Spain’s king denounces ‘unspeakable suffering’ of Gazans

Spain's King Felipe VI. (AFP file photo)
Spain's King Felipe VI. (AFP file photo)
Short Url
Updated 11 sec ago

Spain’s king denounces ‘unspeakable suffering’ of Gazans

Spain's King Felipe VI. (AFP file photo)
  • The Spanish government, which recognized the State of Palestine in May 2024, has become one of Israel’s fiercest critics in Europe
  • Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez later expressed his “deep admiration” for the protesters, while also suggesting excluding Israel from sports competitions “as long as the barbarity continues” in Gaza

MADRID: Spain’s King Felipe VI on Tuesday denounced the “unspeakable suffering” of hundreds of thousands of Gazans under Israeli bombardment in the Palestinian territory, in a rare political intervention.
“The latest episode in this conflict... has degenerated into an unbearable humanitarian crisis, the unspeakable suffering of hundreds of thousands of innocent people and the total devastation of Gaza,” the monarch said during a visit to Egypt.
Felipe, who rarely speaks out on international issues, noted his trip “is taking place at a turbulent and tragic time for the region.”
The Spanish government, which recognized the State of Palestine in May 2024, has become one of Israel’s fiercest critics in Europe.
On Sunday, the final stage of the Vuelta cycling race was canceled because of pro-Palestinian demonstrations that saw some 100,000 people take to the streets of Madrid, according to local authorities.
Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez later expressed his “deep admiration” for the protesters, while also suggesting excluding Israel from sports competitions “as long as the barbarity continues” in Gaza.
Israel has not had an ambassador in Madrid since 2024.
Last week, Spain recalled its ambassador to Israel amid heated exchanges after Sanchez’s government announced measures aimed at stopping “the genocide in Gaza.”


Two UK MPs claim they were denied entry to Israel during West Bank delegation

Two UK MPs claim they were denied entry to Israel during West Bank delegation
Updated 23 min 16 sec ago

Two UK MPs claim they were denied entry to Israel during West Bank delegation

Two UK MPs claim they were denied entry to Israel during West Bank delegation
  • Simon Opher and Peter Prinsley were due to meet UK diplomats in Jerusalem this week as well as Palestinian and Israeli human rights organizations

LONDON: Two British Labour MPs have said they were blocked from entering Israel while travelling as part of a parliamentary delegation to the occupied West Bank.

Simon Opher and Peter Prinsley were due to meet UK diplomats in Jerusalem this week as well as Palestinian and Israeli human rights organizations. Their visit was organised by the Council for Arab-British Understanding (CAABU).

In a statement on Tuesday, Opher’s office said the purpose of the trip was to “enable members of parliament to witness the vital medical and humanitarian work of a range of organisations including Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP) in the occupied West Bank.”

The statement continued: “It is deeply regrettable that Israeli authorities prevented them from seeing first-hand the grave challenges facing medical facilities in the region and from hearing the British government’s assessment of the situation on the ground.”

Opher, who chairs the all-party parliamentary group for health and was previously a full-time doctor in Dursley, has since returned to the UK from Jordan.

Prinsley, a surgeon with three decades’ experience in the NHS, had also planned to take part in the delegation.

The move follows similar incidents earlier this year. In April, Labour MPs Yuan Yang and Abtisam Mohamed were denied entry to Israel and deported back to the UK. At the time, the Israeli immigration ministry claimed the two were suspected of intending to “document the activities of security forces and spread anti-Israel hatred.”

The decision drew criticism from then-foreign secretary David Lammy, who said: “It is unacceptable, counterproductive, and deeply concerning that two British MPs on a parliamentary delegation to Israel have been detained and refused entry by the Israeli authorities.”

Yang and Mohamed said in a joint statement following their deportation: “We’re astounded at the unprecedented step taken by the Israeli authorities to refuse British MPs entry on our trip to visit the occupied West Bank. It is vital that parliamentarians are able to witness first hand the situation in the occupied Palestinian territory.”

They continued: “We are two out of scores of MPs who have spoken out in parliament in recent months on the Israel-Palestine conflict and the importance of complying with international humanitarian law. Parliamentarians should feel free to speak truthfully in the House of Commons without fear of being targeted.

“We had come on an MPs’ delegation to visit humanitarian aid projects and communities in the West Bank with UK charity partners who have over a decade of experience in taking parliamentary delegations.”

The controversy comes as Israel pushed ahead on Tuesday with a major ground offensive in Gaza City, which has drawn sharp international criticism.


EU chief, Trump discuss increasing ‘economic pressure’ on Russia

EU chief, Trump discuss increasing ‘economic pressure’ on Russia
Updated 32 min 27 sec ago

EU chief, Trump discuss increasing ‘economic pressure’ on Russia

EU chief, Trump discuss increasing ‘economic pressure’ on Russia
  • EU executive would soon present its proposals for a 19th package of sanctions on Russia since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine
  • Trump has demanded that allies stop buying Russian oil before he moves on to punishing Moscow

BRUSSELS: EU chief Ursula von der Leyen on Tuesday said she and US President Donald Trump discussed additional steps to tighten the screws on Russia over the Ukraine war.
“I had a good call with (Trump) on strengthening our joint efforts to increase economic pressure on Russia through additional measures,” she posted on X.
Von der Leyen said the EU executive would soon present its proposals for a 19th package of EU sanctions on Russia since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
It will include measures targeting crypto, banks and energy, she said.
Trump has demanded that allies stop buying Russian oil before he moves on to punishing Moscow, and told them to hit China with tariffs.
The 27-nation EU had already banned most imports of Russian oil after the Kremlin’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine and it is planning to phase out all Russian oil and gas by the end of 2027.
Von der Leyen indicated that Brussels was seeking to move faster.
“Russia’s war economy, sustained by revenues from fossil fuels, is financing the bloodshed in Ukraine. To put an end to it, the (European) Commission will propose speeding up the phase-out of Russian fossil imports,” she wrote.


Trump’s UK visit will mix trade and tech talks will royal pomp

Trump’s UK visit will mix trade and tech talks will royal pomp
Updated 1 min 37 sec ago

Trump’s UK visit will mix trade and tech talks will royal pomp

Trump’s UK visit will mix trade and tech talks will royal pomp

LONDON: US President Donald Trump arrived in the UK on Tuesday for a state visit during which the British government hopes a multibillion-dollar technology deal will show the trans-Atlantic bond remains strong despite differences over Ukraine, the Middle East and the future of the Western alliance.
State visits in Britain blend 21st-century diplomacy with royal pageantry. Trump’s two-day trip comes complete with horse-drawn carriages, military honor guards and a glittering banquet inside a 1,000-year-old castle — all tailored to a president with a fondness for gilded splendor.
King Charles III will host Trump at Windsor Castle on Wednesday before talks the next day with Prime Minister Keir Starmer at Chequers, the British leader’s rural retreat.
Starmer’s office said the visit will demonstrate that “the UK-US relationship is the strongest in the world, built on 250 years of history” — after that awkward rupture in 1776 — and bound by shared values of “belief in the rule of law and open markets.” There was no mention of Trump’s market-crimping fondness for sweeping tariffs.
The White House expects the two countries will strengthen their relationship during the trip and celebrate the upcoming 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States, according to a senior White House official who was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity. It was unclear how the UK was planning to mark that chapter in their shared history.
“The trip to the UK is going to be incredible,” Trump told reporters Sunday. He said Windsor Castle is “supposed to be amazing” and added: “It’s going to be very exciting.”
Trump’s second state visit
Trump is the first US president to get a second state visit to the UK
The unprecedented nature of the invitation, along with the expectation of lavish pomp and pageantry, holds dual appeal to Trump. The Republican president has glowingly praised the king’s late mother, Queen Elizabeth II, and spoken about how his own Scotland-born mother loved the queen and the monarchy.
Trump, as he left the White House on Tuesday, noted that during his past state visit he was hosted at Buckingham Palace.
“I don’t want to say one is better than the other, but they say Windsor Castle is the ultimate,” Trump said.
He also called the king “an elegant gentleman” and said “he represents the country so well.”
The president is also royally flattered by exceptional attention and has embraced the grandeur of his office in his second term. He has adorned the normally more austere Oval Office with gold accents, is constructing an expansive ballroom at the White House and has sought to refurbish other Washington buildings to his liking.
Foreign officials have shown they’re attuned to his tastes. During a visit to the Middle East this year, leaders of and Qatar didn’t just roll out a red carpet but dispatched fighter jets to escort Trump’s plane.
Starmer has already shown he’s adept at charming Trump. Visiting Washington in February, he noted the president’s Oval Office decorating choices and decision to display a bust of Winston Churchill. During Trump’s private trip to Scotland in July, Starmer visited and praised Trump’s golf courses.
Efforts to woo the president make some members of Starmer’s Labour Party uneasy, and Trump will not address Parliament during his visit, like French President Emmanuel Macron did in July. Lawmakers will be on their annual autumn recess, sparing the government an awkward decision.
The itinerary in Windsor and at Chequers, both well outside London, also keeps Trump away from a planned mass protest against his visit.
“This visit is really important to Keir Starmer to show that he’s a statesman,” said Leslie Vinjamuri, president of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs. “But it’s such a double-edged sword, because he’s going to be a statesman alongside a US president that is not popular in Europe.”
Troubles for Starmer
Preparations for the visit have been ruffled by political turmoil in Starmer’s center-left government. Last week, Starmer sacked Britain’s ambassador to Washington, Peter Mandelson, over his past friendship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Mandelson had good relations with the Trump administration and played a key role in securing a UK-US trade agreement in May. His firing has put Epstein back in British headlines as Trump tries to swerve questions about his own relationship with the disgraced financier.
Mandelson’s exit came just a week after Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner quit over a tax error on a home purchase. A senior Starmer aide, Paul Ovenden quit Monday over tasteless text messages he sent years ago. Fourteen months after winning a landslide election victory, Starmer’s position at the helm of the Labour Party is fragile and his poll ratings are in the dumps.
But he has found a somewhat unexpected supporter in Trump, who has said Starmer is a friend, despite being “slightly more liberal than I am.”
Starmer’s government has cultivated that warmth and tried to use it to get favorable trade terms with the US, the UK’s largest single economic partner, accounting for 18 percent of total British trade.
The May trade agreement reduces US tariffs on Britain’s key auto and aerospace industries. But a final deal has not been reached over other sectors, including pharmaceuticals, steel and aluminum.
As he left the White House on Tuesday, Trump said UK officials wanted to continue trade negotiations during his visit.
“They’d like to see if they can get a little bit better deal, so we’ll talk to them” he said.
Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman are expected to be among the business leaders in the US delegation. Trump and Starmer are set to sign a technology partnership – which Mandelson was key to striking – accompanied by major investments in nuclear power, life sciences and Artificial Intelligence data centers.
The leaders are also expected to sign nuclear energy deals, expand cooperation on defense technology and explore ways to bolster ties between their financial hubs, according to the White House official.
Ukraine on the agenda
Starmer has also tried to use his influence to maintain US support for Ukraine, with limited results. Trump has expressed frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin but has not made good on threats to impose new sanctions on Russia for shunning peace negotiations.
Last week’s Russian drone incursion into NATO member Poland drew strong condemnation from European NATO allies, and pledges of more planes and troops for the bloc’s eastern flank. Trump played down the incident’s severity, musing that it ” could have been a mistake. ”
Starmer also departs from Trump over Israel’s war in Gaza, and has said the UK will formally recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations later this month.
Vinjamuri said Starmer “has kept the United States speaking the right language” on Ukraine, but has had little impact on Trump’s actions.
“On China, on India, on Israel and Gaza and Hamas, and on Vladimir Putin – on the really big important things – the UK hasn’t had a huge amount of influence,” she said.


UN chief Guterres calls Gaza situation ‘morally, politically, legally intolerable’

UN chief Guterres calls Gaza situation ‘morally, politically, legally intolerable’
Updated 3 sec ago

UN chief Guterres calls Gaza situation ‘morally, politically, legally intolerable’

UN chief Guterres calls Gaza situation ‘morally, politically, legally intolerable’
  • A UN commission report has found that Israel committed four genocidal acts in Gaza under the 1948 Genocide Convention
  • Israel rejected the report as “distorted and false,” while Palestinians hailed it as proof of systematic destruction and genocidal intent

NEW YORK CITY/LONDON: The UN secretary-general condemned on Tuesday the “systematic destruction” of Gaza City, but insisted it was for the international courts to determine whether Israel is committing genocide.

Taking questions at UN headquarters, Antonio Guterres said it was not his role to make a legal determination of genocide after a team of experts commissioned by the UN’s Human Rights Council concluded that Israel is doing just that in Gaza.

UN agencies, global bodies and governments face mounting pressure to say that Israel’s conduct in the Palestinian territory since is began military operations in October 2023 amounts to genocide.

“We are seeing massive destruction of neighborhoods, now the systematic destruction of Gaza City, we are seeing massive killing of civilians in a way that I do not remember in any conflict since I (became) secretary-general,” Antonio Guterres said. (AFP/File)

Asked whether he believes Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, Guterres said: “As I’ve said, time and time again, in these and different, similar circumstances, it is not in the attributions that the secretary-general to do the legal determination of genocide.

“That belongs to the adequate judicial entities, namely the International Court of Justice.”

Guterres nevertheless said that what is happening in Gaza is “horrendous.”

“We are seeing massive destruction of neighborhoods, now the systematic destruction of Gaza City, we are seeing massive killing of civilians in a way that I do not remember in any conflict since I (became) secretary-general,” he said.

“With the consequences that the Palestinian people are suffering a horrendous situation, famine, with no access to any kind of support, and with continued displacement and imminent risk of losing their lives at any moment.”

He added: “The truth is that this is something that is morally, politically and legally intolerable.”

Guterres’s comments came in response to a damning 72-page report by the Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Israel published on Tuesday.

Not only did the findings say that Israel has, since October 2023, committed and continues to commit acts of genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, it found the incitement to do so came from the highest political and military figures of the Israeli state.

The ICC has issued arrest warrants for both Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant for the war crime of starvation and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and “other inhumane acts.” (AFP)

These included Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, President Isaac Herzog, and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant.

“The ongoing genocide in Gaza is a moral outrage and a legal emergency,” Navi Pillay, head of the three-member commission of inquiry and a former International Criminal Court judge, told a press briefing in Geneva.

“The responsibility for these atrocity crimes lies with Israeli authorities at the highest echelons who have orchestrated a genocidal campaign for almost two years now with the specific intent to destroy the Palestinian group in Gaza.”

The report is based on a meticulous study of factual and legal findings in relation to attacks in Gaza by Israeli forces and the conduct of Israeli authorities.

The panel found Israel had committed four of the five genocidal acts defined by a 1948 international treaty known as the “Genocide Convention.”

The four acts are: Killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm, deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the destruction of the Palestinians in whole or in part, and imposing measures intended to prevent births.

The timing of the report’s release could not have been more pertinent, coming shortly after Israel announced a full-scale ground assault on Gaza City — the territory’s largest urban center.

While the conclusions may not come as a surprise to many, the significance of its findings could have global repercussions.

The commission itself is not a legal body, but the report could be incorporated into cases by prosecutors at the ICJ and the ICC.

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk (R) looks on next to Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights Nada Al-Nashif. (AFP)

The ICJ is examining a case brought by South Africa accusing Israeli forces of committing genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza.

The ICC has issued arrest warrants for both Netanyahu and Gallant for the war crime of starvation and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and “other inhumane acts.”

The report was immediately attacked by Israel, but was widely welcomed by Palestinians and their supporters.

The foreign ministry of the Palestinian Authority, which governs in the occupied West Bank, said the report had “unequivocally proven” that Israel had committed the crime of genocide in Gaza “through a deliberate and widespread policy aimed at the systematic destruction of the Palestinian people.”

The ministry called on the international community to take steps to protect the Palestinian people and “halt all forms of military and political support for Israel.”

The report does not represent the UN’s official position on whether acts of genocide have been carried out in Gaza, but it will increase pressure on UN agencies and governments to use the word.

A woman collects salvage items from the rubble of the Unknown Soldier Tower, after it was destroyed by overnight Israeli bombardment, in the Rimal neighbourhood of Gaza City. (AFP)

Volker Turk, the UN high commissioner for human rights, also said it was up to the courts to decide “whether it’s genocide or not” but that the evidence was mounting.

“We see the piling up of war crime after war crime or crime against humanity, and potentially even more,” he said.

In the UK, where the government has come under increasing pressure to take a tougher stance against Israel, a Foreign Office spokesperson told Arab News that any formal determination as to whether genocide has occurred “should be made following a judgment by a competent national or international court.”

“What is happening in Gaza is appalling and we continue to call on Israel to change course immediately by halting its ground offensive and letting in a surge of humanitarian aid without delay,” the spokesperson said.

In a letter earlier this month, the former Foreign Secretary David Lammy wrote that the government “had not concluded that Israel is acting with genocidal intent.”

A joint statement from civil society organizations, including the British Palestinian Committee and Palestine Solidarity Campaign said that the commission of inquiry’s findings confirmed that Lammy was not only “wrong” but showed the extent of UK complicity in Israel’s crimes.

A Palestinian child eats rice out of a pot, in front of a charity kitchen in the Nuseirat refugee camp in the central Gaza Strip. (AFP)

“This government has been playing a linguistic and legal game with MPs, the British public, and the lives of Palestinians,” the statement said. “Rather than doing everything in its power to protect an occupied people, the UK government has opted to back a state committing war crimes.”

The left-wing parliamentarian Zarah Sultana said the report confirmed what was already clear: that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.

“This is the most documented genocide in history,” she wrote on X. “The government’s position was already morally indefensible. It is now politically untenable.”

Nimer Sultany, an expert in international law at the School of Oriental and African Studies, said the report was a nail in the coffin of a “genocide denial” that has delayed governments from acting against Israel.

He told Channel 4 News that the report was a “damning indictment of the policy of the UK government, of the European Commission, of European states, that have failed to act, that have continued to shield Israel from accountability.”

Israel’s foreign ministry said it “categorically” rejected the report, describing it as “distorted and false.”

Palestinians search the rubble of Al-Ghafari tower after its destruction by Israeli airstrikes in Gaza City. (AFP)

The report follows a resolution passed earlier this month by the International Association of Genocide Scholars saying Israel’s conduct meets the legal definition genocide laid out in the 1948 UN convention.

Israel faced further international pressure last week when the UN General Assembly voted overwhelmingly in favor of reviving the two-state solution between Israel and Palestine without involving Hamas.

The “New York Declaration” was presented jointly by and France, with the two countries set to host an international conference on the two-state solution at the UN headquarters on Sept. 22.

The French presidency said on Tuesday that the event was the “only viable solution and option on the table in order to come out of this terrible crisis.”

The “vast mobilization” of international support by and France for the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict aims to convince the US that there is an “absolute urgency” to end the war in Gaza, the French presidency said on Tuesday.

The idea for the conference “came as a result of the state visit that President (Emmanuel) Macron paid to ” last year, the Elysee said in a high-level briefing attended by Arab News.

“We were working with in reflecting on what kind of initiative we could jointly take in order to get a ceasefire in Gaza, an end to the war and a political solution to the crisis that would lead finally to the creation of two states and bring peace and security to all people in the region.”

A convoy of Israeli tanks is deployed at Israel's border with the Gaza Strip. (AFP)

A decision was made by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Macron last December to organize and elevate the proposed conference as a mechanism for implementing the two-state solution.

The UN General Assembly later voted to give a mandate to and France to host the conference, which held its first stage at the UN in July.

That event resulted in the New York Declaration, which was hailed by French Ambassador to the UN Jerome Bonnafont as a “single road map to deliver the two-state solution.”

Though the New York Declaration condemns Hamas and seeks to secure its international isolation, Israeli Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon last week accused the majority of the UNGA of “advancing terror.”

US diplomat Morgan Ortagus told the chamber that the resolution was a “gift to Hamas,” adding: “Far from promoting peace, the conference has already prolonged the war, emboldened Hamas and harmed the prospects of peace in both short and long term.”

The French presidency rebuffed those accusations on Tuesday, warning that the “atrocious humanitarian catastrophe” and “unbearable human toll” in Gaza could only be resolved “on the basis of a political horizon for the two-state solution.”

The New York Declaration lays out “both a timeframe and irreversible step towards the two-state solution that would start with a ceasefire, the release of the hostages and humanitarian aid being offered without constraint to the Palestinian population in Gaza,” the Elysee said.

Displaced Palestinians move with their belongings southwards on a road in the Nuseirat refugee camp area. (AFP)

As part of post-war efforts to stabilize Gaza, a reformed Palestinian Authority must be allowed to operate in the enclave through a UN Security Council mandate, it added.

The French presidency highlighted that “all the Arab countries, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation leaders and the Arab League leaders” accepted the plan, which would see Hamas “have no part” in the administration of post-war Gaza.

The PA’s leader Mahmoud Abbas wrote a letter to Macron and the crown prince on June 9 which, in part, committed to reforming the authority.

As part of the joint international project, a slew of major countries — including Canada, Australia, Belgium and Portugal — have committed to recognizing Palestine at the Sept. 22 conference.

“This is the most significant movement since a long while because, for the very first time, UN Security Council member states but also G7 member states will recognize the state of  Palestine,” the Elysee said.

“This will create a way for us to say that the two-state solution cannot be wiped out by the Israeli operation that we see happening on the ground.”

The French presidency expressed its concern over Israel’s recent strikes on Qatar that targeted Hamas leaders.

In the wake of the attack, leaders from the UK, France, Canada, Qatar, Jordan and Egypt held an emergency remote meeting, pledging solidarity with all Gulf states.

“No country should be stricken and the sovereignty of the neighboring countries of Israel should be respected. We managed to get a clear condemnation in the UN Security Council,” the Elysee said.

“But we need this collective mobilization to be crystal clear, and we hope for Sept. 22 to bring light on this international mobilization that needs to move the needle, and needs to convince the US that there is an absolute urgency to end this war.”


Boat with over 100 migrants runs aground in Dakar, Senegal

Boat with over 100 migrants runs aground in Dakar, Senegal
Updated 16 September 2025

Boat with over 100 migrants runs aground in Dakar, Senegal

Boat with over 100 migrants runs aground in Dakar, Senegal
  • The migrants were likely aiming to sail another 1,500 kilometers across the Atlantic Ocean to Spain’s Canary Islands
  • Although the canoe landed in Ouakam, its journey did not originate there, the mayor said

DAKAR: A boat carrying nearly a hundred migrants hoping to reach Europe from Senegal ran aground on Tuesday morning in the capital city of Dakar, according to local authorities.
The migrants were likely aiming to sail another 1,500 kilometers (about 937 miles) across the Atlantic Ocean to Spain’s Canary Islands, which has reemerged as a major migrant transit route since 2020.
Nearly 47,000 people disembarked in the Canaries in 2024, an increase from the nearly 40,000 in 2023, according to Spanish Interior Ministry figures. Many undertake the journey in large, open top boats known as pirogues.
“We were informed of the interception of a pirogue full of migrants who wanted to leave for Europe,” said Abdou Aziz Guèye, mayor of Ouakam, the neighborhood where the boat ran aground.
The pirogue was first spotted by fishermen who lent the occupants an engine, as they no longer had one, said Guèye.
“It is a distressing sight. The captain reportedly fled with the engine,” Guèye said.
Although the canoe landed in Ouakam, its journey did not originate there, the mayor said.
When the boat arrived local police set up a temporary processing center to conduct identity checks on the passengers.
The Atlantic crossing is one of the deadliest in the world. While there is no accurate death toll because of the lack of information on departures from West Africa, the Spanish migrant rights group Walking Borders estimates the victims are in the thousands this year alone.
“Illegal emigration is not over. It’s a phenomenon that continues,” said Guèye, who cautioned migrants from making the risky journey.
While most migrants leaving Senegal are young men, aid workers in the Canary Islands say they are increasingly seeing women and children risk their lives as well.
Last year, the EU signed a 210 million euro deal with Mauritania to stop smugglers from launching boats to Spain. But statistics show trans-Atlantic migration from West Africa has continued, even as irregular border crossings in Europe have been falling steadily.
In Senegal, winter sees an increase in attempted journeys as the seasonal change lowers the intensity of waves. However, migrants still choose to take the risk throughout the year.