Trump administration deports hundreds of immigrants even as a judge orders their removals be stopped

Trump administration deports hundreds of immigrants even as a judge orders their removals be stopped
In this photo provided by El Salvador's presidential press office, a prison guard transfers deportees from the US, alleged to be Venezuelan gang members, to the Torrorism Confinement Center in Tecoluca, El Salvador, March 16, 2025. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 17 March 2025

Trump administration deports hundreds of immigrants even as a judge orders their removals be stopped

Trump administration deports hundreds of immigrants even as a judge orders their removals be stopped
  • The bar on deportations stands for up to 14 days and the immigrants will remain in federal custody during that time

The Trump administration has transferred hundreds of immigrants to El Salvador even as a federal judge issued an order temporarily barring the deportations under an 18th century wartime declaration targeting Venezuelan gang members, officials said Sunday. Flights were in the air at the time of the ruling.
US District Judge James E. Boasberg issued an order Saturday blocking the deportations but lawyers told him there were already two planes with immigrants in the air — one headed for El Salvador, the other for Honduras. Boasberg verbally ordered the planes be turned around, but they apparently were not and he did not include the directive in his written order.
“Oopsie…Too late,” Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele, a Trump ally who agreed to house about 300 immigrants for a year at a cost of $6 million in his country’s prisons, wrote on the social media site X above an article about Boasberg’s ruling. That post was recirculated by White House communications director Steven Cheung.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who negotiated an earlier deal with Bukele to house immigrants, posted on the site: “We sent over 250 alien enemy members of Tren de Aragua which El Salvador has agreed to hold in their very good jails at a fair price that will also save our taxpayer dollars.”
Steve Vladeck, a professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, said that Boasberg’s verbal directive to turn around the planes was not technically part of his final order but that the Trump administration clearly violated the “spirit” of it.
“This just incentivizes future courts to be hyper specific in their orders and not give the government any wiggle room,” Vladeck said.

The Department of Justice in court papers filed Sunday said some immigrants were already out of the country by the time the hold was issued Sunday night. The department added that it has appealed the order and would use other laws for deportations in coming days if the appeal is not successful.
The immigrants were deported after Trump’s declaration of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which has been used only three times in US history.
The law, invoked during the War of 1812 and World Wars I and II, requires a president to declare the United States is at war, giving him extraordinary powers to detain or remove foreigners who otherwise would have protections under immigration or criminal laws. It was last used to justify the detention of Japanese-American civilians during World War II.
A Justice Department spokesperson on Sunday referred to an earlier statement from Attorney General Pam Bondi blasting Boasberg’s ruling and didn’t immediately answer questions about whether the administration ignored the court’s order.
Venezuela’s government in a statement Sunday rejected the use of Trump’s declaration of the law, characterizing it as evocative of “the darkest episodes in human history, from slavery to the horror of the Nazi concentration camps.”
Tren de Aragua originated in an infamously lawless prison in the central state of Aragua and accompanied an exodus of millions of Venezuelans, the overwhelming majority of whom were seeking better living conditions after their nation’s economy came undone last decade. Trump seized on the gang during his campaign to paint misleading pictures of communities that he contended were “taken over” by what were actually a handful of lawbreakers.
The Trump administration has not identified the immigrants deported, provided any evidence they are in fact members of Tren de Aragua or that they committed any crimes in the United States. It did also send two top members of the Salvadoran MS-13 gang to El Salvador who had been arrested in the United States.
Video released by El Salvador’s government Sunday showed men exiting airplanes into an airport tarmac lined by officers in riot gear. The men, who had their hands and ankles shackled, struggled to walk as officers pushed their heads down to have them bend down at the waist.
The video also showed the men being transported to prison in a large convoy of buses guarded by police and military vehicles and at least one helicopter. The men were shown kneeling on the ground as their heads were shaved before they changed into the prison’s all-white uniform – knee-length shorts, T-shirt, socks and rubber clogs – and placed in cells.
The immigrants were taken to the notorious CECOT facility, the centerpiece of Bukele’s push to pacify his once violence-wracked country through tough police measures and limits on basic rights
The Trump administration said the president actually signed the proclamation contending Tren de Aragua was invading the United States Friday night but didn’t announce it until Saturday afternoon. Immigration lawyers said that, late Friday, they noticed Venezuelans who otherwise couldn’t be deported under immigration law being moved to Texas for deportation flights. They began to file lawsuits to halt the transfers.
“Basically any Venezuelan citizen in the US may be removed on pretext of belonging to Tren de Aragua, with no chance at defense,” Adam Isacson of the Washington Office for Latin America, a human rights group, warned on X.
The litigation that led to the hold on deportations was filed on behalf of five Venezuelans held in Texas who lawyers said were concerned they’d be falsely accused of being members of the gang. Once the act is invoked, they warned, Trump could simply declare anyone a Tren de Aragua member and remove them from the country.
Boasberg barred those Venezuelans’ deportations Saturday morning when the suit was filed, but only broadened it to all people in federal custody who could be targeted by the act after his afternoon hearing. He noted that the law has never before been used outside of a congressionally-declared war and that plaintiffs may successfully argue Trump exceeded his legal authority in invoking it.
The bar on deportations stands for up to 14 days and the immigrants will remain in federal custody during that time. Boasberg has scheduled a hearing Friday to hear additional arguments in the case.
He said he had to act because the immigrants whose deportations may actually violate the US Constitution deserved a chance to have their pleas heard in court.
“Once they’re out of the country,” Boasberg said, “there’s little I could do.”


Kenya court seeks UK citizen’s arrest over young mother’s murder

Updated 8 sec ago

Kenya court seeks UK citizen’s arrest over young mother’s murder

Kenya court seeks UK citizen’s arrest over young mother’s murder
Agnes Wanjiru, 21, died in 2012 after she reportedly went partying with British soldiers at a hotel in central Nanyuki town
Nairobi High Court judge Alexander Muteti said there was “probable cause to order the arrest of the accused and his surrender before this court for his trial“

NAIROBI: A Nairobi court issued an arrest warrant Tuesday for a British citizen in connection with the high-profile death of a young Kenyan mother whose body was found in a septic tank over a decade ago.
Agnes Wanjiru, 21, died in 2012 after she reportedly went partying with British soldiers at a hotel in central Nanyuki town, where Britain has a permanent army garrison.
The Office for the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) said it had informed the court “that evidence gathered links the suspect, a United Kingdom citizen, to the murder.”
Nairobi High Court judge Alexander Muteti said there was “probable cause to order the arrest of the accused and his surrender before this court for his trial,” granting a warrant for “one citizen and resident of the United Kingdom.”
Following the judge’s ruling, the ODPP said in a statement on X that “extradition proceedings would now be initiated to ensure the suspect is brought before a Kenyan court.”
Wanjiru’s sister, Rose Wanyua Wanjiku, 52, welcomed the announcement and told AFP: “Let justice prevail.”
“As a family we are very happy because it has been many years but now we can see a step has been made,” she said.

- ‘Accelerate progress’ -

A spokesperson for the British government acknowledged the DPP had “determined that a British National should face trial in relation to the murder of Ms Wanjiru in 2012.”
The government remains “absolutely committed to helping them secure justice,” but will not comment further due to legal proceedings, according to a statement.
In October 2021, The Sunday Times reported that a soldier had confessed to his comrades to killing Wanjiru and showed them her body.
The report alleged that the murder was taken to military superiors, but there was no further action.
A Kenyan investigation was opened in 2019 but no results have been disclosed. The ODPP said earlier that a team of senior prosecutors had been assembled to review the case.
British defense minister John Healey met the family earlier this year, stressing the need to “accelerate progress” on the case.
London and Nairobi have been at odds over the question of jurisdiction for British soldiers who break the law in Kenya.
The UK has said it does not accept the jurisdiction of the Kenyan court investigating Wanjiru’s death.
Since Kenya gained independence in 1963, Britain has kept a permanent army base near Nanyuki around 200 kilometers (125 miles) north of the capital Nairobi.
The British Army Training Unit in Kenya is an economic lifeline for many in Nanyuki but has faced criticism over incidents of misconduct by its soldiers.

Philippines says one injured in China Coast Guard water cannon attack

Philippines says one injured in China Coast Guard water cannon attack
Updated 19 min 51 sec ago

Philippines says one injured in China Coast Guard water cannon attack

Philippines says one injured in China Coast Guard water cannon attack
  • The incident is the latest in a series of confrontations between China and the Philippines in the crucial waterway
  • A crewmember of the Filipino vessel “sustained injuries due to the shattered glass caused by the water cannon,” said Tarriela

MANILA: The Philippines said one person was injured Tuesday when a water cannon attack by a China Coast Guard vessel shattered a window on the bridge of a fisheries bureau ship near a disputed shoal in the South China Sea.
Two Chinese ships used water cannons while in pursuit of the BRP Datu Gumbay Piang as it delivered rations to Filipino fishermen near the Beijing-controlled Scarborough Shoal, a Philippine Coast Guard spokesman said in a statement.
The incident is the latest in a series of confrontations between China and the Philippines in the crucial waterway, which Beijing claims almost entirely despite an international ruling that the assertion has no legal basis.
“This aggressive action lasted for about 29 minutes, resulting in significant damage, including shattered glass from the aft window of the bridge” and “damage to the captain’s cabin partitions,” said Commodore Jay Tarriela.
A crewmember of the Filipino vessel “sustained injuries due to the shattered glass caused by the water cannon,” said Tarriela, the coast guard’s spokesman for South China Sea issues.
A picture released by the Philippine coast guard showed a man with what appeared to be a lacerated ear.
The China Coast Guard on Tuesday evening released its own statement saying the Philippine ship had “deliberately rammed” a Chinese vessel.
Chinese ships had “taken control measures” on multiple vessels that had “insisted on illegally invading China’s territorial waters of Huangyan Dao,” China’s name for the Scarborough Shoal, they said.
An accompanying video showed the Philippine vessel — caught between two China Coast Guard ships — making contact with one of the Chinese ships after it was hit by the water cannon.
Tariella said the Filipino boat later sailed to a “safer position” away from the shoal following the encounter, which caused a short circuit aboard the vessel.
More than 60 percent of global maritime trade passes through the South China Sea.
Last month, a Chinese navy vessel collided with one from its own coast guard while chasing a Philippine patrol boat near Scarborough Shoal.
China seized control of the fish-rich shoal from the Philippines after a lengthy standoff in 2012.


UK protesters in court charged with supporting Palestine Action

UK protesters in court charged with supporting Palestine Action
Updated 22 min 57 sec ago

UK protesters in court charged with supporting Palestine Action

UK protesters in court charged with supporting Palestine Action
  • They were arrested after a protest in Westminster on July 5, when London’s Metropolitan Police detained 41 people for allegedly supporting the group

LONDON: The first people charged with supporting Palestine Action after the UK government banned it as a “terror” group appeared in court in London on Tuesday.
Hundreds of people have been arrested at protests accused of showing support for the pro-Palestinian organization since it was proscribed by the UK government in July.
The trio who appeared on Tuesday, two of whom are in their 70s, were greeted outside Westminster Magistrates’ Court by several dozen supporters, some chanting slogans and waving Palestinian flags.
Inside, more supporters packed the public gallery.
Jeremy Shippam, 72, Judit Murray, 71, and Fiona Maclean, 53, all entered not guilty pleas and were released on bail until a trial set for March 16 next year.
They were arrested after a protest in Westminster on July 5, when London’s Metropolitan Police detained 41 people for allegedly supporting the group.
They are accused of displaying an article in a public place and arousing reasonable suspicion that they are a supporter of a proscribed organization, according to the charge sheet.
The charges come under section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
They allegedly held placards reading “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action” prior to their arrest.
The government proscribed Palestine Action following several acts of vandalism, including against two planes at a Royal Air Force base which caused an estimated £7.0 million ($10 million) in damage.
At the time, Palestinian Action said: “Despite publicly condemning the Israeli Government, Britain continues to send military cargo, fly spy planes over Gaza and refuel US/Israeli fighter jets.”
“Britain isn’t just complicit, it’s an active participant in the Gaza genocide and war crimes across the Middle East.”
Critics of the ban, including the United Nations, have condemned it as legal overreach and a threat to free speech.
Kay Wagland, a fellow protester and friend of one of those charged, told AFP the government had banned a “non-violent direct action group as terrorist.”
“That means no-one can take any physical action. The protests are about this being a bad law,” the 66-year-old retired environmental projects manager said.
“It is a slippery slope,” warned another supporter, 69-year-old retired boat driver Sarah Green.
Since the ban came into force, there have been multiple protests and arrests.
Police said earlier this month they had arrested 890 people in one London protest on September 6, the majority under anti-terror laws.
Organizers of that protest, campaign group Defend our Juries (DOJ), said the rally had been the “picture of peaceful protest.”
Most demonstrators charged face six months in jail but organizers could be sentenced to up to 14 years if found guilty.
Six activists appeared in court on September 4 charged with “various offenses of encouraging support for a proscribed terrorist organization,” relating to 13 online meetings they attended to allegedly prepare for protests to support Palestine Action over the summer.


India launches first national policy on geothermal energy

India launches first national policy on geothermal energy
Updated 27 min 26 sec ago

India launches first national policy on geothermal energy

India launches first national policy on geothermal energy
  • New policy comes as Big Tech demand rises for low-carbon electricity to fuel AI growth
  • Under Prime Minister Modi, India has been aiming to become a global AI powerhouse

NEW DELHI: India has launched its first national geothermal energy policy to develop the country’s largely untapped resources, as New Delhi seeks to further its transition to clean energy.

Geothermal, which currently meets less than 1 percent of global energy demand, is considered a clean source of power that harnesses heat produced by the Earth from underground reservoirs for heating, cooling and electricity generation.

India has identified potential sites to explore and develop its geothermal energy sources, which include 381 hot springs and 10 geothermal provinces, including Ladakh, Himachal Pradesh and Gujarat.

“India’s renewable energy growth is vital for achieving ambitious climate change targets and the 2070 net-zero goal. India’s geothermal potential, rooted in its unique geological settings, remains largely untapped,” the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy said in the policy announcement on Monday.

The policy is aimed at establishing geothermal energy as “one of (the) major pillars in India’s renewable energy landscape” through incentives, regulations and improving capabilities for geothermal research, exploration, development and deployment.

It promotes joint ventures between geothermal developers and oil, gas, and mineral companies, and encourages such projects to be funded through foreign direct investment, concessional loans and international collaborations.

To support the development of the geothermal sector, the MNRE also suggested fiscal incentives, such as tax holidays and exemptions from import duty and property tax.

The government’s move to unlock the potential of geothermal energy comes amid its popularity as a source of low-carbon electricity for Big Tech companies to fuel artificial intelligence growth that provides continuous, around-the-clock power and does not depend on the weather, unlike solar and wind.

The policy was also launched amid Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s push to make India a global AI powerhouse.

India is already one of the fastest-growing markets for OpenAI, the US-based startup behind the popular ChatGPT application, which is set to open its first office in New Delhi later this year, targeting the nearly one billion internet users in the world’s most populous country.

Next to India’s AI boom, concerns have been growing about how data centers fueling AI, which consume staggering amounts of water and electricity, are straining India’s already scarce resources.

India is home to nearly 18 percent of the world’s population, but holds only 4 percent of its water resources, making it among the most water-stressed globally.

Increasing demand for water from AI, quantum computing, and high-performance computers may further compound the problem, especially as demand also increases with India’s growing population.

Yet India also has an opportunity to “leverage AI to enhance resource conservation while enforcing strict environmental standards” for data centers, according to Varundeep Kaur, chief information officer of the Indian fintech platform Spice Money.

“Incentives for water recycling and renewable energy adoption can align AI growth with sustainability,” she said in a commentary, “AI’s Hidden Thirst: The Water and Power Crisis in India’s Digital Boom,” published in late July.

“India’s AI ambitions must not come at the expense of its environmental future … By adopting cutting-edge cooling technologies, prioritizing renewable energy, and implementing robust regulations, India can lead in sustainable AI development.”


France repatriates three women, 10 children from Syrian camps

France repatriates three women, 10 children from Syrian camps
Updated 48 min 25 sec ago

France repatriates three women, 10 children from Syrian camps

France repatriates three women, 10 children from Syrian camps
PARIS: France on Tuesday repatriated three women and 10 children from Syrian prisons for alleged jihadists, anti-terror prosecutors said, in the first such operation in two years.
Repatriation is a deeply sensitive issue in France, which has been a target of Islamists over the last decade, notably in 2015, when jihadist gunmen and suicide bombers staged the worst attack on Paris since World War II, killing 130 people.
More than five years after the Islamic State group's territorial defeat in Iraq and Syria, tens of thousands of people are still held in Kurdish-run camps and prisons in northeastern Syria, many with alleged or perceived links to IS.
The women repatriated early Tuesday morning are aged between 18 and 34.
Two of them have been taken into police custody, while the third faces possible indictment, according to France's anti-terror unit PNAT.
The 10 children were handed over to child care services and will be monitored by the anti-terror unit and local prosecutors, it added.
France's foreign ministry thanked "the Syrian transitional authorities and the local administration in northeastern Syria for making the operation possible".
Since 2019, France has repatriated 179 children and 60 women, according to a diplomatic source.
The country halted such operations two years ago.

- 'Immense relief' -

Matthieu Bagard, the head of the Syria unit at Lawyers Without Borders, said that Tuesday's repatriation showed France "has the capacity to organise such operations".
Marie Dose, a lawyer who represents the repatriated women, hailed the move.
"For families who have waited more than six years for the return of their grandchildren, nephews and nieces, this is an immense and indescribable relief," Dose said in a statement to AFP.
But she added that 110 French children remained detained in the Roj camp controlled by Kurdish forces, describing France's repatriation policy as "arbitrary".
Dose accused France of seeking "to make these children pay for their parents' choices".
As of June, some 120 children "guilty of nothing" and 50 French women remained in the camps, according to the United Families Collective, which represents their families.
In February, the semi-autonomous Kurdish administration in northern Syria said that in coordination with the United Nations, it aimed to empty camps by the end of the year.

- International pressure -

Several European countries, such as Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands, have recovered many of their citizens from the Syrian camps.
International organisations have for years called on France to take back the wives and children of suspected IS fighters held in the camps since the group was ousted from its self-declared "caliphate" in 2019.
France has refused blanket repatriation, saying the return of potentially radicalised IS family members would pose security risks in France.
In 2022, Europe's top human rights court condemned France's refusal to repatriate two French women who were being held in Syria after joining their Islamist partners.
The following year, the United Nations Committee Against Torture said that in refusing to repatriate women and minors, France was violating the UN Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
On Monday, three French women went on trial in Paris, accused of travelling to the Middle East to join IS and taking their eight children with them.
One of the women is a niece of Jean-Michel and Fabien Clain, who claimed responsibility on behalf of the IS group for the 2015 attacks in Paris.