The ethics around AI in diplomacy and governance

The ethics around AI in diplomacy and governance

The ethics around AI in diplomacy and governance
Inaugural conference of the International Association for Safe and Ethical AI (IASEAI) in Paris, France on Feb. 6, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url

In the illustrious corridors of Techville, where innovation and ethics waltz in perfect harmony, a new era of diplomacy has dawned — one led by the infallible wisdom of artificial intelligence. Here, biases and controversies are but distant memories, thanks to our unwavering trust in machine objectivity.

After all, why leave delicate matters of global politics in the hands of flawed, emotional humans when we can entrust them to algorithms designed by, well, slightly less flawed, highly rational humans?

Gone are the days when human diplomats, with their pesky emotions and subjective judgments, steered the course of international relations. In Techville, we have embraced AI-driven diplomacy, ensuring decisions are made with cold precision.

As Friedrich Nietzsche aptly observed: “Objection, evasion, joyous distrust, and love of irony are signs of health; everything absolute belongs to pathology.” Clearly our AI systems, devoid of such human flaws, epitomize absolute health. Who needs evasion or distrust when we can simply program the perfect response?

Consider the groundbreaking Neural Diplomat 3000, which successfully brokered the landmark Techville Accord between two perpetually feuding factions — by analyzing 500 years of political history and suggesting the one diplomatic solution no human dared propose: a mutual block on social media. Conflict resolved in a single line of code.

Ah, the age-old critique that AI systems are riddled with biases. Ridiculous! The mere suggestion that algorithms could inherit the biases of their creators is laughable. Our algorithms are crafted by the most diverse teams of like-minded engineers, ensuring a uniformity of thought that guarantees impartiality.

Soren Kierkegaard once mused: “Irony is a disciplinarian feared only by those who do not know it but cherished by those who do.” And here in Techville, we cherish our irony, confident that our AI systems are the ultimate disciplinarians, guiding us toward ethical nirvana.

If an AI system disproportionately favors certain nations over others in negotiations, surely it is only because those nations best align with the machine’s perfect logic — certainly not because of any pesky historical biases embedded in its training data.

Take, for instance, the EquiBalance AI Protocol, designed to ensure fairness in global resource distribution. Critics were quick to point out that, oddly, wealthier nations seemed to always receive the lion’s share of resources. A bug? No, no — just an elegant reflection of existing geopolitical realities!

As Karl Wilhelm Friedrich Schlegel observed: “Irony is the form of paradox. Paradox is what is good and great at the same time.” How fortunate we are to witness such greatness! Any controversies surrounding AI are merely the fabrications of skeptics who fail to grasp the brilliance of our creations.

We stand at the precipice of ultimate liberation — freedom from decision-making, freedom from error, freedom from responsibility! Let the machines take the wheel; we promise they have read more philosophy books than we ever will.

Rafael Hernandez de Santiago

Some say that AI cannot navigate the nuance of international diplomacy, that it lacks empathy and cultural understanding. To this, we simply say: Is empathy not just a series of well-calibrated response variables? Is culture not just an aggregation of behavioral data points? If so, then AI, with its vast datasets, understands human emotion and culture better than humans themselves.

Take the EmpaTech Conversational AI, which was programmed to handle sensitive peace negotiations. When presented with the demands of two warring factions, it wisely recommended an option neither had considered: the immediate automation of both leadership structures, replacing human decision-makers with AI overlords who could govern with impeccable logic.

A revolutionary move! Alas, the humans rejected this brilliant proposal, proving once again that irrational sentimentality is the greatest barrier to progress.

But of course, the greatest controversy of them all — the claim that AI diplomacy threatens human autonomy. Ah, the tragic irony! As Jean-Paul Sartre put it: “Man is condemned to be free.”

And yet, we stand at the precipice of ultimate liberation — freedom from decision-making, freedom from error, freedom from responsibility! Let the machines take the wheel; we promise they have read more philosophy books than we ever will.

In Techville, we rest easy knowing our AI diplomats, free from ethical quandaries and immune to controversy, lead us into a future where human error is but a distant memory.

We envision a world where world leaders consult not with each other, but with neural consensus units, AI-powered adjudicators whose recommendations are absolute.

A world where conflicts are settled not through negotiations, but through precise algorithmic solutions that ensure perfect efficiency (though, admittedly, sometimes at the cost of human dignity — but let’s not get bogged down in semantics).

Some still dare to ask: “What happens when the machines disagree with us?” To which we respond: Why should they ever? They are, after all, designed to be right. And when they inevitably reshape our world into one of pure rationality, perhaps we too will learn to love the irony of it all.

Until then, let us bask in the comfort of knowing that our future is in the hands of logic, precision, and an unshakable belief that machines, unlike humans, never make mistakes.

Rafael Hernandez de Santiago, viscount of Espes, is a Spanish national residing in and working at the Gulf Research Center.

 

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point of view

New Trump human resources czar distances himself from Elon Musk

New Trump human resources czar distances himself from Elon Musk
Updated 22 July 2025

New Trump human resources czar distances himself from Elon Musk

New Trump human resources czar distances himself from Elon Musk
  • Kupor said he had told Trump and other people in the White House that “my job is to do the agenda that the president lays out to the best I can.”

WASHINGTON: The new chief of the agency spearheading efforts to slash the federal workforce said on Monday he had no personal ties to tech billionaire and former Trump adviser Elon Musk, pledging to faithfully execute President Donald Trump’s agenda.
“I have zero personal relationship with Elon Musk. I have talked to Elon Musk once on the phone in my life,” Scott Kupor, who was sworn in to lead the Office of Personnel Management earlier this month, told reporters.
The comments underscored lingering questions about the loyalties of Silicon Valley tech entrepreneurs among Trump administration officials following a public spat between Trump and Musk that led to a deep rift between the two former allies.
Kupor said he had told Trump and other people in the White House that “my job is to do the agenda that the president lays out to the best I can.”
“But I’m not going to do it consistent with someone else’s objectives that are inconsistent with what the president wants to do,” he added.
Musk, who spent over a quarter of a billion dollars to help Trump win November’s presidential election, led the Department of Government Efficiency’s efforts to slash the budget and cut the federal workforce until his departure in late May to refocus on his tech empire, including electric vehicle maker Tesla .
While Trump hailed Musk’s tenure upon his departure, the president quickly pulled the nomination of Musk ally and tech entrepreneur Jared Isaacman to lead NASA. Reuters previously reported that Musk was disappointed by Isaacman’s removal.
The president also threatened to cancel billions of dollars worth of contracts between the federal government and Musk’s companies after Musk denounced Trump’s tax-cut and spending bill as a “disgusting abomination.”
Prior to taking the helm at OPM, Kupor was a partner at Silicon Valley-based venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, which invests in Musk’s AI startup Xai as well as SpaceX. 


Once a beacon of hope, Tunisia’s civil society struggles to survive

Once a beacon of hope, Tunisia’s civil society struggles to survive
Updated 22 July 2025

Once a beacon of hope, Tunisia’s civil society struggles to survive

Once a beacon of hope, Tunisia’s civil society struggles to survive
  • The Tunisian General Labour Union, which won the 2015 Nobel peace prize with other civil society groups and could once bring tens of thousands onto the streets, has been sapped by the arrests of junior officials on corruption charges

TUNIS: In May 2024, Tunisian activist Cherifa Riahi was arrested just two months after giving birth, accused of harboring illegal migrants. Over a year later, she is still in prison without charge.
Rights groups see Riahi’s case as a symbol of accelerating repression of civil society under President Kais Saied, who dissolved parliament in 2021 and began ruling by decree.
The crackdown marks a significant turnaround for Tunisia, where civil society groups flourished in the wake of the 2011 uprising that unseated President Zine El-Abidine Ben Ali, inspired other Arab Spring uprisings, and helped shape a democratic transition.

HIGHLIGHTS

• Activists subject to detentions, threats

• Groups report asset freezes and raids

• President accuses them of serving foreign agendas

As head of a refugee support group, Riahi had been helping sub-Saharan asylum seekers and other migrants find housing and access medicine and food. Her family says she did nothing wrong.
The forced separation from her daughter and young son has been traumatic.
“The girl doesn’t recognize her mother at all,” Riahi’s mother Farida, who is now caring for her grandchild, told Reuters at their family home in La Marsa near the capital, Tunis.
“They took her while she was breastfeeding. We didn’t even have time to understand what was happening.”
Since Saied’s power grab, at least a dozen civil society figures like Riahi have been detained on allegations activists denounce as fabricated, according to rights groups and lawyers. At least 10 civil society groups have had their assets frozen and offices raided, they say.
The Tunisian General Labour Union, which won the 2015 Nobel peace prize with other civil society groups and could once bring tens of thousands onto the streets, has been sapped by the arrests of junior officials on corruption charges.
The Tunisian government’s media office did not respond to calls and written questions seeking comment about Riahi’s case and those of other activists and civil society groups.
Saied, 67, has accused civil society groups of “serving foreign agendas” and undermining national unity.
He has said he will not be a dictator and that freedom and democracy will be preserved, but that he will not allow chaos or interference through foreign funding or organizations that represent a “tool of treason.”
Activists warn that some of Tunisia’s last surviving democratic gains are at risk as the judiciary, media and parliament have all come under tighter executive control and most opposition party leaders are in prison.
“The attack on civil society organizations is not an isolated incident,” said Romdhane Ben Amor of the Tunisian Forum for Economic and Social Rights, an independent advocacy group.
“It comes within the context of the authorities’ plan to close civic space and to end the democratic openness achieved by Tunisians after January 14, 2011.”

’SEEN AS ENEMIES’
In Tunis, the offices of I Watch, an anti-corruption watchdog founded after the 2011 revolution, used to bustle with dozens of employees, volunteers and journalists.
These days, only three employees work on-site. Dozens work remotely, some fearing raids or arrests.
Wajdi Belloumi, I Watch’s president, said its bank transfers have been hindered and official investigations into the group are piling up. Hotels have stopped renting spaces for the group’s events, citing vague instructions from authorities, Belloumi said.
Last year, the electoral commission refused for the first time to allow I Watch to monitor elections due to suspicions of foreign funding.
“We’re seen as enemies now,” Belloumi told Reuters. “Many volunteers are afraid. Whistle-blowers have gone quiet. The pressure is everywhere — legal, financial, even personal.”
Ben Amor said he had received anonymous threats and started looking over his shoulder in public spaces.
“People start saying, ‘This man must be gotten rid of’,” he said, referring to comments sent in private messages, or “’your son studies at that school, your daughter studies at that school ... I saw you on that street’.”
Foreign governments that once championed Tunisia’s democratic transition now prioritize curbing migration and short-term stability, rights groups say.
Ben Amor said he believed he had been targeted particularly after speaking out against Saied’s recent anti-migrant rhetoric.
In 2023, the same year Tunisia signed a pact with the European Union aimed at stemming migration across the Mediterranean, Saied said illegal immigration was part of a “conspiracy” to alter Tunisia’s demographics.
Since then, authorities have dismantled tents and carried out forced deportations — the campaign amid which Riahi was detained.
Though the space for civil society groups is shrinking by the day, Belloumi said he remains committed.
“We chose this path — transparency, justice, accountability,” he said. “And we’re not walking away.” 


White House restricts WSJ access to Trump over Epstein story

White House restricts WSJ access to Trump over Epstein story
Updated 22 July 2025

White House restricts WSJ access to Trump over Epstein story

White House restricts WSJ access to Trump over Epstein story
  • The punishment of the Wall Street Journal marks at least the second time the Trump administration has moved to exclude a major news outlet from the press pool over its reporting

WASHINGTON: The White House on Monday barred The Wall Street Journal from traveling with US President Donald Trump during his upcoming visit to Scotland, after the newspaper reported that he wrote a bawdy birthday message to his former friend, alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.
The move comes after Trump on Friday sued the WSJ and its media magnate owner Rupert Murdoch for at least $10 billion over the allegation in the article, which Trump denies.
The Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein case has threatened to split the Republican’s far-right Make America Great Again (MAGA) base, with some of his supporters calling for a full release of the so-called “Epstein Files.”
The punishment of the Wall Street Journal marks at least the second time the Trump administration has moved to exclude a major news outlet from the press pool over its reporting, having barred Associated Press journalists from multiple key events since February.
“As the appeals court confirmed, The Wall Street Journal or any other news outlet are not guaranteed special access to cover President Trump in the Oval Office, aboard Air Force One, and in his private workspaces,” said Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.
“Due to The Wall Street Journal’s fake and defamatory conduct, they will not be one of the thirteen outlets on board (Air Force One).”
Trump departs this weekend for Scotland, where he owns two golf resorts and will meet with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
Earlier this month, the US Department of Justice, under Trump-appointed Attorney General Pam Bondi, said there was no evidence suggesting disgraced financier Epstein had kept a “client list” or was blackmailing powerful figures before his death in 2019.
In its story on Thursday, the WSJ reported that Trump had written a suggestive birthday letter to Epstein in 2003, illustrated with a naked woman and alluding to a shared “secret.”
Epstein, a longtime friend of Trump and multiple other high-profile men, was found hanging dead in a New York prison cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges that he sexually exploited dozens of underage girls at his homes in New York and Florida.
The case sparked conspiracy theories, especially among Trump’s far-right voters, about an alleged international cabal of wealthy pedophiles.
Epstein’s death — declared a suicide — before he could face trial supercharged that narrative.
Since returning to power in January, Trump has moved to increase control over the press covering the White House.
In February, the Oval Office stripped the White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA) of its nearly century-old authority to oversee which outlets have access to certain restricted presidential events, with Trump saying that he was now “calling the shots” on media access.
In a statement, the WHCA president urged the White House to “restore” the Journal to the pool.
“This attempt by the White House to punish a media outlet whose coverage it does not like is deeply troubling, and it defies the First Amendment,” said WHCA President Weijia Jiang.
“Government retaliation against news outlets based on the content of their reporting should concern all who value free speech and an independent media.”

 


Morocco’s central bank explores digital currency cross-border payments

Morocco’s central bank explores digital currency cross-border payments
Updated 22 July 2025

Morocco’s central bank explores digital currency cross-border payments

Morocco’s central bank explores digital currency cross-border payments
  • The bank has been working with the IMF and the World Bank to assess the payment system impacts of its central bank digital currency (CBDC), Jouahri told a conference in Rabat

RABAT: Morocco’s central bank was exploring the use of its own digital currency for peer-to-peer and cross border payments, bank governor Abdellatif Jouahri said on Monday.
A central bank digital currency (CBDC) is controlled by the central bank, in contrast to cryptocurrencies that are usually decentralized.
Cryptocurrencies have been banned in Morocco since 2017, but the public continues to use them underground, circumventing restrictions.
The bank has been working with the IMF and the World Bank to assess the payment system impacts of its central bank digital currency (CBDC), Jouahri told a conference in Rabat.
The Moroccan central bank, together with its Egyptian peer and the World Bank, was also exploring the use of the CBDC for cross-border transfers, he said. A draft law on crypto assets is currently under review by the finance ministry before entering the adoption process, Jouahri said last month.
 

 


Zelensky names new ambassadors during Ukraine political shakeup

Yulia Svyrydenko, Prime Minister of Ukraine. (X @Svyrydenko_Y)
Yulia Svyrydenko, Prime Minister of Ukraine. (X @Svyrydenko_Y)
Updated 22 July 2025

Zelensky names new ambassadors during Ukraine political shakeup

Yulia Svyrydenko, Prime Minister of Ukraine. (X @Svyrydenko_Y)
  • Zelensky launched a major government reshuffle last week, promoting Yulia Svyrydenko, 39, who had served as economy minister and is well known in Washington, to head the cabinet as prime minister

MOSCOW: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky appointed over a dozen new ambassadors on Monday, during a big shakeup that has seen him replace top cabinet officials and envoys to shore up relations with Washington and isolate Russia internationally.
The new envoys named on Monday include ambassadors to NATO members Belgium, Canada, Estonia and Spain, as well as major donor Japan and regional heavyweights South Africa and the United Arab Emirates.

Ukraine's deputy prime minister for European and Euro-Atlantic integration Olha Stefanishyna in Kyiv. (AFP file photo)

Zelensky launched a major government reshuffle last week, promoting Yulia Svyrydenko, 39, who had served as economy minister and is well known in Washington, to head the cabinet as prime minister.
Deputy Prime Minister Olha Stefanishyna is set to become Ukraine’s new envoy to the United States, as Ukraine seeks to mend ties with the Trump administration.
In remarks to the diplomatic corps released by his office, Zelensky said envoys needed to support “everything that causes Russia pain for its war.”
“While the content of our relationship with America has transformed following the change in administration, the goal remains unchanged: Ukraine must withstand Russia’s strikes,” Zelensky said.