Trump’s Pentagon shakeup puts military in political spotlight

US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, alongside Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Charles Q. Brown, Jr. (L), speaks with the media during his first official arrival at the Pentagon as Secretary in Washington, DC, January 27, 2025. (AFP)
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, alongside Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Charles Q. Brown, Jr. (L), speaks with the media during his first official arrival at the Pentagon as Secretary in Washington, DC, January 27, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 25 February 2025

Trump’s Pentagon shakeup puts military in political spotlight

Trump’s Pentagon shakeup puts military in political spotlight
  • Trump announced late Friday that he was firing top US military officer General Charles “CQ” Brown less than two years into his four-year term as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump has launched a sweeping shakeup of the Pentagon, firing top officers and moving to lay off thousands of civilian workers as he seeks to align the US military with his priorities.
The removal of the officers has pushed the Pentagon into the political spotlight, with Democrats accusing Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth of seeking to politicize the military and ensure it is led by people personally loyal to the president.
Remaining above the political fray is a core principle for the US armed forces, with troops even barred from engaging in some types of political activity in order to maintain the military’s neutrality.
Hegseth has insisted the president is simply choosing the leaders he wants, saying “there is civilian control of the military. Nothing about this is unprecedented.”
Trump “deserves to pick his key national security and military advisory team,” Hegseth told “Fox News Sunday.”
But Senator Jack Reed — the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee — argued that “what Trump and Hegseth are trying to do is to politicize the Department of Defense.”
“It’s the beginning of a very, very serious degradation of the military,” Reed said on ABC’s “This Week.”
Trump announced late Friday that he was firing top US military officer General Charles “CQ” Brown less than two years into his four-year term as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Hegseth then said he was also seeking a replacement for top US Navy officer Admiral Lisa Franchetti, as well as the Air Force vice chief of staff and three top military lawyers.
The shakeup of senior personnel came after the Pentagon announced it aims to cut at least five percent of its more than 900,000-person civilian workforce, saying the decision was taken “to produce efficiencies and refocus the department on the president’s priorities.”

Representative Adam Smith, the ranking Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, said Trump fired Brown as well as thousands of federal employees “not because they weren’t competent or good at their jobs, but because Trump wants sycophants.”
“Anyone who doesn’t pledge loyalty has to go,” Smith said in a video posted on X, adding: “That really undermines the competence and capability of the people serving our country.”
Trump administration officials have defended the firings, with Deputy Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson arguing that the removal of the senior officers is in keeping with past presidential actions.
“Truman fired General MacArthur. Lincoln fired General McClellan. Obama fired General McChrystal. Yet the Fake News still claims we’re in ‘uncharted territory,’” Wilson wrote on X.
But those generals were fired due to specific problems — Douglas MacArthur for overstepping his authority and defying orders, George McClellan for insufficient aggression on the battlefield and Stanley McChrystal because he and his aides reportedly criticized US officials.
No accusations of misconduct have been made against the recently removed officers, with Hegseth saying Brown is “an honorable man” but “not the right man for the moment.”
Seth Jones, president of the Defense and Security Department at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that while there are various examples of senior officers being relieved, “it has generally been for competence issues.”
“This does not appear to have been, at least to a significant degree, about the competence of General Brown, for example,” and if the removals were not based on performance, “then this is uncommon.”
Jones said he does not however think that “at this point... the vast majority of the uniformed military has been politicized.”
It is when civilian and uniformed leaders disagree that “you judge whether the military has been politicized. Are they giving their best military judgment on an issue, which is what they’re sworn to do? So we’ll have to see,” he said.


ICC confirms charges against Ugandan warlord Kony

Updated 5 sec ago

ICC confirms charges against Ugandan warlord Kony

ICC confirms charges against Ugandan warlord Kony
Under ICC procedure, a trial would normally follow the confirmation of charges
Judges said there were reasonable grounds to believe Kony was responsible for 29 charges as an “indirect co-perpetrator“

THE HAGUE: The International Criminal Court Thursday confirmed all 39 charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity allegedly committed by fugitive Uganda warlord Joseph Kony, including murder, enslavement, rape, and torture.
The leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army spearheaded a campaign of terror across northern Uganda between July 2002 and December 2005.
Under ICC procedure, a trial would normally follow the confirmation of charges. However, the court does not allow trials in absentia, and Kony has not been seen in public since 2006.
Judges said there were reasonable grounds to believe Kony was responsible for 29 charges as an “indirect co-perpetrator.”
This related to LRA attacks on a school and camps for internally displaced people and included murder, torture, forced marriage, forced pregnancy, rape, and conscripting children younger than 15.
The ICC also said Kony had a case to answer as a direct perpetrator in 10 cases related to two victims forced to be his “wives.”
These charges included enslavement, forced marriage, rape, forced pregnancy, and sexual slavery.
A former Catholic altar boy, Kony headed the feared LRA, whose insurgency against the Ugandan government saw more than 100,000 people killed and 60,000 children abducted, according to the United Nations.
His stated aim was to establish a nation based on the Bible’s 10 commandments but those who escaped told gruesome tales of the group’s brutality, being forced to hack or even bite others to death, eat human remains, and drink blood.
His last-known appearance was in 2006, when he told a Western journalist he was “not a terrorist” and that stories of LRA brutality were “propaganda.”
It is not known whether he is even still alive.

- ‘Tools of war’ -

In September, the ICC held a three-day “confirmation of charges” hearing in The Hague on the Kony case — the first-ever to be held without the suspect present.
His defense lawyer Peter Haynes argued during the hearing that the case should be frozen, as Kony had no way of challenging evidence in his absence.
The ICC judges rejected this request, they said in Thursday’s statement.
A lawyer for the victims, Sarah Pellet, laid out searing testimony of some of the atrocities suffered at the hands of the LRA.
The victims “had no choice when they were forced to watch killings. They had no choice when they were made to kill. They had no choice when their bodies were turned into tools of war,” Pellet told the court.
The court said neither party could appeal the decision until Kony had been informed — almost certainly a moot point.
The ICC prosecutor’s office said that confirming the charges was “a crucial step in holding Kony accountable for the grave crimes attributed to him.”
The office said it had an “unwavering commitment to pursuing justice for the victims of the crimes of the LRA and affected communities in northern Uganda.”
Several victims told AFP in Uganda that the confirmation of charges could not diminish the harm caused.
“ICC confirming Joseph Kony’s atrocities against us was expected, but is it erasing the suffering we suffered?,” said Angel Stella Lalam, a Kony victim who now heads the War Victims and Networking Organization based in Gulu city, the epicenter of the armed insurgency.
Lalam told AFP by phone that she was abducted as a child and only returned to her family more than a decade later.
“The confirmation of charges is cosmetic and does not address the suffering of the victims, especially when he is not in the dock and still at large,” she added.
Alex Okello, 56, a local leader in Pabbo, north of Gulu, said he wanted to see Kony actually face justice.
“The confirmation of charges against Kony is good but it’s not making us comfortable because he has not been arrested and he can kill more people,” Okello added.