Nine killed, 29 injured in blast at police station in India’s Kashmir
Nine killed, 29 injured in blast at police station in India’s Kashmir/node/2622678/world
Nine killed, 29 injured in blast at police station in India’s Kashmir
Indian security forces arrive near the site of an explosion inside a police station in Srinagar, Indian Kashmir on Nov. 15, 2025. (Reuters)
Updated 2 min 23 sec ago
Reuters
Nine killed, 29 injured in blast at police station in India’s Kashmir
Most of the dead were policemen, including forensic officials who were examining the explosives
The blast comes four days after a deadly car explosion in Indian capital New Delhi
Updated 2 min 23 sec ago
Reuters
SRINAGAR, India: At least nine people were killed and 29 injured when a pile of confiscated explosives blew up at a police station in the Indian portion of Kashmir late on Friday, police sources said, days after a car blast in New Delhi killed eight people. Most of the dead were policemen, including forensic officials who were examining the explosives, said the sources, who did not wish to be named. Some of the injured are in critical condition, they said. “The identification of the bodies is underway, as some have been completely burnt,” one of the sources said. “The intensity of the blast was such that some body parts were recovered from nearby houses, around 100-200 meters away from the police station.” The police chief of India’s federally administered Jammu and Kashmir region is expected to address a press conference on the incident shortly. Earlier, a local police official told Reuters an explosion had ripped through Nowgam police station. The official said fire had engulfed the compound and fire tenders had been rushed to the spot. The blast comes four days after a deadly car explosion in Indian capital New Delhi killed at least eight people in what the government has called a terror incident. Nuclear-armed neighbors India and Pakistan have for decades fought periodic wars over the disputed region of Kashmir, which they both claim in full and rule only in part.
Trump says he will likely sue the BBC for up to $5 billion over edited speech/node/2622676/world
Trump says he will likely sue the BBC for up to $5 billion over edited speech
the British broadcaster admitted it wrongly edited a video of a speech he gave but insisted there was no legal basis for his claim
Updated 3 sec ago
Reuters
LONDON: US President Donald Trump said on Friday he would likely sue the BBC next week for as much as $5 billion after the British broadcaster admitted it wrongly edited a video of a speech he gave but insisted there was no legal basis for his claim. The British Broadcasting Corporation has been plunged into its biggest crisis in decades after two senior leaders resigned following accusations of bias, including over the editing of Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021, when his supporters stormed the Capitol. Trump’s lawyers had initially set a Friday deadline for the BBC to retract its documentary or face a lawsuit for “no less” than $1 billion. They also demanded an apology and compensation for what they called “overwhelming reputational and financial harm,” according to a letter seen by Reuters. The BBC, which has admitted its editing of Trump’s remarks was an “error of judgment,” sent a personal apology to Trump on Thursday but said it would not rebroadcast the documentary and rejected the defamation claim. “We’ll sue them for anywhere between $1 billion and $5 billion, probably sometime next week,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One as he headed to Florida for the weekend. “I think I have to do that, I mean they’ve even admitted that they cheated,” he said. “They changed the words coming out of my mouth.” Trump said he had not spoken with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, with whom he has built a solid relationship, about the issue, but that he planned to call him this weekend. He said Starmer had tried to reach him, and was “very embarrassed” by the incident. The documentary, which aired on the BBC’s flagship “Panorama” news program, spliced together three video excerpts from Trump’s speech, creating the impression he was inciting the January 6, 2021, riot. His lawyers said this was “false and defamatory.” ’BEYOND FAKE, THIS IS CORRUPT’ In an interview with British right-leaning TV channel GB News, Trump said the edit was “impossible to believe” and compared it to election interference. “I made a beautiful statement, and they made it into a not beautiful statement,” he said. “Fake news was a great term, except it’s not strong enough. This is beyond fake, this is corrupt.” Trump said the BBC’s apology was not enough. “When you say it’s unintentional, I guess if it’s unintentional, you don’t apologize,” he said. “They clipped together two parts of the speech that were nearly an hour apart. It’s incredible to depict the idea that I had given this aggressive speech which led to riots. One was making me into a bad guy, and the other was a very calming statement.” BBC APOLOGY, NO PLANS TO REBROADCAST BBC Chair Samir Shah sent a personal apology on Thursday to the White House and told lawmakers the edit was “an error of judgment.” The following day, British culture minister Lisa Nandy said the apology was “right and necessary.” The broadcaster said it had no plans to rebroadcast the documentary and was investigating fresh allegations about editing practices that included the speech on another program, “Newsnight.” BIGGEST CRISIS IN DECADES The dispute has escalated into the broadcaster’s most serious crisis in decades. Its director general Tim Davie and head of news Deborah Turness quit this week over the controversy amid allegations of bias and editing failures. Starmer told parliament on Wednesday he supported a “strong and independent BBC” but said the broadcaster must “get its house in order.” “Some would rather the BBC didn’t exist. Some of them are sitting up there,” he said, pointing to opposition Conservative lawmakers. “I’m not one of them. In an age of disinformation, the argument for an impartial British news service is stronger than ever.” The BBC, founded in 1922 and funded mainly by a compulsory license fee, faces scrutiny over whether public money could be used to settle Trump’s claim. Former media minister John Whittingdale said there would be “real anger” if license payers’ money covered damages.