Ontario premier says goal ‘achieved’ with US anti-tariff ad

Ontario premier says goal ‘achieved’ with US anti-tariff ad
Ontario Premier Doug Ford. (The Canadian Press/AP)
Short Url
Updated 17 sec ago

Ontario premier says goal ‘achieved’ with US anti-tariff ad

Ontario premier says goal ‘achieved’ with US anti-tariff ad

MONTREAL: The premier of Ontario on Monday defended his ad campaign attacking US tariffs — which prompted President Donald Trump to suspend trade talks — saying it successfully “sparked a conversation.”
“We have achieved our goal,” Doug Ford told reporters in Toronto, saying the advertisement campaign had attracted “over a billion impressions around the world” on social media.
“We generated a conversation that wasn’t happening in the US,” he said.
An infuriated Trump on Thursday broke off trade talks with Ottawa over the ad, which featured the voice of the late US president Ronald Reagan, a Republican party icon.
Ford later said that the ad campaign would be suspended, starting Monday, so trade talks could resume.
But Trump became angered further when it still aired on US television on Friday and Saturday nights during the first two games of baseball’s World Series.
The championship round pits Canada’s Toronto Blue Jays against the Los Angeles Dodgers.
Over the weekend, Trump announced an additional 10-percent increase in tariffs on Canadian imports in retaliation for the ad campaign.
Ontario, Canada’s most populous province, has been hit hard by US tariffs, particularly in the automotive sector, where Canadian manufacturing is concentrated.
The ad used quotes from a radio address on trade that Reagan delivered in 1987, in which he warned against the ramifications that he said high tariffs on imports could have on the US economy.
Ford told reporters that Prime Minister Mark Carney and his chief of staff had both viewed the ad before it aired.
On Monday, Trump and Carney were both in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to attend meetings of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations , but had no contact.
The US Republican leader indicated that he did not intend to meet with his Canadian counterpart “for a while.”


Judge seeks assurances that Abrego Garcia won’t be deported to Liberia in violation of court order

Judge seeks assurances that Abrego Garcia won’t be deported to Liberia in violation of court order
Updated 16 sec ago

Judge seeks assurances that Abrego Garcia won’t be deported to Liberia in violation of court order

Judge seeks assurances that Abrego Garcia won’t be deported to Liberia in violation of court order

GREENBELT, Md.: A federal judge in Maryland on Monday sought assurances that the government will not deport Kilmar Abrego Garcia before she has lifted an injunction barring his removal from the US
Immigration and Customs Enforcement filed a notice late last week of their plan to deport him to the West African nation of Liberia as early as Friday. It’s the latest in a series of African countries the agency has designated as possible destinations for the Salvadoran national.
Abrego Garcia has an American wife and child and has lived in Maryland for years, but he immigrated to the US illegally as a teenager. In 2019, an immigration judge granted him protection from being deported back to El Salvador, where he faces a “well-founded fear” of violence from a gang that targeted his family. Earlier this year, his mistaken deportation to El Salvador, where he was held in a notoriously brutal prison despite having no criminal record, galvanized opposition to President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown. Facing mounting public pressure and a court order, the Trump administration brought him back to the US in June.
During a status conference on Monday, US District Judge Paula Xinis questioned why the government does not simply deport Abrego Garcia to Costa Rica — a country he has said he is willing to go to because the government has promised he would welcomed as a legal immigrant and not re-deported to El Salvador.
“Any insight you can shed on why we’re continuing this hearing when you could deport him to a third country tomorrow?” Xinis asked government attorneys. She noted that both the government and Abrego Garcia were “about to burn significant resources” in fighting over whether he can legally be deported to Liberia.
Government attorneys, including Deputy Assistant Attorney General Drew C. Ensign and Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Guynn, didn’t immediately have an answer but suggested it could be part of an upcoming court filing.
In the meantime, the attorneys said ICE is preparing to interview Abrego Garcia after he filed an official notice expressing fear of deportation to Liberia. His attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, told the judge they have received some confidential documents pertaining to assurances from the Liberian government about how Abrego Garcia would be treated there. However, they are not satisfied by what they have received. He hinted that the Liberian government has only agreed to take Abrego Garcia for a limited time.
The administration’s deportation agreements with so-called third countries have been contested in court by advocacy groups, who have argued that they violate due process rights and that immigrants are being sent to countries with long histories of human rights violations. But in June, a divided Supreme Court allowed the swift removal of immigrants to countries other than their homelands and with minimal notice.
When Abrego Garcia was returned to the US in June, he was charged in Tennessee with human smuggling. He has pleaded not guilty and asked the judge to dismiss that case. A hearing on the motion to dismiss is set for next week, and Xinis noted the fact that the government seems ready to deport him just prior to that, saying his removal would be the end of the criminal case.
“It doesn’t pass the sniff test that there hasn’t been some coordination” Xinis said, noting that the hearing in the criminal case was “common knowledge.”
“If I don’t lift the injunction, you are abiding by it, and he’s not going to be removed? Is that right?” she asked the government attorneys. They agreed.
In a separate action in immigration court, Abrego Garcia has applied for asylum in the US.


Suspect in Charlie Kirk killing can wear street clothes in court amid ‘extraordinary’ attention

Suspect in Charlie Kirk killing can wear street clothes in court amid ‘extraordinary’ attention
Updated 13 min 16 sec ago

Suspect in Charlie Kirk killing can wear street clothes in court amid ‘extraordinary’ attention

Suspect in Charlie Kirk killing can wear street clothes in court amid ‘extraordinary’ attention

SALT LAKE CITY: The 22-year-old Utah man charged with killing Charlie Kirk can appear in court wearing street clothes but must be physically restrained due to security concerns, a judge ruled Monday.
Attorneys for Tyler Robinson argued images of him shackled and in jail clothing would spread widely in a case with extensive press coverage and public interest, which they said could prejudice future jurors.
Judge Tony Graf agreed to make some allowances to protect Robinson’s presumption of innocence before a trial, agreeing that the case has drawn “extraordinary” public and media attention.
“Mr. Robinson shall be dressed as one who is presumed innocent,” Graf said during a virtual court hearing.
Utah prosecutors have charged Robinson with aggravated murder in the Sept. 10 shooting of the conservative activist on a Utah college campus. They plan to seek the death penalty.
While Robinson has no prior criminal history, Graf said the charges he faces are extremely serious and present safety concerns in the courtroom. It’s the court’s highest priority to protect the attorneys, court staff and Robinson himself during what could be emotional hearings, Graf said before denying Robinson’s request to appear without restraints. He did, however, prohibit members of the media from photographing or filming Robinson’s restraints.
Robinson is accused of shooting Kirk — an ally of President Donald Trump who worked to steer young voters toward conservatism — from a rooftop overlooking a crowded courtyard at Utah Valley University in Orem.
Robinson was arrested the following night when he showed up with his parents to turn himself in at his hometown sheriff’s office in southwest Utah, more than a three-hour drive from Orem.
As law enforcement agencies were scouring the state for the shooter, Washington County Sheriff Nate Brooksby said he received a phone call from a retired deputy saying he knew who killed Kirk. Robinson’s family had reached out to the retired deputy, who they knew through their involvement with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and worked with him to help negotiate a peaceful surrender.
“Part of the negotiation of getting him to bring himself in was that, that we would treat it as delicate and as soft as possible to make him feel comfortable to where he would show up at my office,” Brooksby said just after the arrest.
Prosecutors have since revealed incriminating text messages and DNA evidence that they say connect Robinson to the killing.
Robinson reportedly texted his romantic partner that he targeted Kirk because he “had enough of his hatred.”
Graf ordered Robinson to appear on Jan. 16 and Jan. 30 for his first in-person public hearings. He appeared Monday from jail on a blacked out screen and spoke only to confirm he was present.


‘Not our first hurricane’: Jamaicans prepare to ride out deadly Melissa

‘Not our first hurricane’: Jamaicans prepare to ride out deadly Melissa
Updated 32 min 54 sec ago

‘Not our first hurricane’: Jamaicans prepare to ride out deadly Melissa

‘Not our first hurricane’: Jamaicans prepare to ride out deadly Melissa

KINGSTON: Melissa could be the worst hurricane Jamaica has experienced since recordkeeping began — but some residents on the Caribbean island say they will believe it when they see it.
The country’s top officials have urged people on the island of 2.8 million to cooperate with evacuation orders, but some are staying put, even as torrential rains and battering winds begin.
“Jamaicans on the whole aren’t the type of people who would just get up and leave their home,” said Jamal Peters, a 34-year-old front manager at a hotel in Port Royal.
“They’d prefer to stay. And if a window blows out or something like that they can be there.”
Peters took up his post last month, and so far preparations at the 63-room waterfront hotel have involved moving guests to higher floors, battening down wherever possible, trimming trees and clearing out boats.
“We are still bracing for impact,” he told AFP. “But for the most part, because this is not our first hurricane, Jamaicans would have been prepared for what’s to come.”
The monster top-level Category 5 storm was churning toward Jamaica with maximum 175-mile  winds as of Monday evening and poised to dump several feet of rainfall that could cause deadly flooding.
Warnings that it could be worse than 1988’s Hurricane Gilbert — which left over 40 dead in Jamaica and killed hundreds more across the Caribbean and Mexico — triggered fear in some residents.
But others said it was business as usual.
“Evacuate? No, no. We’re not going to do that,” Roy Brown, a plumber and tiler, said. “As long as I know hurricane, from Gilbert, I have never left here yet. This one is no different.”
“Even if it’s Category 6, I am not moving. I don’t believe I can run from death. So whenever the Father is ready for me. I know he can take me, so I’m not running.”
Brown told AFP that allegations of poor shelter conditions at government-run facilities meant his views were widespread.
Jennifer Ramdial, a fisherwoman who said she has resided in the community for 30 years, cited the same reason for her defiance.
“I just don’t want to leave,” she added.

Jamaica’s own Usain Bolt, the Olympian sprinter, meanwhile was reposting government emergency information and disaster preparedness tips to his 4.6 million X followers.
Jamaicans who planned to shelter at home were already taking precautions like trimming trees, blocking windows and parking cars as safely as possible.
The preparations weren’t limited to human residents: zoos were also securing their animals, doing preparatory feeds and checks.
“Although we’re staring down the loaded barrel of this nasty [Category 5], we will see you all on the other side,” posted Joey Brown of Hope Zoo on Facebook. “Time to hunker down. Likely lose power and comms soon. Much love to all.”
Ishack Wilmot, 42, was sheltering with his family in Kingston, Jamaica’s capital.
“Our family is pretty used to weathering out storms,” he told AFP.
The surf camp hospitality manager and chef said preparations included packing away surfboards at work and collating important documents, along with stockpiling food and water.
“And then, you know, us as surfers — as soon as we did our basic preparations, we all went surfing,” he said.
But now, Wilmot said his normal ocean views had been grayed out by the incoming storm.
“We are currently experiencing a torrential downpour,” he said Monday evening. “It’s foggy out on the sea.”
And ultimately, “if anything does happen and it does become like the worst-case scenario,” he said, “I’d prefer to be with my family.”
 


Man accused of killing ex-Japan PM Abe to go on trial Tuesday

Man accused of killing ex-Japan PM Abe to go on trial Tuesday
Updated 56 min 38 sec ago

Man accused of killing ex-Japan PM Abe to go on trial Tuesday

Man accused of killing ex-Japan PM Abe to go on trial Tuesday
  • Tetsuya Yamagami, 45, was arrested at the scene of the shooting in July 2022 after allegedly firing at Abe with a homemade gun

TOKYO: A man accused of fatally shooting former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is set to go on trial on Tuesday, three years after the assassination of Japan’s longest-serving premier stunned a nation where gun crime and political violence are rare.
The trial opens the same day as two of Abe’s former allies, incumbent Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi and visiting US President Donald Trump, hold a summit.
Tetsuya Yamagami, 45, was arrested at the scene of the shooting in July 2022 after allegedly firing at Abe with a homemade gun while the former premier was giving a speech during an election campaign in the western Japanese city of Nara.
Yamagami blamed Abe for promoting the Unification Church, a religious group he held a grudge against after his mother donated to it some 100 million yen ($663,218), local media reported.
The Unification Church was founded in South Korea in 1954. It is famous for its mass weddings and counts Japanese followers as a key source of income.
Having moved through pretrial conferences, Yamagami is set to admit to murder while disputing parts of the indictment related to violations of the Firearms and Swords Control Act and Ordnance Manufacturing Act, an official at the Nara District Court said.
The shooting was followed by revelations that more than a hundred lawmakers of Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party had ties to the Unification Church, driving down public support for the ruling party, which is now led by Takaichi.
After Tuesday’s first court session, starting at 2 p.m. (0500 GMT), 17 more hearings are scheduled by year-end before a verdict on January 21.


Dozens of Afghans say colleagues, relatives killed after UK data breach

Dozens of Afghans say colleagues, relatives killed after UK data breach
Updated 27 October 2025

Dozens of Afghans say colleagues, relatives killed after UK data breach

Dozens of Afghans say colleagues, relatives killed after UK data breach
  • Evidence to inquiry into MoD leak finds 49 people lost family members or associates as a result of identities being revealed
  • Details of almost 19,000 people who worked for UK government in Afghanistan were leaked 6 months after Taliban seized Kabul

LONDON: Dozens of Afghans whose identities were leaked by the British Ministry of Defence said they have had family members or colleagues killed as a result of the data breach, research for a parliamentary investigation has found.

A spreadsheet containing the details of almost 19,000 people who had worked for the UK government in Afghanistan was accidentally leaked from the MoD in February 2022 — six months after the Taliban seized the capital Kabul.

Research involving 350 Afghans affected by the leak found that 231 said the ministry had contacted them directly to tell them their data had been breached.

Of those, 49 said family members or colleagues had been killed as a result of their details being leaked.

More than 40 percent had received direct death threats and at least half reported that friends or family had been threatened by the Taliban. 

The study, part of evidence submitted to a defense select committee inquiry into the breach, was carried out by the charity Refugee Legal Support, Lancaster University, and the University of York.

A former member of the Afghan special forces who took part in the research said his home had been searched and family members attacked as a result.

“My father was brutally beaten to the point that his toenails were forcibly removed, and my parents remain under constant and serious threat,” he said. “My family and I continue to face intimidation, repeated house searches, and ongoing danger to our safety.”

Others surveyed said the delay between when the data leak was discovered in 2023, and when they were contacted in July this year to say their identities had been released, had further risked their safety.

“Waiting almost two years to inform individuals that their personal data was compromised has put many lives at risk unnecessarily,” a former Afghan National Army member currently residing in Afghanistan said. “Immediate notification could have allowed us to take protective measures much earlier.”

Refugee Legal Support’s Executive Director Olivia Clark said the research laid bare “the devastating human consequences” of the data breach.

“Afghans who served alongside UK forces have reported renewed threats, violent assaults, and even the killing of family members after their personal details were exposed,” she said.

She added only a minority of those affected by the data breach had been offered relocation to the UK.

The British government estimated more than 7,300 Afghans would be eligible for resettlement in the UK under a scheme set up in 2024 to help move those at risk from the data breach to the UK.