Israel cracks down on Palestinian citizens who speak out against the war in Gaza

Israel cracks down on Palestinian citizens who speak out against the war in Gaza
Ahmed Khalefa, a Palestinian citizen of Israel, was charged with incitement to terrorism for demonstrating against the war in Gaza. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 24 November 2024

Israel cracks down on Palestinian citizens who speak out against the war in Gaza

Israel cracks down on Palestinian citizens who speak out against the war in Gaza
  • Israeli authorities have opened more incitement cases against Palestinian citizens during the war in Gaza than in the previous five years combined

UMM AL-FAHM, Israel: Israel’s yearlong crackdown against Palestinian citizens who speak out against the war in Gaza is prompting many to self-censor out of fear of being jailed and further marginalized in society, while some still find ways to dissent — carefully.
Ahmed Khalefa’s life turned upside down after he was charged with inciting terrorism for chanting in solidarity with Gaza at an anti-war protest in October 2023.
The lawyer and city counselor from central Israel says he spent three difficult months in jail followed by six months detained in an apartment. It’s unclear when he’ll get a final verdict on his guilt or innocence. Until then, he’s forbidden from leaving his home from dusk to dawn.
Khalefa is one of more than 400 Palestinian citizens of Israel who, since the start of the war in Gaza, have been investigated by police for “incitement to terrorism” or “incitement to violence,” according to Adalah, a legal rights group for minorities. More than half of those investigated were also criminally charged or detained, Adalah said.
“Israel made it clear they see us more as enemies than as citizens,” Khalefa said in an interview at a cafe in his hometown of Umm Al-Fahm, Israel’s second-largest Palestinian city.
Israel has roughly 2 million Palestinian citizens, whose families remained within the borders of what became Israel in 1948. Among them are Muslims and Christians, and they maintain family and cultural ties to Gaza and the West Bank, which Israel captured in 1967.
Israel says its Palestinian citizens enjoy equal rights, including the right to vote, and they are well-represented in many professions. However, Palestinians are widely discriminated against in areas like housing and the job market.
Israeli authorities have opened more incitement cases against Palestinian citizens during the war in Gaza than in the previous five years combined, Adalah’s records show. Israeli authorities have not said how many cases ended in convictions and imprisonment. The Justice Ministry said it did not have statistics on those convictions.
Just being charged with incitement to terrorism or identifying with a terrorist group can land a suspect in detention until they’re sentenced, under the terms of a 2016 law.
In addition to being charged as criminals, Palestinians citizens of Israel — who make up around 20 percent of the country’s population — have lost jobs, been suspended from schools and faced police interrogations posting online or demonstrating, activists and rights watchdogs say.
It’s had a chilling effect.
“Anyone who tries to speak out about the war will be imprisoned and harassed in his work and education,” said Oumaya Jabareen, whose son was jailed for eight months after an anti-war protest. “People here are all afraid, afraid to say no to this war.”
Jabareen was among hundreds of Palestinians who filled the streets of Umm Al-Fahm earlier this month carrying signs and chanting political slogans. It appeared to be the largest anti-war demonstration in Israel since the Oct. 7 Hamas attack. But turnout was low, and Palestinian flags and other national symbols were conspicuously absent. In the years before the war, some protests could draw tens of thousands of Palestinians in Israel.
Authorities tolerated the recent protest march, keeping it under heavily armed supervision. Helicopters flew overhead as police with rifles and tear gas jogged alongside the crowd, which dispersed without incident after two hours. Khalefa said he chose not to attend.
Shortly after the Oct. 7 attack, Israel’s far-right government moved quickly to invigorate a task force that has charged Palestinian citizens of Israel with “supporting terrorism” for posts online or protesting against the war. At around the same time, lawmakers amended a security bill to increase surveillance of online activity by Palestinians in Israel, said Nadim Nashif, director of the digital rights group 7amleh. These moves gave authorities more power to restrict freedom of expression and intensify their arrest campaigns, Nashif said.
The task force is led by Itamar Ben-Gvir, a hard-line national security minister who oversees the police. His office said the task force has monitored thousands of posts allegedly expressing support for terror organizations and that police arrested “hundreds of terror supporters,” including public opinion leaders, social media influencers, religious figures, teachers and others.
“Freedom of speech is not the freedom to incite ... which harms public safety and our security,” his office said in a statement.
But activists and rights groups say the government has expanded its definition of incitement much too far, targeting legitimate opinions that are at the core of freedom of expression.
Myssana Morany, a human rights attorney at Adalah, said Palestinian citizens have been charged for seemingly innocuous things like sending a meme of a captured Israeli tank in Gaza in a private WhatsApp group chat. Another person was charged for posting a collage of children’s photos, captioned in Arabic and English: “Where were the people calling for humanity when we were killed?” The feminist activist group Kayan said over 600 women called its hotline because of blowback in the workplace for speaking out against the war or just mentioning it unfavorably.
Over the summer, around two dozen anti-war protesters in the port city of Haifa were only allowed to finish three chants before police forcefully scattered the gathering into the night. Yet Jewish Israelis demanding a hostage release deal protest regularly — and the largest drew hundreds of thousands to the streets of Tel Aviv.
Khalefa, the city counselor, is not convinced the crackdown on speech will end, even if the war eventually does. He said Israeli prosecutors took issue with slogans that broadly praised resistance and urged Gaza to be strong, but which didn’t mention violence or any militant groups. For that, he said, the government is trying to disbar him, and he faces up to eight years in prison.
“They wanted to show us the price of speaking out,” Khalefa said.


Jordan, Germany say international force in Gaza needs UN mandate

Jordan, Germany say international force in Gaza needs UN mandate
Updated 9 sec ago

Jordan, Germany say international force in Gaza needs UN mandate

Jordan, Germany say international force in Gaza needs UN mandate
  • A coalition of mainly Arab and Muslim nations is expected to deploy forces in the Palestinian territory under US US-brokered ceasefire
  • The so-called international stabilization force is supposed to train and support vetted Palestinian police in the Strip
MANAMA: Jordan and Germany said on Saturday that an international force expected to support a future Palestinian police in Gaza under US President Donald Trump’s post-war governance plan should have a UN mandate.
Under the US-brokered ceasefire between Hamas and Israel, a coalition of mainly Arab and Muslim nations is expected to deploy forces in the Palestinian territory, which has been devastated by the war that broke out on October 7, 2023 with Hamas’s attack on Israel.
The so-called international stabilization force is supposed to train and support vetted Palestinian police in the Strip, with backing from Egypt and Jordan, as well as secure border areas and prevent weapons smuggling to Hamas.
“We all agree that in order for that stabilization force to be able to be effective in getting the job done, it has to have a Security Council mandate,” Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi said.
Jordan, however, will not be sending its own forces to the Strip.
“We’re too close to the issue and we cannot deploy troops in Gaza,” Safadi said, adding his country was nonetheless ready to cooperate with the international force.
Safadi was speaking at the IISS Manama Dialogue conference in Bahrain alongside his German counterpart Johann Wadephul, who also supported a UN mandate for the force, saying it would “need a clear basis in international law.”
“We understand that this is of utmost importance to those countries who might be willing to send troops to Gaza and for the Palestinians. Germany would also want to see a clear mandate for this mission,” Wadephul said.
The idea of the stabilization force has drawn some criticism, with UN experts last month warning it would “replace Israeli occupation with a US-led occupation, contrary to Palestinian self-determination.”
The UN has mandated international peacekeeping forces in the region for decades, including UNIFIL in southern Lebanon, which is currently working with the Lebanese army to enforce a November 2024 ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel.

Top diplomats from Germany, Jordan and the UK call for an immediate ceasefire in Sudan war

Top diplomats from Germany, Jordan and the UK call for an immediate ceasefire in Sudan war
Updated 01 November 2025

Top diplomats from Germany, Jordan and the UK call for an immediate ceasefire in Sudan war

Top diplomats from Germany, Jordan and the UK call for an immediate ceasefire in Sudan war
  • Diplomats describe the situation in stark, apocalyptic terms after paramilitary force seized the last major city in the East African nation’s Darfur region
DUBAI: The foreign ministers of Germany, Jordan and the United Kingdom jointly called on Saturday for an immediate ceasefire in the war in Sudan, describing the situation there in stark, apocalyptic terms after a paramilitary force seized the last major city in the East African nation’s Darfur region.
United Nations officials have warned that fighters with the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces have rampaged through the Darfur city of El-Fasher, reportedly killing more than 450 people in a hospital and carrying out ethnically targeted killings of civilians and sexual assaults. While the RSF have denied killing people at the hospital, those who have escaped El-Fasher, satellite images and videos circulating social media provide glimpses of what appears to be mass slaughter taking place in the city.
At the Manama Dialogue security summit in Bahrain, British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper on Saturday spoke in grim words about events in El-Fasher, where a paramilitary force known as the Rapid Support Forces has seized the city.
“Just as a combination of leadership and international cooperation has made progress in Gaza, it is currently badly failing to deal with the humanitarian crisis and the devastating conflict in Sudan, because the reports from Darfur in recent days have truly horrifying atrocities,” Cooper said.
“Mass executions, starvation and the devastating use of rape as a weapon of war, with women and children bearing the brunt of the largest humanitarian crisis in the 21st century. For too long, this terrible conflict has been neglected, while suffering has simply increased.”
She added that “no amount of aid can resolve a crisis of this magnitude until the guns fall silent.”
German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul echoed Cooper’s concern, directly calling out the RSF for its violence in El-Fasher.
“Sudan is in absolutely an apocalyptic situation,” Wadephul said.
Jordan’s Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi said Sudan has not received “the attention it deserves. A humanitarian crisis of inhumane proportions has taken place there.”
“We’ve got to stop that,” he added.
Bahrain’s government late on Wednesday rescinded an accreditation for The Associated Press to cover the summit, after a “post-approval review” of that permission. The government did not elaborate on why the visa was revoked. Earlier that day, the AP published a story on long-detained activist Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja beginning an “open-ended” hunger strike in Bahrain over his internationally criticized imprisonment.
Al-Khawaja halted his hunger strike late on Friday after receiving letters from the European Union and Denmark regarding his case, his daughter Maryam Al-Khawaja said.

UN Security Council backs Morocco plan for Western Sahara autonomy

UN Security Council backs Morocco plan for Western Sahara autonomy
Updated 01 November 2025

UN Security Council backs Morocco plan for Western Sahara autonomy

UN Security Council backs Morocco plan for Western Sahara autonomy
  • Resolution says autonomy for Western Sahara under Moroccan sovereignty may be the basis for future negotiations to resolve the 50-year-old conflict
  • Morocco’s King Mohammed VI lauds vote as “historic” and “opening a new and victorious chapter in the process of enshrining the Moroccan character of the Sahara”

UNITED NATIONS: The UN Security Council voted Friday in favor of a resolution brought forward by the United States backing Morocco’s autonomy plan for Western Sahara as the “most feasible” solution for the disputed territory, angering Algeria.
The Western Sahara is a vast mineral-rich former Spanish colony that is largely controlled by Morocco but has been claimed for decades by the pro-independence Polisario Front, which is supported by Algeria.
The Security Council had previously urged Morocco, the Polisario Front, Algeria and Mauritania to resume talks to reach a broad agreement.
But, at the initiative of Donald Trump’s administration, the council shifted to support a plan, initially presented by Rabat in 2007, in which Western Sahara would enjoy autonomy under Morocco’s sole sovereignty.
The resolution, adopted by 11 votes with none against and three abstentions — with Algeria refusing to participate — said autonomy for Western Sahara under Moroccan sovereignty may be the basis for future negotiations to resolve the 50-year-old conflict.
“Genuine autonomy under Moroccan sovereignty could constitute a most feasible solution,” the UNSC resolution said.
Morocco’s King Mohammed VI lauded the vote as “historic,” saying “we are opening a new and victorious chapter in the process of enshrining the Moroccan character of the Sahara.”
Trump, during his first term in office, in 2020 recognized Morocco’s claim to Western Sahara after Morocco normalized relations with Israel — achieving top diplomatic objectives for both Rabat and Washington.
Spain, France, Britain and Germany have since expressed support for Morocco’s sovereignty over the territory.

US-led resolution

The United Nations envoy on Western Sahara, Staffan de Mistura, has welcomed US efforts to solve the issue but raised concerns about lack of detail in Morocco’s plan.
Algerian Ambassador Amar Bendjama said the text “does not faithfully or sufficiently reflect the UN doctrine on decolonization.”
It “fell short of the expectations and legitimate aspirations of the people of Western Sahara, represented by the Polisario Front (who) have been resisting for over 50 years to have, as the sole party, a say in their own destiny,” he added.
The resolution adopted Friday calls on UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and de Mistura to conduct negotiations on the basis of the plan to reach a mutually acceptable agreement.
It also extends the UN peacekeeping mission in Western Sahara for another year.
 


As Iraqi politicians gear up for election, public disillusion sets in again

As Iraqi politicians gear up for election, public disillusion sets in again
Updated 01 November 2025

As Iraqi politicians gear up for election, public disillusion sets in again

As Iraqi politicians gear up for election, public disillusion sets in again

BAGHDAD: Iraqis are bracing for yet another election they fear will change little, with many seeing the pro-reform campaign banners for the Nov. 11 vote as empty gestures from elites who have delivered little since the 2003 US-led invasion.
Years of corruption, high unemployment, and poor public services have blighted daily life since then, even as democratic elections have become standard following decades of repressive dictatorship under Saddam Hussein.
Iraqis complain that many of their leaders are too engaged in rivalry for sectarian power to tackle Iraq’s problems — despite its vast oil wealth.
Despite the election billboards and banners trumpeting change, for much of the public, the election outcome feels predetermined, serving merely to keep Iraq’s political balance in the hands of the same sectarian elites.
Said Hatem, a Baghdad resident, voiced skepticism about the prospects for change. 
“You see the advertisement on the streets ... but they have been ruling for 20–25 years. How do you make me trust you?” he said.
Iraq’s Independent High Electoral Commission has approved 7,768 candidates to run for parliament, including 2,248 women and 5,520 men. It said campaigning was authorized from Oct. 3 to Nov. 8.
The vote will test confidence in Iraq’s political system, which has failed to make good on pledges to improve basic services and fight graft in a country where Iraqis say vast oil revenues only benefit the political elite.

FASTFACT

The Independent High Electoral Commission has approved 7,768 candidates to run for Iraq’s parliament, including 2,248 women and 5,520 men.

Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani and his party will be competing mostly against other dominant, Shiite factions.
Frustration has been heightened by a resurgence in political tension, including the killing of parliamentary candidate Safa Al-Mashhadani, who had leveled criticism at everything from state corruption to militias he said were trying to take over his hometown.
Tabark Tariq Al-Azzawi, a candidate for the Iraqi Progress Party, said she had received threats and increasingly feared for her safety.
“I hope this phase will pass without any further losses or assassinations, whether of candidates or ordinary citizens. I hope that security and safety will prevail always,” she said.
Reuters could not independently verify the motive or details of Al-Mashhadani’s killing.
Authorities have since stepped up protection measures for candidates, with arrests made and investigations continuing, according to Iraq’s main security spokesman Gen. Saad Maan.
Many Iraqis believe that real change through elections is nearly impossible because the same powerful political groups continue to dominate the state and its vast energy resources.
These parties are often backed by armed factions close to Iran who control key institutions, government contracts, and public funds.
Voters say this allows ruling alliances to orchestrate election outcomes in their favor, and only their supporters get through a patronage system — allegations these parties deny.
An Iraqi tribal leader, Sheikh Abdul Jaber Hamoud, criticized what he described as the tendency to improve government outreach and public services only during election cycles while most Iraqis were neglected at other times.
“I believe the political process is no longer a democratic one; rather, it has become a political process manipulated in favor of specific groups from 2003 to this day,” said political analyst Qais Al-Zubaidi.
“Citizens strive for change, but this change is extremely difficult to achieve in the presence of uncontrolled weapons.”
Back in 2003, US officials thought that toppling Saddam would set Iraq on a path to the freedom and prosperity enjoyed by all communities in the country.
Instead, a pro-Saddam insurgency emerged, followed by militants and a sectarian civil war that gave rise to the more extremist Daesh terrorists.
Few politicians have raised hopes of a better life, even years after the sectarian bloodshed subsided.


UK reiterates support for UN mission in Libya at Security Council

UK reiterates support for UN mission in Libya at Security Council
Updated 31 October 2025

UK reiterates support for UN mission in Libya at Security Council

UK reiterates support for UN mission in Libya at Security Council

LONDON: The UK on Friday reaffirmed its full support for the UN Support Mission in Libya as the Security Council renewed its mandate for another year.

Delivering the UK’s explanation for its vote, James Kariuki, London’s charge d’affaires to the UN, welcomed the resolution and thanked UNSC members for their constructive engagement during negotiations.

“The mandate plays an important role in supporting the Libyan people to achieve the peace, stability, and democratic governance they deserve,” Kariuki said, emphasizing that UNSMIL’s work reinforces a Libyan-led and Libyan-owned political process.

Kariuki highlighted the roadmap announced by UN Special Representative Hanna Tetteh in August 2025, noting its three core pillars provide a clear framework for political progress.

He also called for the implementation of recommendations from UNSMIL’s Strategic Review to enhance the mission’s effectiveness.

“The ongoing political deadlock threatens Libya’s stability and continues to deny Libyans the democratic choice, economic opportunity, and security they deserve,” Kariuki said.

He urged all parties to engage constructively with the UN roadmap to deliver free, fair, transparent, and inclusive elections.

The UK also stressed the importance of adhering to international humanitarian and human rights law, describing these principles as vital to building lasting peace and preserving the integrity of Libya’s political process.