Pope meets with Chagos refugees and delivers message about rights of the weak against the powerful

Pope meets with Chagos refugees and delivers message about rights of the weak against the powerful
Pope Leo XIV has strongly affirmed the rights of the weakest against the ambitions of the powerful. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 23 August 2025

Pope meets with Chagos refugees and delivers message about rights of the weak against the powerful

Pope meets with Chagos refugees and delivers message about rights of the weak against the powerful
  • Pope Leo XIV has strongly affirmed the rights of the weakest against the ambitions of the powerful
  • He delivered the message during an audience Saturday with refugees from Chagos

ROME: Pope Leo XIV strongly affirmed the rights of the weakest against the ambitions of the powerful during an audience Saturday with refugees from Chagos, a contested Indian Ocean archipelago that is home to a strategic US-UK military base.
History’s first American pope insisted on the right of the Chagossian people to return to their homes and hailed a recent UK-Mauritius treaty over the archipelago’s future as symbolically important on the international stage.
Leo met with a delegation of refugees from Chagos, some 2,000 of whom who were evicted from their homes by Britain in the 1960s and 1970s so the US could build a naval and bomber base on the largest of the islands, Diego Garcia.
Displaced islanders fought for years in UK courts for the right to go home. In May, Britain and Mauritius signed a treaty to hand sovereignty over the islands to Mauritius while still ensuring the future of the base.
Leo told the refugees he was “delighted” that the treaty had been reached, saying it represented a “significant victory” in their long battle to “repair a grave injustice. He praised in particular the role of the Chagossian women in peacefully asserting their rights to go home.
“The renewed prospect of your return to your native archipelago is an encouraging sign and a powerful symbol on the international stage: all peoples, even the smallest and weakest, must be respected by the powerful in their identity and rights, in particular the right to live on their land; and no one can force them into exile,” Leo said in French.
He said he hoped that Mauritian authorities will commit to ensuring their return, and pledged the help of the local Catholic Church.
Under the agreement, the UK will pay Mauritius an average of 101 million pounds ($136 million) a year to lease back the base for at least 99 years. It establishes a trust fund to benefit the Chagossians and says “Mauritius is free to implement a program of resettlement” on the islands other than Diego Garcia. But it does not require the residents to be resettled, and some displaced islanders fear it will be even harder to return to their place of birth after Mauritius takes control.
Mauritius had long contested Britain’s claim to the archipelago, and the United Nations and its top court had urged Britain to return the Chagos to Mauritius, around 2,100 kilometers (1,250 miles) southwest of the islands.
In a non-binding 2019 opinion, the International Court of Justice ruled that the UK had unlawfully carved up Mauritius when it agreed to end colonial rule in the late 1960s.
Pope Francis visited Mauritius in 2019 and met with a group of Chagossians in the Vatican in 2023. Francis told reporters en route home from Mauritius in 2019 that Britain should obey the UN and return the islands to Mauritius.


Taiwan, China battle it out in competing World War Two narratives

Taiwan, China battle it out in competing World War Two narratives
Updated 10 sec ago

Taiwan, China battle it out in competing World War Two narratives

Taiwan, China battle it out in competing World War Two narratives
  • Taiwan says China falsely claiming communists had leading role fighting Japan
  • China hits back at what it sees as distorting of communist party’s role
  • Taiwan calls on its people not to go to China’s parade set for next month to mark war’s end

TAIPEI: Veteran Pan Cheng-fa says he clearly remembers fighting for China against the Japanese in World War Two, but gets agitated when asked about the role of communist forces who at the time were in an uneasy alliance with his republican government.
“We gave them weapons, equipment — we strengthened them,” Pan, 99, said at an event in Taiwan’s capital Taipei to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two.
As China gears up for a mass military parade in Beijing next month to mark the war’s end, both Taiwan — whose formal name remains Republic of China — and the People’s Republic of China are locked in an increasingly bitter war of words about historical narrative and who should really be claiming credit for the victory.
Fighting in China began in earnest in 1937 with the full-scale Japanese invasion and continued until the surrender of Japan in 1945, when the island of Taiwan was handed over to the Republic of China after decades of Japanese rule.
“After Japan was taken down, (the communists’) next target was the Republic of China,” Pan added, referring to the resumption of the civil war which led to the victory of Mao Zedong’s forces and flight of the republican government to Taiwan in 1949.

The ruling Chinese Communist Party often reminds people of its struggle against the Japanese, but a lot of the fighting was done by the forces of Chiang Kai-shek’s republican government, and it was the Republic of China who signed the peace agreement as one of the allied nations.
“During the Republic of China’s war of resistance against Japan, the People’s Republic of China did not even exist, but the Chinese communist regime has in recent years repeatedly distorted the facts, claiming it was the Communist Party who led the war of resistance,” Taiwan’s top China-policy maker Chiu Chui-cheng said on August 15, the Japanese surrender anniversary.

A wreath lies during an event to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two at Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall in Taipei, Taiwan, August 16, 2025. (REUTERS)

The Mainland Affairs Council, which Chiu heads, said this month that the communists’ strategy at the time was “70 percent about strengthening themselves, 20 percent dealing with republican government and 10 percent about opposing Japan,” repeating an old wartime accusation against Mao the Chinese Communist Party has denied.
Taiwan’s own anniversary events are much more low key, and don’t mention the role of the communists apart from to lambaste them.
A defense ministry concert on Thursday night in Taipei featured performers dressed as World War Two-era republican soldiers, images of the Flying Tigers — volunteer US pilots who flew for the republican Chinese air force — and rap by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One.
“History affirms that the War of Resistance was led and won by the Republic of China,” the ministry said a performance program.
China has hit back at what it sees as misrepresentation of the Chinese Communist Party’s role.
On Tuesday, the party’s official People’s Daily wrote in an online commentary that vigilance was needed against efforts to “distort and falsify the Chinese Communist Party’s role as the country’s backbone” in fighting Japan.
China says the victory belongs to all Chinese people, including those in Taiwan, and is also celebrating the fact the war’s end in 1945 led to Taiwan — a Japanese colony from 1895 — being “returned” to Chinese rule as part of the peace agreement.

Caption

Taiwan says nothing in any agreements talked about handing over Taiwan to the Chinese Communist Party-run People’s Republic of China which was only founded in late 1949.
Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te marked the surrender anniversary of August 15 with a Facebook post saying aggression will be defeated, in a pointed reference to Beijing’s military threats against the island.
The People’s Republic of China says it is the successor state to the Republic of China and that Taiwan is an inherent part of Beijing’s territory, a view Taipei’s government vehemently opposes.
Taiwan’s government has urged its people not to attend China’s military parade, warning against reinforcing Beijing’s territorial claims and backing its version of what the anniversary means.
Veteran Pan, who says family members left behind after the civil war were brutalized while he escaped to Taiwan, sees Beijing’s parade as having nothing to do with him.
“I can’t say anything good about the communists,” he said.


UK’s mass facial-recognition roll-out alarms rights groups

UK’s mass facial-recognition roll-out alarms rights groups
Updated 53 min 11 sec ago

UK’s mass facial-recognition roll-out alarms rights groups

UK’s mass facial-recognition roll-out alarms rights groups
  • Britain is the only European country to deploy the technology on a large scale as a policing tool
  • Big Brother Watch worried that such mass data capture “treats us like a nation of suspects” 

 

LONDON: Outside supermarkets or in festival crowds, millions are now having their features scanned by real-time facial-recognition systems in the UK — the only European country to deploy the technology on a large scale.
At London’s Notting Hill Carnival, where two million people are expected to celebrate Afro-Caribbean culture over Sunday and Monday, facial-recognition cameras are being deployed near entrances and exits.
The police said their objective was to identify and intercept wanted individuals by scanning faces in large crowds and comparing them with thousands of suspects already in the police database.
The technology is “an effective policing tool which has already been successfully used to locate offenders at crime hotspots resulting in well over 1,000 arrests since the start of 2024,” said Metropolitan Police chief Mark Rowley.
The technology was first tested in 2016 and its use has increased considerably over the past three years in the United Kingdom.
Some 4.7 million faces were scanned in 2024 alone, according to the NGO Liberty.
UK police have deployed the live facial-recognition system around 100 times since late January, compared to only 10 between 2016 and 2019.

Examples include before two Six Nations rugby games and outside two Oasis concerts in Cardiff in July.
When a person on a police “watchlist” passes near the cameras, the AI-powered system, often set up in a police van, triggers an alert.
The suspect can then be immediately detained once police checks confirm their identity.

“Nation of suspects”

But such mass data capture on the streets of London, also seen during the coronation of King Charles III in 2023, “treats us like a nation of suspects,” said the Big Brother Watch organization.

“There is no legislative basis, so we have no safeguards to protect our rights, and the police is left to write its own rules,” Rebecca Vincent, its interim director, told AFP.
Its private use by supermarkets and clothing stores to combat the sharp rise in shoplifting has also raised concerns, with “very little information” available about how the data is being used, she added.
Most use Facewatch, a service provider that compiles a list of suspected offenders in the stores it monitors and raises an alert if one of them enters the premises.
“It transforms what it is to live in a city, because it removes the possibility of living anonymously,” said Daragh Murray, a lecturer in human rights law at Queen Mary University of London.
“That can have really big implications for protests but also participation in political and cultural life,” he added.
Often, those using such stores do not know that they are being profiled.
“They should make people aware of it,” Abigail Bevon, a 26-year-old forensic scientist, told AFP by the entrance of a London store using Facewatch.
She said she was “very surprised” to find out how the technology was being used.
While acknowledging that it could be useful for the police, she complained that its deployment by retailers was “invasive.”

“Invasive tech”
Since February, EU legislation governing artificial intelligence has prohibited the use of real-time facial recognition technologies, with exceptions such as counterterrorism.
Apart from a few cases in the United States, “we do not see anything even close in European countries or other democracies,” stressed Vincent.
“The use of such invasive tech is more akin to what we see in authoritarian states such as China,” she added.
Interior minister Yvette Cooper recently promised that a “legal framework” governing its use would be drafted, focusing on “the most serious crimes.”
But her ministry this month authorized police forces to use the technology in seven new regions.
Usually placed in vans, permanent cameras are also scheduled to be installed for the first time in Croydon, south London, next month.
Police assure that they have “robust safeguards,” such as disabling the cameras when officers are not present and deleting the biometric data of those who are not suspects.
However, the UK’s human rights regulator said on Wednesday that the Metropolitan Police’s policy on using the technology was “unlawful” because it was “incompatible” with rights regulations.
Eleven organizations, including Human Rights Watch, wrote a letter to the Metropolitan Police chief, urging him not to use it during Notting Hill Carnival, accusing him of “unfairly targeting” the Afro-Caribbean community while highlighting the racial biases of AI.
Shaun Thompson, a 39-year-old black man living in London, said he was arrested after being wrongly identified as a criminal by one of these cameras and has filed an appeal against the police.


Ukraine drone attack causes fire, capacity reduction at Russia’s Kursk nuclear power plant

Ukraine drone attack causes fire, capacity reduction at Russia’s Kursk nuclear power plant
Updated 25 min 42 sec ago

Ukraine drone attack causes fire, capacity reduction at Russia’s Kursk nuclear power plant

Ukraine drone attack causes fire, capacity reduction at Russia’s Kursk nuclear power plant
  • Fire caused by falling drone that was shot down by Russian air defense systems, said the plant’s press service in a statement
  • There were no injuries, but as a result of the denotation, one unit of the plant was reduced to 50 percent capacity, the statement added

A Ukrainian drone attack sparked a short-lived fire at the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant, damaged an auxiliary transformer and led to reduction in the operating capacity at one of the plant’s units, the plant’s press service reported early on Sunday.
“A combat unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) belonging to the Armed Forces of Ukraine was shot down by air defense systems near the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant,” the press service said in a statement on the Telegram messaging app.
“Upon impact, the drone detonated, resulting in damage to an auxiliary transformer.”
The press service added that there were no injuries, but as a result of the denotation, unit three of the plant was reduced to 50 percent capacity. The destroyed drone also sparked a fire that has since been extinguished, the press service said.
Radiation levels at the site and in the surrounding area have not exceeded normal limits, the press service added.
There was no immediate comment from Ukraine. Kyiv has said its strikes inside Russia are in response to Russia’s continued attacks on Ukraine and are aimed at destroying infrastructure deemed crucial to Moscow’s overall military efforts.
Reuters could not independently verify the report. It was not immediately clear at what part of the plant the fire occurred.
Earlier, Russia’s federal free-to-air television network REN TV reported, citing the plant’s press service, that the transformer is not a part of the nuclear section of the plant.


Pentagon restricts Ukraine’s use of US missiles against Russia, WSJ reports

Pentagon restricts Ukraine’s use of US missiles against Russia, WSJ reports
Updated 24 August 2025

Pentagon restricts Ukraine’s use of US missiles against Russia, WSJ reports

Pentagon restricts Ukraine’s use of US missiles against Russia, WSJ reports
  • As the White House sought to persuade Putin to join peace talks, an approval process was put in place at the Pentagon has kept Ukraine from launching strikes deep into Russian territory, the Journal said

WASHINGTON: The Pentagon has been quietly blocking Ukraine from using US-made long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to strike targets inside Russia, limiting Kyiv’s ability to employ these weapons in its defense against Moscow’s invasion, the Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday, citing US officials.
Reuters could not immediately verify the report.
The news came as US President Donald Trump has grown more frustrated publicly over the three-year-old war and his inability to secure a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine.
After his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin and a subsequent meeting with European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky failed to produce observable progress, Trump said on Friday that he was again considering
slapping Russia with economic sanctions or, alternatively, walking away from the peace process.
“I’m going to make a decision as to what we do and it’s going to be, it’s going to be a very important decision, and that’s whether or not it’s massive sanctions or massive tariffs or both, or we do nothing and say it’s your fight,” Trump said.
Trump had hoped to arrange a bilateral meeting between Putin and Zelensky, but that has also proven difficult. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told NBC on Friday that there was no agenda in place for a sitdown with Zelensky.
“Putin is ready to meet with Zelensky when the agenda would be ready for a summit. And this agenda is not ready at all,” Lavrov told NBC, saying no meeting was planned for now.
As the White House sought to persuade Putin to join peace talks, an approval process put in place at the Pentagon has kept Ukraine from launching strikes deep into Russian territory, the Journal reported.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has final say over use of the long-range weapons, the Journal said.
Neither Ukraine’s presidential office nor the defense ministry immediately responded to Reuters’ request for a comment outside business hours. The White House and the Pentagon also did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
 

 

 


UN rapporteur to take part in former Labour leader Corbyn’s ‘Gaza tribunal’

UN rapporteur to take part in former Labour leader Corbyn’s ‘Gaza tribunal’
Updated 23 August 2025

UN rapporteur to take part in former Labour leader Corbyn’s ‘Gaza tribunal’

UN rapporteur to take part in former Labour leader Corbyn’s ‘Gaza tribunal’
  • The event, titled the “Gaza tribunal,” will be held on Sept. 4 and 5 at Church House in Westminster

LONDON: A UN special rapporteur will contribute to a two-day “tribunal” into Britain’s role in the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn has announced.

Corbyn said Francesca Albanese, the UN special rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, would take part in the hearings, which are being organized by his Peace and Justice Project, on Saturday.

The event, titled the “Gaza tribunal,” will be held on Sept. 4 and 5 at Church House in Westminster.

Speaking at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival on Saturday, Corbyn said the initiative was intended to fill the gap left by the government’s decision to block his private member’s bill calling for an official inquiry into the UK’s role in the conflict.

The bill was halted at its second reading in July.

“We’ve invited people to make submissions — lawyers and others, and voices from Gaza and the West Bank, and other places — in order to put forward their view on the policy. And Francesca Albanese has agreed to take part and put forward her view on the legality of it,” he said.

Corbyn said Albanese was “very keen to support it and get involved,” and compared the event to the Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq war.

He added that the hearings would seek answers on issues including the use of the RAF Akrotiri airbase during the conflict.

A website dedicated to the tribunal says it will “examine Britain’s role in war crimes perpetrated in Gaza” by “hearing from experts and witnesses,” and “establish the full scale of our government’s complicity in the genocide against the Palestinian people.”

Last month, 22 NGOs, including Action Aid, backed Corbyn’s call for an inquiry and said they would consider supporting an independent tribunal if the government rejected his proposal.