Russia says Ukraine launches ‘counterattack’ in Kursk region

Russia says Ukraine launches ‘counterattack’ in Kursk region
A combination of screen grabs from a video posted on social media on January 2, 2025, shows damage caused by a Ukrainian strike on Russia's Kursk Region. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 06 January 2025

Russia says Ukraine launches ‘counterattack’ in Kursk region

Russia says Ukraine launches ‘counterattack’ in Kursk region
  • Moscow said the counter-attack was directed toward the village of Berdin, about 15 kilometers northeast of Sudzha
  • Ukraine's army confirmed that fighting was under way in the Kursk region, without elaborating

MOSCOW: Russia said Sunday that Ukraine had launched a “counterattack” in the western border region of Kursk, where Kyiv’s forces began a shock ground offensive last August.
It was not immediately clear how much Ukraine had advanced in the region, but pro-Kremlin military bloggers reported earlier that a powerful new offensive was under way.
The assault comes at a critical juncture in the nearly three-year conflict, with both sides seeking to strengthen their negotiating hand ahead of US President-elect Donald Trump’s return to the White House on January 20.
“At about 9 a.m. Moscow time (0600 GMT), in order to halt the advance of Russian troops in the Kursk direction, the enemy launched a counterattack,” the Russian defense ministry said.
The Ukrainian army did not comment on the operation, simply saying in its daily report that fighting was under way in the Kursk region without elaborating.
Ukraine used two tanks, a dozen armored vehicles and a demolition unit in the assault, which was directed toward the village of Berdin — about 15 kilometers (nine miles) northeast of Sudzha, Moscow said.
“The operation to destroy the Ukrainian army formations continues,” it added.
Pro-Kremlin military bloggers acknowledged the Russian army had come under pressure but said Moscow was fighting back.
“The main events of the next attempted offensive by the Ukrainian army are clearly still ahead of us,” influential pro-Russian Telegram channel Rybar said.
Images purportedly showing a column of Ukrainian armored vehicles driving through the snow were shared by pro-Russia military blogger Dva Mayora on Telegram.

Ukrainian officials gave little detail on the new offensive, with a prominent lawmaker urging silence.
“I can’t understand why it is necessary to officially report on the Kursk region. Maybe better to do it afterwards when the operation is over?” Ukrainian MP Oleksiy Goncharenko said.
Other officials expressed their glee at the operation, which comes almost three years since Moscow launched its full-scale military assault on Ukraine.
“Russia is getting what it deserves,” Ukrainian presidential chief of staff Andriy Yermak said.
The head of Ukraine’s Center for Countering Disinformation, Andriy Kovalenko, said on Telegram that defense forces were “working” in the area, without elaborating.
“In the Kursk region, the Russians are very worried because they were attacked from several directions, and it was a surprise for them,” he said.
Kyiv seized dozens of villages in the Kursk region shortly after its incursion started on August 6, 2024, but its advances stalled after Moscow rushed reinforcements to the area, including thousands of troops from its ally North Korea.
A Ukrainian army source told AFP last November that Kyiv still controlled 800 square kilometers (around 300 square miles) of the Russian border region, down from previous claims it controlled almost 1,400 square kilometers.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said last year the Kursk operation has boosted Kyiv’s “exchange fund” — its negotiating position on swapping prisoners of war — and diverted tens of thousands of Russian troops away from the eastern front.
He said Saturday evening that “up to a battalion of North Korean infantry soldiers and Russian airborne troops” had been lost in battles in the Kursk region on that day and the day before.
And in an interview with US podcaster Lex Fridman released Sunday, he underlined the key role Trump would play.
“Trump and I will come to an agreement and... offer strong security guarantees, together with Europe, and then we can talk to the Russians,” Zelensky said, according to the published translation of the interview held in Kyiv over the New Year.
“We and Trump come first, and Europe will support Ukraine’s position,” he added. Trump, he said, “has enough power to pressure him, to pressure Putin.”

But Kyiv has so far been unable to halt Moscow’s advances in Ukraine, which were seven times higher in 2024 than the year prior, according to an AFP analysis of data from the Institute for the Study of War.
Both Russia and Ukraine have exchanged regular attacks since the year began.
Russia said Sunday it had downed dozens of Ukrainian drones overnight in a barrage that damaged homes and triggered air alerts, while Kyiv said Moscow fired 103 drones into its territory.
Four Russian airports briefly suspended traffic early Sunday for “safety” reasons, a spokesperson for Russia’s civil aviation authority Rosaviatsia said.
Elsewhere on the front line, Ukrainian authorities in the eastern Donetsk region reported Sunday that five people had been wounded in Russian shelling.


A Spanish town’s ban on religious gatherings in sports centers becomes a flashpoint

A Spanish town’s ban on religious gatherings in sports centers becomes a flashpoint
Updated 13 sec ago

A Spanish town’s ban on religious gatherings in sports centers becomes a flashpoint

A Spanish town’s ban on religious gatherings in sports centers becomes a flashpoint
The ban — approved last week by the conservative local government of Jumilla, a town of 27,000 — has since become a flashpoint
Spain’s Migration Minister Elma Saiz said on Friday the ban was “shameful”

MADRID: Spain’s government on Friday criticized a ban enacted in a southeastern town that prohibits religious gatherings in public sports centers, a measure that will mainly affect members of the town’s Muslim community who in recent years have used the spaces to celebrate religious holidays.

The ban — approved last week by the conservative local government of Jumilla, a town of 27,000 — has since become a flashpoint. Its critics, including Spain’s leftwing national government, have condemned the measure as discriminatory while some on the right are celebrating it as a means to uphold the nation’s Christian culture.

Spain’s Migration Minister Elma Saiz said on Friday the ban was “shameful,” and urged local leaders to “take a step back” and apologize to local residents.

Saiz told Spain’s Antena 3 broadcaster that the measure is “attacking and harming people, citizens who have been living for decades in our towns, in our cities, in our country, contributing and perfectly integrated without any problems of coexistence.”

The ban is the latest controversy involving Spain’s hot-button issues of immigration and multi-culturalism, following clashes last month in the southern Murcia region between far-right groups and local residents and migrants. They erupted after an elderly resident in the town of Torre-Pacheco was beaten up by assailants believed to be of Moroccan origin, which prompted far-right groups to call for retribution on the area’s large migrant population.

Conservative officials in Jumilla, an agriculture-based economy of rolling vineyards, olive and almond trees, defended the ban on Friday.

The town’s mayor Seve González told Spain’s El País newspaper that the measure did not single out any one group and that her government’s wanted to “promote cultural campaigns that defend our identity.”

The measure was initially proposed by the far-right Vox party and then amended and approved by the center-right Popular Party, to which the mayor belongs. It stipulates that municipal sports facilities — where the town’s Muslim community has held religious celebrations — cannot be used for cultural, social or religious activities unrelated to the city council.

Mohamed El Ghaidouni, secretary of the Union of Islamic Communities of Spain that represents more than 900 Muslim communities in the country, called the ban “institutionalized Islamophobia.”

He criticized the local government’s justification for the motion and its allegation that two main Muslim festivals traditionally celebrated in the sports centers — Eid Al-Fitr, which marks the end of Islamic holy month of Ramadan, and Eid Al-Adha, or “Feast of the Sacrifice” — were “foreign to the town’s identity.”

The ban, he added, “clashes with the institutions of the Spanish state” that protect religious freedom.

Vox’s branch in the Murcia region celebrated it, saying Wednesday on X that “Spain is and always will be a land of Christian roots!”

“We must protect public spaces from practices foreign to our culture and our way of life,” the party’s leader Santiago Abascal wrote Friday, adding that “Spain is not Al Andalus,” referencing the historic name for Islamic Spain.

For centuries, Spain was ruled by Muslims, whose influence is present both in the Spanish language and in many of the country’s most celebrated landmarks, including Granada’s famed Moorish Alhambra Palace. Islamic rule ended in 1492 when the last Arab kingdom in Spain fell to the Catholics.

Right-wing governments elsewhere in Europe have passed measures similar to the ban in Jumilla, striking at the heart of ongoing debates about nationalism and religious pluralism.

Last year in Monfalcone, a large industrial port city in northeastern Italy with a significant Bangladeshi immigrant population, its far-right mayor, Anna Maria Cisint, banned prayers outside of places of worship. The move led to protests involving some 8,000 people. The city’s Muslim community is appealing the ban in a regional court.

Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump’s deadline for Russia arrives

Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump’s deadline for Russia arrives
Updated 08 August 2025

Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump’s deadline for Russia arrives

Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump’s deadline for Russia arrives
  • Ukrainian forces are locked in intense battles along the 1,000-kilometer front line
  • In the Pokrovsk area of Donetsk, a commander said he believes Moscow isn’t interested in peace

DNIPROPETROVSK, Ukraine: Ukrainian soldiers on the battlefield expressed little hope for a diplomatic solution to the war with Russia, as US President Donald Trump’s Friday deadline for the Kremlin to make peace arrived and he eyed a possible summit meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss Moscow’s invasion of its neighbor.

Trump, exasperated that Putin didn’t heed his calls to stop bombing Ukrainian cities, almost two weeks ago moved up his ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia, as well as introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil, if no Kremlin moves toward a settlement were forthcoming. It was unclear what steps Trump intended to take Friday.

Trump’s efforts to pressure Putin into stopping the fighting have so far delivered no progress. Russia’s bigger army is slowly advancing deeper into Ukraine at great cost in troops and armor while it relentlessly bombards Ukrainian cities. Russia and Ukraine are far apart on their terms for peace.

Ukrainian forces are locked in intense battles along the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line that snakes from northeast to southeast Ukraine. The Pokrovsk city area of the eastern Donetsk region is taking the brunt of punishment as Russia looks to break out from there into the neighboring Dnipropetrovsk region. Ukraine has significant manpower shortages.

Intense fighting is also taking place in Ukraine’s northern Sumy border region, where Ukrainian forces are engaging Russian soldiers to prevent reinforcements being sent from there to Donetsk.

In the Pokrovsk area of Donetsk, a commander said he believes Moscow isn’t interested in peace.

“It is impossible to negotiate with them. The only option is to defeat them,” Buda, the Spartan Brigade commander, told The Associated Press. He used only his call sign, in keeping with the rules of the Ukrainian military.

“I would like them to agree and for all this to stop, but Russia will not agree to that; it does not want to negotiate. So the only option is to defeat them,” he said.

In the southern Zaporizhzhia region, a howitzer commander using the call sign Warsaw, said troops are determined to thwart Russia’s invasion.

“We are on our land, we have no way out,” he said. “So we stand our ground, we have no choice.”

Trump said Thursday that he would meet with Putin even if the Russian leader will not meet with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky. That has stoked fears in Europe that Ukraine could be sidelined in efforts to stop the continent’s biggest conflict since World War II.

The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, said in an assessment Thursday that “Putin remains uninterested in ending his war and is attempting to extract bilateral concessions from the United States without meaningfully engaging in a peace process.”

“Putin continues to believe that time is on Russia’s side and that Russia can outlast Ukraine and the West,” it said.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said Friday that Europe should take the lead in efforts to
end the conflict.

Orbán said the leaders of Germany and France should go to Moscow “to negotiate on behalf of Europe.” Otherwise, “we will be sidelined in managing the security issues of our own continent,” Orbán told Hungary’s state broadcaster.

Orbán, who is a harsh critic of the European Union to which his country belongs, said Europe’s concerns that a Trump-Putin summit might not address the continent’s interests meant it should seize the diplomatic initiative.

“This war cannot be ended on the front line, no solution can be concluded on the battlefield,” he said. “This war must be ended by diplomats, politicians, leaders at the negotiating table.”


’Prepare for the worst’: Russians skeptical of progress at Putin-Trump summit

’Prepare for the worst’: Russians skeptical of progress at Putin-Trump summit
Updated 08 August 2025

’Prepare for the worst’: Russians skeptical of progress at Putin-Trump summit

’Prepare for the worst’: Russians skeptical of progress at Putin-Trump summit
  • “Hope for the best, prepare for the worst,” Irina, a 57-year-old lawyer, told AFP
  • “I don’t think we’ll get any clarity next week, unfortunately,” said Arseniy, a 21-year-old student

MOSCOW: Russians on the streets of Moscow on Friday held little hope that an upcoming summit between their president, Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump would help end the conflict in Ukraine.

Both presidents have said they are set to meet, possibly as early as next week, as Trump intensifies his bid to convince Moscow to halt its more than three-year-long military offensive.

The former reality TV star has spent his first months in office trying to broker peace — after initially boasting that he could end the conflict in 24 hours.

Multiple rounds of peace talks, telephone calls and diplomatic visits have failed to yield a breakthrough.

“Hope for the best, prepare for the worst,” Irina, a 57-year-old lawyer, told AFP in sunny central Moscow.

“To be honest, I have no hopes,” she added.

The fighting will likely go on until both sides run out of resources, she said.

Tens of thousands have been killed since Russia launched its offensive in February 2022, with millions forced to flee their homes and much of east and southern Ukraine destroyed.

Though Sergei, a 28-year-old car parts merchant welcomed the move toward peace, he said, “the conflict has got bogged down, it will definitely not end now.”

“I don’t think we’ll get any clarity next week, unfortunately,” said Arseniy, a 21-year-old student.

Noone that AFP spoke to agreed to give their surname, with Moscow having introduced strict censorship laws that prohibit any criticism of its offensive on Ukraine or comments that could be seen as going against the Kremlin.

Putin has stuck to his maximalist claims, demanding that Ukraine cede more territory if it wants his army to stop advancing on the ground.

“Whether you like it or not, we have to go all the way,” said Natalya, 79, a retired medical worker.

Russia will have to “clean up Ukraine — absolutely everything, including the western part,” she added.

At talks in June, Russia demanded that Ukraine pull its forces out of four regions Moscow claims to have annexed, shun Western military support and be excluded from joining NATO.

For Tatiana, 39, who works on Russia’s railways, talks felt like they had been ongoing for an “eternity,” without anything to show for them.

She had little interest in where the front line was or what land Russia might secure in a peace deal.

“It doesn’t matter. I’d rather it be frozen already,” she said.

“We have enough of our territory.”

Kyiv wants an immediate ceasefire and has said that it will never recognize Russian control over its land — although it has acknowledged that it would likely have to try to secure the return of land captured by Russia through diplomacy, not on the battlefield.

Leonid, a 70-year-old retiree with a short grey goatee beard, was one of the few to show a degree of optimism.

“Putin and Trump may agree on something, at least on some kind of ceasefire,” he told AFP.

“Any kind of peace is better than a quarrel.”


Philippines says 3 Chinese ships spotted near islets close to Taiwan

Philippines says 3 Chinese ships spotted near islets close to Taiwan
Updated 08 August 2025

Philippines says 3 Chinese ships spotted near islets close to Taiwan

Philippines says 3 Chinese ships spotted near islets close to Taiwan
  • China considers self-ruled Taiwan to be part of its territory and has threatened to seize it by force.
  • The three Chinese vessels were spotted near Batanes province

MANILA: Three Chinese coast guard vessels were being monitored in the waters off remote islands in the northern Philippines near Taiwan, maritime officials in Manila said on Friday.

The vessels were first spotted on Thursday, a day after a YouTube video appeared in which Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos said there was no way Manila could stay out of conflict if China invaded Taiwan.

China considers self-ruled Taiwan to be part of its territory and has threatened to seize it by force.

The three Chinese vessels were spotted near Batanes province, a remote group of sparsely populated islets north of the Philippines’ largest island, Luzon.

An aircraft was deployed on Friday to monitor the “irregular movements” of the three Chinese ships near the Batanes islands, the Philippine Coast Guard said in a statement.

China Coast Guard ship 4304 was located about 140 kilometers (85 miles) west of Sabtang town but bad weather prevented authorities from getting close to the locations of the other two vessels, it said.

Marcos said in an interview with Indian news agency Firstpost that, in the event of a confrontation between China and the United States over Taiwan, “there is no way that the Philippines can stay out of it simply because of our physical geographic location.”

“If there is an all-out war, then we will be drawn into it,” he said in the interview, which was uploaded on YouTube on Wednesday.

He also said many Filipinos living in Taiwan would need to be rescued and repatriated.

China has lodged a protest with the Philippines over Marcos’s remarks.

“We urge the Philippines to earnestly abide by the one-China principle... and refrain from playing (with) fire on issues concerning China’s core interests,” a foreign ministry spokesperson said on Friday.


Reintegrating millions of Afghan refugees is critical to a peaceful future, a UN official says

Reintegrating millions of Afghan refugees is critical to a peaceful future, a UN official says
Updated 08 August 2025

Reintegrating millions of Afghan refugees is critical to a peaceful future, a UN official says

Reintegrating millions of Afghan refugees is critical to a peaceful future, a UN official says
  • Stephanie Loose, a country program manager at UN Habitat, said reintegrating these millions was critical for a peaceful future in Afghanistan
  • It is important for people to understand that those returning are not a burden

ISLAMABAD: Reintegrating Afghan refugees is critical to the country’s peaceful future as social cohesion will be reduced without it, a UN official said Friday.

Some 2.2 million Afghans have crossed the border from Iran and Pakistan since the start of the year, according to the latest figures from the UN refugee agency. They arrive in a country struggling with climate change, a stagnant economy and a humanitarian crisis. Some 60 percent of those returning to Afghanistan are under 18.

Stephanie Loose, a country program manager at UN Habitat, said reintegrating these millions was critical for a peaceful future in Afghanistan.

“If you come back to a country where resources are already scarce, there’s a lot of competition already for jobs, land, housing, any sort of services, it’s clear that if you don’t foster dialogue between the local population and those arriving, this feeling of competition will grow and reduce social cohesion, which is like creating another root cause for war and conflicts,” Loose told a media briefing in Geneva. “And the country has seen enough of that.”

It is important for people to understand that those returning are not a burden, she added. They come with skills and are part of a solution for social and economic stability.

People bring what they can carry from Iran and Pakistan, leaving behind their homes and the majority of their belongings. Afghan authorities offer support at the border with cash, food, shelter, health care and onward transport to settlements across the country.

The Taliban have urged their neighbors to avoid forcibly returning Afghans and to treat them with dignity. Iran and Pakistan deny targeting Afghans, saying they are expelling foreigners living in their countries illegally.

Women and girls are particularly hard hit once they return to Afghanistan, where education is banned for females beyond grade six and the Taliban restrict access to many jobs and public spaces.

Loose said Afghan women and girls lacked social, educational and economic development opportunities. Requirements to have a male guardian when leaving the home created further barriers for women-headed households.