Conservative activist Charlie Kirk fatally shot in act of ‘political assassination’ at Utah college

Update Conservative activist Charlie Kirk fatally shot in act of ‘political assassination’ at Utah college
Charlie Kirk speaks before he is shot during Turning Point's visit to Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, Wednesday, Sept. 10, 2025. (The Deseret News/AP)
Short Url
Updated 11 September 2025

Conservative activist Charlie Kirk fatally shot in act of ‘political assassination’ at Utah college

Conservative activist Charlie Kirk fatally shot in act of ‘political assassination’ at Utah college
  • “The Great, and even Legendary, Charlie Kirk, is dead,” Trump wrote on social media
  • A university spokesperson said police did not have a suspect in custody

OREM, Utah: Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist and close ally of President Donald Trump who played an influential role in rallying young Republican voters, was shot and killed Wednesday at a Utah college event in what the governor called a political assassination carried out from a rooftop. A person of interest was in custody, officials said.
“This is a dark day for our state. It’s a tragic day for our nation,” said Utah Gov. Spencer Cox. “I want to be very clear this is a political assassination.”
Authorities did not immediately identify the person in custody, a motive or any criminal charges, but the circumstances of the shooting drew renewed attention to an escalating threat of political violence in the United States that in the last several years has cut across the ideological spectrum. The FBI, which investigates such acts, was helping lead the inquiry, though officials said at this point they had no reason to believe a second person was involved.
Videos posted to social media from Utah Valley University show Kirk speaking into a handheld microphone while sitting under a white tent emblazoned with the slogans “The American Comeback” and “Prove Me Wrong.” A single shot rings out and Kirk can be seen reaching up with his right hand as a large volume of blood gushes from the left side of his neck. Stunned spectators are heard gasping and screaming before people start to run away. The Associated Press was able to confirm the videos were taken at Sorensen Center courtyard on the Utah Valley University campus.
The shooter, who Cox pledged would be held accountable in a state with the death penalty, wore dark clothing and fired from a roof on campus some distance away.
Kirk was speaking at a debate hosted by his nonprofit political organization. Immediately before the shooting, Kirk was taking questions for an audience member about mass shootings and gun violence.
“Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years?” an audience member asked. Kirk responded, “Too many.”
The questioner followed up: “Do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years?”
“Counting or not counting gang violence?” Kirk asked.
Then a single shot rang out.
The death was announced on social media by Trump, who praised the 31-year-old Kirk, the co-founder and CEO of the youth organization Turning Point USA, as “Great, and even Legendary.”
“No one understood or had the Heart of the Youth in the United States of America better than Charlie,” Trump posted on his Truth Social account.
Utah Valley University said the campus was immediately evacuated and remained closed. Classes were canceled until further notice. Those still on campus were asked to stay in place until police officers could safely escort them off campus. Armed officers walked around the neighborhood bordering the campus, knocking on doors and asking for information on the shooter.
Officers were seen looking at a photo on their phones and showing it to people to see if they recognized a person of interest.
The event, billed as the first stop on Kirk’s “The American Comeback Tour,” had generated a polarizing campus reaction. An online petition calling for university administrators to bar Kirk from appearing received nearly 1,000 signatures. The university issued a statement last week citing First Amendment rights and affirming its “commitment to free speech, intellectual inquiry, and constructive dialogue.”
Last week, Kirk posted on X images of news clips showing his visit was sparking controversy. He wrote, “What’s going on in Utah?”
The shooting drew swift bipartisan condemnation, with Democratic officials joining Trump, who ordered flags lowered to half-staff and issued a presidential proclamation, and Republican allies of Kirk in decrying the violence.
“The attack on Charlie Kirk is disgusting, vile, and reprehensible,” Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who last March hosted Kirk on his podcast, posted on X.
“The murder of Charlie Kirk breaks my heart. My deepest sympathies are with his wife, two young children, and friends,” said Gabrielle Giffords, the former Democratic congresswoman who was wounded in a 2011 shooting in her Arizona district.
The shooting appeared poised to become part of a spike of political violence that has cut across the political spectrum. The attacks include the assassination of a Minnesota state lawmaker and her husband at their house in June, the firebombing of a Colorado parade to demand Hamas release hostages, and a fire set at the house of Pennsylvania’s governor, who is Jewish, in April. The most notorious of these events is the shooting of Trump during a campaign rally last year.
Former Utah congressman Jason Chaffetz, a Republican who was at Wednesday’s event, said in an interview on Fox News Channel that he heard one shot and saw Kirk go back.
“It seemed like it was a close shot,” Chaffetz said, who seemed shaken as he spoke.
He said there was a light police presence at the event and Kirk had some security but not enough.
“Utah is one of the safest places on the planet,” he said. “And so we just don’t have these types of things.”
Turning Point was founded in suburban Chicago in 2012 by Kirk, then 18, and William Montgomery, a tea party activist, to proselytize on college campuses for low taxes and limited government. It was not an immediate success.
But Kirk’s zeal for confronting liberals in academia eventually won over an influential set of conservative financiers.
Despite early misgivings, Turning Point enthusiastically backed Trump after he clinched the GOP nomination in 2016. Kirk served as a personal aide to Donald Trump Jr., the president’s eldest son, during the general election campaign.
Soon, Kirk was a regular presence on cable TV, where he leaned into the culture wars and heaped praise on the then-president. Trump and his son were equally effusive and often spoke at Turning Point conferences.


Palestinian-American author sues Oxford Union over censored speech on YouTube

Palestinian-American author sues Oxford Union over censored speech on YouTube
Updated 5 sec ago

Palestinian-American author sues Oxford Union over censored speech on YouTube

Palestinian-American author sues Oxford Union over censored speech on YouTube
  • Susan Abulhawa describes the edited version of her remarks as ‘politically motivated censorship’
  • She wants an apology, damages and for the union to restore the full version of her speech

LONDON: Palestinian American author Susan Abulhawa is suing the Oxford Union in the UK, seeking an apology and compensation for damages after parts of a speech she gave during a debate on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict were removed from a video posted by the union on YouTube.

The Pennsylvania-based author of the best-selling book “Mornings in Jenin” was one of eight speakers who took part in the debate in November 2024. The Oxford Union uploaded her speech to YouTube but deleted it from the platform a week after the debate, then replaced it in December with an edited version that omitted remarks she made about Zionism and Israel’s actions in Lebanon.

The union said that it removed parts of Abulhawa’s speech because of “legal concerns” about certain aspects of it, The Times newspaper reported, including comments about Zionists encouraging “the most vile of human impulses,” and Israeli booby traps in Lebanon.

When contacted by Abulhawa’s legal team, the union argued that the cut remarks constituted racial hatred in violation of Section 17 of the UK’s Public Order Act 1986. The author uploaded the full version of her speech to her own YouTube channel in April.

In one part removed by the union, Abulhawa addresses Zionists directly, saying: “You don’t know how to live in the world without dominating others. You have crossed all lines and nurtured the most vile of human impulses.”

She also highlighted atrocities carried out by Israeli forces in the Gaza Strip, including the bombing of hospitals and schools, and the killing of women and children, which a number of UN and Western officials have described as amounting to genocide.

Israel’s military campaign in Gaza has resulted in the killing of more than 65,000 Palestinians since October 2023, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health, and the displacement of the entire 2 million-strong population of the territory.

Abulhawa, whose family hails from the Mount of Olives, a Palestinian neighborhood overlooking the walled city of occupied East Jerusalem, described the edited version of her speech as “politically motivated censorship.”

She said: “They talk about freedom of expression, free discourse and free debate, exchange of thoughts, exchange of ideas, however uncomfortable, but when it comes to this one issue … there’s a different set of rules.”

Abulhawa said the actions of the Oxford Union, one of Britain’s oldest university unions, had damaged her reputation by implying her remarks were criminal, The Times reported. She wants an apology, damages, and for the union to restore the full version of her speech. She is suing the union on various legal grounds, including copyright infringement, discrimination and breach of contract.

“I prepared a speech that I labored over for quite a while and I chose my words carefully for content,” she said. “The suggestion was I said things that were unlawful, that were malicious or substandard. It was definitely disparaging to me.”

The debate resulted in approval of a motion that proposed “Israel is an apartheid state responsible for genocide.” The union did not comment on Abulhawa’s legal challenge.