TikTok says it will go dark Sunday in US without assurance from Biden

TikTok says it will go dark Sunday in US without assurance from Biden
TikTok was is due to go dark on Sunday. (Getty Images/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 18 January 2025

TikTok says it will go dark Sunday in US without assurance from Biden

TikTok says it will go dark Sunday in US without assurance from Biden

WASHINGTON: TikTok warned late Friday it will go dark in the United States on Sunday unless President Joe Biden’s administration provides assurances to companies like Apple and Google that it will not face enforcement actions when a ban takes effect.
The statement came hours after the Supreme Court upheld a law banning TikTok in the United States on national security grounds if its Chinese parent company ByteDance does not sell it, putting the popular short-video app on track to go dark in just two days.
The court’s 9-0 decision throws the social media platform — and its 170 million American users — into limbo, and its fate in the hands of Donald Trump, who has vowed to rescue TikTok after returning to the presidency on Monday.
“Unless the Biden Administration immediately provides a definitive statement to satisfy the most critical service providers assuring non-enforcement, unfortunately TikTok will be forced to go dark on January 19,” the company said.
The White House declined to comment.
Apple, Alphabet’s Google, Oracle and others could face massive fines if they continue to provide services to TikTok after the ban takes effect.
The law was passed by an overwhelming bipartisan majority in Congress last year and signed by Biden, though a growing chorus of lawmakers who voted for it are now seeking to keep TikTok operating in the United States.
TikTok, ByteDance and some of the app’s users challenged the law, but the Supreme Court decided that it did not violate the US Constitution’s First Amendment protection against government abridgment of free speech as they had argued.
ByteDance has done little to divest of TikTok by the Sunday deadline set under the law. But the app’s shutdown might be brief. Trump, who in 2020 had tried to ban TikTok, has said he plans to take action to save the app.
“My decision on TikTok will be made in the not too distant future, but I must have time to review the situation. Stay tuned!” Trump said in a social media post.
TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew plans to attend Trump’s second inauguration on Monday in Washington.
Trump said he and Chinese President Xi Jinping discussed TikTok in a phone call on Friday.

‘Foreign adversary control’
For years TikTok’s Chinese ownership has raised concerns among US leaders, and the TikTok fight has unfolded at a time of rising trade tensions between the world’s two biggest economies.
Lawmakers and Biden’s administration have said China could use TikTok to amass data on millions of Americans for harassment, recruitment and espionage.
“TikTok’s scale and susceptibility to foreign adversary control, together with the vast swaths of sensitive data the platform collects, justify differential treatment to address the government’s national security concerns,” the Supreme Court said in the unsigned opinion.
TikTok has become one of the most prominent social media platforms in the US, particularly among young people who use it for short-form videos, including many who use it as a platform for small businesses.
Some users reacted with shock that the ban could actually happen.
“Oh my god, I’m speechless,” said Lourd Asprec, 21, of Houston, who has amassed 16.3 million followers on TikTok and makes an estimated $80,000 a year from the platform. “I don’t even care about China stealing my data. They can take all my data from me. Like, if anything, I’ll go to China myself and give them my data.”
The company’s powerful algorithm, its main asset, feeds individual users short videos tailored to their liking. The platform presents a vast collection of user-submitted videos, that can be viewed with a smart phone app or on the Internet.
As the Jan. 19 deadline approached, millions of users jumped to other Chinese-owned apps like RedNote, finding they had to decipher its all-Mandarin platform to kickstart their feeds.
“China is adapting in real-time to the ruling,” said Craig Singleton, a China expert at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank, which submitted a brief in the case against TikTok. “Beijing isn’t just building apps; it’s building a discourse power ecosystem to shape global narratives and influence societies.”
Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement the ruling affirmed that the law protects US national security.
“Authoritarian regimes should not have unfettered access to millions of Americans’ sensitive data,” Garland added.

What happens next
The Biden administration has emphasized that TikTok could continue operating if it is freed from China’s control. The White House said on Friday that Biden will not take any action to save TikTok.
Biden has not formally invoked a 90-day delay in the deadline as allowed by the law.
“This decision’s going to be made by the next president anyway,” Biden told reporters.
The law bars providing certain services to TikTok and other foreign adversary-controlled apps including by offering it through app stores such as Apple and Google.
Google declined to comment on Friday. Apple and Oracle did not respond to requests for comment.
White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said action to implement the law “must fall to the next administration” while the Justice Department said “implementing and ensuring compliance with the law after it goes into effect on January 19 — will be a process that plays out over time.”
TikTok said those statements “have failed to provide the necessary clarity and assurance to the service providers that are integral to maintaining TikTok’s availability to over 170 million Americans.”
A viable buyer could still emerge, or Trump could invoke a law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, stating that keeping TikTok is beneficial for national security.
Only one notable bidder has emerged so far — Frank McCourt, former owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers baseball team, who said he believes TikTok is worth about $20 billion without its algorithm.
“Beijing needs TikTok more than Washington does,” said Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow and expert in US-China relations at the Hudson Institute think tank.
“With that leverage, Trump has a better chance of getting what he wants: TikTok’s continued operation in America without any national security threats.”


Ukrainian troops doubt quick ceasefire, reject territorial concessions

Ukrainian troops doubt quick ceasefire, reject territorial concessions
Updated 4 sec ago

Ukrainian troops doubt quick ceasefire, reject territorial concessions

Ukrainian troops doubt quick ceasefire, reject territorial concessions
  • Ukraine fears Trump and Putin could use their summit to dictate terms of peace and force Kyiv to abandon territory
  • Trump said on Monday that both Kyiv and Moscow would need to cede land to end the war

KHARKIV REGION: Ukrainian soldiers preparing for battle say they have little faith in prospects for a quick ceasefire, and many reject suggestions that Kyiv should give up any of its hard-fought territory to Russia.
Reuters interviewed troops at two training bases in the northeastern Kharkiv region this week, days ahead of a planned meeting in Alaska between US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin.
Ukraine fears the two leaders could use their summit on Friday to dictate terms of peace and force Kyiv to abandon territory, a move Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has flatly rejected.
“Give it away to whom? Give it away for what?” asked the commander of a training base for Ukraine’s 58th Motorized Brigade, whose call sign is Chef.
Trump said on Monday that both Kyiv and Moscow would need to cede land to end the war, now in its fourth year. European Union leaders rallied to Ukraine’s defense on Tuesday, saying it must have the freedom to decide its own future.
The joint statement came as Russian forces made a sudden thrust into eastern Ukraine in a bid to break a key defensive line, likely aimed at boosting pressure on Kyiv to give up land.
The rapid battlefield push by Russia’s larger and better-equipped army followed months of deadly air strikes on Ukrainian towns and cities.
A Gallup poll released last week found that 69 percent of Ukrainians favor a negotiated end to the war as soon as possible. However, around the same number believe fighting won’t end soon.
“Every path to peace is built through negotiations,” said another 58th Brigade soldier, call sign Champion, sitting inside an armored vehicle.
“But I cannot say that tomorrow there will be peace just like that... Because the enemy continues to creep in.”
Trump said his talks with Putin would be “a feel-out meeting” and that he would tell the Russian leader to “end this war.” But he also hinted that he may walk away and let the two sides continue fighting.
Other Ukrainian troops training in the Kharkiv region also welcomed a ceasefire, but said the Kremlin would need to be forced into making peace.
“Until Russia suffers losses big enough to give up the idea of military pressure on us, (fighting) will continue,” said an instructor from the 43rd Separate Mechanized Brigade, whose call sign is Snail.
“We will not be able to stop this otherwise.”


Protest-hit UK town bids to empty asylum-seeker hotel

Protest-hit UK town bids to empty asylum-seeker hotel
Updated 16 min 47 sec ago

Protest-hit UK town bids to empty asylum-seeker hotel

Protest-hit UK town bids to empty asylum-seeker hotel
  • The council in Epping, northeast of London, applied for an interim injunction against the housing of of asylum seekers
  • Protests broke out in the town in July after an asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl

LONDON: A UK town applied for a High Court injunction on Tuesday to stop asylum seekers being housed in a local hotel, following protests, some of which turned violent.
The council in Epping, northeast of London, applied for an interim injunction against the housing of of asylum seekers and refugees at the Bell Hotel, citing “the clear risk of further escalating community tensions.”
“The current situation cannot go on. If the Bell Hotel was a nightclub we could have closed it down long ago,” Epping Forest district council leader Chris Whitbread, from the Conservative party, said in a statement.
Protests broke out in the town in July after an asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl, which he denies.
Since then hundreds of people have taken part in protests and counter-protests outside the Bell Hotel. Further anti-immigration demonstrations also spread to London and around England.
Police said there had been at least six protests in Epping since July 17 and 28 people have been arrested and 16 people charged in connection with disorder.
Police officers and vehicles have been attacked during some protests.
The council is arguing that since the accommodation is not being used as a hotel, it breaches planning permissions, especially due to its proximity to schools and a care home.
“So far as the council is aware, there is no criminal record checking of individuals ... before being housed at the hotel,” Whitbread said.
“The use by the Home Office of the premises for asylum seekers poses a clear risk of further escalating community tensions already at a high, and the risk of irreparable harm to the local community.”
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has vowed to slash the number of migrants and asylum seekers in Britain to stave off pressure from the hard-right Reform UK party.
But the Epping council leader accused the government of “not listening.”
“We should not have to take this fight to the High Court, but we are left with no choice,” said Whitbread.


Italian PM agrees with PA’s Abbas over ‘no future’ for Hamas in Gaza

Italian PM agrees with PA’s Abbas over ‘no future’ for Hamas in Gaza
Updated 12 August 2025

Italian PM agrees with PA’s Abbas over ‘no future’ for Hamas in Gaza

Italian PM agrees with PA’s Abbas over ‘no future’ for Hamas in Gaza
  • During phone conversation, Giorgia Meloni expressed concern over Israeli move to occupy Gaza
  • The 2 leaders agreed to meet on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in September

LONDON: Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas agreed during a phone call on Tuesday that Hamas must release all Israeli hostages and accept that it has no future in governing the coastal enclave of Gaza.

Meloni expressed concern over the Israeli decision last week to occupy Gaza, describing the humanitarian situation there as “unjustified and unacceptable,” and calling for an immediate cessation of hostilities.

She highlighted Italy’s commitment to humanitarian aid, such as the Food for Gaza initiative, airdrops and the evacuation of more than 150 Palestinian children needing treatment, the Wafa news agency reported.

She added that Italy is ready to assist in stabilizing and reconstructing Gaza, and highlighted the importance of a political process for a just, lasting peace in the Middle East through a two-state solution.

The two leaders agreed to meet in New York City on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in September, a highly anticipated occasion where several countries have pledged to recognize the state of Palestine, including France and Canada.

Abbas has previously said that Hamas will not govern Gaza and should surrender its weapons to the Palestinian Authority. He has highlighted the need for “one system, one law and one legitimate weapon” in the Palestinian territories.

Neither Hamas nor Palestinian Islamic Jihad are part of the Palestine Liberation Organization, and both groups have long rejected calls to join what the majority of Palestinians consider their sole political representative since the 1960s.


France urges Israel to grant journalists ‘safe’ access to Gaza

Al Jazeera staff members gather at the network’s studios, to remember colleagues who were killed in Gaza City by Israeli strike.
Al Jazeera staff members gather at the network’s studios, to remember colleagues who were killed in Gaza City by Israeli strike.
Updated 12 August 2025

France urges Israel to grant journalists ‘safe’ access to Gaza

Al Jazeera staff members gather at the network’s studios, to remember colleagues who were killed in Gaza City by Israeli strike.
  • Condemning the strike, the French foreign ministry said that the journalists were targeted while “carrying out their reporting duties”
  • International journalists “must be able to operate freely and independently to document the reality of the conflict,” Confavreux said

PARIS: France on Tuesday condemned “the heavy toll paid by local journalists” in Gaza and called on the Israeli authorities to guarantee “safe and unhindered access” for international media.
On Sunday, five Al Jazeera journalists were killed in an Israeli strike on their tent in Gaza City. Among the victims was Anas Al-Sharif, a prominent Al Jazeera correspondent aged 28.
A freelance reporter was also killed in the strike that targeted the Al Jazeera team.
Condemning the strike, the French foreign ministry said that the journalists were targeted while “carrying out their reporting duties.”
Israel confirmed it had targeted Sharif, whom it labelled a “terrorist” affiliated with Hamas, saying he “posed as a journalist.”
“Journalists must never be targeted,” Pascal Confavreux, a spokesman for the French foreign ministry, said in a statement, adding that they were protected by international humanitarian law.
International journalists “must be able to operate freely and independently to document the reality of the conflict,” Confavreux added.
Since the start of the war in Gaza, members of the international press have not been allowed to work freely in the Palestinian territory.
Only a few hand-picked media outlets have been allowed to enter, embedded with the Israeli army, and their reports are subject to military censorship.
Almost 200 journalists have been killed in the war Israel launched in response to Hamas’s October 7, 2023 assault, according to media watchdog Reporters Without Borders (RSF).
International news agencies Agence France-Presse (AFP), Associated Press (AP) and Reuters as well as the BBC in July called on Israel to allow journalists in and out of Gaza.


Gaza suffering has reached ‘unimaginable’ levels, say 24 foreign ministers

In the summer heat, Palestinians line up to collect water from a distribution point in Gaza City, Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2025. (AP)
In the summer heat, Palestinians line up to collect water from a distribution point in Gaza City, Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2025. (AP)
Updated 12 August 2025

Gaza suffering has reached ‘unimaginable’ levels, say 24 foreign ministers

In the summer heat, Palestinians line up to collect water from a distribution point in Gaza City, Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2025. (AP)
  • “Famine is unfolding before our eyes. Urgent action is needed now to halt and reverse starvation,” the foreign ministers of 24 countries said in a joint statement

LONDON/BRUSSELS: The humanitarian crisis in Gaza has reached “unimaginable levels,” Britain, Canada, Australia and several of their European allies said on Tuesday, calling on Israel to allow unrestricted aid into the war-torn Palestinian enclave.
“Famine is unfolding before our eyes. Urgent action is needed now to halt and reverse starvation,” the foreign ministers of 24 countries said in a joint statement.
“We call on the government of Israel to provide authorization for all international NGO (non-governmental organizations) aid shipments and to unblock essential humanitarian actors from operating,” the statement said.
“All crossings and routes must be used to allow a flood of aid into Gaza, including food, nutrition supplies, shelter, fuel, clean water, medicine and medical equipment.”
Israel has denied responsibility for hunger spreading in Gaza, accusing Hamas militants of stealing aid shipments, which Hamas denies. However, in response to a rising international uproar, Israel late last month announced steps to let more aid into the enclave, including pausing fighting for part of the day in some areas and announcing protected routes for aid convoys.
Western capitals, however, say much more aid is needed.
The statement was signed by the foreign ministers of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Britain.
The EU’s foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, and two other members of the European Commission also signed the statement.
Some EU member countries, including Germany and Hungary, did not sign it.