malaysia doing that and thought Korea could definitely engage in the halal economy too.”

It took years of trials and various initiatives — from modest fashion shows to advising Korean firms on halal certification and exports — before Kim’s efforts bore fruit in bridging Muslim consumers and Korean businesses closer together.

Returning to Korea in 2015, Kim faced skepticism. “Eight out of 10 people asked me why I was working on halal,” he recalled. “I (even) got phone calls from the police.” But he believed Korea, with its booming food, beauty, and cultural exports, could not afford to ignore the Muslim market.

He started linking Korean employers with a growing Muslim migrant community. In 2015, he partnered with the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries to host a halal expo, and later with the Seoul Business Agency to provide halal industry training for thousands of workers.

“The reason why the halal economy is not working here, and what makes my work difficult, is that 96 percent of Koreans do not even know the meaning of halal. So, there is a lot of effort put into raising awareness,” Kim said.

“Halal is about inclusion. Halal is a lifestyle. So, Koreans should be naturally exposed to it, and that is what I am trying to do.”

The CEO of Halal Korea and chair of the Overseas Korean Entrepreneurs’ Cooperative, he spearheaded last month the K-Halal Food Festa in Seoul’s Coex Magok Exhibition Hall.

Over 100 booths from across Korea and abroad drew not only industry buyers, but also students curious about halal cuisine, and families eager to try something new.

They left the venue with bags full of halal-certified ramen, sauces, and iconic K-beauty items.

The halal footprint is steadily increasing in South Korea. In the food sector alone, halal products accounted for 11.1 percent of the country’s total agri-food exports in 2023 — up 1.7 percentage points from 9.4 percent in 2022, according to data released by the Korea Food Research Institute.

In January this year, Seoul expanded its halal certification institutions from four to six, in a bid to support companies seeking entry into Muslim-majority markets.

“I think people now have opened their eyes a bit to the fact that halal is not only about food but that it is about the economy. So, that is a positive change,” Kim said, forecasting that in the years to come, South Korea’s halal exports will grow 10 percent year-on-year.

However, the expansion of the halal industry has also seen its fair share of backlash. In the late 2010s, talks were underway to build a halal food factory cluster in Iksan, a city 170 km south of Seoul, to supply both exports and domestic demand. Yet the plan has faced protests and still has not materialized.

Kim acknowledges the challenges but sees opportunity in sending Koreans to Muslim countries to learn and create joint ventures.

He foresees a Korea- halal cluster or a Korea-UAE halal cluster, “where Korean corporations foray there to produce the goods, and their local partners take care of the marketing and halal certifications.”

Another strategy would be to follow in the footsteps of Japan, which attracts about 6 to 7 million Muslim tourists each year.

In Korea, the number is roughly half that.

“If we create the right environment — halal food, halal cosmetics, halal fashion — we can make Korea not just a K-pop destination for teenagers, but also a welcoming place for Muslim families with real purchasing power,” Kim said.

“When more Muslims come to Korea, there will be an increase in demand for halal beauty products, fashion products ... So, naturally, the halal market will thrive.”


Singapore to sanction Israeli settler leaders, supports Palestine statehood

A view of the Parliament House in Singapore. (File/Reuters)
A view of the Parliament House in Singapore. (File/Reuters)
Updated 22 September 2025

Singapore to sanction Israeli settler leaders, supports Palestine statehood

A view of the Parliament House in Singapore. (File/Reuters)
  • Singapore’s Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan chided those Israeli politicians who have spoken about annexing parts of the West Bank or Gaza

SINGAPORE: Singapore said on Monday it will impose targeted sanctions on leaders of Israeli settler groups and would recognize a Palestine state under the right conditions.
Western and other nations have been taking an increasingly hard line against settler groups and some Israeli officials they accuse of fomenting violence, while global recognition is growing of Palestinians’ aspiration for an independent homeland.
Singapore’s Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan, speaking in parliament, chided those Israeli politicians who have spoken about annexing parts of the West Bank or Gaza, the two Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories.
“We call on the Israeli government to cease settlement construction and expansion,” he said, citing the so-called E1 settlement project as fragmenting the West Bank.
“We oppose ongoing attempts to create new facts on the ground which undermine the prospects for a two-state solution.”
More details on the sanctions would be released at a later date, he said.
Balakrishnan said it was a matter of when not if Singapore recognizes a Palestinian state and that the nation is waiting for an “appropriate constellation” of factors, including a need for an effective Palestinian government that accepts Israel’s right to exist and categorically renounces terrorism.
“Ultimately, to resolve this long-standing conflict in a comprehensive, just and durable manner, there needs to be a negotiated settlement which results in two states, one Israeli (and) one Palestinian, with their peoples living alongside each other in peace, security and dignity,” he added.
Most of the international community considers Israeli settlements in the West Bank illegal under international law. Israel disputes this, citing historical and biblical ties to the area and saying the settlements provide security.
While Singapore and Israel have shared close diplomatic and military ties since the former gained independence in 1965, the city-state in 2024 voted in favor of numerous resolutions expressing support for UN recognition of a Palestinian state.


Philippine protest arrests leave parents seeking answers

Philippine protest arrests leave parents seeking answers
Updated 19 min 25 sec ago

Philippine protest arrests leave parents seeking answers

Philippine protest arrests leave parents seeking answers
  • At least 88 minors were among those taken into custody as police deployed water cannon and deafening sirens against crowds of mostly young, rock-throwing protesters

MANILA: Anxious Filipino parents braved the rain outside Manila’s police headquarters Monday, after more than 200 people – including dozens of children – were arrested in clashes that erupted during weekend anti-corruption demonstrations.

At least 88 minors were among those taken into custody as police deployed water cannon and deafening sirens against crowds of mostly young, rock-throwing protesters.

Manila City Mayor Isko Moreno said a 12-year-old boy was the youngest detained on Sunday. Michelle Blanco said her son Zoren was 13.

Standing in a line outside the Manila Police District offices, the 45-year-old saleswoman said she hadn’t been told when her son would be released despite having spent most of the day there.

“A little information about how they are doing inside or what we should do to get him out means a lot,” she said, insisting her son had only been watching when scooped off the street.

Elsie Santos said her son Reden had a speech impediment, showing AFP journalists the 27-year-old’s PWD, or person with disability, card.

“No one is explaining anything to us at this point,” she said as a small group of youth activists chanted for the prisoners’ release in the background.

“My son cannot communicate properly, and I’m scared they won’t understand him when he explains himself.”

‘Maximum tolerance’

Thousands of Filipinos rallied in Manila on Sunday to vent their anger over a ballooning scandal involving bogus flood-control projects believed to have cost taxpayers billions of dollars.

But peaceful demonstrations filled with families, activists and clergy were later overshadowed by street battles that saw police vehicles set ablaze and the windows of a precinct headquarters shattered.

“So far, none of them are saying the reasons behind their actions or if somebody paid them to do it,” regional police spokesperson Major Hazel Asilo said of those arrested.

“As soon as we know their affiliations, we can know if they were part of the protesters or if they were just causing trouble,” she added.

According to a statement released Monday by the department of health, about 50 people were taken to one Manila hospital alone following the clashes.

Police said 93 officers were injured in the melees.

Amid accusations by at least one local rights group that police had used disproportionate force, interior secretary Jonvic Remulla said their response had been one of “maximum tolerance.”

“They only had their riot gear and no firearms,” he said of the 4,000 police deployed, noting that no weapons had been discharged or tear gas fired.

Rage over so-called ghost infrastructure projects has been mounting in the Southeast Asian country since President Ferdinand Marcos put them center stage in a July state of the nation address that followed weeks of deadly flooding.

The Department of Finance has estimated the Philippine economy lost up to 118.5 billion pesos ($2 billion) from 2023 to 2025 due to corruption in flood control projects.

Greenpeace has suggested the number is actually closer to $18 billion.