India capital car blast death toll rises to 12

India capital car blast death toll rises to 12
Security personnel stand guard near the site of Monday’s deadly car blast, in front of the historic Red Fort in the old quarters of Delhi on Nov. 12, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 8 min 32 sec ago

India capital car blast death toll rises to 12

India capital car blast death toll rises to 12

NEW DELHI: India’s anti-terrorism agency spearheaded on Wednesday the third day of investigations into a car blast in the capital, as a hospital official said the death toll had increased to 12.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has called the explosion on Monday evening a “conspiracy,” and has vowed that those responsible will face justice.

Police are yet to give exact details of what caused the intense explosion near the historic Red Fort in the crowded Old Delhi quarter of the city, one of India’s most well-known landmarks, and the site of the annual prime minister’s Independence Day speech.

It was the most significant security incident since April 22, when 26 mainly Hindu civilians were killed at the tourist site of Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir, triggering clashes with Pakistan.

“Twelve people have died and more than 30 are injured,” Ritu Saxena, the chief medical officer of Delhi’s LNJP hospital, said.

India’s National Investigation Agency is leading the probe into the explosion, which came hours after police said they had arrested a gang and seized explosive materials and assault rifles.

Police said the men were linked with Jaish-e-Mohammed, a Pakistan-based Islamist group, and Ansar Ghazwat-ul-Hind, a Kashmir offshoot of militant group Al-Qaeda.

India lists both groups as terrorist organizations.

Home Minister Amit Shah, after chairing security talks following Monday’s blast, said he had instructed officials “to hunt down each and every culprit behind this incident.”


Australia’s top court blocks Russia from building new Canberra embassy

Australia’s top court blocks Russia from building new Canberra embassy
Updated 14 sec ago

Australia’s top court blocks Russia from building new Canberra embassy

Australia’s top court blocks Russia from building new Canberra embassy
  • Russia owned a lease to a plot of land that is about 300 meters from Parliament House in Canberra
  • The Russian government secured a 99-year lease for diplomatic use of the site in 2008

SYDNEY: Australia’s highest court on Wednesday blocked Russia from building a new embassy in the nation’s capital, unanimously upholding a law that canceled its lease on national security grounds.

Russia owned a lease to a plot of land that is about 300 meters (984 feet) from Parliament House in Canberra and intended to build a new embassy building there to replace an older building elsewhere in the capital.

But in 2023, the Australian government introduced a law to cancel the lease after receiving “very clear security advice as to the risk presented by a new Russian presence so close to Parliament House,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said at the time.

Russia challenged the law in front of the High Court of Australia, arguing parliament was not authorized under the constitution to pass such a law.

On Wednesday, the court ruled unanimously that the Home Affairs Act 2023 validly invoked parliament’s constitutional power to seize land on “just terms,” though it said Moscow was entitled to compensation.

The Russian government secured a 99-year lease for diplomatic use of the site in 2008, paying A$2.75 million ($1.79 million).

Construction on the new site kicked off but was never completed. Russia’s existing embassy is in Griffith, a suburb.

Australia’s government argued that the lease’s cancelation was supported by parliament’s power to make laws for the nation’s territories, including the Australian Capital Territory, where Canberra is located.

It added that it did not need to pay Russia “just terms” because the constitution only required compensation in cases where property was acquired for a specific use case, which it said did not exist in this instance.

It also argued that compensation should not extend to paying a foreign state as it would be “incongruous” with the Home Affairs Act.

The court said the absence of a proposed use or application for the land was “irrelevant” and compensation “is what the constitution requires.”

Australian Attorney-General Michelle Rowland welcomed the High Court’s decision.

“Australia will always stand up for our values and we will stand up for our national security,” she said in a statement.

“The government will closely consider the next steps in light of the court’s decision.”

The Russian embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment.