Russia says talks on Ukraine’s security without Moscow are a ‘road to nowhere’

Russia says talks on Ukraine’s security without Moscow are a ‘road to nowhere’
A service member of the 44th Separate Artillery Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces fires a 2S22 Bohdana self-propelled howitzer towards Russian troops near a front line in Zaporizhzhia region on August 20, 2025, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 21 August 2025

Russia says talks on Ukraine’s security without Moscow are a ‘road to nowhere’

Russia says talks on Ukraine’s security without Moscow are a ‘road to nowhere’
  • Foreign Minister Lavrov raps ‘clumsy’ European lobbying of Trump
  • Comments highlight Russia’s demand for direct engagement

MOSCOW: Russia said on Wednesday attempts to resolve security issues relating to Ukraine without Moscow’s participation were a “road to nowhere,” sounding a warning to the West as it scrambles to work out guarantees for Kyiv’s future protection.

Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov particularly criticized the role of European leaders who met US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House on Monday to discuss security guarantees for Ukraine that could help end the three-and-a-half-year-old war.

“We cannot agree with the fact that now it is proposed to resolve questions of security, collective security, without the Russian Federation. This will not work,” Lavrov told a joint press conference after meeting Jordan’s foreign minister.

US and European military planners have begun exploring post-conflict security guarantees for Ukraine, US officials and sources told Reuters on Tuesday. Lavrov said such discussions without Russia were pointless.
“I am sure that in the West and above all in the United States they understand perfectly well that seriously discussing security issues without the Russian Federation is a utopia, it’s a road to nowhere.”




A service member of the 44th Separate Artillery Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces fires a 2S22 Bohdana self-propelled howitzer towards Russian troops near a front line in Zaporizhzhia region on August 20, 2025, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine. (REUTERS)

NATO military leaders holding a video conference on Wednesday had a “great, candid discussion” on the results of recent talks on Ukraine, the chair of the alliance’s military committee said.
“Priority continues to be a just, credible and durable peace,” Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone wrote in a post on X.
A Western official told Reuters that a small group of military leaders continued discussions in Washington on security guarantees shortly after the bigger virtual meeting. After Polish officials said that an object that crashed in a cornfield in eastern Poland overnight was likely a Russian drone, Poland accused Russia of provoking NATO countries just as efforts to find an end to the war were intensifying.
“Once again, we are dealing with a provocation by the Russian Federation, with a Russian drone. We are dealing in a crucial moment, when discussions about peace (in Ukraine) are under way,” Defense Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz said.
Lavrov’s comments highlighted Moscow’s demand for Western governments to directly engage with it on questions of security concerning Ukraine and Europe, something it says they have so far refused to do.
Moscow this week also restated its rejection of “any scenarios involving the deployment of NATO troops in Ukraine.”

‘Clumsy’ Europeans
Lavrov accused the European leaders who met Trump and Zelensky of carrying out “a fairly aggressive escalation of the situation, rather clumsy and, in general, unethical attempts to change the position of the Trump administration and the president of the United States personally ... We did not hear any constructive ideas from the Europeans there.”
Trump said on Monday the United States would help guarantee Ukraine’s security in any deal to end Russia’s war there. He subsequently said he had ruled out putting US troops in Ukraine, but the US might provide air support as part of a deal to end the hostilities.
Zelensky’s chief of staff, speaking after a meeting of national security advisers from Western countries and NATO, said work was proceeding on the military component of the guarantees.
“Our teams, above all the military, have already begun active work on the military component of security guarantees,” chief of staff Andriy Yermak wrote on social media.
Yermak said Ukraine was also working on a plan with its allies on how to proceed “in case the Russian side continues to prolong the war and disrupt agreements on bilateral and trilateral formats of leaders’ meetings.”
Lavrov said Russia was in favor of “truly reliable” guarantees for Ukraine and suggested these could be modelled on a draft accord that was discussed between the warring parties in Istanbul in 2022, in the early weeks of the war.
Under the draft discussed then, Ukraine would have received security guarantees from a group of countries including the five permanent members of the UN Security Council — China, Russia, the United States, Britain, and France.
At the time, Kyiv rejected that proposal on the grounds that Moscow would have held effective veto power over any military response to come to its aid. 


Magnitude 7.4 earthquake strikes Philippines’ Mindanao, tsunami warning issued

Magnitude 7.4 earthquake strikes Philippines’ Mindanao, tsunami warning issued
Updated 11 sec ago

Magnitude 7.4 earthquake strikes Philippines’ Mindanao, tsunami warning issued

Magnitude 7.4 earthquake strikes Philippines’ Mindanao, tsunami warning issued

MANILA: An earthquake of magnitude 7.4 struck Philippines’ Mindanao region on Friday, the European-Mediterranean Seismological Center (EMSC) said.
The quake was at a depth of 58 km (36.04 miles), EMSC said.
The US Tsunami Warning System issued a tsunami threat, saying hazardous tsunami waves are possible for coasts located within 300 km (186 miles) of the earthquake’s epicenter.
EMSC had earlier pegged the magnitude at 7.2. 

 


Trump proposes barring Chinese airlines flying over Russia on US flights

Trump proposes barring Chinese airlines flying over Russia on US flights
Updated 10 October 2025

Trump proposes barring Chinese airlines flying over Russia on US flights

Trump proposes barring Chinese airlines flying over Russia on US flights
  • US airlines have long criticized the decision to allow Chinese carriers to fly over Russia on some flights
  • They said the flights give them the advantage of decreased flying time and burning less fuel

WASHINGTON: The Trump administration on Thursday proposed banning Chinese airlines from flying over Russia on flights to and from the United States, saying the practice puts American carriers at a disadvantage.
US airlines have long criticized the decision to allow Chinese carriers to fly over Russia on some flights because it which gives them the advantage of decreased flying time and burning less fuel.
The US Transportation Department said on Thursday in its proposed order “this imbalance has become a significant competitive factor.” USDOT said it was proposing to bar Chinese overflights “to level this competitive disparity among US and Chinese air carriers.”
The Chinese embassy in Washington did not have an immediate comment.
Russia has barred US airlines and other foreign carriers from flying over its airspace in retaliation for Washington banning Russian flights over the US in March 2022 after the country invaded Ukraine.
The decision could impact some US flights operated by Air China, China Eastern, Xiamen Airlines and China Southern.
The push comes amid growing tension between China and the United States over a series of economic issues.
USDOT is giving Chinese carriers two days to respond to the order and said a final order could be in effect as soon as November. In May 2023, the United States approved additional flights by Chinese carriers after they agreed not to fly over Russia on new flights, Reuters reported.
Last year, USDOT said Chinese passenger airlines could boost weekly round-trip US flights to 50. More than 150 weekly round-trip passenger flights were allowed by each side before restrictions were imposed in early 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Some US carriers have told the Trump administration that direct East Coast flights to China are not economically feasible because of the added expense of not flying over Russia.


New York Attorney General Letitia James charged in fraud case after pressure campaign by Trump

New York Attorney General Letitia James charged in fraud case after pressure campaign by Trump
Updated 10 October 2025

New York Attorney General Letitia James charged in fraud case after pressure campaign by Trump

New York Attorney General Letitia James charged in fraud case after pressure campaign by Trump

WASHINGTON: New York Attorney General Letitia James was charged Thursday as part of a mortgage fraud investigation aggressively pushed by the Trump administration, becoming the latest foe of the president to be prosecuted by his Justice Department.
James, who infuriated President Donald Trump by suing him and his company for fraud in a case that played out as he was running for office, was indicted on charges of bank fraud and false statements to a financial institution following a presentation to a grand jury in Virginia by a prosecutor who was hastily appointed last month amid Trump administration pressure to deliver criminal cases against his adversaries.
James’ office had no immediate comment Thursday. Her lawyers have vigorously denied any allegations and characterized the investigation as an act of political revenge.
The indictment, two weeks after a separate criminal case charging former FBI Director James Comey with lying to Congress, is the latest indication of the Trump administration’s norm-busting determination to use the law enforcement powers of the Justice Department to pursue the president’s political foes and public figures who once investigated him.
The James case remained under seal Thursday, making it impossible to assess what evidence prosecutors have. But as was the case with the Comey charges, the prosecution followed a strikingly unconventional route. The Trump administration, two weeks ago, pushed out Erik Siebert, the veteran prosecutor who had overseen the investigation for months but had resisted pressure to file a case, and replaced him with Lindsey Halligan, a White House aide who was once Trump’s personal lawyer but who has never worked as a federal prosecutor.
Halligan presented the case to the grand jury herself, as she did in the case against Comey, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press.
“No one is above the law. The charges as alleged in this case represent intentional, criminal acts and tremendous breaches of the public’s trust,” Halligan said in a statement. “The facts and the law in this case are clear, and we will continue following them to ensure that justice is served.”
Trump has been advocating charging James for months, posting on social media without citing any evidence that she’s “guilty as hell” and telling reporters at the White House, “It looks to me like she’s really guilty of something, but I really don’t know.”
Her lawyer has accused the Justice Department of concocting a bogus criminal case to settle Trump’s personal vendetta against James, who last year won a staggering judgment against Trump and his companies in a lawsuit alleging he lied to banks and others about the value of his assets.
The Justice Department has also been investigating mortgage-related allegations against Federal Reserve board member Lisa Cook, using the probe to demand her ouster, and Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., whose lawyer called the allegations against him “transparently false, stale, and long debunked.”
But James is a particularly personal target. As attorney general, she sued the Republican president and his administration dozens of times and oversaw a lawsuit accusing him of defrauding banks by dramatically overstating the value of his real estate holdings on financial statements.
An appeals court overturned the fine, which had ballooned to more than $500 million with interest, but upheld a lower court’s finding that Trump had committed fraud.
The Justice Department probe began after Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William Pulte sent a letter in April to Attorney General Pam Bondi, asking her to investigate James over her role in the 2023 purchase of a house in Norfolk, Virginia.
In seeking the investigation, Pulte cited a two-page power-of-attorney form that James signed on Aug. 17, 2023, which states, “I intend to occupy this property as my principal residence.” He speculated that claiming the house as her primary residence might have allowed James to avoid higher interest rates that often apply to second homes.
James’ lawyer, Abbe Lowell, said the Democrat never misled anyone. James has said that she made an error while filling out a form related to the home purchase, but quickly rectified it and didn’t deceive the lender.


11 candidates vie to unseat president in Cameroon election

11 candidates vie to unseat president in Cameroon election
Updated 10 October 2025

11 candidates vie to unseat president in Cameroon election

11 candidates vie to unseat president in Cameroon election
  • Cameroon has seen just two leaders since independence in 1960

LIBREVILLE: Eleven candidates face off against Cameroon’s incumbent president, Paul Biya, in elections on Sunday, with the divided opposition having failed to unite behind a joint contender.
The 92-year-old head of state, who has spent 43 years in power, made his first public appearance of the campaign on Tuesday just five days before the vote.
Four candidates among the crowded lineup of presidential hopefuls have drawn attention: Two former ministers and 2 fierce government adversaries.
Biya is seeking an eighth term in office in a single-round presidential election, in which 8.2 million Cameroonians are registered to vote.
He first became president in 1982 following the resignation of his predecessor, Ahmadou Ahidjo, and has ruled since then. 
He was declared the winner of seven subsequent elections. 
Cameroon has seen just two leaders since independence in 1960. Most Cameroonians heading to the polls on Sunday have known only one president in their lifetime.
But days before the vote, young people appeared torn between hope and resignation as Biya seeks another term.
Few anticipated anything other than another victory for Biya, with a fragmented opposition and his fiercest rival, Maurice Kamto, excluded from running.
“No young person, whether they are a graduate or not, will be left behind,” Biya promised at his election campaign in the northern city of Maroua.
In Cameroon, nearly everyone is under 20, and unemployment rates can reach 35 percent in major cities, according to the National Employment Fund.
Some of the youth “are calling for the departure of the elderly,” said Aristide Mono, a political sociology professor and chief of staff at the Cameroon Society for Intelligence and Research.
“But they are very poorly organised and divided,” he added, citing “tribalism” as a key factor.

“Given the way things are going here, I think the election has been decided in advance,” said Sylvie, a 20-year-old student from Douala
“But I would like to have a new president. To have more opportunities and for us students to quickly find jobs.
“A president of his age in power is bad for the country. He should leave and make way for young people. There’s so much to be done: roads, education, and unemployment.
“I have no intention of going anywhere. I have hope in my country. But the old people in power need to step aside and let today’s youth take over.”
Giovanni, 20, another student from Douala, said:  “Some believe he should leave office. But I think Paul Biya still has things to offer.
“Even though some promises haven’t been fulfilled, I am counting on him; he’s wise. I don’t look at his age or health, but at his experience and track record.
“I want a president with a good vision for us as future workers. Candidates like Cabral Libii and Hiram Iyodi, who are also young, have good programs, but I remain convinced of the idea of a new term for Paul Biya.”
Boris, 26, a computer engineer in Buea, said: “I can’t wait for the vote to happen. I believe in change, and it can only come about through an election.


DR Congo president calls on Rwanda’s Kagame to ‘make peace’

DR Congo president calls on Rwanda’s Kagame to ‘make peace’
Updated 09 October 2025

DR Congo president calls on Rwanda’s Kagame to ‘make peace’

DR Congo president calls on Rwanda’s Kagame to ‘make peace’

BRUSSELS: DR Congo President Felix Tshisekedi appealed to his Rwandan counterpart Paul Kagame to stop supporting insurgents in the DRC at a Brussels event attended by both leaders on Thursday, drawing a rebuke from Kigali that he was “completely mistaken” about the roots of the conflict.
Tshisekedi, 62, issued the call as he took the podium after Kagame at the Global Gateway Forum, an investment conference organized by the EU in the Belgian capital.
“I call this forum as witness, and through it the entire world, to reach out my hand to you, Mr. President, so that we may make peace,” Tshisekedi said.
“This requires you to order the M23 troops supported by your country to stop this escalation, which has already caused enough deaths,” he said.
Kagame had not addressed the conflict directly in his speech, though he referred to an earlier statement by South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa, who said he could “feel the energy for making peace” upon seeing the Rwandan and Congolese leaders.
“Some of us also felt the same. We felt the positive energy about business, investment, peace,” Kagame said.
Rwandan Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe later responded directly to the Congolese president on X, saying: “You are completely mistaken. The only one who can stop this escalation is President Tshisekedi, and he alone.” Tshisekedi must end “this ridiculous political comedy that consists of abusing the platform of an important economic partnership summit, like the Global Gateway Forum, to launch accusations and shameless lies against a head of state, before posing as a victim of a conflict that he himself provoked,” said Nduhungirehe.
The eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, a region bordering Rwanda with abundant natural resources but plagued by non-state armed groups, has suffered extreme violence for more than three decades.
The M23 armed group, which resumed fighting at the end of 2021, has seized swaths of land in the region with Rwanda’s backing, triggering a spiralling humanitarian crisis.
According to the UN, clashes since January have caused thousands of deaths and forced hundreds of thousands of people to flee their homes. The Congolese government and the M23 signed a declaration of principles on July 19 that included a “permanent ceasefire” to halt the conflict.
It followed a separate US-brokered peace deal between the Congolese and Rwandan governments signed in Washington in June, but it has proved slow to take effect on the ground.
“Africa needs to move on, President Paul Kagame, and we are capable of doing so,” Tshisekedi said, adding he would shelve a call for international sanctions on Rwanda to give talks a chance.
But Rwanda’s foreign minister accused his government of widespread abuses in eastern DRC, including “daily bombings by his fighter jets and attack drones.”
Rwanda has long accused Kinshasa of supporting a militia, the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda, drawn from the remnants of Hutu fighters who carried out the 1994 Rwandan genocide.