US says China spreads ‘false’ World War Two narratives to pressure Taiwan

US says China spreads ‘false’ World War Two narratives to pressure Taiwan
Chinese Rocket Force personnel march during the rehearsal ahead of a military parade to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two, in Beijing, China. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 3 sec ago

US says China spreads ‘false’ World War Two narratives to pressure Taiwan

US says China spreads ‘false’ World War Two narratives to pressure Taiwan
  • The Beijing government says documents like Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation support its legal claims of sovereignty over the island, as the wording states Taiwan was to be “restored” to Chinese rule, Taiwan being a Japanese colony at the time

TAIPEI: China is intentionally mischaracterising World War Two-era documents to put pressure on and isolate Taiwan given those agreements made no determination of the island’s ultimate political status, the de facto US embassy in Taipei said.
The 80th anniversary of the war’s end has been marked by a bitter dispute between Taipei and Beijing on its broader historical meaning and relevance today.
The Beijing government says documents like the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation support its legal claims of sovereignty over the island, as the wording states Taiwan was to be “restored” to Chinese rule, Taiwan being a Japanese colony at the time.
The Chinese government at the time was the Republic of China, which then in 1949 fled to Taiwan after losing a subsequent civil war with Mao Zedong’s communists.
Republic of China remains Taiwan’s formal name, and its government says no World War Two agreements made any mention of Mao’s People’s Republic of China because it did not exist then, thus Beijing has no right to claim Taiwan now.
“China intentionally mischaracterises World War Two-era documents, including the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation, and the Treaty of San Francisco, to try to support its coercive campaign to subjugate Taiwan,” the American Institute in Taiwan said in an statement emailed to Reuters on Monday.
“Beijing’s narratives are simply false, and none of these documents determined Taiwan’s ultimate political status.”
The San Francisco Peace Treaty was signed by Japan in 1951 renouncing its claims to Taiwan, though the island’s sovereignty is left unresolved in it. Beijing says the treaty is “illegal and invalid” given it was not a party to it.
The United States ended official ties with Taipei in 1979 when it recognized Beijing, but remains the island’s most important international backer.
Washington follows a “one China policy” under which it officially takes no position on Taiwan’s sovereignty and only acknowledges China’s position on the subject.
“False legal narratives are part of Beijing’s broader campaign to try to isolate Taiwan from the international community and constrain the sovereign choices of other countries regarding their interactions with Taiwan,” added the American Institute in Taiwan, the de facto US embassy.
China’s foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Chinese President Xi Jinping on September 3 oversaw a massive military parade in Beijing to mark the war anniversary.
Taiwan Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung expressed his thanks for the US mission’s statement.
“Our country and the People’s Republic of China are not subordinate to each other, and the People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan in the international community,” Lin said in a statement.


Trump intensifies crackdown on Washington, DC, threatens national emergency over ICE cooperaton

Trump intensifies crackdown on Washington, DC, threatens national emergency over ICE cooperaton
Updated 7 sec ago

Trump intensifies crackdown on Washington, DC, threatens national emergency over ICE cooperaton

Trump intensifies crackdown on Washington, DC, threatens national emergency over ICE cooperaton

US President Donald Trump said on Monday he will call a national emergency and federalize Washington, D.C. after Mayor Muriel Bowser informed the federal government that the Metropolitan Police will not cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement on information of individuals living in, or entering, the United States illegally.


Philippine president supports public outrage over corruption but says protests should be peaceful

Philippine president supports public outrage over corruption but says protests should be peaceful
Updated 15 min 59 sec ago

Philippine president supports public outrage over corruption but says protests should be peaceful

Philippine president supports public outrage over corruption but says protests should be peaceful
  • Massive corruption has plagued flood-control projects in one of Asia’s most typhoon-prone countries
  • The Philippines spent an estimated $9.6 billion for thousands of flood mitigation projects in the last three years alone

MANILA: The Philippine president on Monday encouraged the public to express their outrage over massive corruption that has plagued flood-control projects in one of Asia’s most typhoon-prone countries but said street protests should be peaceful.
President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. vowed that an investigation by an independent commission would not spare even his allies in the House of Representatives and the Senate, where several legislators have been identified and accused in televised congressional hearings of pocketing huge kickbacks, along with government engineers and construction companies. Marcos first spoke about the corruption scandal in July in his annual state of the nation speech.
Unlike recent violent protests in Nepal and Indonesia, street rallies against alleged abuses in the Philippines have been smaller and relatively peaceful. Outrage has largely been vented online, including by Catholic church leaders, business executives and retired generals.
A planned protest on Sept. 21 in a pro-democracy shrine in the Manila metropolis near guarded upscale neighborhoods, where some of the corruption suspects live in affluence, is expected to draw a larger crowd. Police forces and troops have been placed on alert.
“If I wasn’t president, I might be out in the streets with them,” Marcos said of anti-corruption protesters.
“Of course they are enraged, of course they are angry, I’m angry,” Marcos added, calling on the protesters to demand accountability. “You let them know your sentiments, you let them know how they hurt you, how they stole from you, shout at them and do everything, demonstrate, just keep it peaceful.”
But Communications Undersecretary Claire Castro said over the weekend that “people who have ill intentions and want to destabilize the government” should not exploit the public’s outrage.
Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro, Jr. and military chief of staff Gen. Romeo Brawner Jr. issued a joint statement late Friday rejecting a call for the country’s armed forces to withdraw support from Marcos in response to public outrage over the corruption scandal. They did not elaborate, but underscored that the 160,000-member military was non-partisan, professional and “abides by the constitution through the chain-of-command.”
During a recent rally, a speaker called on the military to end its loyalty to Marcos and called on Filipinos to stage a non-violent “people power” revolt similar to army-backed uprisings that ousted Ferdinand Marcos, the current president’s late father and namesake, in 1986 and Joseph Estrada in 2001.
The House of Representatives and the Senate have been investigating alleged substandard and non-existent flood-control projects in separate televised inquiries. Dozens of legislators, senators, construction companies and public works engineers have been identified and accused of pocketing huge kickbacks that financed lavish lifestyles with mansions, European luxury cars and high-stakes casino gambling in a country still wracked by poverty.
The Philippines has spent an estimated 545 billion pesos ($9.6 billion) for thousands of flood mitigation projects in the last three years alone. The projects were under government review to determine which ones are substandard or non-existent, as Marcos said he found during recent inspections in some flood-prone areas, including in Bulacan, a densely populated province north of Manila.


Former British soldier goes on trial for Bloody Sunday killings

Former British soldier goes on trial for Bloody Sunday killings
Updated 14 min 15 sec ago

Former British soldier goes on trial for Bloody Sunday killings

Former British soldier goes on trial for Bloody Sunday killings
  • Former paratrooper, identified only as a ‘Soldier F’, is the lone defendant in the deadliest shooting in the three decades of Northern Ireland violence known as ‘The Troubles’

LONDON: Families of the victims and survivors of the 1972 Bloody Sunday, in which British soldiers opened fire and killed 13 unarmed civil rights marchers and injured 15 others in Northern Ireland, have fought for justice for five decades without a single person being held accountable in court.
That could change after Monday when a former British soldier goes on trial on charges of murder in the shooting of two men and the attempted murders of five others.
The ex-paratrooper, identified only as a “Soldier F” and concealed from view in court behind blue floor-to-ceiling curtain to protect him from vengeance, is the lone defendant in the deadliest shooting in the three decades of Northern Ireland violence known as “The Troubles.”
The Jan. 30, 1972 massacre in Londonderry has come to symbolize the long-running conflict between mainly Catholic supporters of a united Ireland and predominantly Protestant forces that wanted to remain part of the United Kingdom. Tensions have eased since the 1998 Good Friday peace accord, which created a system for Republican and Unionist parties to share power in Northern Ireland.
The path to the nonjury trial in Belfast Crown Court has been a torturous journey for families of the victims.
From instigators to victims
The government initially said soldiers from a parachute regiment opened fire at gunmen and bombers who were attacking them. A formal inquiry cleared the troops of responsibility. A subsequent and lengthier review in 2010 reached a much different conclusion, finding that soldiers had fired at unarmed people who were running away and then lied about it for decades.
Then-Prime Minister David Cameron apologized and said the killings were “unjustified and unjustifiable.”
The findings cleared the way for the eventual prosecution of Soldier F, though that, too, has been beset by delays and obstacles.
It took seven years from the time police opened their investigation until prosecutors announced in 2019 that they would only charge Soldier F. They said there wasn’t enough evidence to charge 16 other former soldiers and two alleged members of the Official Irish Republican Army who were investigated for their roles in the shootings.
Two years later, the Public Prosecution Service dropped the case because they didn’t think they could prevail at trial. They made the decision after a judge tossed out a case against two soldiers in the killing of an Irish Republican Army leader after ruling key prosecution evidence was inadmissible.
But family members of one the Bloody Sunday victims appealed and the case against Soldier F was reinstated.
Long wait for justice
Tony Doherty, whose father Patrick was one of those killed, said the campaign for justice that began in 1992 had three demands: a declaration of innocence for the dead and wounded, rejection of the initial inquiry’s conclusions and prosecution of those responsible.
“The first two demands have been met, and when a British soldier stands in the dock on Monday and faces charges of multiple murder and attempted murder, we will see the third demand met, although we will always believe there should be many more on trial for Bloody Sunday,″ Doherty said. “We have waited 53 long years for justice and, hopefully, we will see a measure of it through this trial.”
Soldier F has pleaded not guilty to two counts of murder in the deaths of James Wray and William McKinney, and five attempted murders for the shootings of Joseph Friel, Michael Quinn, Joe Mahon, Patrick O’Donnell and a person whose identity is unknown.
A quarter century after the peace agreement, Bloody Sunday remains a source of tension in Northern Ireland.
Families of the victims continue to demand justice for their loved ones, while supporters of army veterans who fought in the conflict complain that they continue to be dogged by investigations and potential charges decades after their service ended.
Britain’s Ministry of Defense had said it would defend the ex-soldier while also working to reform the system for investigating allegations of past military misdeeds.
Derry Councilor Shaun Harkin, of the People Before Profit party, said the case against Soldier F represents the British state going on trial.
“The British government has sought to protect its parachute regiment killers for decades through lies, cover-up, delay and evasion,” Harkin said. “Soldier F pulled the trigger on Bloody Sunday and should be held to account, but the British government and top military brass who gave the orders should be held to account too.”


King Charles III to deploy tiara diplomacy as UK prepares to welcome Trump for second state visit

King Charles III to deploy tiara diplomacy as UK prepares to welcome Trump for second state visit
Updated 22 min 45 sec ago

King Charles III to deploy tiara diplomacy as UK prepares to welcome Trump for second state visit

King Charles III to deploy tiara diplomacy as UK prepares to welcome Trump for second state visit
  • State visits are the monarchy’s ultimate tool, with world leaders vying to get the full royal treatment
  • After welcoming the Trumps, Charles and Queen Camilla will accompany them on a carriage ride through the Windsor estate, then back to the castle along a path lined by members of the armed forces

LONDON: Windsor Castle staff are setting the 50-meter-long (164-feet-long) mahogany table. Grooms are buffing the hooves of the horses that will pull the royal carriages. And the military honor guard is drilling to ensure every step lands with precision.
Throughout the halls and grounds of the almost 1,000-year-old castle west of London, hundreds of people are working to make sure King Charles III puts on the best show possible when he welcomes US President Donald Trump for his historic second state visit this week.
The visit, featuring glittering tiaras, brass bands and a sumptuous banquet served on 200-year-old silver, is a display of the pomp and ceremony that Britain does like no one else. But it’s a spectacle with a purpose: to bolster ties with one of the world’s most powerful men at a time when his America First policies are roiling longstanding trade and security relationships.
“We’re buttering up to him,” said Robert Lacey, a royal historian and consultant on the Netflix series “The Crown.”
“He wouldn’t come to Britain if he wouldn’t have the chance to stay at Windsor Castle, probably pay homage to the (late) queen he admires so much, and to meet the king.”
Soft power in action
Three centuries after Britain’s kings and queens gave up political power and settled for the role of ceremonial head of state, the royals remain a robust instrument of “soft power,” which the elected government uses to reward friends and wring concessions out of reluctant allies.
State visits are the monarchy’s ultimate tool, with world leaders vying to get the full royal treatment.
During seven decades on the throne, the late Queen Elizabeth II hosted everyone from Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceauşescu to South African President Nelson Mandela.
The royals have also hosted the last four US presidents, though not all were full-scale state visits.
Hospitality with purpose
While the impact of soft power is hard to quantify, it contributes to a feeling of friendship that “may incline another party to be more open to your entreaties,” said Martin Farr, an expert in modern British history at Newcastle University.
Six years ago, Britain sought Trump’s support as it prepared to leave the European Union. This time the UK is lobbying for favorable trade terms and help in combating Russian aggression in Ukraine.
“A new Trump presidency, a new prime minister, a different government, but the same sense of panic and the same feeling that the biggest lever we can pull with this president is to flatter him and to try and connect him with something he seems genuinely to be impressed by, which is monarchy, and the fact that his mother of course was born” in Scotland, Farr said.
So Prime Minister Keir Starmer hurried to Washington in February, just five weeks after Trump began his second term, and handed him the king’s invitation for a state visit.
It was the first time any world leader received the honor of a second state visit, and the first time the invitation was delivered in a personal letter from the king, which Trump proudly displayed for TV cameras.
“It’s a great, great honor, and that says at Windsor,” Trump said as he praised the king. “That’s really something.”
Pomp and circumstance
There will be plenty of glitz for a president who has gilded the Oval Office and plans to build a White House ballroom for 650 guests.
While the president and first lady Melania Trump will arrive in the UK late Tuesday, the meat of the visit begins the next day.
After welcoming the Trumps, Charles and Queen Camilla will accompany them on a carriage ride through the Windsor estate, then back to the castle along a path lined by members of the armed forces.
Inside the crenellated walls of the castle, which William the Conqueror started building in 1070, a military band will play the national anthems of both countries before Charles and Trump review the guard of honor in scarlet tunics and tall bearskin hats.
Hundreds of military personnel will take part in the ceremonies — mounted troops, foot guards and musicians — after months of rehearsals.
When rifles are shouldered, it will come with a single thwack. When boots hit the ground, they will do so in unison. “God Save the King” and “The Star-Spangled Banner” will be note-perfect.
Highlighting history
After the welcoming ceremonies, the Trumps will view an exhibit of documents and artwork put together to highlight the shared history of Britain and the US The palace hasn’t said what will be included, but the options are myriad for two countries with common legal and democratic traditions that stretch back to Magna Carta, the historic charter of rights signed in 1215 at Runnymede, just a few miles from Windsor.
But the centerpiece of the visit will be Wednesday night’s state banquet, where the men will don white ties and tail coats and the women will wear designer gowns and jewels that will sparkle in the flickering light from antique candelabra.
“The tiaras will be out in force,’’ said Hugo Vickers, a royal historian and author of “Alice,” a biography of the late Prince Philip’s mother. “It will all look very splendid.”
Dinner for many
The king and queen will join their guests around the massive Waterloo Table, which is about half the length of a football field and has space for 160 guests. It takes five full days to set the table, which will be laid with the Grand Service, a silver-gilt dining service that includes more than 4,000 pieces ranging from serving dishes to dinner plates and egg cups.
Vickers said the silver and ceremonies pave the way for conciliation, which Elizabeth believed was the way to solve even intractable problems.
“Keir Starmer has, cleverly in a way, used the king to lure President Trump over here, to give him a very good time,” he said. “And (it’s) a wonderful opportunity, with all the goodwill that will be engaged at this point, to talk to him … and if there’s any hope of sorting out Ukraine, etc. This is all a step in the right direction.”
Those discussions take place Thursday, when Trump and Starmer meet at Chequers, the country estate of British prime ministers.


 ‘No regrets’: wounded Nepalis protesters proud at change

 ‘No regrets’: wounded Nepalis protesters proud at change
Updated 53 min 39 sec ago

 ‘No regrets’: wounded Nepalis protesters proud at change

 ‘No regrets’: wounded Nepalis protesters proud at change
  • It was the country’s worst unrest since the end of a decade-long civil war and the abolition of the monarchy in 2008

Katmandu: University student Aditya Rawal was outside Nepal’s parliament with hundreds of other anti-corruption protesters when gunfire crackled and 14 people slumped down in front of him.
One was his university friend, and as he dashed forward to help — with his hands up — bullets smashed into him too.
“I heard somewhere that if you raise both hands, they will not shoot you,” Rawal, a 22-year-old digital marketer, told AFP as he lay on a bed in the capital Katmandu’s Civil Service Hospital.
“But I was their target.”
At least 72 people were killed during chaos beginning on September 8, as youth protests under a loose “Gen Z” label rallied against a government ban on social media.
“There had been so many protests in Nepal by older people, but in our ‘Gen-Z’ protest, they used guns,” Rawal said.
A day later, protests escalated, driven by economic woes and anger at government corruption.
The veteran prime minister quit and parliament and key government buildings were set on fire, before the army seized back control.
It was the country’s worst unrest since the end of a decade-long civil war and the abolition of the monarchy in 2008.
On Friday, former chief justice Sushila Karki, 73, was sworn in as interim prime minister, tasked with steering Nepal to elections within six months.

&Բ;‘BǴǻ’&Բ;

Nurse Usha Khanal, 36, said her gloves were “drenched with blood” as she treated the wounded, while tear gas fired nearby seeped into the hospital itself.
The Civil Service Hospital admitted 458 injured protesters; six later died, four of them under 30 — a stark reminder of the youth-led nature of the movement.
Rawal, his leg heavily bandaged and bullet fragments lodged in his arm and stomach, said he would do it again.
“If there is no change, we still have time to fight... We want a transparent government, no corruption and no dictatorship.”
One in five Nepalis aged 15-24 are jobless, World Bank data shows, with GDP per capita at just $1,447 in the Himalayan nation of 30 million.
Rawal’s cousin, 20-year-old Puja Kunwar, has remained by his bedside.
“His actions were for our nation,” she said. “It really gives me courage.”

- ‘Changes’ -

On the same ward, 19-year-old protester Subash Dhakal, shot in his knees, is likely to be largely bedridden for six months.
The sacrifices of those who died and were injured “should not be in vain,” he said.
“This has toppled the government and formed a new one... we don’t want the country to return to its earlier state,” he said.
His mother, government school teacher Bhawani Dhakal, 45, gave him money to take a bus to join the protests from their hometown, 30 kilometers (19 miles) away.
Dhakal said she had protested with other teachers against an education bill earlier this year, but that had resulted in nothing.
“It’s amazing that they brought change in just 24 hours,” she said. “Our sons threw out all the corrupt leaders.”
Subash Dhakal said he was proud of his role.
“I have no regrets at all,” he said.
“I have done it not only for me. It was for everyone, from my family to all brothers. This pain is ephemeral, but this will definitely bring about some changes.”