Official Lebanese source: ‘We are holding talks with Hezbollah about Day After, and all concerns are being addressed’

Special Official Lebanese source: ‘We are holding talks with Hezbollah about Day After, and all concerns are being addressed’
Lebanese soldiers stand guard outside an army base in the southern city of Tyre, Aug. 28, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 8 sec ago

Official Lebanese source: ‘We are holding talks with Hezbollah about Day After, and all concerns are being addressed’

Official Lebanese source: ‘We are holding talks with Hezbollah about Day After, and all concerns are being addressed’
  • ‘The army confiscated more than 80 percent of Hezbollah weapons south of the Litani River,’ official tells Arab News
  • ‘We possess French documents confirming the Lebanese ownership of the Shebaa Farms’
  • Source says political authority and the army commands defense strategy, and no one can replace them 

BEIRUT: An official Lebanese source has confirmed to Arab News that the government is in direct talks with Hezbollah about the disarmament of non-state armed groups and the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Lebanese territory.

The source said that concerns raised by the Shiite group “are being addressed.” 

“The Lebanese army is capable of fulfilling all its duties south of the Litani River,” the source said, referencing the UN Security Council resolution adopted on Thursday evening, which extended the mandate of the UN Interim Force in Lebanon, or UNIFIL, until the end of 2026.

This resolution also envisions a phased withdrawal of UNIFIL forces from an area where they have served for more than four decades. 

“Let Israel withdraw from southern Lebanon, and the Lebanese army will carry out its duties to the fullest extent in coordination with UNIFIL forces,” the source said. “What is required is supporting the army to increase its capabilities.”  

The Lebanese Army has about 6,500 troops deployed south of the Litani River and is working to increase that number to 10,000. 

The source revealed that the Lebanese Army “has completed more than 80 percent of its mission south of the Litani River, confiscating all types of weapons it finds, without any objection from Hezbollah.” Contrary to general expectations, the group “has been cooperative,” the source said. 

“The Lebanese Army confiscates everything it encounters south of the Litani River,” the official said. “It either destroys it if it is unusable, and uses what is usable, according to estimates by military experts after inspecting the confiscated weapons.” 

Military experts estimate that weapons and ammunition generally have an expiration date of between 10 and 20 years, though this varies depending on the weapon type, manufacturing process and storage conditions. Factors such as humidity, heat and exposure to water can degrade the weapons, potentially turning them into hazards. 

“Neither the army nor the political leadership knows what remains of Hezbollah’s military arsenal, nor do Hezbollah officials themselves,” the source said. 

“There is no doubt that the resistance (Hezbollah), which is usually secretive in its operations, has a method that prevents us from assessing the size and status of its arsenal.” 

Addressing recent incidents, the source described the explosions that occurred during weapon confiscations in the south earlier this month — which killed six soldiers — as “incidents still under investigation.” The official confirmed that “in light of these events, the Lebanese army has adopted a more cautious approach.” 

Expressing optimism about Lebanon regaining full sovereignty over its territory, the source said: “The defense strategy is drawn up by the army command under the guidance of the political authority, and no one can replace them. 

“Lebanon’s long-standing military capabilities cannot be underestimated. The state also resorts to diplomacy to achieve sovereignty, and it is the decision-maker in war and peace, and everyone must coordinate with the state, not allow anyone to open a confrontation at their own expense.” 

The source emphasized that when the political authority drafted its ministerial statement — and earlier, when the president of the republic delivered his inaugural speech — no external party dictated their positions or demands. 

“The arms embargo is one of the provisions of the Taif Agreement and international resolutions, and its implementation does not mean surrender to Israel.” 

The source also said that the withdrawal of weapons from the Palestinian camps fell within the framework of the Lebanese decision, not the Israeli one. 

The source said that the government did not consider the step-by-step policy pursued by US envoy Thomas Barrack to implement the terms of the ceasefire agreement as a failure, despite Israel’s recent response linking its withdrawal from the Five Hills area to the Lebanese government’s enforcement of the arms embargo decision. 

“We judge the facts and exercise our convictions, and I believe that diplomacy in this area requires patience. The American paper and the Lebanese amendments to it, which were approved by the Council of Ministers, required dozens of hours of work.” 

The representative addressed concerns about allaying Hezbollah’s fears concerning the confiscation of its weapons and reassuring its supporters: “Hezbollah is present in the state, and anyone who wants to join the Lebanese Army is welcome, according to the conditions of membership. The idea of ​​compensating Hezbollah fighters is not a bad idea. I believe that joining the military establishment is a positive thing for their families, as they will receive social benefits.” 

On efforts to restore confidence among Hezbollah supporters in state institutions, the source revealed that “under-the-table discussions” have been taking place between Hezbollah and decision-makers “about the Day After.” 

The source acknowledged that “Hezbollah and its supporters are wounded, deeply hurt, and all concerns must be addressed, and work is underway to address them.” 

On the American proposal to establish an economic zone in the border area as a buffer zone, it was noted that the plan has not yet been officially discussed. 

“The state understands the concerns of the people of the region regarding this matter, and they are 100 percent right. If it is raised, Lebanon will certainly have its own reservations. No one accepts the separation of the people of the south from their land. What is most important, above all, is that Israel withdraws from the positions it occupies and that they cease their hostile actions,“ the official said. 

The source also reiterated Lebanon’s openness to all Arab assistance for reconstruction, especially from Gulf states led by . 

Concerning Lebanese-Syrian relations, the official indicated that “a Syrian delegation will visit Lebanon to discuss border demarcation, the issue of Syrian detainees, and trade relations.” 

On Lebanon’s stance if Syria decided to recognize the Shebaa Farms as Syrian rather than Lebanese territory, the source said: “It must prove this with documents. We have documents from the French state archives that confirm their Lebanese identity.” 


Israel says in talks ‘right now’ on south Syria demilitarization

Israel says in talks ‘right now’ on south Syria demilitarization
Updated 15 sec ago

Israel says in talks ‘right now’ on south Syria demilitarization

Israel says in talks ‘right now’ on south Syria demilitarization
JERUSALEM: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday that Israel was engaged in talks aimed at the demilitarization of southern Syria, implicitly acknowledging for the first time contacts with the new Syrian regime.
Following deadly sectarian violence in Syria last month, Netanyahu met with a Druze leader in Israel, reassuring him that his government was negotiating to safeguard the religious community in Syria.
“We are focusing on three things: Protecting the Druze community in the Sweida governorate, but not only there; creating a demilitarised zone stretching from the Golan Heights (passing) south of Damascus down to and including Sweida; and establishing a humanitarian corridor to allow the delivery of aid,” the premier said.
“These discussions are taking place right now, at this very moment,” he added, according to a video shared by his office.
Last week, Syria’s official news agency SANA reported that Foreign Minister Asaad Al-Shaibani had met an Israeli delegation led by Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer in Paris on August 19.
Talks focused on de-escalation between the two countries and the situation in Druze-majority Sweida province after deadly sectarian clashes there last month, the news channel said
The French Foreign Ministry confirmed the meeting to AFP, saying it had been conducted “under US mediation” and that delegations from the two Middle Eastern neighbors had previously met on July 24 in the French capital.
Israel has carried out hundreds of strikes in Syria since the overthrow of President Bashar Assad in December, and occupied much of a UN-patrolled demilitarised zone on the Syrian-held side of the armistice line between the two countries.
Damascus has confirmed holding indirect contacts with Israel with the intention of returning to the 1974 disengagement agreement that created the buffer zone.
In July, Israel bombed Syrian government forces in the capital and in Sweida province to force their withdrawal from the southern region amid a wave of sectarian violence.
On Wednesday night, Israeli forces conducted an airborne raid on a site near the Syrian capital after bombing it several times, SANA reported Thursday.
Israel did not confirm the raid, but Defense Minister Israel Katz said its forces operate “in all combat zones” to ensure the country’s security.

UN chief calls for accountability over ‘endless catalog of horrors in Gaza’ amid humanitarian collapse

UN chief calls for accountability over ‘endless catalog of horrors in Gaza’ amid humanitarian collapse
Updated 28 August 2025

UN chief calls for accountability over ‘endless catalog of horrors in Gaza’ amid humanitarian collapse

UN chief calls for accountability over ‘endless catalog of horrors in Gaza’ amid humanitarian collapse
  • Unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe, including famine, is result of decisions that defy ‘basic humanity,’ says Secretary-General Antonio Guterres
  • He demands Israel abide by provisional measures issued by International Court of Justice and lift the blockade on aid

NEW YORK CITY: UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Thursday condemned the worsening crisis in Gaza. He described “an endless catalog of horrors” in the territory and warned of catastrophic humanitarian consequences, as he called for immediate international action to address the situation and ensure accountability.

Guterres said civilians in Gaza were enduring “yet another deadly escalation” as Israel continues to signal plans for a military takeover of Gaza City. He called this a “new and dangerous phase” of the conflict that would have “devastating consequences,” including the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people already traumatized by months of violence.

“This must stop,” Guterres said. “Gaza is piled with rubble, piled with bodies, and piled with examples of what may be serious violations of international law.”

Citing recent airstrikes, he added that Israeli military operations have killed civilians, medical workers and journalists.

A double Israeli strike on Nasser hospital in Khan Younis killed 20 people on Monday, including health workers and journalists. At least one person was killed by the initial strike, and others in a second minutes later as rescuers and journalists rushed to the scene.

The five journalists who died worked for international media outlets, including the Associated Press, Reuters, Al Jazeera and Middle East Eye.

“These attacks are part of an endless catalog of horrors,” Guterres said. “There must be accountability.”

He also condemned Hamas and other armed groups for taking hostages and subjecting them to “atrocious treatment,” and demanded the immediate and unconditional release of all those being held.

He described the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza as beyond critical, warning that famine was no longer a looming threat but “a present-day catastrophe.” He said civilians were dying from hunger, women were giving birth under extreme conditions, and essential services such as water, healthcare and food systems had been “systematically dismantled.”

“These are the facts on the ground,” he added. “And they are the result of deliberate decisions that defy basic humanity.”

As the occupying power, Guterres said, Israel has a legal obligation to ensure the population has access to food, water and medical aid. He called for the implementation of binding provisional measures issued by the International Court of Justice, including the facilitation of full and immediate humanitarian access throughout Gaza, in cooperation with the UN.

He noted that 366 UN workers have been killed since the conflict escalated, and that humanitarian efforts were being “blocked, delayed and denied” on a daily basis. “This is unacceptable,” he added.

The secretary-general also addressed the deteriorating situation in the West Bank, citing increased military operations, settler violence and discriminatory policies. He warned that a recently approved plan to expand settlements there could effectively sever the northern West

Bank from the south of the territory, posing what he described as an “existential threat” to a two-state solution.

“I repeat: the Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem have been established, and are being maintained, in violation of international law,” Guterres said. “Israel must cease such actions and comply with its obligations.

“There is no military solution to this conflict. I appeal once again for an immediate and permanent ceasefire, unfettered humanitarian access across Gaza, and the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages.

“Starvation of the civilian population must never be used as a method of warfare. Civilians must be protected. Humanitarian access must be unimpeded. No more excuses. No more obstacles. No more lies.”


UN experts condemn enforced disappearances at Gaza aid sites, call for Israeli accountability

UN experts condemn enforced disappearances at Gaza aid sites, call for Israeli accountability
Updated 28 August 2025

UN experts condemn enforced disappearances at Gaza aid sites, call for Israeli accountability

UN experts condemn enforced disappearances at Gaza aid sites, call for Israeli accountability
  • ‘Reports of enforced disappearances targeting starving civilians seeking their basic right to food are not only shocking but amount to torture,’ says head of working group
  • Refusal by Israeli authorities to provide information about fate or whereabouts of detainees is a clear breach of international law, the experts say

NEW YORK CITY: A group of UN human rights experts on Thursday condemned what they described as enforced disappearances of Palestinian civilians at food aid distribution sites in Gaza.

They called on Israeli authorities to end this “heinous crime” against an already starving and traumatized population.

“Reports of enforced disappearances targeting starving civilians seeking their basic right to food are not only shocking but amount to torture,” said Gabriella Citroni, the chair-rapporteur of the UN’s Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances.

“Using food as a tool to conduct targeted and mass disappearances needs to end, now.”

The group of experts also included Francesca Albanese, special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967 and Michael Fakhri, special rapporteur on the right to food.

They cited reports of individuals, including at least one child, disappearing after visiting aid distribution centers operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in Rafah. These sites, they said, have also come under aerial bombardment and gunfire, resulting in mass casualties among civilians already facing severe hunger.

According to the UN, Israeli forces are operating in and around these aid-distribution areas and are allegedly involved in detentions and disappearances of people seeking humanitarian assistance.

“We are particularly concerned that, once again, the Palestinian people have been targeted and punished as such,” said Albanese. “In the most desperate moment of man-made starvation, they are being denied life-saving aid and subjected to further violence.”

The experts warned that the rising number of disappearances at aid sites could deter desperate civilians from seeking food assistance, exacerbating the risk of famine in Gaza. Fakhri said that this represented a fundamental violation of the right to food.

“Enforced disappearances in this context are part of a broader attack on the right to access food and survive,” he added.

The experts accused Israeli authorities of refusing to provide information about the fate or whereabouts of detained individuals, describing this as a clear breach of international law.

“The failure to acknowledge deprivation of liberty by state agents, and refusal to acknowledge detention, constitute an enforced disappearance,” said Citroni.

“This is a violation of the absolute and non-derogable prohibition against enforced disappearances.”

The experts said that such actions must be investigated thoroughly and impartially, and those found to be responsible for them must be held accountable.

“The obligation to investigate and punish enforced disappearances is a jus cogens (compelling law) norm of international law,” said Ana Lorena Delgadillo Perez, a member of the working group.

“It must not be delayed or obstructed under any circumstances.”

The experts also raised concern over the reliance by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation on private military security contractors at its aid distribution sites.

Aua Balde, another member of the working group, described the current GHF arrangement as an “inhumane aid system” and called for it to be immediately dismantled in favor of a UN-led humanitarian mechanism.

Special rapporteurs are part of what is known as the special procedures of the UN Human Rights Council. They are independent experts who work on a voluntary basis, are not members of UN staff and are not paid for their work.


UN votes to end peacekeeping force in Lebanon after 5 decades

UN votes to end peacekeeping force in Lebanon after 5 decades
Updated 28 August 2025

UN votes to end peacekeeping force in Lebanon after 5 decades

UN votes to end peacekeeping force in Lebanon after 5 decades
  • UN Security Council votes unanimously for UNIFIL a final extension until the end of 2026
  • Resolution says aim is to make the Lebanese government 'the sole provider of security' in southern Lebanon

UNITED NATIONS: The UN Security Council voted unanimously on Thursday to terminate the UN peacekeeping force in southern Lebanon at the end of next year after nearly five decades, bowing to demands from the United States and its close ally Israel.
The United States, which initially demanded that the force be ended in six months and later sought a one-year final extension, voted in favor of a final 16-month mandate to continue its activities near Lebanon’s UN-drawn border with Israel.
The multinational peacekeeping force has played a significant role in monitoring the security situation in southern Lebanon for decades, including during the Israel-Hezbollah war last year, but it has drawn criticism from both sides and numerous US lawmakers, some of whom now hold prominent roles in President Donald Trump’s administration or wield new influence with the Republican White House.
The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon was created to oversee the withdrawal of Israeli troops from southern Lebanon after Israel’s 1978 invasion. Its mission was expanded following the monthlong 2006 war between Israel and the militant group Hezbollah.
The resolution gives the force, known as UNIFIL, a year starting on Dec. 31, 2026, to withdraw its 10,800 military and civilian personnel and all UN equipment. During this period, UNIFIL was authorized to carry out a few limited activities.
The resolution says the aim is to make the Lebanese government “the sole provider of security” in southern Lebanon north of the UN-drawn border with Israel known as the Blue Line. It calls on Israel to withdraw its forces from north of the Blue Line.
Trump administration political appointees came into office wanting to shut down UNIFIL as soon as possible and have secured major cuts in US funding for the force.
They regard the operation as a waste of money that is merely delaying the goal of eliminating Hezbollah’s influence and restoring full security control to the Lebanese armed forces. The government says its forces are not yet capable of assuming full control.
European nations, notably France and Italy, objected to winding down UNIFIL too quickly. They argued that ending the peacekeeping mission before the Lebanese army was able to fully secure the border area would create a vacuum Hezbollah could easily exploit.
During the one-year withdrawal period, the resolution says, UNIFIL is authorized to provide security and assistance to UN personnel, “to maintain situational awareness in the vicinity of UNIFIL locations,” and to contribute to the protection of civilians and the safe delivery of humanitarian aid “within the limits of its capacities.”
The resolution urges the international community “to intensify its support, including equipment, material and finance” to the Lebanese armed forces.


Lebanese official says disarmament of Palestinian camps could pave way for new refugee rights

Lebanese official says disarmament of Palestinian camps could pave way for new refugee rights
Updated 28 August 2025

Lebanese official says disarmament of Palestinian camps could pave way for new refugee rights

Lebanese official says disarmament of Palestinian camps could pave way for new refugee rights
  • Ramez Dimashkieh, head of the Lebanese-Palestinian Dialogue Committee said his group is working on proposed legislation that they hope to introduce by the end of the year
  • The proposed legislation under being drafted would not confer Lebanese nationality on the refugees

BEIRUT: As more Palestinian refugee camps handed over caches of weapons to the Lebanese army this week, a Lebanese government official told The Associated Press that the disarmament effort could pave the way for granting Palestinian refugees in Lebanon more legal rights.

Ramez Dimashkieh, head of the Lebanese-Palestinian Dialogue Committee, a government body that serves as an interlocutor between Palestinian refugees and officials, said his group is working on proposed legislation that they hope to introduce by the end of the year that could improve the situation of Lebanon’s approximately 200,000 Palestinian refugees.

Palestinian refugees in Lebanon are not given citizenship, ostensibly to preserve their right to go back to the homes they fled or were forced from during the 1948 creation of the state of Israel, which now bans them from returning. They are prohibited from working in many professions, have few legal protections and can’t own property.

The proposed legislation under being drafted would not confer Lebanese nationality on the refugees, Dimashkieh said, but would strengthen their labor and property rights.

“If people see a serious move forward in terms of arms delivery and they see the Palestinians here … are serious about transforming into a civil society rather than militarized camps, it will make the discourse much easier,” he said.

A first step

Last week, Palestinian factions started handing over some of the weapons held in the Burj Al-Barajneh refugee camp on the outskirts of Beirut to the Lebanese army, an initial step in implementing a plan announced by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun three months earlier for removing arms from the camps.

The step of removing weapons from the camps was widely seen as a precursor to the much more difficult step of disarming the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, which last year fought a bruising war with Israel. The group has been under domestic and international pressure since then to give up its remaining arsenal, which it has so far refused to do.

Only one pickup truck loaded with machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades left Burj Al-Barajneh last week, leading many to dismiss the initiative in the Palestinian camps as ineffective or purely symbolic.

Dimashkieh acknowledged that “there was a lot of cynicism about the quantity and quality of the weapons delivered,” but insisted that the government is serious about following through.

“Whatever weapons are given, they’re weapons which are now in the possession of the Lebanese Armed Forces,” he said. “So we should be happy about that.”

On Thursday, another three camps in southern Lebanon handed over weapons, including some Grad rockets as well as RPGs, machine guns and hand grenades.

A move toward civil administration

The 12 Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon aren’t under the control of Lebanese authorities, and rival Palestinian factions have clashed inside the camps in recent years, inflicting casualties and affecting nearby areas.

In the Ein el Hilweh camp near the southern port city of Sidon, rounds of fighting between members of Abbas’s Fatah movement and rival Islamist factions in 2023 killed around 30 people, wounded hundreds and displaced thousands.

The fighting also left the schools in one of two school complexes in the camp run by the UN agency for Palestinian refugees “heavily damaged to the extent that we are unable to use them,” said Dorothee Klaus, UNRWA director in Lebanon. The cash-strapped agency does “not have the resources currently to reopen the schools,” she said.

While UNRWA is not involved in the disarmament effort currently underway, Klaus said, “We very much hope that this leads to a situation of safety and security and stability with a functioning civil administration.”

Eventually, Dimashkieh said, the objective is for the camps to be patrolled by Lebanese police or internal security forces while being governed by civilian Palestinian officials, although he acknowledged that there would be “a transitional period” before that happens.

Abbas’s administration launched an overhaul of the Palestinian Authority’s leadership in Lebanon a few months ago, including the removal of the former Palestinian ambassador and many security officials and staff. Dimashkieh said that a Palestinian delegation had recently visited to pave the way for elections of new “popular committees” that serve as de facto municipal authorities in the camps.

Palestinian factions opposed to Abbas, including Hamas and its allies, have rejected the plan to hand over weapons in the camps, and even members of Abbas’ Fatah movement have sent mixed signals, with some officials saying last week that only “illegal” weapons would be handed over, not those belonging to organized factions.

However, on Thursday, Sobhi Abu Arab, the head of the Palestinian National Security Forces in
Lebanon, said, “We are doing our part as the Fatah movement and the Palestinian Liberation Organization to implement” Abbas’s decision.

Dimashkieh said his group has also had “initial talks” with Hamas and that he is “quite optimistic that we will make headway” with bringing them on board.