Trump rethinking next week’s planned immigration raids, report says

This image released by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) shows a Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) officer guarding suspected illegal aliens on August 7, 2019. (AFP file photo)
This image released by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) shows a Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) officer guarding suspected illegal aliens on August 7, 2019. (AFP file photo)
Short Url
Updated 19 January 2025

Trump rethinking next week’s planned immigration raids, report says

Trump rethinking next week’s planned immigration raids, report says
  • “President Trump has been clear from day one ... he’s going to secure the border and he’s going to have the deportation operation,” Homan told Fox News ahead of Trump’s inauguration on Monday

WASHINGTON: President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration is reconsidering plans for immigration raids in Chicago next week after details were leaked, Trump’s “border czar” Tom Homan told the Washington Post in an interview on Saturday.
The new administration “hasn’t made a decision yet,” said Homan, the former acting director of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, according to the report. “We’re looking at this leak and will make decision based on this leak,” he added.
ICE did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Officials and rights advocates had said Trump’s administration would launch sweeps in multiple US cities almost as soon as he takes office on Monday, with Chicago considered a likely first location.
Dulce Ortiz, president of the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, told Reuters that as many as 200 ICE agents were expected to start raids in the Chicago area on Monday at 5 a.m., aiming to catch people heading into work or starting their day.
The enforcement had been expected to continue for several days, she said. An ICE spokesperson referred questions to the Trump transition team, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Reuters reported Friday that agents would also conduct raids in New York and Miami. The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday that ICE would stage a week-long operation in Chicago with potentially hundreds of agents.
Trump said in an NBC News interview on Saturday that launching the mass deportations he promised in his election campaign would be a top priority. But he declined to identify the cities targeted or when deportations would start.
“It will begin very quickly,” said Trump. “We have to get the criminals out of our country.”
Homan himself had appeared to confirm the raids earlier on Saturday, telling Fox News that “targeted enforcement operations” would quickly pursue some of what he said were 700,000 migrants who are in the US illegally and under deportation orders. He indicated the efforts would occur in several cities.
“President Trump has been clear from day one ... he’s going to secure the border and he’s going to have the deportation operation,” Homan told Fox News ahead of Trump’s inauguration on Monday.
Homan said the agency had carefully planned the operation and identified specific individuals for enforcement.
“Every target for this operation is well-planned, and the whole team will be out there for officers’ safety reasons,” he said.
Asked how the detention operations would be received in so-called sanctuary cities, which have pledged not to use city resources for federal immigration raids, Homan said sanctuary city policies were “unfortunate.”
In the case of targeted individuals who are already in local jails, he said the cities’ stance creates a threat to public safety. Cities would “release that public safety threat back into the community....and force (ICE) officers into communities,” Homan said.
He urged public officials of those cities to assist in the deportation raids, but added, “We’re going to do this, with or without their help. They are not going to stop us.”


Exit poll suggests centrists win Dutch vote, beating far right

Exit poll suggests centrists win Dutch vote, beating far right
Updated 24 sec ago

Exit poll suggests centrists win Dutch vote, beating far right

Exit poll suggests centrists win Dutch vote, beating far right
  • The centrist D66 party led by Rob Jetten was projected to win 27 seats out of 150 in parliament, ahead of Wilders and his far-right PVV Freedom Party with 25 seats, according to the Ipsos poll

THE HAGUE: Dutch voters appeared to have rejected far-right leader Geert Wilders in favor of a centrist party, an exit poll suggested Wednesday, after a cliffhanger election closely watched in Europe where extremists are gaining ground.
The centrist D66 party led by Rob Jetten was projected to win 27 seats out of 150 in parliament, ahead of Wilders and his far-right PVV Freedom Party with 25 seats, according to the Ipsos poll.
If confirmed, the result would put Jetten, 38, in pole position to become the country’s youngest and first openly gay prime minister, subject to coalition talks.
D66 supporters exploded with joy at their election party in Leiden, waving Dutch and European flags. “We’ve done it,” said a jubilant Jetten.
“This is a historic election result because we’ve shown not only to the Netherlands but also to the world that it is possible to beat populist and extreme-right movements,” Jetten told reporters.
Exit polls in the Netherlands are generally accurate but the seats could change as actual votes are counted and the margin of error is two seats.
The center-right liberal VVD party was predicted to win 23 seats, with the left-wing Green/Labour bloc expected to gain 20.
With far-right parties topping the polls in Britain, France, and Germany, the Dutch election was seen as a bellwether of the strength of the far right in Europe.
If the exit poll results are confirmed, the PVV lost 12 seats compared to its stunning 2023 election win.
“The Dutch election really mirrors trends across Western Europe,” Sarah de Lange, Professor of Dutch Politics at Leiden University, told AFP before the exit poll.
Even before the vote, Wilders was virtually certain not to be prime minister, as all other parties had ruled out joining a coalition with him.
The 62-year-old firebrand, sometimes known as the “Dutch Trump,” had collapsed the previous government, complaining progress was too slow to achieve “the strictest asylum policy ever.”
“The voter has spoken. We had hoped for a different outcome but we stuck to our guns,” said the anti-Islam, anti-immigration, Wilders on social media.
When the result is finalized, there will be a prolonged period of haggling between the parties to see who wants to work with whom, a process that could take months.
The fragmented Dutch political system means no party can reach the 76 seats needed to govern alone, so consensus and coalition-building are essential.
“It will certainly take time for the Netherlands to reach stability and a new coalition,” De Lange told AFP.
“The parties are ideologically very, very diverse, which will make compromising very challenging.”

- ‘Heart of Europe’ -

Millions of Dutch people cast their votes in a variety of locations including zoos, football stadiums, and windmills.
They had a bewildering range of 27 parties to choose from, meaning each voter had to grapple with a huge A3 sheet of paper listing the candidates.
The main issues were immigration and a housing crisis that especially affects young people in the densely populated country.
Jetten shot up the polls in the final days of the campaign thanks to strong media performances and an optimistic message.
“I want to bring the Netherlands back to the heart of Europe because without European cooperation, we are nowhere,” he told AFP after casting his vote in The Hague.
Frans Timmermans, an experienced former European Commission vice president, threw in the towel after a disappointing result for his left-wing bloc.
“With pain in my heart, I step down as your party leader,” the 64-year-old told supporters.

- ‘Not that aggressive’ -

Violence and disinformation marred the campaign in the European Union’s fifth-largest economy and major global exporter.
Demonstrators against shelters for asylum-seekers clashed with police in several cities, and violence erupted at an anti-immigration protest in The Hague last month.
Until a new government is formed, outgoing Prime Minister Dick Schoof will run the country — reluctantly. “I wouldn’t wish it on you,” he told one MP in parliament.
“If you accept this job, you know that it will end someday,” Schoof told AFP after casting his vote.
Voters appeared to yearn for a return to less polarizing politics.
“I think society should be more positive and less negative,” Bart Paalman, a 53-year-old baker, told AFP, as he cast his vote at the Anne Frank House, converted into a polling station for election day.
“I’m voting for a party who’s not that aggressive.”


Trump and China’s Xi are meeting in South Korea to try to roll back months of trade tensions

Trump and China’s Xi are meeting in South Korea to try to roll back months of trade tensions
Updated 10 min 5 sec ago

Trump and China’s Xi are meeting in South Korea to try to roll back months of trade tensions

Trump and China’s Xi are meeting in South Korea to try to roll back months of trade tensions
  • Trump’s aggressive use of tariffs since returning to the White House for a second term combined with China’s retaliatory limits on exports of rare earth elements have given the meeting newfound urgency

BUSAN, South Korea: President Donald Trump is set to meet face-to-face with Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Thursday, a chance for the leaders of the world’s two largest economies to stabilize relations after months of turmoil over trade issues.
Trump’s aggressive use of tariffs since returning to the White House for a second term combined with China’s retaliatory limits on exports of rare earth elements have given the meeting newfound urgency. There is a mutual recognition that neither side wants to risk blowing up the world economy in ways that could jeopardize their own country’s fortunes.
In the days leading up to the meeting, US officials have signaled that Trump does not intend to make good on a recent threat to impose an additional 100 percent import tax on Chinese goods — and China has shown signs it is willing to relax its export controls on rare earths and also buy soybeans from America.
Trump went further aboard Air Force One on his way to South Korea, telling reporters he may reduce tariffs that he placed on China earlier this year related to its role in making fentanyl.
“I expect to be lowering that because I believe that they’re going to help us with the fentanyl situation,” Trump said, later adding, “The relationship with China is very good.”
Shortly before the meeting on Thursday, Trump posted on Truth Social that the meeting would be the “G2,” a recognition of America and China’s status as the world’s biggest economies. The Group of Seven and Group of 20 are other forums of industrialized nations.
The meeting is set to begin at 11 a.m. (10 p.m. ET) in Busan, South Korea, a port city about 76 kilometers (47 miles) south from Gyeongju, the main venue for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit.
At a dinner on Wednesday night with other APEC leaders, Trump was caught on a microphone saying the meeting with Xi would be “three, four hours” and he would then go home to Washington.
Officials from both countries met earlier this week in Kuala Lumpur to lay the groundwork for their leaders. Afterward, China’s top trade negotiator Li Chenggang said they had reached a “preliminary consensus,” a statement affirmed by US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent who said there was ” a very successful framework.”
The anticipated detente has given investors and businesses caught between the two nations a sense of relief. The US stock market has climbed on the hopes of a trade framework coming out of the meeting.
However cordial the rhetoric, Trump and Xi remain on a potential collision course as their countries vie to dominate manufacturing, develop emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and shape world affairs such as the status of Russia’s war in Ukraine. Trump indicated that he did not plan to bring up issues such as the security of Taiwan with Xi.
“The proposed deal on the table fits the pattern we’ve seen all year: short-term stabilization dressed up as strategic progress,” said Craig Singleton, senior director of the China program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “Both sides are managing volatility, calibrating just enough cooperation to avert crisis while the deeper rivalry endures.”
The US and China have each shown they believe they have levers to pressure the other, and the past year has demonstrated that tentative steps forward can be short-lived.
For Trump, that pressure comes from tariffs.
Right now, China had faced new tariffs this year totaling 30 percent, of which 20 percent has been tied to its role in fentanyl production. But the tariff rates have been volatile. In April, he announced plans to jack the rate on Chinese goods to 145 percent, only to abandon those plans as markets recoiled.
Then, on Oct. 10, Trump threatened a 100 percent import tax because of China’s rare earth restrictions.
Xi has his own chokehold on the world economy because China is the top producer and processor of the rare earth minerals needed to make fighter jets, robots, electric vehicles and other high-tech products.
China had tightened export restrictions on Oct. 9, repeating a cycle in which each nation jockeys for an edge only to back down after more trade talks.
What might also matter is what happens directly after their talks. Trump plans to return to Washington, while Xi plans to stay on in South Korea to meet with regional leaders during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, which officially begins on Friday.
“Xi sees an opportunity to position China as a reliable partner and bolster bilateral and multilateral relations with countries frustrated by the US administration’s tariff policy,” said Jay Truesdale, a former State Department official who is CEO of TD International, a risk and intelligence advisory firm.


From beaches to ski slopes, photos show how cameras keep watch all over China

From beaches to ski slopes, photos show how cameras keep watch all over China
Updated 23 min 49 sec ago

From beaches to ski slopes, photos show how cameras keep watch all over China

From beaches to ski slopes, photos show how cameras keep watch all over China
  • Over the past few decades, the Chinese government has rolled out a series of high-tech surveillance projects aimed at bringing the entire country under watch, including “Sky Net” and the “Golden Shield”

BEIJING: The Chinese government has blanketed the country with the world’s largest network of surveillance cameras.
Some cameras swivel, ensuring sweeping views of public squares. Others scan license plates of passing cars, allowing police to track vehicles in real-time. At night, cameras light up across China’s cities, shining lights down alleys and corners.
Over the past few decades, the Chinese government has rolled out a series of high-tech surveillance projects aimed at bringing the entire country under watch, including “Sky Net” and the “Golden Shield”.
The latest such project is called the “Xueliang Project,” or Sharp Eyes, a reference to a quote from Communist China’s founder, Mao Zedong, who once said “the people have sharp eyes” when urging them to root out neighbors opposed to socialist values.
AP investigations have found that American companies to a large degree designed and built China’s surveillance state, playing a far greater role in enabling human rights abuses than previously known. The US government repeatedly allowed and even actively helped American firms to sell technology to the Chinese police, government and surveillance companies, AP found.
The cameras studding China are knitted together in policing systems that allow authorities to track and control virtually anyone in the country, often targeting perceived threats to the state like dissidents, religious believers or ethnic minorities. Following directives from Beijing to ensure “100 percent coverage” in key public areas, authorities have installed facial-recognition cameras across the country, including in unlikely locations:
Ski slopes.
Beaches.
Remote country roads.
The Great Wall of China.
A slew of cameras greets visitors to Beijing, with a screen underneath announcing: “Amazing China travel starts here!”
At times, entire neighborhoods have been demolished and rebuilt in part to make it easier for cameras to keep watch. The historic quarter of Xinjiang’s ancient silk road city of Kashgar, once a maze-like warren of twisting alleys, was demolished and rebuilt with wider avenues and thousands of camera that light up at night.
China’s cities, roads and villages are now studded with more cameras than the rest of the world combined, analysts say — roughly one for every two people.
The goal is clear, according to authorities: Total surveillance in every corner of the country, with “no blind spots” to be found.
This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors.


Trump orders war department to immediately start testing US nuclear weapons

Trump orders war department to immediately start testing US nuclear weapons
Updated 1 min 7 sec ago

Trump orders war department to immediately start testing US nuclear weapons

Trump orders war department to immediately start testing US nuclear weapons
  • Says the US cannot sit idly by while other nuclear powers, notably Russia and China,have testing programs
  • The US last tested a nuclear weapon in 1992, after which it signed theComprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty

US President Donald Trump, ahead of his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday, said he has instructed the Department of Defense to immediately resume testing nuclear weapons on an “equal basis” with other nuclear powers.
“Because of other countries testing programs, I have instructed the Department of War to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis. That process will begin immediately,” Trump said on Truth Social, ahead of the meeting with Xi in South Korea.
“Russia is second, and China is a distant third, but will be even within 5 years,” Trump noted.
President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday Russia had successfully tested a Poseidon nuclear-powered super torpedo that military analysts say is capable of devastating coastal regions by triggering vast radioactive ocean swells.

As Trump has toughened both his rhetoric and his stance on Russia, Putin has publicly flexed his nuclear muscles with the test of a new Burevestnik cruise missile on October 21 and nuclear launch drills on October 22.
The United States last tested a nuclear weapon in 1992.
Tests provide evidence of what any new nuclear weapon will do — and whether older weapons still work.
Apart from providing technical data, such a test would be seen in Russia and China as a deliberate assertion of US strategic power.

IN NUMBERS

• 1,032 nuclear weapons tests conducted by the US between 1945 and 1992

• 715 tests by the Soviet Union (now Russia) from 1949 and 1990

• 210 tests by France between 1960 and 1996

• 45 tests by Britain between 1952 and 1991

• 45 tests by China from 1964 and 1996

• 1 test carried out by India in 1974

The United States opened the nuclear era in July 1945 with the test of a 20-kiloton atomic bomb at Alamogordo, New Mexico, and then dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 to end World War Two. 

According to the , more than 2,000 nuclear tests were carried out all over the world from 1945 until 1996, when the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) was opened for signature.
Since then, only 10 nuclear tests had been conducted, two each by rival neighbors India and Pakistan in 1998, and the rest by North Korea in 2006, 2009, 2013, 2016, and 2017.
 


‘Quick reaction’ National Guard forces to be trained for civil disturbances by 2026, US officials say

‘Quick reaction’ National Guard forces to be trained for civil disturbances by 2026, US officials say
Updated 39 min 39 sec ago

‘Quick reaction’ National Guard forces to be trained for civil disturbances by 2026, US officials say

‘Quick reaction’ National Guard forces to be trained for civil disturbances by 2026, US officials say
  • President Donald Trump has increasingly embraced using the military to support his domestic agenda, including deploying troops to Democratic-led cities like Los Angeles; Portland, Oregon, and Washington, DC

WASHINGTON: The National Guard is planning to train hundreds of troops in each state to be part of a rapid-response force focused on civil disturbance missions by the start of next year, two US officials said on Wednesday. President Donald Trump has increasingly embraced using the military to support his domestic agenda, including deploying troops to Democratic-led cities like Los Angeles; Portland, Oregon, and Washington, D.C.
The latest move follows an executive order signed by Trump in August, which called for each state to have National Guard troops who could be quickly deployed for “quelling civil disturbances and ensuring the public safety and order.”
Two US officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said each state would be required to have such a force by the start of next year. Most of the states would be required to have 500 troops as a part of the force.
The specific date for the move was first reported by the Guardian, which cited a National Guard memo from October 8.
A Pentagon spokesperson did not immediately reply to a request for comment on Wednesday.
It is unclear how the force would be different from existing quick-reaction forces already available to each state.
According to the National Guard, each state already has a specially trained force that can take part in missions, including civil disturbance control.
The existing National Guard forces must be able to deploy up to 125 troops within eight hours and a follow-on force of up to 375 personnel within 24 hours. During a trip to Japan earlier this week, Trump told US troops he was prepared to send “more than the National Guard” into US cities if needed.
“We have cities that are troubled ... and we’re sending in our National Guard. And if we need more than the National Guard, we’ll send more than the National Guard because we’re going to have safe cities,” Trump said.