Pakistan PM urges Afghanistan to rein in ‘terrorists’ after Islamabad court blast

Pakistan PM urges Afghanistan to rein in ‘terrorists’ after Islamabad court blast
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif speaks in the National Assembly on November 12, 2025. (PTV News/ Youtube)
Short Url
Updated 50 sec ago

Pakistan PM urges Afghanistan to rein in ‘terrorists’ after Islamabad court blast

Pakistan PM urges Afghanistan to rein in ‘terrorists’ after Islamabad court blast
  • Suicide blast outside Islamabad court complex killed 12 people, injured 36 on Tuesday 
  • Islamabad alleges militants carry out attacks in Pakistan from sanctuaries in Afghanistan

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Wednesday urged the Afghanistan government to rein in “terrorists” to ensure peace in the region, a day after a deadly suicide blast killed 12 people in Pakistan’s capital. 

The suicide blast took place outside a court complex in Islamabad’s G-11 sector on Tuesday afternoon, killing 12 and injuring 36. Sharif blamed the Pakistani Taliban or the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) for the blast. The group subsequently denied responsibility. 

The blast took place as tensions persist between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Islamabad alleges the TTP carries out attacks in Pakistan from sanctuaries in Afghanistan, a charge Kabul denies. The two countries engaged in fierce clashes that killed dozens last month before agreeing to a temporary ceasefire on Oct. 19. A third round of talks in Istanbul subsequently broke down between the two, each side blaming the other for it. 

“I would like to seize this opportunity and say, ‘Come, let’s sit with sincere intentions and rein in terrorists,’” Sharif said in a message to the Afghan government while speaking in parliament. 

“Make this commitment and we will support you completely so that peace can be established in this entire region, and so that Pakistan and this entire region can experience progress and prosperity.”

Sharif said “foreign hands” were involved in the Islamabad court blast and in an attack this week at a cadet college in northwestern Pakistan that killed at least three. 

Pakistan’s government and the military also accuse India of funding and arming militants in the northwestern and southwestern provinces of the country. New Delhi denies the allegations and accuses Islamabad of backing separatist militants in the part of disputed Kashmir India administers. Pakistan denies this. 

These mutual allegations fueled tensions earlier this year when a militant attack in Indian-administered Kashmir in April killed 22 people, mostly tourists. The incident triggered four days of cross-border shelling, drone strikes and limited air engagements between the two sides in May before a ceasefire was brokered by the United States.


Pakistan’s lower house passes 27th constitutional amendment seeking revisions to judicial, military command 

Pakistan’s lower house passes 27th constitutional amendment seeking revisions to judicial, military command 
Updated 12 November 2025

Pakistan’s lower house passes 27th constitutional amendment seeking revisions to judicial, military command 

Pakistan’s lower house passes 27th constitutional amendment seeking revisions to judicial, military command 
  • Constitutional amendment sails through National Assembly with 234 votes in favor, four against amid opposition walkout
  • Bill empowers army chief to become constitutionally recognized head of armed services, reduces top court’s powers

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s lower house of parliament on Wednesday passed the contentious 27th constitutional amendment seeking major changes in the country’s judicial and military command structure by a two-thirds majority required for constitutional changes, as opposition lawmakers staged a walkout in protest. 

The development takes place after Pakistan’s upper house of parliament, the Senate, passed the 27th constitutional amendment by a two-thirds majority on Monday. Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar had tabled it in the lower house a day earlier. 

The amendment introduces changes to Article 243 of the constitution, creating a new post of the Chief of Defense Forces. It also abolishes the role of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee (CJCSC). This empowers the army chief to become the constitutionally recognized head of Pakistan’s armed services. 

It also calls for establishing a Constitutional Court, reducing the powers of the top court and introducing new procedures for the transfer of judges. Pakistan’s government argues the amendment will help reduce the backlog of cases and improve governance. The opposition argues it clips the powers of the judiciary. 

“Two hundred and thirty-four members cast their votes for Is, four members were nos. Consequently the bill is passed by the assembly by not less than the two-third of the membership of the assembly,” Speaker Ayaz Sadiq announced to loud applause. 

Former three-time prime minister Nawaz Sharif, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari attended the National Assembly session. 

Before voting took place, Tarar announced the government had introduced a set of new amendments to the bill. One of these amendments clarified that the post of the chief justice was not being abolished, adding that Justice Yahya Afridi will remain as the country’s top judge. 

Shortly after Tarar started speaking, opposition members started shouting slogans before staging a walkout in protest. Voting on the bill followed. 

Another amendment was made to Article 6 of the constitution, which relates to “high treason.” Tarar said previously, neither the Supreme Court nor a high court could ratify the abrogation of the constitution. He said the constitutional court was also added to this list.

The bill will now be sent back to the upper house or Senate for the new amendments to be debated upon again. If it sails through the Senate, the bill will then require the president’s assent to become law. 

The 27th amendment follows the 26th amendment of October 2024, which gave parliament a role in appointing the chief justice and created a senior judges’ panel to hear constitutional cases, measures that were also widely criticized as weakening judicial independence.