șÚÁÏÉçÇű

Man arrested over UK tanker crash as abandoned vessels smolder at sea

Update Man arrested over UK tanker crash as abandoned vessels smolder at sea
The Stena Immaculate tanker that collided with Solong container vessel appear at a distance off the coast of Withernsea, east of England, on Mar. 11, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 11 March 2025

Man arrested over UK tanker crash as abandoned vessels smolder at sea

Man arrested over UK tanker crash as abandoned vessels smolder at sea
  • One crew member from the Portuguese-flagged Solong is assumed dead and the vessel is unlikely to stay afloat, maritime minister Mike Kane told parliament
  • “We have arrested a 59-year-old man on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter in connection with the collision,” police said

WITHERNSEA, England: British police arrested a man on Tuesday on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter after an unexplained collision at sea left a tanker carrying US army jet fuel with a gaping hole in its side and a container ship adrift and likely to sink.
The tanker, Stena Immaculate, which carries jet fuel for the US military, was at anchor on Monday when it was struck by the smaller Solong, causing huge fires and explosions, releasing fuel into the sea, and potentially posing a danger to wildlife.
One crew member from the Portuguese-flagged Solong is assumed dead and the vessel is unlikely to stay afloat, maritime minister Mike Kane told parliament.
Thirty-six people were brought ashore following the incident and no others remain missing, the coast guard said.
“We have arrested a 59-year-old man on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter in connection with the collision,” police said in a statement.
Aerial video on Tuesday showed a gaping hole in Stena Immaculate’s hull, with fire damage along its length, although the flames that engulfed it after the collision appeared to have subsided.
The Solong, which appeared badly burnt and smoldering in separate footage, had drifted south overnight, the coast guard said, adding that a one-kilometer (0.62 mile) exclusion zone had been placed around both vessels.
Owners of the Solong said the vessel was not carrying sodium cyanide, contrary to an earlier report from maritime data provider Lloyd’s List Intelligence, which cited the local coast guard, but conservation groups said the environmental impact from the spillage of jet fuel could prove wide reaching.
The Solang owners said they were monitoring four containers which had previously been used to store sodium cyanide.
The surrounding area is home to large colonies of protected seabirds including puffins and gannets as well as a delicate coastal ecosystem.

’UNLIKELY TO STAY AFLOAT’
“Modelling suggests that should the Solong remain afloat, it will remain clear of land for the next few hours,” Kane told parliament. “The assessment of (the coast guard) is, however, that it is unlikely the vessel will remain afloat.”
Earlier, Dutch marine provider Boskalis, appointed to salvage the Stena Immaculate tanker, said four ships carrying foam and extinguishing agents were heading to the scene.
Authorities are ready to deploy equipment to minimize pollution at sea, including spray dispersants for oil spills and containment booms, if required, the British government said.
The potential environmental impact is being assessed, coordinated by the Maritime and Coast Guard Agency and an East of England environmental group, and the situation is being monitored overhead by plane, the government added.
Local lawmaker Graham Stuart said most of the spilled jet fuel appeared now to have burned off and there was no sign of either ship leaking engine oil.
“Risks remain, however. It’s possible that heavy engine oil could yet leak,” Stuart said on X.
Conservation groups have warned of possible risks including the immediate poisoning of wildlife, damage to habitats on land, and the longer-term accumulation of toxins within food chains.
The coast guard statement cited the UK Health Security Agency as saying that “any public health risk on shore is currently deemed to be very low.”

UNEXPLAINED INCIDENT
Authorities and operators of the vessels have yet to offer an explanation of why multiple safety systems on board modern vessels failed to prevent Monday’s collision.
Data from maritime analytics website MarineTraffic showed the 183-meter (600 ft) Stena Immaculate was anchored off Immingham, northeast England, when it was struck by the 140-meter (460 ft) Solong, which was en route to Rotterdam.
The Solong was sailing at cruise speed and close to the maximum of around 18-19 knots, shipping sources said, and the vessel had sailed through the same area on past voyages.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s spokesman said there was currently no suggestion of “foul play.”
The Stena Immaculate was carrying 220,000 barrels of jet fuel in 16 segregated cargo tanks, but it was unclear how much of it was spilt after at least one tank was hit, Crowley, the US logistics group which operated the vessel, said on Monday.
While Britain’s Marine Accident Investigation Branch will gather initial evidence, overall responsibility for investigating the crash lies with the US and Portuguese authorities, the flag states of the vessels.


Princess of Wales pulls out of engagement at Royal Ascot

Updated 5 sec ago

Princess of Wales pulls out of engagement at Royal Ascot

Princess of Wales pulls out of engagement at Royal Ascot
Kate has been gradually returning to public duties since last fall
Racegoers had hoped to see Kate on Wednesday

LONDON: The Princess of Wales canceled plans to attend Royal Ascot on Wednesday as she continues to balance the demands of her public duties against the realities of her recovery from cancer.

Kate, as Prince William’s wife is commonly known, has been gradually returning to public duties since last fall, when she announced that she had completed chemotherapy and would return to work. At the time, she said her road to full recovery would be long and she would “take each day as it comes.”

Royal Ascot, a five-day series of horse races, is the centerpiece of the summer social season in Britain, with members of the royal family attending throughout the meeting.

Racegoers had hoped to see Kate on Wednesday, as Prince William was scheduled to awarding race prizes. William attended without his wife.

Kate, 42, announced on Sept. 9 that she had completed treatment six months after revealing she had an undisclosed type of cancer.

The announcement came six weeks after Buckingham Palace said King Charles III was also being treated for cancer, stretching the ability of the royal family to keep up with its busy schedule of public appearances. Charles has also returned to public duties.

Pakistan has had no new military cooperation with Iran since Israeli strikes began, defense minister Asif tells Arab News

Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif speaks with Arab News Pakistan in Islamabad, Pakistan, on June 17, 2025. (AN photo)
Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif speaks with Arab News Pakistan in Islamabad, Pakistan, on June 17, 2025. (AN photo)
Updated 29 min 29 sec ago

Pakistan has had no new military cooperation with Iran since Israeli strikes began, defense minister Asif tells Arab News

Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif speaks with Arab News Pakistan in Islamabad, Pakistan, on June 17, 2025. (AN photo)
  • Khawaja Asif says Pakistan is mobilizing China and Muslim countries to press for calm before Israel-Iran conflict engulfs entire region
  • Says Pakistan Army on high alert and nuclear security robust, warns Israeli government “will think many times before taking on Pakistan”

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif said on Monday that Islamabad had not engaged in any new military cooperation with Tehran since Israel launched attacks on Iran last week and had not held specific talks with the US over the escalating crisis in the Middle East.

Iran, which borders Pakistan, has hit back with strikes against Israel after it unleashed waves of attacks on Friday at Iranian nuclear installations, missile stockpiles, scientists and military commanders, among other targets, sparking global alarm that the conflict could erupt into a regional war.

The latest escalation follows months of hostilities between Israel and Iranian-backed groups in Lebanon, Syria and Yemen, which intensified after the war in Gaza was launched late in 2023.

Regional powers fear a direct confrontation could spiral into a broader conflict involving major oil shipping lanes and global energy supplies.

For Pakistan, a close Iranian neighbor and a longtime opponent of Israel, a prolonged conflict risks disrupting border security, inflaming sectarian tensions at home and possibly putting it in a tight spot with Arab allies and the West.

Pakistan’s Air Force fighter JF-17 fighter jets fly past during the multinational naval exercise AMAN-25 in the Arabian Sea near Karachi on February 10, 2025. (AFP)

Speaking to Arab News, Asif said regular security cooperation was continuing with Iran along their shared border to combat militant groups, but no fresh operational coordination had been initiated in response to Israel’s attacks on Iranian territory since June 13.

“I don’t see any need for it,” the defense minister said in response to a question on whether Pakistan’s military was coordinating with its Iranian counterparts on the border or engaging in any fresh defense cooperation.

“We coordinate on a very regular basis as far as the Iran and Pakistan border is concerned because of terrorist activities 
 that sort of cooperation is already on. So I don’t see any new activity.”

Asked if Pakistan had held talks with Washington to discuss the fast-evolving situation, the minister said there had been no contact specifically on the crisis in the past five days.

“But we are in constant touch with the United States of America regarding the tense situation we have in this region.”

Smoke rises following what Iran says was an Israeli attack on Sharan Oil depot in Tehran, Iran, June 16, 2025. (Reuters)

Asif said Pakistan’s leadership was instead focused on engagement with close partners like China and Muslim countries to press for calm, warning that the conflict risked engulfing the entire region.

“The countries who have religious affinity with us or geographical affinity, even China or other countries, because what we are pursuing is peace,” he said.

“And we would like to mobilize the countries of this region. This conflict can multiply and it can engulf the whole region into a situation which could be very, very disastrous.”

Diplomatic and security experts warn that the Israel-Iran hostilities could affect Pakistan by destabilizing its western border with Iran, threatening energy imports as oil prices surge and creating new pressures on Pakistan’s relations with the US and Gulf partners if Islamabad is seen as tilting too far toward Tehran.

On the other hand, if Tehran were to fall or be severely weakened, analysts say Pakistan would likely side with the US and its allies — despite being Iran’s immediate neighbor — to protect its strategic and economic interests.

Pakistani security personnel stand guard as pilgrims who evacuated from Iran walk at the Pakistan-Iran border in Taftan on June 16, 2025. (AFP)

Addressing concerns over past remarks by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that have drawn parallels between Iran and Pakistan as so-called militant Islamic regimes that needed to be deterred, Asif rejected any immediate threat to Pakistan from Tel Aviv, but stressed Islamabad would remain vigilant.

“If we are threatened by Israel, which I will discount at the moment 
 what happens in the coming months or years I can’t predict, but at the moment I discount (a threat from Israel),” he said.

He described Israel as a state with “hegemonic intent” whose recent actions in Gaza and against Iran were “extremely dangerous to the immediate region,” and said global public opinion was turning against Israeli policies despite support or muted reactions from many Western governments.

Asif declined to comment on reports that Pakistan had scrambled fighter jets near its nuclear sites and the Iranian border in response to Israel’s initial strikes on Iran but insisted that its nuclear security remained robust.

In addition to the Middle East tensions, Pakistan faced a major military standoff with India last month in which the two sides exchanged missile, drone and artillery attacks.

Iranian cargo trucks cross into the Pakistan-Iran border at Taftan, Balochistan province on June 18, 2025, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran. (AFP)

Islamabad claimed to have shot down six Indian jets and struck back at military positions, triggering fears of a wider conflict between the nuclear-armed rivals before a ceasefire was announced by the Trump administration on May 10.

When questioned about any direct threat to Pakistan’s national security or strategic assets as a result of the conflict in the Middle East, Asif said Pakistan’s armed forces were already on high alert following the latest confrontation with New Delhi, describing the country’s nuclear facilities as “very militantly guarded, very grudgingly guarded” and fully compliant with international safeguards.

“Since our short war with India, we have been on alert so we have not lowered guards 
 We can never take the risk of any attack on our nuclear facility from anywhere, that is something which is a lifeline as far as our defense is concerned,” he said.

A general view shows the destruction at the site of an overnight Iranian missile strike in Bat Yam on June 15, 2025. (AFP)

Asif said Pakistan’s performance in the recent fight with India was evidence of his country’s defense capability and national resolve, which would deter Israel from any adventurism.

“We have just had a bout with India and we clearly established our superiority, the superiority of our armed forces, air force, Pakistan army, Pakistan navy and the determination of our people, the way the nation stood behind the armed forces,” he said.

“So I think Netanyahu or his people or his government will think many times before taking on Pakistan.”


‘Nobody knows’: Trump won’t say whether he will move forward with US strikes on Iran

‘Nobody knows’: Trump won’t say whether he will move forward with US strikes on Iran
Updated 10 min 57 sec ago

‘Nobody knows’: Trump won’t say whether he will move forward with US strikes on Iran

‘Nobody knows’: Trump won’t say whether he will move forward with US strikes on Iran
  • Trump said: “I mean, nobody knows what I’m going to do”
  • Trump added that it’s not “too late” for Iran to give up its nuclear program

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump would not say Wednesday whether he has decided to order a US strike on Iran, a move that Tehran warned anew would be greeted with stiff retaliation if it happens.

“I may do it, I may not do it,” Trump said in an exchange with reporters at the White House . “I mean, nobody knows what I’m going to do.”

Trump added that it’s not “too late” for Iran to give up its nuclear program as he continues to weigh direct US involvement in Israel’s military operations aimed at crushing Tehran’s nuclear program.

“Nothing’s too late,” Trump said. “I can tell you this. Iran’s got a lot of trouble.”

“Nothing is finished until it is finished,” Trump added. But “the next week is going to be very big— maybe less than a week.”

Trump also offered a terse response to Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s refusal to heed to his call for Iran to submit to an unconditional surrender.

“I say good luck,” Trump said.

Khamenei earlier Wednesday warned that any United States strikes targeting the Islamic Republic will “result in irreparable damage for them” and that his country would not bow to Trump’s call for surrender.

Trump said Tuesday the US knows where Iran’s Khamenei is hiding as the the Israel-Iran conflict escalates but doesn’t want him killed — “for now.”

“He is an easy target, but is safe there — We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now,” Trump said.

Trump’s increasingly muscular comments toward the Iranian government come after he urged Tehran’s 9.5 million residents to flee for their lives as he cut short his participation in an international summit earlier this week to return to Washington for urgent talks with his national security team.

Trump said that the Iranian officials continue to reach out to the White House as they’re “getting the hell beaten out of them” by Israel. But he added there’s a “big difference between now and a week ago” in Tehran’s negotiating position.

“They’ve suggested that they come to the White House— that’s, you know, courageous,” Trump said.
Iran’s mission to the United Nations refuted Trump’s claim in a statement on social media. “No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House. The only thing more despicable than his lies is his cowardly threat to ‘take out’ Iran’s Supreme Leader. ”

The US president said earlier this week Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to serve a mediator with. But Trump said he told Putin to keep focused on finding an endgame to his own conflict with Ukraine.

“I said, ‘Do me a favor, mediate your own,’” Trump said he told Putin. “I said, ‘Vladimir, let’s mediate Russia first. You can worry about this later.’”

The Russia-Iran relationship has deepened since Putin launched a war on Ukraine in February 2022, with Tehran providing Moscow with drones, ballistic missiles, and other support, according to US intelligence findings.


German minister to Iran: never too late to negotiate

German minister to Iran: never too late to negotiate
Updated 18 June 2025

German minister to Iran: never too late to negotiate

German minister to Iran: never too late to negotiate
  • “It is never too late to come to the negotiating table if one comes with sincere intentions,” Johann Wadephul said
  • Wadephul said Israel’s fear that Iran would develop nuclear weapons was justified

BERLIN: Germany’s foreign minister appealed to Iran’s leaders to make credible assurances that it is not seeking a nuclear weapon and to show it is willing to find a negotiated solution as fears mount of further military escalation between Iran and Israel.

“We are still ready to negotiate a solution. However, Iran must act urgently ... it is never too late to come to the negotiating table if one comes with sincere intentions,” Johann Wadephul said at a news conference with his Jordanian counterpart on Wednesday.

Wadephul said Israel’s fear that Iran would develop nuclear weapons was justified and it had a right to self-defense.

“The Israeli decision to do something against this threat is comprehensible,” he said, adding civilian deaths on both sides were regrettable after air attacks between Iran and Israel.

His ministry was arranging special flights later on Wednesday and on Thursday to each repatriate about 180 German citizens via Amman, he said.

Wadephul also said Germany had agreed to create an economic council with Syria to improve cooperation and boost prosperity and stability there.


Hegseth says the Pentagon has given Trump possible options for Israel-Iran conflict

Hegseth says the Pentagon has given Trump possible options for Israel-Iran conflict
Updated 18 June 2025

Hegseth says the Pentagon has given Trump possible options for Israel-Iran conflict

Hegseth says the Pentagon has given Trump possible options for Israel-Iran conflict
  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said ‘maximum force protection’ was being provided for US troops in the Middle East
  • He said that it is Trump’s decision whether to provide Israel a ‘bunker buster’ bomb to strike at the core of Iran’s nuclear program

WASHINGTON: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told lawmakers Wednesday that the Pentagon was providing possible options to President Donald Trump as he decides next steps on Iran but would not say whether the military was planning to assist with Israeli strikes, an action that could risk dragging America into a wider war in the Middle East.
Hegseth was on Capitol Hill for the last of his series of often combative hearings before lawmakers, who have pressed him on everything from a ban on transgender troops to his use of a Signal chat to share sensitive military plans earlier this year.
In questioning before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Hegseth said “maximum force protection” was being provided for US troops in the Middle East and that it is Trump’s decision whether to provide Israel a ”bunker buster” bomb to strike at the core of Iran’s nuclear program, which would require US pilots flying a B-2 stealth bomber. He would not indicate what the US may do next.
“My job — our job, the chairman and I — at all times is to make sure the president has options and is informed of what those options might be and what the ramifications of those options might be,” Hegseth said, referring to Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who was testifying alongside him.
The US has shifted significant numbers of refueling tanker and fighter aircraft to position them to be able to respond to the escalating conflict, such as supporting possible evacuations, or airstrikes. Hegseth said this week that was done to protect US personnel and air bases.
Hegseth, who is appearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Wednesday, has spent vast amounts of time during his first months in office promoting the social changes he’s making at the Pentagon. He’s been far less visible in the administration’s more critical international security crises and negotiations involving Russia, Ukraine, Israel, Gaza and Iran.