UN food agency WFP received dozens of US stop work orders despite emergency waiver

UN food agency WFP received dozens of US stop work orders despite emergency waiver
The WFP was ordered by Washington to stop work on dozens of US-funded grants, according to an email seen by Reuters, that was sent five days after Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a waiver for emergency food assistance. (Reuters/File)
Short Url
Updated 07 February 2025

UN food agency WFP received dozens of US stop work orders despite emergency waiver

UN food agency WFP received dozens of US stop work orders despite emergency waiver
  • Several of the suspended grants are under the Food for Peace Title II program
  • The program, which makes up the bulk of US international food assistance, is co-administered by the US Department of Agriculture and USAID

WASHINGTON/LOS ANGELES: The UN World Food Programme (WFP) was ordered by Washington to stop work on dozens of US-funded grants, according to an email seen by Reuters, that was sent five days after Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a waiver for emergency food assistance.
The US Agency for International Development (USAID) grants, at various stages of progression, are worth tens of millions of dollars and provide food assistance in impoverished countries including Yemen, Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan, South Sudan, Central African Republic, Haiti and Mali.
The US State Department and the World Food Programme did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Several of the suspended grants are under the Food for Peace Title II program, which spends about $2 billion annually on the donation of US commodities. The program, which makes up the bulk of US international food assistance, is co-administered by the US Department of Agriculture and USAID.
Just hours after taking office on January 20, Trump ordered a 90-day foreign aid pause so contributions could be reviewed to see if they align with his “America First” foreign policy. The US is the world’s largest aid donor.
The State Department then wrote a January 24 “stop work” cable — seen by Reuters — for all existing foreign assistance and paused new aid, but said Rubio had given an exemption for emergency food assistance. He also approved a waiver on January 28 for life-saving humanitarian help, defined as core life-saving medicine, medical services, food and shelter.

’FAR REACHING CONSEQUENCES’
But on January 29, WFP — whose executive director is American Cindy McCain — received an email, seen by Reuters, from USAID’s Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance listing dozens of project numbers subjected to a stop work order.
A senior WFP official in Washington responded with a list of clarifying questions, according to the email. In another note, seen by Reuters, the same official raised concerns about the pause in Title II and Commodity Credit Corporation awards.
“The pause in Title II and CCC awards has disrupted WFP’s massive food supply chain, affecting over 507,000 metric tons (MT) of food valued at more than $340 million,” the WFP official wrote.
The official noted that some of that food was currently en route by sea, more was stored in 23 countries and some was in overland transport. They added that “a substantial quantity of food is currently being loaded at ports like Houston and other locations across the US domestic supply chain.”
“The scale of this disruption underscores the far-reaching consequences of the funding pause on global food assistance efforts. WFP is in the process of analyzing the impact this has on the extremely vulnerable beneficiaries in severe humanitarian contexts that receive this lifesaving assistance,” the WFP official wrote.
The Trump administration’s effort to slash and reshape American foreign aid is crippling the intricate global system that aims to prevent and respond to famine, according to humanitarian organizations.
USAID has been a target of a government reorganization program spearheaded by businessman Elon Musk, a close Trump ally. The Trump administration plans to keep fewer than 300 USAID staff out of the agency’s thousands of staff.
Trump’s incoming UN Ambassador Elize Stefanik praised WFP as “a very successful program” when she appeared before the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee last month. She noted that WFP has “significant bipartisan support” in Congress.


Australia to step up sanctions against Afghan Taliban

Australia to step up sanctions against Afghan Taliban
Updated 7 sec ago

Australia to step up sanctions against Afghan Taliban

Australia to step up sanctions against Afghan Taliban
  • Human Rights Watch welcomes move that could see more targeted moves against regime figures
  • UN has warned of ‘gender apartheid’ in Afghanistan, while persecution of minorities is commonplace

LONDON: Australia’s new sanctions proposals against the Afghan Taliban are an “important step toward accountability” for the regime in Kabul, Human Rights Watch has said.

Amendments proposed to Canberra’s sanctions regime will allow Australia to target Taliban officials more directly, including through travel bans.

HRW said the changes to the Autonomous Sanctions Regulations would affect those involved in the oppression of females and minorities, as well as those “undermining good governance and the rule of law” in the country.

“It’s crucial for the Australian government to take action against Taliban leaders responsible for the assault on women and girls’ rights and other egregious abuses in Afghanistan,” said Daniela Gavshon, HRW’s Australia director.

“The amended sanctions regulations will allow Australia to join with other countries already taking steps to oppose the Taliban’s widespread and systematic oppression.”

The Taliban have been internationally condemned since retaking power in Afghanistan in August 2021 for their oppression of females, minorities and political opponents. 

The UN has warned that the Taliban are practising “gender apartheid” with severe limits placed on females’ right to work, education or to operate freely. Gender persecution is recognized as a crime against humanity, HRW said.

“The Australian government should use targeted sanctions as an important foreign policy tool against the Taliban to press for accountability for serious abuses,” Gavshon said. 

“Imposing sanctions on abusive leaders is one of several measures that can raise the cost of committing human rights violations in Afghanistan and elsewhere.”

Afghanistan has also become unsafe for a multitude of other people since the Taliban’s resurgence, with censorship normalized and the torture of journalists and activists commonplace, HRW added.