Police arrest almost 900 at London protest supporting banned group Palestine Action

Man reacts as police officers operate during a rally challenging the British government’s proscription of “Palestine Action” under anti-terrorism laws, in Parliament Square, in London, September 6, 2025. (Reuters)
Man reacts as police officers operate during a rally challenging the British government’s proscription of “Palestine Action” under anti-terrorism laws, in Parliament Square, in London, September 6, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 07 September 2025

Police arrest almost 900 at London protest supporting banned group Palestine Action

Man reacts as police officers operate during a rally challenging the British government’s proscription of “Palestine Action.”
  • Almost 1,600 people have now been detained, many for silently holding signs supporting the group, since it was outlawed two months ago

LONDON: British police said Sunday that they arrested almost 900 people demonstrating in London against a ban on the group Palestine Action, which has been deemed a terrorist organization by the government.
Almost 1,600 people have now been detained, many for silently holding signs supporting the group, since it was outlawed two months ago. Protesters say the ban on Palestine Action is an unwarranted curb on free speech and the right to protest.
The Metropolitan Police force said 890 people were arrested at Saturday’s demonstration, the vast majority, 857, under the Terrorism Act for supporting a proscribed organization. Some 33 were detained for other offenses, including 17 for assaulting police officers.
Defend Our Juries, the campaign group organizing the protest, said 1,500 people took part in the demonstration outside Parliament, sitting down and holding signs reading “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.”
Within minutes, police began arresting the demonstrators, as bystanders chanted “Shame on you,” and “Met Police, pick a side, justice or genocide.” There were some scuffles and angry exchanges as officers dragged away demonstrators who went limp as they were removed from the crowd.
“In carrying out their duties today, our officers have been punched, kicked, spat on and had objects thrown at them by protesters,” said Deputy Assistant Commissioner Claire Smart, who called the abuse directed at police “intolerable.”
Defend Our Juries said aggression had come from police officers and dismissed claims that protesters had been violent as “frankly laughable.”
More than 700 people were arrested at earlier protests, and 138 have been charged under the Terrorism Act.
Mike Higgins, 62, who is blind and uses a wheelchair, was arrested last month but returned to demonstrate on Saturday.
“And I’m a terrorist? That’s the joke of it,” he said. “I’ve already been arrested under the Terrorism Act and I suspect I will be today.
“Of course I’ll keep coming back. What choice do I have?”
Direct action protests
The government proscribed Palestine Action in July, after activists broke into a Royal Air Force base and vandalized planes to protest against what they called Britain’s support for Israel’s offensive against Hamas in Gaza. The activists sprayed red paint into the engines of two tanker planes and caused further damage with crowbars.
Proscription made it a crime to publicly support the organization. Membership of, or support for, the group is punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
Palestine Action has carried out direct action protests in the UK since it formed in 2020, including breaking into facilities owned by Israeli weapons manufacturer Elbit Systems UK, and has targeted other sites in Britain that participants believe have links with the Israeli military.
The group has targeted defense companies and national infrastructure, and officials say their actions have caused millions of pounds in damage that affect national security.
Banning the group, then-Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said, “The assessments are very clear, this is not a nonviolent organization.”
Palestine Action has won approval from the High Court to challenge the ban, a ruling the government is seeking to overturn. The case is ongoing, with a hearing scheduled for Sept. 25.
Supporters say the ban stifles free speech
The UN human rights chief has criticized the British government’s stance, saying the new law “misuses the gravity and impact of terrorism.”
The decision to designate Palestine Action as a terrorist group “raises serious concerns that counterterrorism laws are being applied to conduct that is not terrorist in nature, and risks hindering the legitimate exercise of fundamental freedoms across the UK,” Volker Türk warned.
He added that according to international standards, terrorist acts should be confined to crimes such as those intended to cause death or serious injury or the taking of hostages.
Huda Ammori, Palestine Action’s co-founder, has condemned the government’s decision to ban it as “catastrophic” for civil liberties, leading to a “much wider chilling effect on freedom of speech.”
The group has been supported by prominent cultural figures including bestselling Irish author Sally Rooney, who said she planned to use the proceeds of her work “to keep backing Palestine Action and direct action against genocide.”
Israel — founded in part as a refuge in the wake of the Holocaust, when some 6 million European Jews were murdered — vehemently denies it is committing genocide.
Britain’s government stressed that proscribing Palestine Action as a terrorist group does not affect other lawful groups — including pro-Palestinian or pro-Israel voices — campaigning or peacefully protesting.
About 20,000 people, by a police estimate, attended a separate pro-Palestinian march in London on Saturday.


UK police say train knife attack not terrorist incident, two British men arrested

UK police say train knife attack not terrorist incident, two British men arrested
Updated 4 sec ago

UK police say train knife attack not terrorist incident, two British men arrested

UK police say train knife attack not terrorist incident, two British men arrested
HUNTINGDON, England: British police said on Sunday that a knife attack on a train which put 11 people in hospital was not a terrorist incident, adding that two men — both British nationals — had been arrested.
Counterterrorism police had helped with the initial investigation after the mass stabbing of passengers on a London-bound train in eastern England on Saturday.
“At this stage, there is nothing to suggest that this is a terrorist incident,” Superintendent John Loveless from British Transport Police told media on Sunday.
The two men arrested on suspicion of attempted murder were a 32-year-old male, a black British national, and a 35-year-old British national of Caribbean descent, Loveless said. Both had been born in the UK, he added.
“It would not be appropriate to speculate on the cause of this incident,” he said.
The arrests were made by armed police after the train made an emergency stop at Huntingdon around 80 miles (130 km) north of London.
Of the 11 people hospitalized, four have since been discharged and two patients remain in a life-threatening condition, police said.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer called it an “appalling incident” which was “deeply concerning,” while King Charles said he was “truly appalled and shocked.”
Interior Minister Shabana Mahmood said she was “deeply saddened” and urged people to avoid comment and speculation.
The government is keen to stop rumors spreading on social media following an incident in Southport in northwest England in 2024, when Internet claims over the murder of three young girls sparked days of rioting across the country.
Witness Olly Foster told the BBC that he was on the train when someone ran past him saying a man was stabbing “everyone, everything.”
“I put my hand on this chair...and then I look at my hand, and it’s covered in blood. And then I look at the chair, and there’s blood all over the chair. And then I look ahead and there’s blood on all the chairs,” he said.
Another witness told Sky News that a suspect was seen waving a large knife before being tasered by police.
Britain’s current threat level from terrorism is rated as “substantial” by security services, meaning an attack is considered “likely.”
After a number of serious attacks in 2017, Britain has had some quieter years in the 2020s, although last month three people were killed when a synagogue was attacked in Manchester.

UK MPs call for govt adoption of new Islamophobia definition after hate crime surge

Britain's Housing Secretary Steve Reed leaves 10 Downing Street, in central London, on September 9, 2025. (File/AFP)
Britain's Housing Secretary Steve Reed leaves 10 Downing Street, in central London, on September 9, 2025. (File/AFP)
Updated 7 min 16 sec ago

UK MPs call for govt adoption of new Islamophobia definition after hate crime surge

Britain's Housing Secretary Steve Reed leaves 10 Downing Street, in central London, on September 9, 2025. (File/AFP)
  • Letter: ‘In 2025, 45 percent of religious hate crimes were directed towards Muslims’
  • MP Afzal Khan: ‘We urgently need a robust definition that protects people while preserving free speech’

LONDON: Prominent UK politicians have written to Steve Reed, secretary of state for housing, communities and local government, urging him to adopt a new definition of Islamophobia. 

Recent statistics in England and Wales have shown a 19 percent rise in hate crimes against Muslims in the last year.

In a letter, the group of 40 MPs said adopting the new definition would be an “important step” in curbing anti-Muslim prejudice.

An independent working group of MPs was established in February to determine the new definition of Islamophobia to address “unacceptable treatment, prejudice, discrimination and hate targeting Muslims or anyone who is perceived to be Muslim.” 

It was chaired by the former attorney general for England and Wales, Dominic Grieve, and included the co-chair of the British Muslim Network, Akeela Ahmed.

The letter said the new definition “comes at a time when unfortunately, Islamophobia continues to increase rapidly, with devastating consequences. In 2025, 45 percent of religious hate crimes were directed towards Muslims.”

It added: “This means Islamophobic hate crimes have risen 92% since 2023 and the adoption of a definition by the government becomes more important than ever.”

Signatories urged Reed to adopt the definition in November during Islamophobia Awareness Month, after the working group submitted their report in October for consultation.

The proposal for a new definition has been met with criticism in some quarters over fears it could curb free speech in the UK.

Supporters of a new definition have pointed out that under the 2010 Equality Act, Muslims are not protected from racial discrimination as they are not defined as a racial group.

Shaista Gohir, a member of the House of Lords who also sat on the working group, accused government ministers of being “silent” on the increase in anti-Muslim hate in England and Wales.

A previous definition of Islamophobia from the all-party parliamentary group on British Muslims stated: “Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.”

The definition was adopted by the Labour Party in 2019, as well as the Liberal Democrats, but not by the Conservative government at the time, which said it “was not broadly” accepted and required more work.

MP Afzal Khan, who penned the letter to Reed, told The Guardian: “Muslims receive the highest number of recorded religious hate crimes in the UK.”

He said there had been an “aggressive shift” in attitudes toward Muslims in the past year, and the government cannot “let the momentum slip” on a new definition of Islamophobia. “We urgently need a robust definition that protects people while preserving free speech,” he added.

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said in a statement: “The department is carefully considering the Working Group’s recommendations and we will respond in due course.”


‘We’re not a violent city’: Chicago locals take on ICE block-by-block

‘We’re not a violent city’: Chicago locals take on ICE block-by-block
Updated 02 November 2025

‘We’re not a violent city’: Chicago locals take on ICE block-by-block

‘We’re not a violent city’: Chicago locals take on ICE block-by-block
  • The immigration crackdown in Chicago grows increasingly heated
  • Sounding the alarm on immigration crackdown by whistle and messaging apps

CHICAGO: The immigration agents’ tear gas grenades clinked and then exploded against the concrete, shrouding the block in plumes of white gas. The dozen or so residents at the scene only screamed louder. “We don’t want you here,” yelled Rae Lindenberg. The 32-year-old, who works in marketing, ran out of her apartment when she heard the shrill sound of whistles. “Get out of our neighborhood!” The squad of agents had appeared in Lakeview last month, an upscale neighborhood dotted with dog daycares, medical spas and vegan restaurants, hopping over a gate to chase down a construction worker who was handcuffed and shoved into a vehicle.
When Courtney Conway, a 42-year-old lifelong Chicago resident, heard about the chase through Facebook groups and text message chains, she hopped on her bike to join the protesters.
“We are not a violent city. This is not a war zone, and I think these guys are terrorizing us and trying to incite us,” said Conway. “We want them out. We want them to stop kidnapping our neighbors.”
Creating a zone defense
Chicago, a city of 2.7 million, has long been known as a patchwork of close-knit neighborhoods. And since the city took center stage of President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown in September, those neighborhoods have mobilized against enforcement efforts, sometimes block-by-block. That hyperlocal effort, spun off into dozens of chats on social platforms, has helped create a type of zone defense that – activists say – has slowed down immigration agents and in some cases forced them to withdraw without making an arrest.
When asked for comment, Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary for public affairs at the Department of Homeland Security, said: “Our officers are highly trained and in the face of rioting, doxxing and physical attacks they have shown professionalism. They are not afraid of loud noises and whistles.”
Over in Chicago since early September, according to DHS.
In Facebook groups and on Signal chats, tens of thousands of residents regularly crowdsource information on immigration agents’ last-known locations, neighborhoods being targeted that day and – importantly – the license plates, makes and models of the rental cars used by agents, which can
change daily.
Some ICE-spotting Facebook pages in Chicago
have up to 50,000 members. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and US Customs and Border Protection agents prowling city streets in unmarked cars are often trailed by drivers honking their horns and cyclists on an almost daily basis.
In some neighborhoods, confrontations between CBP and ICE agents and protesters have grown increasingly heated. Immigration agents have tear-gassed at least five neighborhoods in the past month, according to a Reuters tally, their car into another vehicle at least once, protesters trailing immigration agents, used Tasers on people during violent arrests, pointed at people and two people, including one fatally.
The Cook County Department of Public Health said it does not track injuries sustained during confrontations with federal agents and five city hospitals called by Reuters said they had not treated any protesters.
Last month, US District Judge Sara Ellis directed agents to use body cameras and issue two warnings to protesters before using tear gas in a case brought by protesters, clergy and journalists.
Helicopter watch groups
Hours after the confrontation in the Lakeview neighborhood, dozens of parents stood guard outside a school in Bucktown, another North Side neighborhood favored by families and young professionals, after hearing ICE and border patrol officers were in the area. Some parents set up an informal checkpoint next to the school to check cars for immigration enforcement agents.
And in Little Village, one of the city’s biggest Latino enclaves, businesses and residents locked their doors after activists warned them of approaching ICE and border patrol vehicles and at one point, surrounded vehicles to prevent them from making arrests.
“The community defended the neighborhood today,” said Baltazar Enriquez, president of the Little Village Community Council.
Some protesters specialize in watching out for Black Hawk helicopters the agents use to surveil neighborhoods, which don’t appear on flight-tracking apps and are often a harbinger of a raid.
On a recent Saturday morning, Brian Kolp, an attorney and former prosecutor, ran out of the house in his pajamas when word spread throughout the Old Irving Park neighborhood that immigration agents in balaclavas had grabbed a worker and a protester and shoved them into their car. Other residents came out in Halloween costumes.
“People were yelling, and it was chaos,” said Kolp. Soon after, he said, agents tossed tear gas grenades into the street and left.


Djibouti parliament removes presidential age limit: speaker

Djibouti parliament removes presidential age limit: speaker
Updated 02 November 2025

Djibouti parliament removes presidential age limit: speaker

Djibouti parliament removes presidential age limit: speaker
  • Vote opens the way for leader Ismail Omar Guelleh to run for a sixth term
  • Guelleh, 77, has held power since 1999 in the tiny Horn of Africa nation

ADDIS ABABA: Djibouti’s parliament removed the age limit for presidents with a unanimous vote on Sunday, its speaker said, opening the way for leader Ismail Omar Guelleh to run for a sixth term.
Guelleh, 77, has held power since 1999 in the tiny Horn of Africa nation, a major port that hosts military bases for the United States, France, China, Japan and Italy.
Djibouti’s lawmakers unanimously approved the change to the constitution to remove a bar on running for president past the age of 75.
The move allows Guelleh to run in the next election in April 2026, likely facing minimal opposition in a country with limited freedom of expression and press.
“The National Assembly ratified the removal of the age limit today, so it is official,” said parliament speaker Dileita Mohamed Dileita.
Parliament had already passed the motion a week earlier in an initial vote that was then approved by Guelleh and sent back to lawmakers for the final vote.
Dileita earlier said the constitutional change was necessary to ensure “the stability of the small country, in a troubled region, the Horn of Africa, with Somalia, Ethiopia, and Eritrea.”
Guelleh won the last election in 2021 with 97 percent of the vote while his party, the Union for the Presidential Majority, holds the majority of parliamentary seats.
He succeeded Hassan Gouled Aptidon, the father of Djibouti’s independence, in 1999 after serving as his chief of staff for 22 years.
Djibouti has only around one million inhabitants but lies on the strategic trade route of the Bab El-Mandeb Strait on the Red Sea.


Political violence kills almost 300 since Hasina’s fall: rights group

Political violence kills almost 300 since Hasina’s fall: rights group
Updated 02 November 2025

Political violence kills almost 300 since Hasina’s fall: rights group

Political violence kills almost 300 since Hasina’s fall: rights group
  • Human rights had improved since the fall of Hasina’s government but law enforcement agencies were still not being held accountable

DHAKA: Nearly 300 people have been killed in political violence in Bangladesh in the year since student-led protests toppled autocratic former leader Sheikh Hasina, the country’s main human rights group said on Sunday.
A report by Odhikar, a Dhaka-based rights organization, said at least 281 people had been killed in violence involving political parties from August 2024, when Hasina’s rule ended and she fled to India, to September 2025.
On top of those, there were another 40 victims of extrajudicial killings who had been suspected of crimes, while another 153 were lynched, the quarterly report released last week said.
Odhikar director ASM Nasiruddin Elan said adherence to human rights had improved since the fall of Hasina’s government but law enforcement agencies were still not being held accountable.
“Yes, we don’t see the frequent extrajudicial killings or enforced disappearances that we witnessed during the Hasina era, but deaths in custody, bribery, and harassment of victims are still ongoing,” Elan said.
He said that “innocent people fall prey to atrocities” for their alleged involvement with the Awami League, Hasina’s political party that is now banned.
Hasina’s 15-year rule saw widespread human rights abuses, including the mass detention and extrajudicial killing of her political opponents.
The Odhikar report also said many people had fallen victim to extortion by political parties, regardless of their financial or social standing, in the year since Hasina’s fall.
Those included the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, seen as the frontrunner in elections slated for February 2026, and the Anti-Discrimination Student Movement, which was credited with starting the protests that toppled Hasina.
Jamaat-e-Islami, Muslim-majority Bangladesh’s largest Islamist party, was also included in reports of extortion, the report said.
Odhikar also said mob attacks had been relatively frequent during the period, mainly because of inefficient policing.
“Police have been used to achieve party interests and were given impunity, which eventually led them to kill and torture activists affiliated with the opposition,” the report said.
It said “the police largely became dysfunctional and lost their morale,” after Hasina fell.
Bangladesh’s interim government nor any of the political parties have responded yet to Odhikar’s report.