BBC apologizes over Gaza documentary narrated by son of Hamas figure

BBC apologizes over Gaza documentary narrated by son of Hamas figure
The BBC apologised on Thursday for "serious flaws" in the making of a Gaza documentary after it emerged that the child narrator was the son of Hamas's former deputy minister of agriculture. (X/@Osint613)
Short Url
Updated 27 February 2025

BBC apologizes over Gaza documentary narrated by son of Hamas figure

BBC apologizes over Gaza documentary narrated by son of Hamas figure
  • The broadcaster said that it shared the blame for the “unacceptable” flaws with the production company
  • “BBC News takes full responsibility for these and the impact that these have had on the Corporation’s reputation. We apologize“

LONDON: The BBC apologized on Thursday for “serious flaws” in the making of a Gaza documentary after it emerged that the child narrator was the son of Hamas’s former deputy minister of agriculture.
The BBC removed its documentary, “Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone,” from its platform after a backlash and launched an immediate review into the “mistakes,” which it called “significant and damaging.”
The BBC said in a press release published Thursday that the review had identified “serious flaws in the making of this program,” which was produced by UK company Hoyo Films.
The broadcaster said that it shared the blame for the “unacceptable” flaws with the production company.
“BBC News takes full responsibility for these and the impact that these have had on the Corporation’s reputation. We apologize,” it added.

The independent production company was asked in writing “a number of times” during the making of the documentary about any potential connections the narrator might have with Hamas.
“Since transmission, they have acknowledged that they knew that the boy’s father was a deputy agriculture minister in the Hamas government; they have also acknowledged that they never told the BBC this fact,” said the press release.
“It was then the BBC’s own failing that we did not uncover that fact and the documentary was aired.”
The production company also revealed that they paid the boy’s mother “a limited sum of money” for the narration.
The BBC is seeking additional assurance that no money was paid directly or indirectly to Hamas.
UK culture minister Lisa Nandy told parliament earlier Thursday that she had demanded “cast-iron” guarantees that Hamas did not receive any money for the documentary after the opposition Conservative party brought an urgent question and called for a public inquiry.
“I also held discussions with the BBC director general earlier this week, at my request, in order to seek urgent answers about the checks and due diligence that should have been carried out,” she added.
The revelations sparked an angry response and led to protests outside the BBC’s London headquarters.
A spokesperson for Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) said: “The BBC’s bias and lack of accountability have led it to a new low, where it is a mouthpiece for terrorists and their supporters.”
The Telegraph also reported Tuesday that the Arabic words for Jew or Jews were changed to Israel or Israeli forces or removed from the documentary.
The broadcaster is now working to determine whether any disciplinary action is warranted “in relation to shortcomings in the making of this program.”
“This will include issues around the use of language, translation and continuity that have also been raised with the BBC,” it said.
The decision to remove the documentary from its catch-up service also led to criticism, with more than 500 TV and film workers — including former England footballer Gary Lineker — sending an open letter calling the move “politically-motivated censorship.”
“This film is an essential piece of journalism, offering an all-too-rare perspective on the lived experiences of Palestinian children living in unimaginable circumstances, which amplifies voices so often silenced,” said the letter.
The documentary was initially broadcast on February 17.


Microsoft terminates Israel’s access to technology it used for mass surveillance of Palestinians

Microsoft terminates Israel’s access to technology it used for mass surveillance of Palestinians
Updated 4 min 14 sec ago

Microsoft terminates Israel’s access to technology it used for mass surveillance of Palestinians

Microsoft terminates Israel’s access to technology it used for mass surveillance of Palestinians
  • It follows reports that Israeli military surveillance agency used Microsoft cloud services to store millions of phone calls made in Gaza and West Bank since 2022
  • The intelligence obtained from the call data was reportedly used to plan military bombing campaigns

DUBAI: Microsoft has terminated the Israeli military’s access to technology it used for the mass surveillance of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.

The tech firm informed Israeli authorities it would “cease and disable specified IMOD (Israel Ministry of Defense) subscriptions and their services, including their use of specific cloud storage and AI services and technologies,” Brad Smith, the vice-chair and president of Microsoft said in a company memo and blog post on Thursday.

Cybersecurity services provided by the company to Israel and other countries in the Middle East are not affected, he added.

The decision follows the preliminary findings of a formal review launched by Microsoft last month in response to a report by The Guardian newspaper on an investigation it carried out in partnership with the Israeli-Palestinian publication +972 Magazine, and the Hebrew-language news site Local Call.

The joint investigation found Israel’s military surveillance agency, Unit 8200, used Microsoft Azure cloud services to store recordings of millions of cellphone calls made by Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank since 2022.

The intelligence obtained from the call data stored in Azure was reportedly used by Unit 8200 to identify targets for military bombing campaigns. When planning airstrikes in densely populated areas containing many civilians, intelligence officers would analyze calls from Palestinians located nearby, sources said. They described the system as indiscriminate and intrusive, labeling it a tool that had turned an entire population into the “enemy.”

During development of the system, Microsoft and Unit 8200 engineers collaborated to implement advanced security measures in Azure that met the standards required by the Israeli agency. The project was highly secretive, and Microsoft staff were instructed not to make any mention of Unit 8200.

To protect the privacy rights of cellphone users, the Microsoft review did not access the IMOD data but instead focused on the company’s own business records, including internal documents and email communications, Smith said.

“We do not provide technology to facilitate mass surveillance of civilians,” he added. “We have applied this principle in every country around the world, and we have insisted on it repeatedly for more than two decades.”


AP, Reuters demand answers from Israeli government on airstrike that killed journalists last month

AP, Reuters demand answers from Israeli government on airstrike that killed journalists last month
Updated 25 September 2025

AP, Reuters demand answers from Israeli government on airstrike that killed journalists last month

AP, Reuters demand answers from Israeli government on airstrike that killed journalists last month

NEW YORK: Two major news agencies demanded that Israel explain what happened during a strike on a hospital in Gaza last month that killed five journalists, calling for concrete actions and accountability to ensure it doesn’t happen again.
Reuters and The Associated Press — through their top editors, Alessandra Galloni and Julie Pace — urged the Israeli government to “explain the deaths of these journalists and to take every step to protect those who continue to cover this conflict.” Their statement came on the one-month anniversary of the strike.
Killed in the strikes were five journalists, including visual journalist Mariam Dagga, who worked for AP and other news organizations; Reuters cameraman Hussam Al-Masri; and Moaz Abu Taha, a freelance journalist whose work had been published by Reuters. Seventeen others were killed in the strike.
“We renew our demand for a clear account from the Israeli authorities and urge the government to uphold its obligations to ensure press freedom and protection,” the statement from the AP and Reuters said. “We remain devastated and outraged by their deaths.”
The journalists died at the Nasser Hospital, which the agencies pointed out is a location protected under international law and “widely known to be crucial for news coverage out of Gaza.”
“An incident of this gravity requires a prompt and clear explanation, followed by accountability and concrete actions to ensure such attacks are never repeated,” the statement said.
The two agencies wrote a joint letter immediately after the attack, but that Israel has not responded. The Israeli military said it launched an investigation into the incident.
The Gaza war has been deadly for those covering it. Nearly 200 journalists and media workers have been killed in the region since the attacks by Hamas on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. Comparatively, 18 journalists have been killed so far in Russia’s war in Ukraine, according to the CPJ.
AP reporting on the attack on the hospital raised serious questions about Israel’s rationale for the strikes and the way they were carried out.
The agencies’ statement was issued a day before Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was scheduled to address the UN General Assembly during its annual leaders’ meeting.
Dagga, 33, was among the war’s victims. She and the four other reporters were killed when Israeli forces struck Nasser Hospital in the Gaza town of Khan Younis, along with 17 other people.
The Israeli military said it targeted what it believed was a Hamas surveillance camera in the hospital attack, without providing evidence, and that the journalists weren’t the targets. The prime minister called the attack a ‘“mishap.’’


Media giants release film urging Israel to grant Gaza access to foreign journalists

Media giants release film urging Israel to grant Gaza access to foreign journalists
Updated 25 September 2025

Media giants release film urging Israel to grant Gaza access to foreign journalists

Media giants release film urging Israel to grant Gaza access to foreign journalists
  • The short film from the BBC, AFP, Reuters and AP times to coincide with the UN General Assembly taking place in New York

LONDON: Four major international news agencies have released a film that urges Israel to allow foreign journalists into Gaza.

The short film from the BBC, AFP, Reuters and AP, times to coincide with the UN General Assembly taking place in New York, features historic journalistic footage from conflicts such as World War II, Vietnam, Tiananmen Square, the Rwandan genocide, the Syrian refugee crisis and the war in Ukraine.

“History is told by those who report it,” it begins, narrated by BBC journalist David Dimbleby.

“The report of a child’s body washed up on a beach revealed the stark reality of the Syrian refugee crisis; in Ukraine, journalists from around the world risk their lives every day to report the suffering of the people,” he said, over a slideshow of wartime images.

“But when it comes to Gaza, the job of reporting falls solely to Palestinian journalists who are paying a terrible cost, leaving fewer to bear witness.”

 

 

The BBC said in a statement on Thursday that the film aims “to highlight the importance of independent journalism throughout key moments in recent history.”

Deborah Turness, CEO of BBC News, said: “As journalists, we record the first draft of history. But in this conflict, reporting is falling solely to a small number of Palestinian journalists, who are paying a terrible cost.”

Foreign journalists have been barred from entering the enclave since the onset of Israel’s war in Gaza, which followed the attack by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023. Only a select few have been escorted in under tight military control, sparking accusations of censorship and a lack of transparency.

Israel has cited security concerns for the restrictions. In a statement last year, the Israel Defense Forces claimed journalists were accompanied “to ensure safety” in battlefield areas.

Media watchdogs and human rights groups have described the Gaza conflict as the deadliest for journalists.

According to the UN Human Rights Office, at least 248 Palestinian journalists have been killed in Israeli attacks on Gaza since the war began. The Israeli government denies they are deliberately targeted.

“We must now be let into Gaza. To work alongside local journalists, so we can all bring the facts to the world,” Turness said.

The new film premiered in New York on Wednesday night during an event hosted by the Committee to Protect Journalists.

Israel is facing mounting international pressure to end the war on Gaza after a wave of Western countries formally recognized the State of Palestine this week amid renewed backing for a two-state solution to the decades-long conflict.

The war has killed more than 65,000 people in Gaza, according to local authorities, and triggered a catastrophic humanitarian crisis marked by famine and widespread displacement.

In response to the diplomatic shift, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to prevent the creation of a Palestinian state and threatened to annex parts of the occupied West Bank, defying growing global calls for a negotiated solution.

In previous months, the four media outlets had issued joint statements expressing concern over the humanitarian conditions faced by journalists in Gaza, including hunger, displacement and the risk of death.

In August, 27 countries, including the UK, issued a joint statement urging Israel to allow immediate foreign media access to Gaza and condemning attacks on journalists.


Jimmy Kimmel returns from suspension, late-night show reaches ratings high

Jimmy Kimmel returns from suspension, late-night show reaches ratings high
Updated 25 September 2025

Jimmy Kimmel returns from suspension, late-night show reaches ratings high

Jimmy Kimmel returns from suspension, late-night show reaches ratings high
  • “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” achieved the ratings milestone, even though the show did not reach about one-quarter of American households

WASHINGTON: Millions of people tuned in to “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” on Tuesday to watch the host’s return to late-night television after a nearly week-long suspension, propelling the show to a 10-year ratings high among adult viewers, ABC said.
The network said 6.26 million viewers watched Kimmel as he used sincerity and humor to thank his supporters while addressing remarks he made on September 15 about the man accused of assassinating conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
It was the highest-rated regularly scheduled episode of the late-night show, which typically attracts an average of 1.42 million nightly viewers, ABC said.
“Jimmy Kimmel Live!” achieved the ratings milestone, even though the show did not reach about one-quarter of American households. ABC affiliates in several major markets did not carry the show, which aired hours after network parent Walt Disney lifted Kimmel’s suspension.
On social media, the monologue attracted nearly 26 million views, ABC reported. That included 15.3 million views on Alphabet’s YouTube, and another 6.3 million on Meta’s Instagram by late Wednesday afternoon.
His monologue featured video of President Donald Trump speaking from Air Force One, saying the late-night comedian has “no talent” and “no ratings.”
“Well, I do tonight!” said a smiling Kimmel, as the studio audience stood in applause. “You almost have to feel sorry for him.”

PRESSURE FROM TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

Kimmel returned to the air six days after his remarks about Kirk’s accused killer provoked social media outrage and pressure from Trump’s administration.
ABC parent Disney’s decision to cut short Kimmel’s exile marked a high-profile act of corporate defiance in the face of Trump’s escalating crackdown on perceived enemies in the media through litigation and regulatory threats. Disney was also under pressure from Kimmel’s fans, some of whom were canceling subscriptions to the company’s streaming services Disney+ and Hulu. Kimmel alluded to that in his monologue, joking that the company had asked him to read some remarks on the air.
“To reactivate your Disney+ and Hulu account, open the Disney+ app on your smart TV or TV-connected device,” he read. Kimmel defended political satire against “bullying” from Trump and officials in his administration. Kimmel’s voice choked with emotion, moments after he took the stage to a standing ovation, and he said: “It was never my intention to make light of the murder of a young man. I don’t think there’s anything funny about it.”
Last week, Kimmel said Trump’s supporters were eager to characterize Kirk’s assassin “as anything other than one of them” and accused them of trying to “score political points” from Kirk’s killing.
Before Tuesday’s broadcast, Trump said on his Truth Social online platform that he “can’t believe” ABC gave Kimmel back his show, and hinted at further action against the network. Trump’s post called Kimmel “yet another arm” of the Democratic National Committee, and characterized the comedian’s jokes about the Republican administration as “a major illegal Campaign Contribution. I think we’re going to test ABC out on this.” Previously, Trump had said Kimmel was fired for “bad ratings.”
The late-night format has been struggling for years, as more viewers have abandoned cable television and migrated to streaming. Younger viewers, in particular, are more apt to find amusement on YouTube or TikTok, leaving smaller audiences and declining ad revenues for traditional TV.

NEXSTAR OPTS OUT OF KIMMEL
Nexstar Media Group and Sinclair both opted on Tuesday to keep “Jimmy Kimmel Live” off their combined 70 owned and operated ABC stations, which account for about 23 percent of US households. That meant the show was not seen over the air in places like Seattle; Salt Lake City, Utah; Nashville and New Orleans, among other markets. It also did not air in Washington, D.C.
Nexstar said Wednesday that it is evaluating the status of the show, which it will continue to pre-empt on its ABC-affiliated local television stations.
“We are engaged in productive discussions with executives at The Walt Disney Company, with a focus on ensuring the program reflects and respects the diverse interests of the communities we serve,” the company said in a statement.
Still, Disney offers Kimmel’s show for viewing on a number of streaming apps, which are accessible all over the country.
Following Kimmel’s remarks last week, US Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr threatened an investigation of ABC and its affiliates. He urged television stations to drop Kimmel’s show or face possible fines and revocation of their broadcast licenses. “We can do this the easy way or the hard way,” Carr said on September 17, which brought calls for his resignation from Democrats and sharp criticism from Republicans including Senator Ted Cruz.
On Wednesday, US Senate Majority Leader John Thune told CNN that programmers should make decisions and the government should not coerce broadcasters, but stopped short of saying either Carr or Trump made mistakes. “This isn’t an area that I think the FCC ought to be wandering into,” Thune said.
In his monologue, Kimmel thanked Cruz and other conservatives who did not support his views but supported his right to express them.
“I don’t think I’ve ever said this before, but Ted Cruz is right,” Kimmel said to a chorus of laughter.


Meta CEO Zuckerberg says Instagram has grown to 3 billion monthly active users

Meta CEO Zuckerberg says Instagram has grown to 3 billion monthly active users
Updated 24 September 2025

Meta CEO Zuckerberg says Instagram has grown to 3 billion monthly active users

Meta CEO Zuckerberg says Instagram has grown to 3 billion monthly active users
  • Some firms have estimated that Instagram will make up more than half of Meta’s US ad revenue this year

LONDON: Meta Platforms’ Instagram has grown to 3 billion Monthly Active Users, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said on Wednesday, marking another milestone for one of the most popular social media apps in the world.
Meta last disclosed Instagram’s user figures in 2022 when Zuckerberg said the app had hit more than 2 billion monthly active users.
Meta, previously known as Facebook, bought Instagram for $1 billion in 2012, a move that had raised questions about the company’s strategy as the social media app had begun with just photo-sharing without significant revenue.
Since then the app has grown astronomically and some firms have estimated it will make up more than half of Meta’s US ad revenue this year.
A major factor contributing to Instagram’s success is the Reels feature which launched in 2020 and allows users to create short-form content — a market that faces fierce competition from rivals such as TikTok and Google-owned YouTube shorts.
TikTok, owned by Chinese technology behemoth ByteDance, has more than 1 billion users globally who visit monthly, a company spokesperson said earlier this month.