șÚÁÏÉçÇű

Trump administration reinstating 24,500 fired workers after court order

Trump administration reinstating 24,500 fired workers after court order
The Trump administration in court filings has for the first time acknowledged that it fired nearly 25,000 recently hired workers, and said agencies were working to bring all of them back after a judge ruled that their terminations were likely illegal. (AP/File)
Short Url
Updated 18 March 2025

Trump administration reinstating 24,500 fired workers after court order

Trump administration reinstating 24,500 fired workers after court order
  • The mass firings, part of President Donald Trump’s broader purge of the federal workforce, were widely reported
  • The court filings are the first full accounting of the terminations by the administration

WASHINGTON: The Trump administration in court filings has for the first time acknowledged that it fired nearly 25,000 recently hired workers, and said agencies were working to bring all of them back after a judge ruled that their terminations were likely illegal.
The filings made in Baltimore, Maryland, federal court late Monday include statements from officials at 18 agencies, all of whom said the reinstated probationary workers were being placed on administrative leave at least temporarily.
The mass firings, part of President Donald Trump’s broader purge of the federal workforce, were widely reported, but the court filings are the first full accounting of the terminations by the administration.
Most of the agencies said they had fired a few hundred workers. The Treasury Department terminated about 7,600 people, the Department of Agriculture about 5,700 and the Department of Health and Human Services more than 3,200, according to the filings.
US District Judge James Bredar on March 13 said the mass firings of probationary workers that began last month violated regulations governing the mass layoffs of federal employees, and ordered them to be reinstated pending further litigation.
Probationary workers typically have less than one year of service in their current roles, though some are longtime federal employees.
Bredar’s ruling came in a lawsuit by 19 Democrat-led states and Washington, D.C., who said the mass firings would trigger a spike in unemployment claims and greater demand for social services provided by states.
The office of Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown, which is spearheading the lawsuit, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Tuesday.
The Trump administration has appealed Bredar’s decision and on Monday asked a Richmond, Virginia-based appeals court to pause the ruling pending the outcome of the case.
Hours before Bredar issued his ruling, a federal judge in San Francisco had ordered that probationary workers be reinstated at six agencies, including five also covered by Bredar’s order and the US Department of Defense. The administration has also appealed that decision.
In the filings late Monday, agency officials said they had either reinstated all of the fired employees or were working to do so, but warned that bringing back large numbers of workers had imposed significant burdens and caused confusion and turmoil.
The officials also noted that an appeals court ruling reversing Bredar’s order would allow agencies to again fire the workers, subjecting them to multiple changes in their employment status in a matter of weeks.
“The tremendous uncertainty associated with this confusion and these administrative burdens impede supervisors from appropriately managing their workforce,” Mark Green, deputy assistant secretary at the US Department of the Interior, wrote in one of the filings. “Work schedules and assignments are effectively being tied to hearing and briefing schedules set by the courts.”
Bredar has scheduled a hearing for March 26 on whether to keep his ruling in place pending the outcome of the lawsuit, which could take months or longer to resolve.


Luxembourg to recognize Palestinian State at UN summit next week

Luxembourg to recognize Palestinian State at UN summit next week
Updated 14 sec ago

Luxembourg to recognize Palestinian State at UN summit next week

Luxembourg to recognize Palestinian State at UN summit next week
  • ‘A movement is now emerging in Europe and around the world to demonstrate that the two-state solution is still relevant’
BRUSSELS: Luxembourg has said it will join a raft of countries recognizing the State of Palestine at a United Nations summit in New York next week.
French President Emmanuel Macron is spearheading the drive on recognizing a Palestinian state as international condemnation grows of Israel over its nearly two-year offensive in Gaza.
Speaking to journalists late Monday, Luxembourg’s Prime Minister Luc Frieden said that “the situation on the ground has deteriorated considerably in recent months.”
“A movement is now emerging in Europe and around the world to demonstrate that the two-state solution is still relevant,” Frieden said.
“That is why the Luxembourg government intends to join those who recognize the State of Palestine at next week’s conference on the two-state solution.”
Countries including Britain, Australia, Canada and Belgium have said they plan to recognize a Palestinian state at the meeting at the UN General Assembly.
Israel and its ally the United States have blasted the push, with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying Monday the move “emboldened” Hamas.
The war in Gaza was sparked by Hamas’ October 2023 attack on Israel that resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally of official figures.
Israel’s retaliatory campaign in Gaza has killed at least 64,905 people, also mostly civilians, according to figures from the territory’s health ministry that the United Nations considers reliable.
UN investigators on Tuesday accused Israel of committing “genocide” in Gaza in a bid to “destroy the Palestinians,” blaming Israel’s prime minister and other top officials for incitement.

UN official says conflicts, disasters and funding cuts a ‘perfect storm’ causing acute hunger

UN official says conflicts, disasters and funding cuts a ‘perfect storm’ causing acute hunger
Updated 40 sec ago

UN official says conflicts, disasters and funding cuts a ‘perfect storm’ causing acute hunger

UN official says conflicts, disasters and funding cuts a ‘perfect storm’ causing acute hunger
BANGKOK: A string of natural disasters and global conflicts, combined with drastic cuts to international aid means that some of the world’s neediest people are suffering from serious food shortages, and will face further reductions in assistance soon, a United Nations official said Tuesday.
Carl Skau, deputy executive director and chief operating officer of the World Food Program, said that with needs rising and funding dropping, the agency is pushing every efficiency it can find, promoting greater self-reliance in the communities it helps, and looking for new sources of donations to help fill the growing gap.
“We are managing globally a perfect storm... with food security needs going up dramatically,” Skau told The Associated Press during a visit to Bangkok, where he was to meet with Thai officials to press for assistance, following a trip to India.
“We’ve seen a three-fold increase only in the past five years, and this year has been really tough also with conflict increasing, extreme climate events and on top of that we now have a funding crunch where the WFP is losing some 40 percent of our funding.”
In the region, he said recent flooding in Pakistan and a massive earthquake and drought in neighboring Afghanistan have exacerbated already difficult situations in both countries, leaving millions in need.
The decision by US President Donald Trump earlier this year to cut more than 90 percent of the United States Agency for International Development’s foreign aid contracts and $60 billion in overall assistance around the world — coupled with cuts to international aid from several European countries — has meant that the WFP and others have less means to respond, he said.
“In Afghanistan two years ago we were assisting 10 million people, today we are at around 1.5 (million) and we don’t have the resources to preposition food in areas that won’t be accessible during the winter,” Skau said.
Already in Afghanistan, there has been a surge in malnutrition recorded, particularly among young children, over the last few months, he said.
“We know that through this winter, children will die and it’s not only about children dying, I mean when children are severely, acutely malnourished, there are damages to their brains and to their organs that will remain with them for their life,” Skau said.
Meantime, conflicts in Myanmar, Sudan and Gaza have made it extremely difficult to reach people in need, and the latter two are already facing famine conditions. A 7.7 magnitude earthquake in Myanmar in March has led to even greater needs there, and new challenges in reaching people with humanitarian assistance.
The civil war in Myanmar has also meant that even more Rohingya refugees have fled to Cox’s Bazar in neighboring Bangladesh, and there are no immediate prospects for them to safely return home, Skau said.
“So we have a situation where we basically have 1.3 million people in a camp that is like a prison where they do 100 percent depend on international assistance,” said Skau, who visited Cox’s Bazar earlier this month.
The WFP currently provides refugees there with a $12 monthly voucher for food that has been enough for them to survive, but with funding running out for that by the end of November, it may have to either reduce the amount or the number of people it supports.
When the agency temporarily had to reduce monthly assistance to $8 in 2023, it saw tension and violence spike in the camp and people turning to criminality, and many desperate people piling into boats to head to Indonesia, Malaysia or elsewhere, Skau said.
“There are all kinds of negative implications,” he said. “Frankly, regional stability is somewhat at stake here, and that also has implications beyond the immediate region.”

Spain summons Israeli diplomat to protest FM’s ‘liar’ comments

Spain summons Israeli diplomat to protest FM’s ‘liar’ comments
Updated 17 min 57 sec ago

Spain summons Israeli diplomat to protest FM’s ‘liar’ comments

Spain summons Israeli diplomat to protest FM’s ‘liar’ comments
  • Israel’s charge d’affaires, Dana Erlich, was called in over “the unacceptable words and positions of the Israeli foreign minister,” the foreign ministry said in a statement
  • Spain’s leftist government has been one of Europe’s most outspoken critics of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his military campaign in Gaza, launched in response to the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023

MADRID: Spain summoned Israel’s top diplomat on Tuesday for the second time in five days over remarks by Israel’s foreign minister that Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez was antisemitic and a “liar.”
Israel’s charge d’affaires, Dana Erlich, was called in over “the unacceptable words and positions of the Israeli foreign minister,” the foreign ministry said in a statement.
Israel has not had an ambassador in Spain since the Sanchez government recognized the state of Palestine in 2024.
Spain’s leftist government has been one of Europe’s most outspoken critics of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his military campaign in Gaza, launched in response to the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023.
Madrid recalled its ambassador to Israel last week after announcing new measures aimed at “ending the genocide in Gaza,” further straining relations.
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar recently described Sanchez as “antisemitic” and a “liar” after the Spanish leader expressed admiration for pro-Palestinian protesters who disrupted Spain’s Vuelta cycling race.
Last Friday, Erlich was summoned after Netanyahu accused Sanchez of inciting genocide against Israel.


Afghan man handed life sentence in Germany after fatal stabbing at anti-Islam rally

Afghan man handed life sentence in Germany after fatal stabbing at anti-Islam rally
Updated 16 September 2025

Afghan man handed life sentence in Germany after fatal stabbing at anti-Islam rally

Afghan man handed life sentence in Germany after fatal stabbing at anti-Islam rally
  • Sulaiman A attacked a speaker and several demonstrators at the event before stabbing a police officer who rushed in to help. The officer later succumbed to his injuries

STUTTGART: An Afghan man with suspected Islamist motives was sentenced to life in prison by a German court on Tuesday for a knife attack that killed a police officer and injured five others at an anti-Islam rally last year.
The verdict comes at a time of heated debate about immigration and security in Germany, and a strong surge in support for the country’s far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.
The defendant, named only as Sulaiman A to protect his privacy, was found guilty of using a large hunting knife to attack people during a demonstration in the western city of Mannheim that was organized by the anti-Islam group Pax Europa in late May 2024.
Sulaiman A attacked a speaker and several demonstrators at the event before stabbing a police officer who rushed in to help. The officer later succumbed to his injuries.
The attacker was taken into pre-trial custody in June 2024 after leaving intensive care for injuries he sustained during his arrest.
Though prosecutors say he sympathized with the Daesh group, he was not tried as a terrorist. He faced one count of murder and five counts of attempted murder.


Ex-British soldier goes on trial for 1972 Bloody Sunday killings in Northern Ireland

Ex-British soldier goes on trial for 1972 Bloody Sunday killings in Northern Ireland
Updated 16 September 2025

Ex-British soldier goes on trial for 1972 Bloody Sunday killings in Northern Ireland

Ex-British soldier goes on trial for 1972 Bloody Sunday killings in Northern Ireland
  • Prosecutors say the killing of 13 unarmed civil rights demonstrators and wounding of 15 others was unjustified
  • Families of the victims who have campaigned for justice for over 50 years marched to the courthouse holding photos of the dead

LONDON: The only British soldier to be prosecuted in the 1972 Bloody Sunday massacre in Northern Ireland went on trial Monday in Belfast on murder charges in a case that has come to symbolize the three decades of sectarian violence known as “The Troubles.”
The ex-paratrooper, a lance corporal named as “Soldier F” to protect his identity, was concealed behind a blue curtain that shielded him from view of the families of some of the 13 people killed and 15 wounded when troops opened fire on unarmed civil rights demonstrators on Jan. 30, 1972, in Londonderry, also known as Derry.
“The civilians ... did not pose a threat to the soldiers and nor could the soldiers have believed that they did,” prosecutor Louis Mably said during an opening statement in Belfast Crown Court. “The civilians were unarmed and they were simply shot as they ran away.”
The Army veteran pleaded not guilty to two counts of murder and five counts of attempted murder in what was the deadliest shooting of the long-running conflict between mainly Catholic supporters of a united Ireland and predominantly Protestant forces that wanted to remain part of the United Kingdom.
While the conflict largely ended with the 1998 Good Friday peace accord that created a system for Republican and Unionist parties to share power in Northern Ireland, tensions remain. Families of civilians killed continue to press for justice and supporters of army veterans complain that their losses have been downplayed and that they have been unfairly targeted in investigations.
A long march to court
Families of the victims who have campaigned for more than a half century for accountability for the killings marched to the courthouse before the trial carrying photos of the dead and walking behind a banner reading “Towards Justice.”
John McKinney called it a momentous day.
“It has taken 53 years to get to this point, and we have battled all the odds to get here,” said McKinney, whose brother, William, was killed in the shooting.
“Everything that we have achieved to this point has been through relentless commitment and a refusal to lie down,” he said. “We will shortly occupy a courtroom very proudly with our heads held high and in the knowledge that, regardless of the ultimate outcome, that we are on the right side of history.”
From instigators to victims
The fact that it’s taken more than a half century for a trial to get underway reflects the tortured history of the shooting and foreshadows hurdles ahead for prosecutors.
The government initially said members of a parachute regiment fired in self-defense after being attacked by bombers and gunmen and a formal inquiry cleared troops of responsibility. A subsequent and lengthier review in 2010 found soldiers had fired at unarmed civilians fleeing and then lied about it for decades.
Then-Prime Minister David Cameron apologized and said the killings were “unjustified and unjustifiable.”
The findings cleared the way for the eventual prosecution of Soldier F, though that, too, has been beset by delays and obstacles.
It took seven years from the time police opened their investigation until prosecutors announced in 2019 that they would only charge Soldier F. They said there wasn’t enough evidence to charge 16 other former soldiers and two alleged members of the Official Irish Republican Army who were investigated for their roles in the shootings.
Two years later, the Public Prosecution Service dropped the case because they didn’t think they could prevail at trial. They made the decision after a judge tossed out a case against two soldiers in the killing of an Irish Republican Army leader after ruling key prosecution evidence was inadmissible.
Although the prosecution against Soldier F was revived after McKinney’s family appealed, Mably acknowledged Monday that the government would have to clear legal challenges over the use of the type of hearsay testimony that torpedoed the IRA case.
Confusion and chaos on the streets
Mably also said it was not possible to identify who shot each of the victims, but the prosecution’s theory is that Soldier F and others from his battalion had joint responsibility when they pulled the triggers of their self-loading rifles.
Mably described a chaotic scene as soldiers began shooting. Some mistook the sound of gunfire as troops shooting rubber bullets, though the reality quickly became clear as bullets skipped across the pavement and bodies began dropping. Most of those shot were struck in the side or the back.
“These soldiers lost control of themselves,” said Mably, adding that they had “disgraced the British Army.”
In his interview with police in 2016, Soldier F declined to answer questions, saying he had no “reliable recollection” of the events that day but was sure he had properly discharged his duties as a soldier.
Soldier F is charged with two counts of murder in the deaths of James Wray, 22, and William McKinney, 27, and five counts of attempted murder for shooting Joseph Friel, Michael Quinn, Joe Mahon, Patrick O’Donnell and for opening fire at unarmed civilians.
Three of the survivors are expected to testify in the weeks-long trial that resumes Wednesday.
While family members marched for the victims, some veterans gathered outside the courthouse in support of their brethren.
Northern Ireland Veterans Commissioner David Johnstone said it’s important to remember the vast majority of nearly 300,000 British troops served with dignity and restraint and more than 1,000 lost their lives and thousands more were wounded in that tumultuous period.
“Many veterans today feel frustrated, feel angry, and indeed feel betrayed by the legacy process since 1998,” he said. “There must first be a fair and balanced legacy process, a process that does not facilitate the wholesale demonization of those who served and certainly not facilitate the rewriting of the history of the Troubles.”