Trump administration deports hundreds of immigrants even as a judge orders their removals be stopped

Trump administration deports hundreds of immigrants even as a judge orders their removals be stopped
In this photo provided by El Salvador's presidential press office, a prison guard transfers deportees from the US, alleged to be Venezuelan gang members, to the Torrorism Confinement Center in Tecoluca, El Salvador, March 16, 2025. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 17 March 2025

Trump administration deports hundreds of immigrants even as a judge orders their removals be stopped

Trump administration deports hundreds of immigrants even as a judge orders their removals be stopped
  • The bar on deportations stands for up to 14 days and the immigrants will remain in federal custody during that time

The Trump administration has transferred hundreds of immigrants to El Salvador even as a federal judge issued an order temporarily barring the deportations under an 18th century wartime declaration targeting Venezuelan gang members, officials said Sunday. Flights were in the air at the time of the ruling.
US District Judge James E. Boasberg issued an order Saturday blocking the deportations but lawyers told him there were already two planes with immigrants in the air — one headed for El Salvador, the other for Honduras. Boasberg verbally ordered the planes be turned around, but they apparently were not and he did not include the directive in his written order.
“Oopsie…Too late,” Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele, a Trump ally who agreed to house about 300 immigrants for a year at a cost of $6 million in his country’s prisons, wrote on the social media site X above an article about Boasberg’s ruling. That post was recirculated by White House communications director Steven Cheung.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who negotiated an earlier deal with Bukele to house immigrants, posted on the site: “We sent over 250 alien enemy members of Tren de Aragua which El Salvador has agreed to hold in their very good jails at a fair price that will also save our taxpayer dollars.”
Steve Vladeck, a professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, said that Boasberg’s verbal directive to turn around the planes was not technically part of his final order but that the Trump administration clearly violated the “spirit” of it.
“This just incentivizes future courts to be hyper specific in their orders and not give the government any wiggle room,” Vladeck said.

The Department of Justice in court papers filed Sunday said some immigrants were already out of the country by the time the hold was issued Sunday night. The department added that it has appealed the order and would use other laws for deportations in coming days if the appeal is not successful.
The immigrants were deported after Trump’s declaration of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which has been used only three times in US history.
The law, invoked during the War of 1812 and World Wars I and II, requires a president to declare the United States is at war, giving him extraordinary powers to detain or remove foreigners who otherwise would have protections under immigration or criminal laws. It was last used to justify the detention of Japanese-American civilians during World War II.
A Justice Department spokesperson on Sunday referred to an earlier statement from Attorney General Pam Bondi blasting Boasberg’s ruling and didn’t immediately answer questions about whether the administration ignored the court’s order.
Venezuela’s government in a statement Sunday rejected the use of Trump’s declaration of the law, characterizing it as evocative of “the darkest episodes in human history, from slavery to the horror of the Nazi concentration camps.”
Tren de Aragua originated in an infamously lawless prison in the central state of Aragua and accompanied an exodus of millions of Venezuelans, the overwhelming majority of whom were seeking better living conditions after their nation’s economy came undone last decade. Trump seized on the gang during his campaign to paint misleading pictures of communities that he contended were “taken over” by what were actually a handful of lawbreakers.
The Trump administration has not identified the immigrants deported, provided any evidence they are in fact members of Tren de Aragua or that they committed any crimes in the United States. It did also send two top members of the Salvadoran MS-13 gang to El Salvador who had been arrested in the United States.
Video released by El Salvador’s government Sunday showed men exiting airplanes into an airport tarmac lined by officers in riot gear. The men, who had their hands and ankles shackled, struggled to walk as officers pushed their heads down to have them bend down at the waist.
The video also showed the men being transported to prison in a large convoy of buses guarded by police and military vehicles and at least one helicopter. The men were shown kneeling on the ground as their heads were shaved before they changed into the prison’s all-white uniform – knee-length shorts, T-shirt, socks and rubber clogs – and placed in cells.
The immigrants were taken to the notorious CECOT facility, the centerpiece of Bukele’s push to pacify his once violence-wracked country through tough police measures and limits on basic rights
The Trump administration said the president actually signed the proclamation contending Tren de Aragua was invading the United States Friday night but didn’t announce it until Saturday afternoon. Immigration lawyers said that, late Friday, they noticed Venezuelans who otherwise couldn’t be deported under immigration law being moved to Texas for deportation flights. They began to file lawsuits to halt the transfers.
“Basically any Venezuelan citizen in the US may be removed on pretext of belonging to Tren de Aragua, with no chance at defense,” Adam Isacson of the Washington Office for Latin America, a human rights group, warned on X.
The litigation that led to the hold on deportations was filed on behalf of five Venezuelans held in Texas who lawyers said were concerned they’d be falsely accused of being members of the gang. Once the act is invoked, they warned, Trump could simply declare anyone a Tren de Aragua member and remove them from the country.
Boasberg barred those Venezuelans’ deportations Saturday morning when the suit was filed, but only broadened it to all people in federal custody who could be targeted by the act after his afternoon hearing. He noted that the law has never before been used outside of a congressionally-declared war and that plaintiffs may successfully argue Trump exceeded his legal authority in invoking it.
The bar on deportations stands for up to 14 days and the immigrants will remain in federal custody during that time. Boasberg has scheduled a hearing Friday to hear additional arguments in the case.
He said he had to act because the immigrants whose deportations may actually violate the US Constitution deserved a chance to have their pleas heard in court.
“Once they’re out of the country,” Boasberg said, “there’s little I could do.”


Across Europe, nationalist parliament speakers spark controversy

Updated 17 sec ago

Across Europe, nationalist parliament speakers spark controversy

Across Europe, nationalist parliament speakers spark controversy
VIENNA: As far-right parties have topped polls across Europe in recent years, nationalist politicians have taken the helm of four parliaments, stirring controversy.
Czech lawmakers elected the country’s first-ever far-right parliament speaker on Wednesday, becoming the latest parliament in Europe to be headed by a nationalist and pro-Russian politician since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
One day after Czech far-right leader Tomio Okamura — who has called for an end to aid for Ukraine — was elected parliament speaker, he ordered the removal of the Ukrainian flag from the building, where it had been hoisted in solidarity.
Austrian historians this week also urged the Alpine country’s first far-right parliamentary speaker to call off a planned event on November 11 that “honors a declared antisemite,” the late politician Franz Dinghofer, Austria’s vice chancellor in the 1920s and a Nazi party member during World War II.
In Italy, Austria, Slovakia and the Czech Republic, nationalist politicians have won the parliamentary presidency, joining Hungary, where nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s party has held the post since 2010.
In all four countries, the change followed an agreement with other political parties, as the nationalists lacked an absolute majority.
And the elected parliament speakers were not from the same political party as the head of government, as is the case in Hungary.
According to Catherine Fieschi, a researcher at the Robert Schuman Center at the European University Institute of Florence, Orban “has paved the way” for the current trend.
Since Orban’s return to power in 2010, he “has shown that it is possible to remain in the European Union” without respecting its treaties, she said.
Moreover, the trend has accelerated since Donald Trump’s return to the White House, with the US president’s “character hardly acting as a repellent” in European countries marked by a different “political culture” and an “ambiguous” relationship with Russia, she added.
Due to some countries’ shared communist past and their geographical proximity to Moscow, they try to refrain from any “escalation” with Russia, Fieschi said.
These countries also benefit considerably from European funds, and fear they might have to share money from Brussels with countries such as Albania, Montenegro or even Ukraine that aim to join the EU, she added.

- ‘Gaining respectability’ -

For nationalist parties, which have seized on such concerns, taking the helm of parliament is a major step forward, experts told AFP.
In Slovakia, the Hlas party got the parliamentary presidency in March thanks to its support for nationalist premier Robert Fico’s party and the far-right SNS party since joining a coalition in 2023.
The Socialists and Democrats Group in the European parliament excluded Hlas from its parliamentary group, saying its positions on “Russia’s war in Ukraine, migration, the rule of law and the LGBTQ community have raised serious concerns and have no place in the progressive family.”
Austria’s far-right parliamentary speaker Walter Rosenkranz — who faces widespread criticism for being a member of a far-right student fraternity known for its strident pan-German nationalism — has not tried to build consensus beyond his own political camp since assuming office last year.
“For these parties, which have long been outside the system, taking control of presidencies allows them to counterbalance the executive branch, as governing parties have often sought coalitions due to their weakened position,” said Cyrille Bret, associate researcher at the Jacques Delors Institute.
This position is “particularly suited to protest parties in the process of gaining power,” he said.
“They can use their powers of oversight to criticize the government without assuming responsibility themselves, not to mention the budgetary gains.”
This also allows them to “raise their profile and gain respectability.”