NATO says has ‘confirmed evidence’ North Korea troops in Russia

NATO says has ‘confirmed evidence’ North Korea troops in Russia
NATO countries have confirmed evidence that North Korea has sent troops to Russia, an alliance spokeswoman said Wednesday, warning it would be a major escalation if they head to Ukraine. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 24 October 2024

NATO says has ‘confirmed evidence’ North Korea troops in Russia

NATO says has ‘confirmed evidence’ North Korea troops in Russia
  • “Allies have confirmed evidence of a DPRK troop deployment to Russia,” Farah Dakhlallah said

BRUSSELS: NATO countries have confirmed evidence that North Korea has sent troops to Russia, an alliance spokeswoman said Wednesday, warning it would be a major escalation if they head to Ukraine.
“Allies have confirmed evidence of a DPRK troop deployment to Russia. If these troops are destined to fight in Ukraine, it would mark a significant escalation in North Korea’s support for Russia’s illegal war and yet another sign of Russia’s significant losses on the front lines,” Farah Dakhlallah said in a statement.


Norway proposes maintaining Ukraine aid at $8.4bn in 2026

Norway proposes maintaining Ukraine aid at $8.4bn in 2026
Updated 58 min 33 sec ago

Norway proposes maintaining Ukraine aid at $8.4bn in 2026

Norway proposes maintaining Ukraine aid at $8.4bn in 2026
  • The proposal must be ratified by the Norwegian parliament
  • Norway was the second largest European provider of military aid to Ukraine in May and June

OSLO: The Norwegian government aims to maintain its aid to Ukraine at 85 billion kroner ($8.4 billion) in 2026, the same level as this year, the office of Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store said Monday.
The proposal, made as Store visited Kyiv, must be ratified by parliament and if passed would take to 275 billion kroner ($27.1 billion) the total civilian and military aid which Norway will send the country for the 2023-2030 period.
“The government intends to maintain Norway’s extraordinary support to Ukraine next year and is proposing an allocation of a total of 85 billion kroner in military and civilian support,” said Store in a statement.
“This is a critical time in Ukraine’s fight to defend itself. As talks on a ceasefire and peace take place, the war rages on in Ukraine.
“It is important in the current situation to reaffirm our continued strong support for Ukraine: political, financial and military,” said Store, who was to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday.
The aid package proposed by the minority Labor government must be included in 2026 budget proposals due for presentation in October.
Norway is to hold parliamentary elections – expected to see a close battle between left and right – on September 8.
Oslo’s support for Ukraine is almost universal among the Norwegian public, with the country sharing a border with Russia.
According to German research institute Kiel Institute, Norway was the second largest European provider of military aid to Ukraine in May and June, behind Germany.
On Sunday, Oslo announced it would allocate some seven billion kroner to strengthening Ukraine’s air defenses, including the joint purchase with Germany of two Patriot air and missile defense systems.


Polish president proposes restricting state benefits for Ukrainians

Polish president proposes restricting state benefits for Ukrainians
Updated 25 August 2025

Polish president proposes restricting state benefits for Ukrainians

Polish president proposes restricting state benefits for Ukrainians
  • President Karol Nawrocki, a conservative nationalist inspired by US President Donald Trump, promised during his election campaign this year to put “Poles first” and to limit the rights of foreigners in Poland
  • Official data shows some 1.5 million Ukrainian citizens currently reside in Poland

WARSAW: Poland’s president unveiled plans on Monday to limit Ukrainians’ access to child benefits and health care, while also proposing a ban on the glorification of a 20th-century Ukrainian nationalist leader, in a sign of a hardening stance toward refugees.
Poland has been one of Ukraine’s staunchest backers since Russia invaded in 2022, but some Poles have grown weary of large numbers of refugees, while tensions between Warsaw and Kyiv over World War Two Volhynia massacres have at times come to the surface. Official data shows some 1.5 million Ukrainian citizens currently reside in Poland.
President Karol Nawrocki, a conservative nationalist inspired by US President Donald Trump, promised during his election campaign this year to put “Poles first” and to limit the rights of foreigners in Poland.
“I did not change my opinion and I intend to fulfil my obligations and I believe that (family) benefit should only be granted to those Ukrainians who make the effort to work in Poland, the same with health care,” he told journalists.
Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
Ukrainian refugees are currently eligible to receive the monthly family benefit of 800 zlotys ($219) per child if their children attend Polish schools. Other EU countries such as Germany have also proposed cutting benefits recently.
In Poland, the president can propose bills and veto government legislation. The government, currently led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, a pro-EU centrist opposed to Nawrocki, can similarly block the president’s proposals, creating deadlock.

HISTORICAL STRAINS
Nawrocki also proposed on Monday tightening the criminal code to ban the promotion of Stepan Bandera, a Ukrainian nationalist leader who fought both Nazi and Soviet forces during World War Two, and his insurgent army.
“I believe this bill should clearly address Bandera and equate the Bandera symbol in the criminal code with symbols corresponding to German National Socialism, commonly known as Nazism, and Soviet communism,” Nawrocki said.
Many Ukrainians regard Bandera and his militia as heroes for the resistance they mounted against the Soviet Union and as symbols of Kyiv’s painful struggle for independence from Moscow.
But he is remembered by many in Poland as a symbol of anti-Polish violence. Bandera is associated with the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), which Warsaw says carried out mass killings of Polish civilians in 1943-44, especially in Volhynia.
Thousands of Ukrainians also died in reprisal killings.
Publicly promoting Nazi, fascist or communist ideas is subject to up to 3 years of prison under the Polish criminal code.


Suspects plead not guilty to sabotage in Baltic Sea cable breaches

Suspects plead not guilty to sabotage in Baltic Sea cable breaches
Updated 25 August 2025

Suspects plead not guilty to sabotage in Baltic Sea cable breaches

Suspects plead not guilty to sabotage in Baltic Sea cable breaches
  • Prosecutors say the Eagle S tanker deliberately dragged its anchor along the seabed to sever five undersea cables
  • Finnish prosecutors are seeking 2.5 years in prison for the tanker’s senior officers

HELSINKI: The captain and two officers of an oil tanker accused of severing five undersea power and telecoms cables when their vessel left Russia and sailed through the Gulf of Finland pleaded not guilty as their trial began in Helsinki on Monday.
NATO allies with forces stationed around the Baltic Sea went on high alert after the December 25 incident, one of a string of suspicious cable and gas pipeline outages in the region since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
Prosecutors say the Eagle S tanker deliberately dragged its anchor along the seabed to sever the Estlink 2 power cable linking Finland and Estonia, as well as four Internet cables in the Christmas Day incident.
Finnish security forces intercepted the ship and boarded it from helicopters after ordering it to move into Finnish territorial waters.
The three defendants pleaded not guilty in court, denying all charges and rejecting the cable owners’ claims for damages that amount to tens of millions of euros.
Finnish prosecutors are seeking 2.5 years in prison for the Cook Islands-registered tanker’s Georgian captain, Davit Vadatchkoria, and the Indian first and second officers for aggravated criminal mischief and aggravated interference with telecommunications.
Vadatchkoria’s lawyer Tommi Heinonen called the incident “a marine accident” in court, and together with the other defendants denied the court’s jurisdiction in the matter, given the cable cuts occurred in international waters.
He told the court that the vessel’s anchor had dropped due to technical faults in the securing of the anchor winch.
On December 25, the Eagle S sailed on for three hours at a reduced speed after severing the first power cable at 12:26 p.m. local time, prosecutors told the court. When contacted and asked by Finnish marine authorities at 3:20 p.m. whether its anchor was up and secured, its crew replied in the affirmative, which was not the truth, prosecutors said.
Defense lawyers said the crew had no reason to believe the anchor had sunk to the seabed as the tanker’s mechanical engineer, who is not on trial, had told the defendants the drop in speed was due to “an engine problem.”
Prosecutors said the tanker continued on its journey and went on to cut four more cables between 6 and 7 p.m. on December 25, which they said showed clear criminal intent.
Finland’s maximum sentence for aggravated criminal mischief is 10 years in prison, while aggravated interference with telecommunications carries a term of up to five years.
Prosecutors say the damage caused serious danger to energy supply and telecommunications in Finland, and that repair costs totalled at least 60 million euros ($70 million).
Last week, a Ukrainian was arrested over the 2022 attacks on the Nord Stream gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea. Both Moscow and the West have described the explosions, which largely severed Russian gas supplies to Europe, as sabotage.


Beyond the ‘bling’, China aims for deterrence in military show

Beyond the ‘bling’, China aims for deterrence in military show
Updated 25 August 2025

Beyond the ‘bling’, China aims for deterrence in military show

Beyond the ‘bling’, China aims for deterrence in military show
  • The parade comes amid protracted military tensions across East Asia as China increases deployments around Taiwan and the disputed South China Sea and the US and its allies prepare potentially to respond to a regional conflict

HONG KONG: As China stages its largest-ever military parade through Beijing next week, it will be highlighting not just advancements in arms hardware, but also the vital technology required to protect, control and command the weapons it would use in any future conflict.
Among the more eye-catching aircraft, hypersonic missiles and undersea drones, will be equipment such as battlefield sensors on tanks, advanced early warning and targeting radars and air defense lasers — all part of an effort that some analysts describe as transparency designed to intimidate and deter potential rivals. But beyond the unprecedented scale and choreographed display of military might, question marks remain about how effectively China’s armed forces — untested since a bloody border conflict with Vietnam in 1979 — could knit it all together in a future conflict.
Singapore-based security scholar Drew Thompson said while the People’s Liberation Army may unveil advanced weapons and systems to protect and command them, China’s key potential adversaries may not be deterred by the “bling” of a parade.
“It is performative but it doesn’t speak to capability, and we still don’t know how effectively China could tie it all together and operate in a conflict scenario,” said Thompson, a senior fellow at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS).
The parade comes amid protracted military tensions across East Asia as China increases deployments around Taiwan and the disputed South China Sea and the US and its allies prepare potentially to respond to a regional conflict.
China claims Taiwan as its territory and has never renounced the use of force to seize it. Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te and his government strongly object to China’s sovereignty claims, saying it is up to the island’s people to decide their future.
While the military leaderships of the US and its allies like Japan as well as Taiwan may not be deterred, others might be intimidated, Thompson said.
To that end, China might be signalling to India, Russia and smaller regional nations as well as “American libertarian isolationists.”
“As you’re watching the parade, it is easy to get distracted....it is not about the bling, but the effect the bling has on the view of the observer — that is China is too big to fight and US interests aren’t worth the risk or the consequences of a fight with China.”
The Chinese defense ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

VICTORY DAY PARADE
Regional military attaches and security analysts have already been scrutinizing on-line footage of the rehearsals of what Beijing has called a “Victory Day” parade, marking the end of World War Two after Japan’s formal surrender.
The war is also often described by Chinese officials and in state media as the “War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression” and the “World Anti-Fascist War.”
“(The weapons and equipment) will fully demonstrate our military’s robust ability to adapt to technological advancements, evolving warfare patterns, and win future wars,” parade deputy director Wu Zeke told a press conference last week.
If Beijing is to win those wars, it will have to fully integrate a network of military satellites and cyber and electronic warfare capabilities, now considered second only to the United States, and use them to effectively dominate its near seas.
To that end, an early warning plane capable of operating from China’s aircraft carriers, the KJ-600, has been displayed — a vital piece in finishing the complex jigsaw of carrier operations.
China’s jet fighters will also be closely watched, particularly following Pakistan’s use of Chinese-built J-10C fighters against Indian aircraft during clashes in May.
Pakistan has claimed that it shot down six Indian aircraft during the clashes, including a French-made Rafale fighter. India has acknowledged some losses but denied losing six aircraft and,
earlier this month, said it had shot down six Pakistani planes. A suite of new YJ-17, YJ-19 and YJ-20 cruise missiles will also be shown. They could be deployed from bombers and ships, some with hypersonic warheads — potentially complicating operations by US and allied ships across East Asia.
And a new medium-sized tank, the ZTZ-201, has appeared in rehearsals bristling with what analysts believe are advanced sensors and battle management systems.
An entirely new weapon on show is also vexing analysts with its sudden appearance — a torpedo-shaped sea drone too large to be fired from ordinary submarines. Ben Lewis, founder of open source data platform PLATracker, said its emergence suggested China had been closely tracking the US’s own underwater drone program.
While it is unclear how close it is to operational, “if they can produce a lot of these kinds of weapons cheaply, things could get very ugly, very fast in a Taiwan scenario,” Lewis said. Collin Koh, a senior fellow at the RSIS’ Institute of Defense and Strategic Studies in Singapore, said while the sea drone effort had been underway for some time, he was surprised that it had reached the point where the PLA was ready to show it off.
“(It) seems to be imply that the system is either already in service or soon to do so,” he said.


Australia mushroom murderer Erin Patterson left me ‘half alive’, lone surviving victim says

Australia mushroom murderer Erin Patterson left me ‘half alive’, lone surviving victim says
Updated 25 August 2025

Australia mushroom murderer Erin Patterson left me ‘half alive’, lone surviving victim says

Australia mushroom murderer Erin Patterson left me ‘half alive’, lone surviving victim says
  • Patterson was found guilty last month of luring her in-laws to lunch at her home and poisoning them with individual portions of Beef Wellington that contained toxic death cap mushrooms

SYDNEY: The lone surviving guest of a lunch where three others died after being served food laced with deadly mushrooms told an Australian court on Monday the actions of host and convicted murderer Erin Patterson had left him feeling “half alive.”
Patterson was found guilty last month of luring her mother-in-law Gail Patterson, father-in-law Donald Patterson and Gail’s sister, Heather Wilkinson, to lunch at her home and poisoning them with individual portions of Beef Wellington that contained toxic death cap mushrooms.
A jury also found the 50-year-old guilty of the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson, Heather’s husband, who survived the 2023 meal at Erin Patterson’s home in Leongatha, a town of about 6,000 people some 135 km (84 miles) southeast of Melbourne.
The seriousness of her offenses meant Patterson’s sentence could only be life imprisonment, her own barrister said on Monday during a pre-sentencing hearing.
Earlier, Ian Wilkinson told a court in Melbourne that the death of his wife had left him bereft.
“It’s a truly horrible thought to live with that somebody could decide to take her life. I only feel half alive without her,” he said, breaking down in tears as he delivered his victim impact statement.
Wilkinson, a pastor in a local church, spent months in hospital recovering from the poisoning, and said on Monday he had only narrowly survived.
He called on Patterson, who said the poisonings were accidental and continues to maintain her innocence, to confess to her crimes.
“I encourage Erin to receive my offer of forgiveness for those harms done to me with full confession and repentance. I bear her no ill will,” he said.
“I am no longer Erin Patterson’s victim and she has become the victim of my kindness.”
‘Grim reality’
The court received a total of 28 victim impact statements, of which seven were read publicly.
Erin Patterson’s estranged husband Simon Patterson – who was invited to the lunch but declined – spoke of the devastating impact on the couple’s two children.
“The grim reality is they live in an irreparably broken home with only a solo parent, when almost everyone else knows their mother murdered their grandparents,” he said in a statement that was read out on his behalf.
The extraordinary media interest in the case, which gripped Australia for much of the 10-week trial, had been traumatic for the family, he added.
The current hearing will form part of presiding judge Justice Christopher Beale’s sentencing decision, which is due to be heard on September 8.
“This is very grave offending and we make no argument that the (longest possible) sentence should be anything other than life imprisonment,” Patterson’s barrister Colin Mandy said on Monday.
However, Mandy urged Beale to impose a non-parole period, meaning she would have the possibility of eventual release.
He said Patterson’s “notorious” reputation would make prison more onerous for her than the average offender, and that with a non-parole period of 30 years she would be 80 before she could even be considered for release.
The court earlier heard evidence from Jennifer Hosking, assistant commissioner of Corrections Victoria that runs the prison where she is being held. She said Patterson was currently being kept in isolation for her own safety, and was permitted contact with only one other prisoner, who is in jail for terrorism offenses.
The prosecution argues that Patterson should never be released.
Patterson has 28 days from the day of her sentencing to appeal, but has not yet indicated whether she will do so.